I'm looking into an issue with slow queries, and I can't figure out why using LIMIT 20 on this query makes it a factor 100 slower.
The query is as follows:
SELECT DISTINCT e.eventid,e.clock,e.ns,e.objectid,e.acknowledged,er1.r_eventid
FROM events e JOIN event_recovery er1 ON er1.eventid=e.eventid
WHERE e.source='0' AND e.object='0' AND e.objectid='115779'
AND e.eventid<='65535859' AND e.value='1'
ORDER BY e.eventid
LIMIT 20;
EXPLAIN:
Without LIMIT 20:
EXPLAIN SELECT DISTINCT e.eventid... ORDER BY e.eventid;
+------+-------------+-------+--------+---------------------------+----------+---------+-------------------------+-------+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+------+-------------+-------+--------+---------------------------+----------+---------+-------------------------+-------+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | e | ref | PRIMARY,events_1,events_2 | events_1 | 16 | const,const,const | 15792 | Using index condition; Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort |
| 1 | SIMPLE | er1 | eq_ref | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 8 | zabbix_server.e.eventid | 1 | |
+------+-------------+-------+--------+---------------------------+----------+---------+-------------------------+-------+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
(4256 rows in set (0.050 sec) when executed without EXPLAIN)
With LIMIT 20:
EXPLAIN SELECT DISTINCT e.eventid... ORDER BY e.eventid LIMIT 20;
+------+-------------+-------+--------+---------------------------+---------+---------+-------------------------+---------+------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+------+-------------+-------+--------+---------------------------+---------+---------+-------------------------+---------+------------------------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | e | range | PRIMARY,events_1,events_2 | PRIMARY | 8 | NULL | 2969589 | Using where; Using temporary |
| 1 | SIMPLE | er1 | eq_ref | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 8 | zabbix_server.e.eventid | 1 | |
+------+-------------+-------+--------+---------------------------+---------+---------+-------------------------+---------+------------------------------+
(20 rows in set (9.269 sec) when executed without EXPLAIN)
Why is it not using the keys for the LIMIT 20?
I'm using MariaDB 10.3.11 on Debian 9
EDIT:
Forcing it to use the INDEX makes it fast, but why doesn't the MySQL optimizer realise this?
EXPLAIN SELECT DISTINCT e.eventid,e.clock,e.ns,e.objectid,e.acknowledged,er1.r_eventid FROM events e USE INDEX (events_1) JOIN event_recovery er1 ON er1.eventid=e.eventid WHERE e.source='0' AND e.object='0' AND e.objectid='115779' AND e.eventid<='65535859' AND e.value='1' ORDER BY e.eventid LIMIT 20;
+------+-------------+-------+--------+---------------+----------+---------+-------------------------+-------+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+------+-------------+-------+--------+---------------+----------+---------+-------------------------+-------+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | e | ref | events_1 | events_1 | 16 | const,const,const | 15820 | Using index condition; Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort |
| 1 | SIMPLE | er1 | eq_ref | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 8 | zabbix_server.e.eventid | 1 | |
+------+-------------+-------+--------+---------------+----------+---------+-------------------------+-------+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
Related
Query
SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE contacts.id,
contacts.date_modified contacts__date_modified
FROM contacts
INNER JOIN
(SELECT tst.team_set_id
FROM team_sets_teams tst
INNER JOIN team_memberships team_membershipscontacts ON (team_membershipscontacts.team_id = tst.team_id)
AND (team_membershipscontacts.user_id = '5daa2e92-c347-11e9-afc5-525400a80916')
AND (team_membershipscontacts.deleted = 0)
GROUP BY tst.team_set_id) contacts_tf ON contacts_tf.team_set_id = contacts.team_set_id
LEFT JOIN contacts_cstm contacts_cstm ON contacts_cstm.id_c = contacts.id
WHERE contacts.deleted = 0
ORDER BY contacts.date_modified DESC,
contacts.id DESC
LIMIT 21;
Takes extremely long (2 minutes on 2M records). I cant change this query, since it is system generated
This is it's explain:
+----+-------------+--------------------------+------------+--------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------------+---------+-------------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | filtered | Extra |
+----+-------------+--------------------------+------------+--------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------------+---------+-------------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| 1 | PRIMARY | contacts | NULL | ref | idx_contacts_tmst_id,idx_del_date_modified,idx_contacts_del_last,idx_cont_del_reports,idx_del_id_user | idx_del_date_modified | 2 | const | 1113718 | 100.00 | Using temporary; Using filesort |
| 1 | PRIMARY | <derived3> | NULL | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 2 | 50.00 | Using where; Using join buffer (Block Nested Loop) |
| 1 | PRIMARY | contacts_cstm | NULL | eq_ref | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 144 | sugarcrm.contacts.id | 1 | 100.00 | Using index |
| 3 | DERIVED | team_membershipscontacts | NULL | ref | idx_team_membership,idx_teammemb_team_user,idx_del_team_user | idx_team_membership | 145 | const | 2 | 99.36 | Using index condition; Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort |
| 3 | DERIVED | tst | NULL | ref | idx_ud_set_id,idx_ud_team_id,idx_ud_team_set_id,idx_ud_team_id_team_set_id | idx_ud_team_id_team_set_id | 144 | sugarcrm.team_membershipscontacts.team_id | 1 | 100.00 | Using index |
+----+-------------+--------------------------+------------+--------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------------+---------+-------------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
But when I use force index(idx_del_date_modified) (which is the same index used in explain), the query takes just 0.01s and I get slightly different explain.
