I'm rather new with these technologies so bear with me. I have successfully deployed Bot Framework and linked QnA Maker to it. I am using Adaptive Card for first response and i want images in that adaptive card to (when clicked) to generate answer from QnA Maker. How can i link these images to generate QnA Maker answer? Is there a way to just give it URL that would trigger QnA Maker?
You could use the data property in your Adaptive Card to send a message payload to the Bot, which would then trigger the QnA answer.
For example, in the data property, if you put something like 'How do I upload a file', so when the image is clicked, the payload will be 'How do I upload a file' and will be sent to the Bot, where the QnA service should respond in kind with the correct answer.
{
"type": "AdaptiveCard",
"body": [
{
"type": "ColumnSet",
"columns": [
{
"type": "Column",
"items": [
{
"type": "Image",
"style": "Person",
"url": "${creator.profileImage}",
"size": "Small",
"selectAction": {
"type": "Action.Submit",
"id": "image",
"title": "image",
"data": "show me the text 'image'"
}
}
],
"width": "auto"
}
]
}
],
"$schema": "http://adaptivecards.io/schemas/adaptive-card.json",
"version": "1.2"
}
Related
I am trying to use Action.Submit in my adaptive card to hit my Google Cloud Function. Where do I specify where to send the submission to? The reason I am doing this is I want to skip building a full chat server due to time constraint.
Example of Adaptive Card, no property to specify post URL:
{
"$schema": "http://adaptivecards.io/schemas/adaptive-card.json",
"type": "AdaptiveCard",
"version": "1.0",
"body": [
{
"type": "TextBlock",
"text": "Present a form and submit it back to the originator"
},
{
"type": "Input.Text",
"id": "firstName",
"placeholder": "What is your first name?"
},
{
"type": "Input.Text",
"id": "lastName",
"placeholder": "What is your last name?"
}
],
"actions": [
{
"type": "Action.Submit",
"title": "Action.Submit",
"data": {
"x": 13
}
}
]
}
Adaptive cards aren't developed specifically for bot service.
so working with them needs some tricks , in your case if you are trying to send a request that contain adaptive card inputs you need to know :
when the user click the submit button the adaptive card will send a message to bot activity handler on behalf of the user, this message contains a JSON object (you can view this object by adding this line in the bot onMessage function.
console.log(context.activity)
you can get the data from this meesage by using :
context.activity.value.firstName (to get the firstName sent by the adaptive card)
Now you can send your request to the server i prefer using Axios .
I have the following adaptive card JSON code that has three Input.Toggle's. Is there a way to throw an error when the user clicks "Submit" and all three Input.Toggle's are not set to true? I saw in the Schema Explorer (Schema Explorer Input.Toggle) that they have Inherited properties called "fallback" and "requires", is that what I need? If so, how do I implement "fallback" and "requires" into this JSON code?
{
"$schema": "http://adaptivecards.io/schemas/adaptive-card.json",
"type": "AdaptiveCard",
"version": "1.2",
"body": [
{
"placeholder": "1.1 Business Office Coordinator - RFQ Receipt",
"type": "Input.Text",
"id": "Title"
},
{
"text": "Quote ##{body('Get_response_details')?['b194cde8837234ccc80fu5017c1b0f869']} ",
"type": "TextBlock",
"id": "textBlock1"
},
{
"type": "Input.Toggle",
"title": "Customer Acknowledgement",
"valueOn": "custYes",
"valueOff": "custNo",
"id": "Customer"
},
{
"type": "Input.Toggle",
"title": "Create RFQ Log Number and Enter Information into RFQ Log",
"valueOn": "RFQYes",
"valueOff": "RFQNo",
"id": "RFQ"
},
{
"type": "Input.Toggle",
"title": "Populate Quote Folder with Customer Data",
"valueOn": "PopulateYes",
"valueOff": "PopulateNo",
"id": "Populate"
}
],
"actions": [
{
"type": "Action.Submit",
"title": "Submit",
"data": {
"id": "9876543210"
}
}
]
}
this is part of input validation which as of today is not available yet.
I'm afraid what you're asking for is not possible right now but will hopefully be soon.
You can follow the feature request here: https://portal.productboard.com/adaptivecards/1-adaptive-cards-features/c/21-input-validation-and-evolution , add your own vote to it aswell if you want to.
Depending on where you use the card however, you can get this working. In MS Teams you could verify the card submission in your own code and return an error. Its not client side but that way you can still do the check.
We are trying to retrieve the description or custom attribute field as shown in BIM360 Docs using Autodesk Forge API requests/commands.
