So, I need a button that would add a new ListElement to existing list. I need to fill in one value, taken from TextField. I have no idea how to do this. I tried something like
onClicked:{
nameOfList.append(JSON.parse([nameOfList.nameOfColumn,myTextField.text]));
}
Obviously it didn't work. Do I have to send these two values to C++, then make a QJsonObject and send it back, or is there an easier way?
While the question does not describe the type of nameOfList, I assume it is ListModel since the question is about adding a new ListElement. In that case, appending would be straightforward:
onClicked:{
nameOfList.append({"nameOfColumn": myTextField.text})}
}
However, if nameOfList.nameOfColumn is not constant, you'd need to make a temporary:
var temp = {}
temp[nameOfList.nameOfColumn] = myTextField.text
nameOfList.append(temp)
It can depend on what exactly nameOfList is, but here you will most probably find an answer.
I'm having a bit of trouble removing commas from an array when I go to write it to a cell in google spreadsheets. array.join(''); doesn't seem to do the trick. I would appreciate any help. Also, anchor[i][j].join('') returns an error.
Here is a bit of code:
anchor[i][j].join('') returns an error
anchor[i].join('') doesn't seem to have an effect.
for (var i=0; i(less than) rangeKW.length-2;i++){
anchor[i] = [];
for (var j=0; j<rangeURL.length;j++){
anchor[i][j] = ahref + rangeKW[i] + ahref1 + rangeURL[j] + "</a>|";
}
}
cell.setValue("{" + anchor);
}
Suppose you have
var x = [[1,2,3],[4,5,6]]
Then either of these lines will give you "123456":
Array.prototype.concat.apply([], x).join('')
x.map(function(a){ return a.join(''); }).join('');
The first one constructs the array [1,2,3,4,5,6] and then joins it. The second one joins each inner array first, constructing ["123", "456"] and then joins that. I think the first one is likely to be a tiny bit more efficient, although we are talking peanuts here, but the second one gives you a bit more control if you want to put something different between rows and columns.
In both cases, this doesn't change the original value in x. You can assign the new value to x if that's what you want.
array.join() works with "normal" arrays, by normal I mean 1 dimension and applies to the array itself, not on an single element (error on [i][j]), beside that I don't really understand what you want to do and how your code is related to your question ...
concerning anchor[i].join('');// doesn't seem to have an effect. I don't know how many elements are in there and how they look like but the syntax is correct. You can also use toString() if you want to make it a CSV string.
EDIT : (thanks for the information in comments.)
I think the easiest way (or at least the most clear) would be to create a couple of new variables that you could log separately to see exactly what happens.
for example
var anchorString = anchor[i].join(); // or toString() they both return strings from 1D arrays
Logger.log(anchorString)
if every index i of anchor have to be in the same cell then write it like this in the i-loop :
var anchorString += anchor[i].join();
Logger.log(anchorString)
I recently came across some code like this:
parent && parent.removeChild(this);
Which takes the place of:
if(parent)
parent.removeChild(this);
I see how it works, I'm just having a lot of trouble explaining the syntax to myself in plain English so that I can implement it elsewhere (I guess I don't fully understand what's happening, I just know how it works in this particular case). For example, the below which I use often reads easily to me as "value is a or b (in the absence of a)".
var url:String = root.loaderInfo.parameters.url || "http://test.com/";
You can think of it as this:
Execute the statement on the right hand side if and only if the
statement on the left hand side returns a true value.
well i created some variables in the main stage level, with something like this:
for(i=0,i<10,i++){
var var_name="var_num_"+i;
this[var_name]="some value";
}//<-----------------------------------------------------works
so i get 10 variables named "var_num0", "var_num1", "var_num2" each one with some value.
and i can acces them any where calling this
var second_var=MovieClip(root).var_num0;//<--------------works
my problem comes when i want to call all the variables from a lower level or in another frame or somewhere else using another loop:
var third_var;
for(j=0,j<3,j++){
third_var=this["MovieClip(root).var_num_"+j];//<---------DOSNT WORK
trace(this["MovieClip(root).var_num_"+j]);//<------------returns "undefined"
}
how can i make this work? i tried a lot of things and nothing...
thanks you all
In your case both "root" and "this" are the scope you want to access the vars from. so try this:
var third_var:MovieClip;
for(j = 0; j < 3; j++)
{
third_var = MovieClip(root)[var_num_ + j];
trace(third_var);
}
Also you should have semi-colons in your for loop rather than comers.
