How to add a background square behind the image? - html

I am trying to recreate this:
But I have not been able to do so. I tried with adding a :before on the img but that doesnt work. How would you go on about making this. It has to be responsive in the way that the background doesnt get bigger than the image.
SEO is not important so background-image or whatever is fine with me too.
WRITTEN IN SCSS - CHANGE IN HTML IS OK
UPDATED CODE TO ROB's ANSWER
This is the code I have so far
.imgbox {
padding: 5%;
position: relative;
height: auto;
.backdrop {
position: relative;
min-width: 100px;
min-height: 100px;
div {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
background: rgb(208, 0, 0);
background: linear-gradient(
90deg,
rgba(208, 0, 0, 1) 0%,
rgba(149, 0, 0, 1) 100%
);
}
transform: translateX(-5px) translateY(5px);
}
.img {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
transform: translateX(5px) translateY(-5px);
}
}
<div className="imgbox">
<div className="backdrop">
<div></div>
</div>
<img
className="img"
src={'https://source.unsplash.com/400x250'}
alt="test"
>
</div>

It's simple with a box shadow.
The paddings in the parent are there to prevent it from cropping the shadow.
.imgbox {
padding: 0 0 30px 30px;
}
.imgbox .img {
display: inline-block;
box-shadow: -30px 30px 0 rgb(208, 0, 0);
}
<div class="imgbox">
<img
class="img"
src='https://source.unsplash.com/400x250'
alt="test"
/>
</div>

Very easy to get the gradient with a pseudo-element:
.image-container::after {
content:'';
position: absolute;
z-index:-1;
bottom:-24px;
left:-24px;
width:100%;
height:100%;
background: linear-gradient(red, firebrick);
}
You can change the gradient and offset using background, left and bottom respectively. I'm not sure if there is a second gradient as well, to the top right? If so, you pair this with a ::before to get a second background, and play around the with z-index to get the ordering correct.
Just remember - for an absolute positioned pseudo element to work, you'll need to set position:relative on the parent container, and content:'';
Codepen here.

Related

How to make image blurred but make edges crisp

Please, don't say anything like OH THERE ARE A LOT OF ANSWERS OUT THERE. I founded a lot of them, but none of them worked. This is HTML:
<img src="images/ONamaImg.png" class="main-page-img"> (not all of the HMTL of course, only pic code)
And here is CSS:
.main-page-img
{
filter: grayscale(100%) blur(10px);
float: right;
width: 550px;
height: 700px;
z-index: -1;
border-radius: 1000px 0px 0px 1000px;
margin-top: -350px;
box-shadow: 0px 0px 30px #777777;
overflow:hidden;
}
Thanks!
First, wrap the image in a container :
<div class="container">
<img src="path/to/image.jpg">
</div>
Then, add these css rules to the container and image:
.container {
overflow: hidden;
height: /*add height*/;
width: /*add width*/;
}
img {
margin: -10px;
}
Note: I didn't add other styles. Make sure to add them.
The basic concept is to wrap the blurred image in the container and clip the blurred edges using negative margins.
I also found a lot of answers that don't seen to solve the problem.
Here is my attempt:
HTML
First I created a container and added an image to use as the crisp border.
<div class="container">
<img class="border-img" src="https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/2209676047/gatinho-5755_400x400.jpg" />
<div class="blur-img"></div>
</div>
CSS
Then I use the same image as a background to an epty div inside the container. Within the div backgroud I can scale and adjust the images to make then appear like one.
.container {
width: 450px;
height: 500px;
overflow:hidden;
}
.blur-img {
width: 70%;
height: 70%;
background-image: url("https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/2209676047/gatinho-5755_400x400.jpg");
background-position: center;
transform: scale(1.2); /* use scale to zoom image */
filter: blur(10px);
position:relative; /* adjust position */
left:15%;
top:15%;
}
.border-img {
width: 450px;
height: 500px;
position:fixed;
}
Output
And the output looks like this:

Creating connectors between <div> boxes

I've been trying to create a gray connector between div containers (image below) for a while now. The margin between the containers is set to 2.5vw per container on each side.
I've tried to create it using an .svg background on a :before pseudo element and positioning it, but I couldn't make it work. The gray connector should stay fixed in relation to the boxes until the boxes wrap (mobile version), in which case the connectors should be hidden. The mobile version is easy to setup, but when the elements are next to each other I'm finding it almost impossible to apply the gray connector to the elements. The connector should stay fixed in relation to the containers when transitioning between laptop screens and large desktop screens.
Here's the outcome I want:
Gray connector between boxes.
Here's the outcome I've got and the code I've used:
Outcome I've got.
.box-container:after{
content: '';
height: 700px;
width: 600px;
position: absolute;
background-image: url("folder_path/Connector-1.svg");
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: -80px 60px;
background-overflow: visible !important;
z-index: 0 !important;
}
.box-container{
z-index: 1 !important;
}
Maybe I've been going at it the wrong way, all workarounds are welcome.
Here is one way to do it:
main {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: relative;
}
section {
display: inline-block;
width: 100px;
height: 200px;
background: orange;
box-shadow: 0 5px 15px rgba(0, 0, 0, .3);
}
section + section {
margin-left: 46px;
}
.connector {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
z-index: -1;
background: #444;
width: 100px;
height: 200px;
transform-origin: top left;
transform: skewX(36.87deg); /* do some trigonometry here to get the deg */
}
.connector:nth-of-type(2) {
left: 150px;
}
<main>
<section></section>
<section></section>
<section></section>
<div class="connector"></div>
<div class="connector"></div>
</main>
I figured out the solution! It's to create a pseudo-element, with a height of 100% and a width equal to the margin between the elements. To keep it responsive, it's important to use vw for the width unit, both for the margin between elements and also the width of the decoration itself. The margin of the <div>s are 2.5vw each, so setting the width of the pseudo element to 5 makes it fit perfectly. Heres the code:
.container:after{
content: '';
z-index:-1;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
right: -5vw;
width: 5vw;
height: 100%;
background-color: #444;
clip-path: polygon(0% 0%, 100% 40%, 100% 100%, 0% 60%);
}

the two div under wrapper follows the wrapper div's margin-top value, it should not

So i'm coding my website now, and i'm using two div to create a somewhat gradient in the background, where div#bg1 is grey and div#bg2 is dark grey. But when i'm then adding the wrapper div, bg1 and bg2 still follows the wrapper's top alignement, but it should not. bg1 and bg2 should stay at the top.
heres the html:
<div id="bg1"> </div>
<div id="bg2"> </div>
<div id="wrapper"></div>
and stylesheet:
div#wrapper {
background-color: #FFFFFF;
width: 800px;
height: 1000px;
margin-left:auto;
margin-right:auto;
margin-top: 30px;
position: relative;
z-index:3;
}
div#bg1 {
width: 100%;
margin:0px;
padding:0px;
height: 200px;
background-color: #ccc;
z-index: 2;
position: absolute;
box-shadow: inset 0px 10px 60px 0px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.6);
}
div#bg2 {
width: 100%;
margin:0px;
padding:0px;
height: 100px;
background-color: #444444;
z-index: 2;
position: absolute;
box-shadow: inset 0px 10px 60px 0px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.7);
}
i have the code currently on my website here: http://andreassvarholt.com/test/test3/
You have both your BG divs set to an absolute position.
To force them to the top, you need to define the "top" CSS attribute.
div#bg1 {
top: 0;
}
div#bg2 {
top: 0;
}
Furthermore, I must point out that your implementation is inelegant. Just make a 1px by 200px image that tiles as a background image on the body. There's no sense in stacking divs on top of divs just for a simple background effect.
Using divs to creat a background gradient is kind of jenky. Why not just go to one of the many free css3 gradient generators available online. Free and easy.
Good Luck
-brian

How can I highlight part of an image on a webpage?