We have tried the following requests to retrieve information about a specific file:
https://forge.autodesk.com/en/docs/data/v2/reference/http/projects-project_id-items-item_id-GET/
https://forge.autodesk.com/en/docs/data/v2/reference/http/ListItems/
We get a lot of information/data about our files, but we cannot see the Description field neither a Custom Attribute in the responses that we are getting.
"data": {
"type": "versions",
"id": "urn:adsk.wipprod:fs.file:vf.WKuhlYuyR8uK2WT8HE1bCQ?version=20",
"attributes": {
"name": "TESTING",
"displayName": "TESTING",
"createTime": "2019-07-29T09:37:33.0000000Z",
"createUserId": "*****",
"createUserName": "TESTING",
"lastModifiedTime": "2019-08-05T08:27:10.0000000Z",
"lastModifiedUserId": "*****",
"lastModifiedUserName": "TESTING",
"versionNumber": 20,
"storageSize": 27020,
"fileType": "xlsx",
"extension": {
"type": "versions:autodesk.bim360:File",
"version": "1.0",
"schema": {
"href": "https://developer.api.autodesk.com/schema/v1/versions/versions:autodesk.bim360:File-1.0"
},
"data": {
"processState": "PROCESSING_COMPLETE",
"extractionState": "UNSUPPORTED",
"splittingState": "NOT_SPLIT",
"revisionDisplayLabel": "20",
"sourceFileName": "TESTING"
}
}
},
...
}
Among all of these fields, we expected the fields "Description" or "Custom Attributes" to appear as well (As they are shown in BIM360 DOCS). ¿Is it possible to retrive these fields using API requests?
At the moment it is not possible to retrieve Custom Attribute information from BIM 360 Docs, But a new API is under development and in Private Beta testing at the moment to get this information back, Please check back with us in a near future since this will become available soon. Thank you for understanding.
I tried to get the example from https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftteams/platform/get-started/get-started-dotnet to run.
I successfully built and published (on Azure) the webapp.
Then I tried
- manually editing the json file in the visual studio solution similarly to what the docs said, and then import the resulting zip in App Studio
- adding the App directly in App Studio through the manifest editor (this works, but it fails when installing/testing it)
Both give me an error without any more info "something went wrong".
Any way to actually figure out what I did wrong (if anything)?
Either way, maybe you guys can figure it out from the json file's contents:
{
"$schema": "https://statics.teams.microsoft.com/sdk/v1.0/manifest/MicrosoftTeams.schema.json",
"manifestVersion": "1.0",
"version": "1.0.0",
"id": " 1CC58D17-1E95-443C-958F-E1F14D4CA3B4",
"packageName": "com.contoso.helloworld",
"developer": {
"name": "Contoso",
"websiteUrl": "https://www.microsoft.com",
"privacyUrl": "https://www.microsoft.com/privacy",
"termsOfUseUrl": "https://www.microsoft.com/termsofuse"
},
"name": {
"short": "Hello World",
"full": "Hello World App for Microsoft Teams"
},
"description": {
"short": "Hello World App for Microsoft Teams",
"full": "This sample app provides a very simple app for Microsoft Teams. You can extend this to add more content and capabilities."
},
"icons": {
"outline": "contoso20x20.png",
"color": "contoso96x96.png"
},
"accentColor": "#60A18E",
"staticTabs": [
{
"entityId": "com.contoso.helloworld.hellotab",
"name": "Hello Tab",
"contentUrl": "https://microsoftteamssampleshelloworldweb20181022032046.azurewebsites.net/hello",
"scopes": [
"personal"
]
}
],
"configurableTabs": [
{
"configurationUrl": "https://microsoftteamssampleshelloworldweb20181022032046.azurewebsites.net/configure",
"canUpdateConfiguration": true,
"scopes": [
"team"
]
}
],
"bots": [
{
"botId": "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000",
"needsChannelSelector": false,
"isNotificationOnly": false,
"scopes": [
"team",
"personal"
]
}
],
"composeExtensions": [
{
"botId": "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000",
"scopes": [
"personal",
"team"
],
"commands": [
{
"id": "getRandomText",
"description": "Gets some random text and images that you can insert in messages for fun.",
"title": "Get some random text for fun",
"initialRun": true,
"parameters": [
{
"name": "cardTitle",
"description": "Card title to use",
"title": "Card title"
}
]
}
]
}
],
"permissions": [],
"validDomains": []
}
Any suggestions?
There is a whitespace in your app Id in shared manifes:
"id": " 1CC58D17-1E95-443C-958F-E1F14D4CA3B4"
Could you please remove it and try and let us know if it works? Also you can remove bots and composeExtensions section if you want.
I can't comment yet (not enough reputation points) but could you go through the instructions again?
I believe something went wrong with either the GUID, or one of the URL's. The instructions also advise to use ngrok, which is usefull for debugging.