I'd like to preface my answer with a suggestion you use a 'Document Class' with AS3 to make things like namespaces and inheritance much clearer. You know exactly where things are accessible when using document based, object oriented programming versus the timeline programming available through the Flash IDE (its only there because of AS1/2). Tut: http://www.kirupa.com/forum/showthread.php?223798-ActionScript-3-Tip-of-the-Day/page14
On to the answer: You are trying to move two levels of inheritance in one set of [] Another way of writing your first "Doesn't work" line is:
this.myMovieClip["var_num"+j"];
You could also use: this["MovieClip"]["var_num"+j];
Basically, you need to take the "MovieClip(root)" out of the string you are using to call your variable because you are passing through two levels of inheritance: this->MovieClip->targetVar
You need to use two periods, a period and a set square bracket or two sets square brackets to move two levels of inheritance. A period . and a set of square brackets [] both accomplish the task of moving one level deeper, so putting the . inside the string used to call up your variable won't work.
Explanation:
The following three examples all return the same variable:
myMovieClip.my_variable
myMovieClip["my_variable"]
var str:String = "my_variable";
myMovieClip[str];
In the case of languages that support single decision and action without brackets, such as the following example:
if (var == true)
doSomething();
What is the preferred way of writing this? Should brackets always be used, or should their usage be left as a preference of the individual developer? Additionally, does this practice depend on the size of the code block, such as in the following example:
if (var == 1)
doSomething(1);
else if (var > 1 && var < 10)
doSomething(2);
else
{
validate(var);
doSomething(var);
}
There isn't really a right answer. This is what coding standards within the company are for. If you can keep it consistent across the whole company then it will be easy to read. I personally like
if ( a == b) {
doSomething();
}
else {
doSomething();
}
but this is a holy war.
I recommend
if(a==b)
{
doSomething();
}
because I find it far easier to do it up-front than to try to remember to add the braces when I add a second statement to to success condition...
if(a==b)
doSomething();
doSomethingElse();
is very different to
if(a==b)
{
doSomething();
doSomethingElse();
}
see Joel's article for further details
I tend to use braces at all times. You can get some subtle bugs where you started off with something like:
if(something)
DoOneThing();
else
DoItDifferently();
and then decide to add another operation to the else clause and forget to wrap it in braces:
if(something)
DoOneThing();
else
DoItDifferently();
AlwaysGetsCalled();
AlwaysGetsCalled() will always get called, and if you're sitting there at 3am wondering why your code is behaving all strange, something like that could elude you for quite some time. For this reason alone, I always use braces.
My preference is to be consistent, e.g., if you use brackets on one block, use brackets all throughout even with just one statement:
if (cond1)
{
SomeOperation();
Another();
}
elseif (cond2)
{
DoSomething();
}
else
{
DoNothing();
DoAnother();
}
But if you have just a bunch of one liners:
if (cond1)
DoFirst();
elseif (cond2)
DoSecond();
else
DoElse();
Looks cleaner (if you don't mind the dummy method names ;) that way, but that's just me.
This also applies to loop constructs and the like:
foreach (var s as Something)
if (s == someCondition)
yield return SomeMethod(s);
You should also consider that this is a convention that might be more suited to .NET (notice that Java peepz like to have their first curly brace in the same line as the if).
Chalk this one to lack of experience, but during my seven-year stint as a code monkey I've never actually seen anyone make the mistake of not adding braces when adding code to a block that doesn't have braces. That's precisely zero times.
And before the wisecrackers get to it, no, the reason wasn't "everyone always uses braces".
So, an honest question -- I really would like to get actual replies instead of just downvotes: does that ever actually happen?
(Edit: I've heard enough outsourcing horror stories to clarify a bit: does it ever actually happen to competent programmers?)
It doesn't really matter, as long as you're consistent with it.
There does seem to be a tendency to demand sameness within a single statement, i.e. if there's brackets in one branch, there's brackets everywhere. The Linux kernel coding standards, for one, mandate that.
I would strongly advocate always using braces, even when they're optional. Why? Take this chunk of C++ code:
if (var == 1)
doSomething();
doSomethingElse();
Now, someone comes along who isn't really paying enough attention and decides that something extra needs to happen if (var == 1), so they do this:
if (var == 1)
doSomething();
doSomethingExtra();
doSomethingElse();
It's all still beautifully indented but it won't do what was intended.
By always using braces, you're more likely to avoid this sort of bug.
I personnally side with McConnell's explanation from Code Complete.