+----+-------------+--------------------------+------------+--------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------------+---------+-------------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | filtered | Extra |
+----+-------------+--------------------------+------------+--------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------------+---------+-------------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| 1 | PRIMARY | contacts | NULL | ref | idx_del_date_modified | idx_del_date_modified | 2 | const | 1113718 | 100.00 | Using where |
| 1 | PRIMARY | <derived2> | NULL | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 2 | 50.00 | Using where |
| 1 | PRIMARY | contacts_cstm | NULL | eq_ref | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 144 | sugarcrm.contacts.id | 1 | 100.00 | Using index |
| 2 | DERIVED | team_membershipscontacts | NULL | ref | idx_team_membership,idx_teammemb_team_user,idx_del_team_user | idx_team_membership | 145 | const | 2 | 99.36 | Using index condition; Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort |
| 2 | DERIVED | tst | NULL | ref | idx_ud_set_id,idx_ud_team_id,idx_ud_team_set_id,idx_ud_team_id_team_set_id | idx_ud_team_id_team_set_id | 144 | sugarcrm.team_membershipscontacts.team_id | 1 | 100.00 | Using index |
+----+-------------+--------------------------+------------+--------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------------+---------+-------------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
The first query uses temporary table and file sort, but the query with force index uses just where. Shouldn't the queries be the same? Why is the query with force index so much faster - used index is still the same.
According to MySQL manual:
Temporary tables can be created under conditions such as these:
If there is an ORDER BY clause and a different GROUP BY clause, or if
the ORDER BY or GROUP BY contains columns from tables other than the
first table in the join queue, a temporary table is created.
DISTINCT combined with ORDER BY may require a temporary table.
If you use the SQL_SMALL_RESULT option, MySQL uses an in-memory
temporary table, unless the query also contains elements (described
later) that require on-disk storage.
Likely, you have better performance because in MySQL there is the query optimizer component.
If you create index the query optimizer could not use the index column even though the index exists.
Using force index(..) you are forcing MySql to use index, instead.
Please consider a detailed example here.
MySQL version 5.7.17
When I use JOIN for small tables, MySQL don't allow me to use index on the main table.
Compare:
EXPLAIN SELECT `ko_base_client_orders`.*
FROM `ko_base_client_orders`
LEFT JOIN `ko_base_new_perspe` AS `ko_of`
ON (`ko_of`.`id` = `ko_base_client_orders`.`office`)
ORDER BY `order_time` DESC
LIMIT 10 OFFSET 0;
+----+-------------+-----------------------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+------+-------+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | filtered | Extra |
+----+-------------+-----------------------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+------+-------+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | ko_base_client_orders | NULL | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 60737 | 100.00 | Using temporary; Using filesort |
| 1 | SIMPLE | ko_of | NULL | index | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 4 | NULL | 2 | 100.00 | Using where; Using index; Using join buffer (Block Nested Loop) |
+----+-------------+-----------------------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+------+-------+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
2 rows in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)
and the same query with index hint:
EXPLAIN SELECT `ko_base_client_orders`.*
FROM `ko_base_client_orders`
LEFT JOIN `ko_base_new_perspe` AS `ko_of`
FORCE INDEX FOR JOIN (`PRIMARY`)
ON (`ko_of`.`id` = `ko_base_client_orders`.`office`)
ORDER BY `order_time` DESC
LIMIT 10 OFFSET 0;
+----+-------------+-----------------------+------------+--------+---------------+------------+---------+---------------------------------+------+----------+-------------+
| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | filtered | Extra |
+----+-------------+-----------------------+------------+--------+---------------+------------+---------+---------------------------------+------+----------+-------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | ko_base_client_orders | NULL | index | NULL | order_time | 6 | NULL | 10 | 100.00 | NULL |
| 1 | SIMPLE | ko_of | NULL | eq_ref | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 4 | e3.ko_base_client_orders.office | 1 | 100.00 | Using index |
+----+-------------+-----------------------+------------+--------+---------------+------------+---------+---------------------------------+------+----------+-------------+
In second case MySQL uses key for order_time, but in first example it ignores index and scans the entire table.
I can not predict which table would be small, and which would not (it differs from project to project), so I don't want to use index hints all the time. Is there another solution for this problem?