If you can't find a clear error message, i advise you follow those instructions.
is it possible to check, in an ARM Template, if the name for my Virtual Machine already exists?
I am developing a Solution Template for the Azure Marketplace. Maybe it is possible to set a paramter in the UiDefinition uniqe?
The goal is to reproduce this green Hook
A couple notes...
VM Names only need to be unique within a resourceGroup, not within the subscription
Solution Templates must be deployed to empty resourceGroups, so collisions with existing resources aren't possible
For solution templates the preference is that you simply name the VMs for the user, rather than asking - use something that is appropriate for the workload (e.g. jumpbox) - not all solutions do this but we're trying to improve that experience
Given that it's not likely we'll ever build a control that checks for naming collisions on resources without globally unique constraints.
That help?
This looks impossible, according to the documentation.
There are no validation scenarious.
I assume that you should be using the Microsoft.Common.TextBox UI element in your createUiDefinition.json.
I have tried to reproduce a green check by creating a simple createUiDefinition.json as below with a Microsoft.Common.TextBox UI element as shown below.
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/0.1.2-preview/CreateUIDefinition.MultiVm.json",
"handler": "Microsoft.Compute.MultiVm",
"version": "0.1.2-preview",
"parameters": {
"basics": [
{
"name": "textBoxA",
"type": "Microsoft.Common.TextBox",
"label": "VM Name",
"defaultValue": "",
"toolTip": "Please enter a VM name",
"constraints": {
"required": true
},
"visible": true
}
],
"steps": [],
"outputs": {}
}
}
I am able to reproduce the green check beside the VM Name textbox as shown below:
However, this green check DOES NOT imply the VM Name is Available.
This is because based on my testing, even if I use an existing VM Name in the same subscription, it is still showing the green check.
Based on the official documented constraints that are supported by the Microsoft.Common.TextBox UI element, it DOES NOT VALIDATE Name Availability.
Hope this helps!
While bmoore's point is correct that it's unlikely you would ever need this for a VM (nor is there an API for it), there are other compute resources that do have global naming requirements.
As of 2022 this concept is possible now with the use of the ArmApiControl UI element. It allows you to call ARM apis as part of validation in the createUiDefinition.json. Here is an example using the check name API for an Azure App service.
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/0.1.2-preview/CreateUIDefinition.MultiVm.json#",
"handler": "Microsoft.Azure.CreateUIDef",
"version": "0.1.2-preview",
"parameters": {
"basics": [
{}
],
"steps": [
{
"name": "domain",
"label": "Domain Names",
"elements": [
{
"name": "domainInfo",
"type": "Microsoft.Common.InfoBox",
"visible": true,
"options": {
"icon": "Info",
"text": "Pick the domain name that you want to use for your app."
}
},
{
"name": "appServiceAvailabilityApi",
"type": "Microsoft.Solutions.ArmApiControl",
"request": {
"method": "POST",
"path": "[concat(subscription().id, '/providers/Microsoft.Web/checknameavailability?api-version=2021-02-01')]",
"body": "[parse(concat('{\"name\":\"', concat('', steps('domain').domainName), '\", \"type\": \"Microsoft.Web/sites\"}'))]"
}
},
{
"name": "domainName",
"type": "Microsoft.Common.TextBox",
"label": "Domain Name Word",
"toolTip": "The name of your app service",
"placeholder": "yourcompanyname",
"constraints": {
"validations": [
{
"regex": "^[a-zA-Z0-9]{4,30}$",
"message": "Alphanumeric, between 4 and 30 characters."
},
{
"isValid": "[not(equals(steps('domain').appServiceAvailabilityApi.nameAvailable, false))]",
"message": "[concat('Error with the url: ', steps('domain').domainName, '. Reason: ', steps('domain').appServiceAvailabilityApi.reason)]"
},
{
"isValid": "[greater(length(steps('domain').domainName), 4)]",
"message": "The unique domain suffix should be longer than 4 characters."
},
{
"isValid": "[less(length(steps('domain').domainName), 30)]",
"message": "The unique domain suffix should be shorter than 30 characters."
}
]
}
},
{
"name": "section1",
"type": "Microsoft.Common.Section",
"label": "URLs to be created:",
"elements": [
{
"name": "domainExamplePortal",
"type": "Microsoft.Common.TextBlock",
"visible": true,
"options": {
"text": "[concat('https://', steps('domain').domainName, '.azurewebsites.net - The main app service URL')]"
}
}
],
"visible": true
}
]
}
],
"outputs": {
"desiredDomainName": "[steps('domain').domainName]"
}
}
}
You can copy the above code and test it in the createUiDefinition.json sandbox azure provides.