I want to mask out part of an image on a page, making part of the image darker so a highlighted portion stands out. (This is often used to preview the effect of the crop tool in photo editors.)
Currently, my plan involves loading two copies of the images on top of each other and using clip: rect(); to slice out of a portion of the top image. Is there a better way to handle this? I should also mention that my image is actually an animated GIF (oh dear ...)
I thought it best to figure this out before I started trying to update the crop with javascript.
CSS:
.container {
width: 1075px;
margin: 10px;
border: 1px solid black;
padding: 10px;
overflow: auto;
}
.image-container {
position: relative;
clear: both;
background-color:#eee;
}
.background{
opacity:.40;
}
.highlight {
position: absolute;
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
clip: rect(126px 257px 197px 156px);
}
HTML:
<div class="container">
<div class="image-container">
<img class="background" src="animate.gif" width="1075" height="605" />
<img class="highlight" src="animate.gif" width="1075" height="605" />
</div>
</div>
Position the image using position: absolute for each image. The layer above should be smaller then the bottom one. Than use background-position: x y;
Something like this:
#image1, #image2 {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
background: url('https://www.google.com/intl/en_ALL/images/logos/images_logo_lg.gif')
}
#image1 {
min-width: 276px !important;
min-height 110px !important;
opacity: 0.5;
}
#image2 {
left: 251px;
width: 25px;
height: 110px;
background-position: 100% 100%;
}​
Look here an example:
http://jsfiddle.net/8n3Rr/
Try to position a <div> over the images, put a low opacity on it and a width or height half the size of the image.

How to apply an opacity without affecting a child element with html/css?