Use them whenever you can. They enhance your code's readability and remove the few and scarce confusions that might occur.
There is one thing that's more important though....Consistency. Which ever style you use,make sure you always do it the same way.
Start writing stuff like:
If A == true
FunctA();
If B == "Test"
{
FunctB();
}
You are bound to end up looking for an odd bug where the compiler won't understand what you were trying to do and that will be hard to find.
Basically find the one you are comfortable writing everytime and stick to it. I do believe in using the block delimeters('{', '}') as much as possible is the way to go.
I don't want to start a question inside another, but there is something related to this that I want to mention to get your mental juices going. One the decision of using the brackets has been made. Where do you put the opening bracket? On the same line as the statement or underneath. Indented brackets or not?
If A == false {
//calls and whatnot
}
//or
If B == "BlaBla"
{
//calls and whatnot
}
//or
If C == B
{
//calls and whatnot
}
Please don't answer to this since this would be a new question. If I see an interest in this I will open a new question your input.
I've always used brackets at all times except for the case where I'm checking a variable for NULL before freeing it, like is necessary in C
In that case, I make sure it's clear that it's a single statement by keeping everything on one line, like this:
if (aString) free(aString);
There is no right or wrong way to write the above statement. There are plenty of accepted coding styles. However, for me, I prefer keeping the coding style consist throughout the entire project. ie. If the project is using K&R style, you should use K&R.
Ruby nicely obviates one issue in the discussion. The standard for a one-liner is:
do_something if (a == b)
and for a multi-line:
if (a == b)
do_something
do_something_else
end
This allows concise one-line statements, but it forces you to reorganize the statement if you go from single- to multi-line.
This is not (yet) available in Java, nor in many other languages, AFAIK.
As others have mentioned, doing an if statement in two lines without braces can lead to confusion:
if (a == b)
DoSomething();
DoSomethingElse(); <-- outside if statement
so I place it on a single line if I can do so without hurting readability:
if (a == b) DoSomething();
and at all other times I use braces.
Ternary operators are a little different. Most of the time I do them on one line:
var c = (a == b) ? DoSomething() : DoSomethingElse();
but sometimes the statements have nested function calls, or lambda expressions which
make a one-line statement difficult to parse visually, so I prefer something like this:
var c = (a == b)
? AReallyReallyLongFunctionName()
: AnotherReallyReallyLongFunctionOrStatement();
Still more concise than an if/else block but easy to see what's going on.
Sun's Code Conventions for the Java programming Language has this to say:
The if-else class of statements should
have the following form:
if (condition) {
statements;
}
if (condition) {
statements;
} else {
statements;
}
if (condition) {
statements;
} else if (condition) {
statements;
} else {
statements;
}
Our boss makes us put { } after a decision statement no matter what, even if it's a single statement. It's really annoying to add two extra lines. The only exception is ternary operators.
I guess it's a good thing I have my code monitor in portrait orientation at 1200x1600.
I prefer
if (cond)
{
//statement
}
even with only a single statement. If you were going to write something once, had no doubts that it worked, and never planned on another coder ever looking at that code, go ahead and use whatever format you want. But, what does the extra bracketing really cost you? Less time in the course of a year than it takes to type up this post.
Yes, I like to indent my brackets to the level of the block, too.
Python is nice in that the indentation defines the block. The question is moot in a language like that.
I tend to agree with Joel Spolsky on that one with that article (Making Wrong Code Look Wrong) with the following code example :
if (i != 0)
bar(i);
foo(i);
Foo is now unconditionnal. Wich is real bad!
I always use brackets for decision statements. It helps code maintainability and it makes the code less bug prone.
I use curly braces around every statement if and only if at least one of them requires it.
In Perl if you are doing a simple test, sometime you will write it in this form:
do_something if condition;
do_something unless condition;
Which can be really useful to check the arguments at the start of a subroutine.
sub test{
my($self,#args) = #_;
return undef unless defined $self;
# rest of code goes here
}
The golden rule is that, when working in an existing project, follow those coding standards.
When I'm at home, I have two forms.
The first is the single line:
if (condition) doThis();
and the second is for multiple lines:
if (condition) {
doThis();
}
I used to follow the "use curly braces always" line like an apparatchik. However, I've modified my style to allow for omitting them on single line conditional expressions:
if(!ok)return;
For any multistatement scenario though I'm still of the opinion that braces should be mandatory:
if(!ok){
do();
that();
thing();
}