I have a MySQL query on which I believe I already have all the indexes and so I would expect the query to be processed instantly. However, the query takes several seconds to finish. Using EXPLAIN shows the query uses INDEX CONDITION:
+----+-------------+-------+----------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+---------+-------------------+------+----------------------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+-------------+-------+----------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+---------+-------------------+------+----------------------------------------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | il | fulltext | PRIMARY,FK32F0579FBAF38C6F,name_ftx | name_ftx | 0 | NULL | 1 | Using where; Using temporary |
| 1 | SIMPLE | i | eq_ref | PRIMARY,FK5C6729AF5D52323,... | PRIMARY | 8 | goout.il.thing_id | 1 | Using where |
| 1 | SIMPLE | s | ref | state,event_id,parent_id | parent_id | 9 | const | 5 | Using index condition; Using where; Distinct |
+----+-------------+-------+----------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+---------+-------------------+------+----------------------------------------------+
Please notice the third row which uses this INDEX CONDITION. Is there a way to find what causes it?
SELECT DISTINCT i.id
FROM event i
JOIN event_locale il ON i.id = il.thing_id
LEFT JOIN event_schedule s ON i.id = s.event_id
WHERE (i.parent_id IS NULL)
AND (s.state = 2 OR s.state = 3)
AND s.parent_id IS NULL
AND (i.state = 2 OR i.state = 3)
AND (MATCH(il.name) AGAINST ("jan"))
LIMIT 10;
I am positive I have indexes on all used columns and fulltext index on the match-against column.
I have a query that is taking way too long to execute (4 seconds) even though all the fields i am querying against are indexed. Below are the query and the explain results. Any ideas what the problem is? (mysql CPU usage shoots up to 100% when executing the query
EXPLAIN SELECT count(hd.did) as NumPo, `hd`.`sid`, `src`.`Name`
FROM (`hd`)
JOIN `result` ON `result`.`did` = `hd`.`did`
JOIN `sf` ON `sf`.`fid` = `hd`.`fid`
JOIN `src` ON `src`.`sid` = `hd`.`sid`
WHERE `sf`.`tid` = 2
AND `result`.`set` = 'xxxxxxx'
GROUP BY `hd`.`sid`
ORDER BY `NumPo` DESC
LIMIT 10;
+----+-------------+--------------+--------+-------------------------+---------+---------+--------------------------+------+----------------------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+-------------+--------------+--------+-------------------------+---------+---------+--------------------------+------+----------------------------------------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | sf | ref | PRIMARY,type | type | 2 | const | 4 | Using index; Using temporary; Using filesort |
| 1 | SIMPLE | hd | ref | PRIMARY,sid,fid | FeedID | 4 | f2.sf.fid | 3 | |
| 1 | SIMPLE | result | ALL | resultset | NULL | NULL | NULL | 5322 | Using where; Using join buffer |
| 1 | SIMPLE | src | eq_ref | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 4 | f2.hd.sid | 1 | |
+----+-------------+--------------+--------+-------------------------+---------+---------+--------------------------+------+----------------------------------------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | result | ALL | resultset | NULL | NULL | NULL | 5322 | Using where; Using join buffer |
It looks like it's not using an index on the biggest table. I'm having trouble guessing what this query is supposed to do, but it looks like you have an index on result.set, so I'd try adding one to result.did and see if it helps.
I am running the following query:
SELECT
MyField,
COUNT(*) AS MyCount
FROM
MyTable
NATURAL JOIN
AnotherTable
WHERE
Timestamp >= 1000 AND Timestamp <= 10000
GROUP BY
MyField
ORDER BY
MyCount DESC;
This runs fine and takes about 6 seconds to complete. If I want to limit the result to show only the 20 highest MyCounts, I add LIMIT 20 on to the end of the query. Suddenly it takes 6 minutes to complete!
The EXPLAIN output for the original query:
+----+-------------+-------------+--------+---------------------------+---------+---------+---------------------------+---------+----------------------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+-------------+-------------+--------+---------------------------+---------+---------+---------------------------+---------+----------------------------------------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | MyTable | ALL | mytable_fkey | NULL | NULL | NULL | 6858209 | Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort |
| 1 | SIMPLE | AnotherTable| eq_ref | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 4 | test.MyTable.FKeyID | 1 | Using index |
+----+-------------+-------------+--------+---------------------------+---------+---------+---------------------------+---------+----------------------------------------------+
The EXPLAIN output for the query with LIMIT 20:
+----+-------------+-------------+--------+---------------------------+-------------------------+---------+---------------------------+---------+----------------------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+-------------+-------------+--------+---------------------------+-------------------------+---------+---------------------------+---------+----------------------------------------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | MyTable | index | mytable_fkey | myfield_timestamp_index | 771 | NULL | 6858209 | Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort |
| 1 | SIMPLE | AnotherTable| eq_ref | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 4 | test.MyTable.FKeyID | 1 | Using index |
+----+-------------+-------------+--------+---------------------------+-------------------------+---------+---------------------------+---------+----------------------------------------------+
What is the explanation for this? Is there a better way I can limit the number of rows?
If you see Using temporary; Using filesort in your EXPLAIN output, you are probably missing a suitable index and you're getting killed because of it.
Make sure your JOIN and GROUP BY fields are both available in the same index.