I want to achieve this using html and css:
I have tried to set the opacity of the container to 0.3 and the box to 1, but it doesn't work: both divs have 0.3 opacity.
jsFiddle of my try here
The effect I am trying to achive is a popup box that comes on top of the page. It is highlighted by fading the content below (by lowering the opacity).
You can use opacity in combination with background color, like this:
#container {
border: solid gold 1px;
width: 400px;
height: 200px;
background:rgba(56,255,255,0.1);
}
#box {
border: solid silver 1px;
margin: 10px;
width: 300px;
height: 100px;
background:rgba(205,206,255,0.1);
}
<div id="container">
containter text
<div id="box">
box text
</div>
</div>
​Live demo
As far as I know you can't do it in a simple way. There a couple of options here:
Use absolute positioning to position box "inside" the container.
#container {
opacity: 0.3;
background-color: #777788;
position: absolute;
top: 100px;
left: 100px;
height: 150px;
width: 300px;
}
#box {
opacity: 1;
background-color: #ffffff;
position: absolute;
top: 110px;
left: 110px;
height: 130px;
width: 270px;
}
<div id="container"></div>
<div id="box">
<p>Something in here</p>
</div>
Use Javascript - almost the same as above, but position and size don't have to be hardcoded.
You can't apply an opacity property without affecting a child element!
"Opacity applies to the element as a whole, including its contents, even though the value is not inherited by child elements. Thus, the element and its children all have the same opacity relative to the element's background, even if they have different opacities relative to one another... If you do not want to apply opacity to child elements, use the background property instead." https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/opacity
If you want the opacity to be applied only to the background, without affecting the child elements, use:
background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, .3)
However, you can achieve the desired effect if you place them inside a div parent element and use CSS position property:
.parent {
border: solid green 3px;
position: relative;
width: 400px;
height: 200px;
}
.sibling-one {
border: solid red 3px;
position: absolute;
box-sizing: border-box;
width: 400px;
height: 200px;
opacity: .3;
}
.sibling-two {
border: solid blue 1px;
margin: 10px;
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
position: absolute;
transform: translateY(50%);
}
<div class="parent">
<div class="sibling-one">
<p>A sibling's one element</p>
</div>
<div class="sibling-two">
<p>A sibling's two element</p>
</div>
</div>
Try using rgba as a 'pre content' overlay to your image, its a good way to keep things responsive and for none of the other elements to be effected.
header #inner_header_post_thumb {
background-position: center;
background-size: cover;
position: relative;
background-image: url(https://images.pexels.com/photos/730480/pexels-photo-730480.jpeg?w=1260&h=750&auto=compress&cs=tinysrgb);
border-bottom: 4px solid #222;
}
header #inner_header_post_thumb .dark_overlay {
position: relative;
left: 0;
top: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.75);
}
header #inner_header_post_thumb .dark_overlay .container .header-txt {
padding-top: 220px;
padding-bottom: 220px;
color: #ffffff;
text-align:center;
}
header #inner_header_post_thumb .dark_overlay .container .header-txt h1 {
font-size: 40px;
color: #ffffff;
}
header #inner_header_post_thumb .dark_overlay .container .header-txt h3 {
font-size: 24px;
color: #ffffff;
font-weight: 300;
}
header #inner_header_post_thumb .dark_overlay .container .header-txt p {
font-size: 18px;
font-weight: 300;
}
header #inner_header_post_thumb .dark_overlay .container .header-txt p strong {
font-weight: 700;
}
<header>
<div id="inner_header_post_thumb">
<div class="dark_overlay">
<div class="container">
<div class="row header-txt">
<div class="col-xs-12 col-sm-12">
<h1>Title On Dark A Underlay</h1>
<h3>Have a dark background image overlay without affecting other elements</h3>
<p>No longer any need to re-save backgrounds as .png ... <strong>Awesome</strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</header>
See a working codepen here
Using background-color: rgba(#777788, 0.3); instead of opacity could maybe fix the problem.
Apply this css rule
.alpha60 {
/* Fallback for web browsers that doesn't support RGBa */
background: rgb(0, 0, 0);
/* RGBa with 0.6 opacity */
background: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.6);
/* For IE 5.5 - 7*/
filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient(startColorstr=#99000000, endColorstr=#99000000);
/* For IE 8*/
-ms-filter: "progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient(startColorstr=#99000000, endColorstr=#99000000)";
}
In addition to this, you have to declare background: transparent for IE web browsers.
For more details visit the following link:
http://robertnyman.com/2010/01/11/css-background-transparency-without-affecting-child-elements-through-rgba-and-filters/
Any child of an element with opacity set will take on that opacity.
To achieve this style you could use rgba colours and filters for IE for the background, and opacity on the textual elements. So long as the second box isn't a child of one of the text elements, then it won't inherit the opacity.
Another workaround is to simply use an overlay background to create a similar effect.
I personally like a black overlay with about a 65% opacity, but for what you are trying to do you may want to use a white overlay at round 70%.
Create a small (100 x 100 or less) PNG in Photoshop or GIMP that has the color and opacity you want. Then just set that as the background of your light box.
If you create multiple PNGs at different opacities you can easily switch between them with JS or dynamically at load via backend scripting.
It's not technically what you are trying to do, but aesthetically it can give a very similar effect and UX wise accomplishes the same thing. It is also very easy to do, and widely supported across pretty much everything.
Opacity will always inherits by the child element regardless whatever the element in there, there is no workaround up to today have suggested, when the moving of the child element outside the transparency background is not an option like in a popup menu/dialog box creation, use of background with the rgba is the solution.
Here is a input box that i created that i can turn on or off with the class property invisible by javascript
<div id="blackout" class="invisible">
<div id="middlebox">
<p>Enter the field name: </p>
<input type="text" id="fieldvalue" />
<input type="button" value="OK" id="addfname" />
</div>
</div>
CSS
#blackout {
z-index: 9999;
background: rgba(200, 200, 200, 0.6);
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
display: block;
padding: 0px;
clear: both;
float: left;
position: absolute;
margin-top: -10px;
margin-right: 0px;
margin-bottom: 0px;
margin-left: -10px;
}
#blackout #middlebox {
border: thick solid #333;
margin: 0px;
height: 150px;
width: 300px;
background-color: #FFF;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
position: absolute;
-ms-transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
padding: 10px 50px 0px 50px;
}
#middlebox p {
float: left;
width:100%;
clear:both;
}
#middlebox input {
clear:both;
margin-bottom:10px;
}
#middlebox input[type=text]{
width:100%;
}
#middlebox input[type=button]{
float:right;
width:30%;
}
.invisible{
visibility:hidden !important;
}
Use such elements that you can add :before or :after. My solution
<div class="container">
<div>
Inside of container element is not effected by opacity.
</div>
</div>
Css.
.container{
position: relative;
}
.container::before{
content: '';
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
position: absolute;
background-color: #000000;
opacity: .25
}
This might not be the most orthodox method but you can use a small semi-transparent background image for each div / container that repeats. It does seem that in this day and age you should be able to achieve this in pure (simple not hackish) css with no js but as the answers above show it isn't that straight forward...
Using a tiled image might seem dated but will work no worries across all browsers.
You can add a container's sibling absolutely positioned behind container, with the same size, and apply opacity to it.
And use no background on your container.
Now container's children have no opaque parent and the problem vanishes.