I have to do a client based statistic report in which I include, in the first column, count of clients which have 1 to 50 registered documents, then 51 to 100 documents..and so on to 901 to 1000 documents. or this I used this expression "Sum(IIF(Fields!Calculated_Value_03.Value>0 AND Fields!Calculated_Value_03.Value<=50, 1, 0))" where calculated_value_03 is the number of documents per client and it worked. The next step is to bring in the second column the invoiced value for each category of clients(for 1 to 50, 51 to 100..etc) and i used this expression "sum(IIF(Fields!Calculated_Value_03.Value>0 AND Fields!Calculated_Value_03.Value<=50, Fields!Calculated_Value_09.Value, 0))" where Calculate_Value_09 is the net invoiced value, but those conditions are both true and the expression is summing everything in the DB. Any clue on how i could solve this? Thank you in advance.
Related
I have a table with records each representing an appointment. I have the name of the contactthe appointment is with, and the date. In another table I have a field that contains how many appointments each contact is supposed to have during the day. There are 12 entries for each contact, because some are expected to have different numbers during different months.
I am able to call up the data for the appropriate contactfor the appropriate month. It looks great in the graph when I count up the number of entries for Contact A and put next to it the expected number of entries from the related table.
The problem I'm running into now is that I need to add up all of the expected appointments between all of the entities. So:
::ContactName:: ::appointments:: ::expected::
Contact A 12 10
Contact B 33 34
Contact C 18 27
Getting the roll up for the actual appointments is easy, a simple COUNT summary field in a subsubsummary section. But what of the expected? Because ContactA had 12 appointments that means that there will be 12 records for them, so putting a summary field for the expected column is would return 120 for all Contact A's. Instead, given the dataset above, I need the calculation to return 71. Does this issue make sense? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
If I am following this correctly, you need to divide the amount of expected appointments between the entries of the group, then total the result. So something like:
Sum ( Entities::Expected ) / GetSummary ( sCount ; EntityID )
(this would be easier if we knew the names of your tables and fields).
P.S. The term "entity" has a specific meaning in the context of a relational database. Consider using another term (e.g. "contacts").
Added:
Using your example data, you should see the following results in the above calculation field:
in the 1st group of 12 records: 10 / 12 = .8333333333333333
in the 2nd group of 33 records: 34 / 33 = 1.0303030303030303
in the 3rd group of 18 records: 27 / 18 = 1.5
When you sum all this up (using a summary field defined as Total of this calculation field), you should get 71 (or a number very near 71, due to rounding errors).
Note: in the above calculation, sCount is a summary field defined in the Appointments table as Count of [ any field that cannot be empty ], and EntityID is the field by which your records are sorted and grouped (and it must be a local field).
I am working on a database with two different tables.
The first contains every change in the database like a transaction table. It contains the object that was bought/sold, how many of them where bought/sold, when this tranaction happend and in which place.
The second table contains the total value of every object that should be available in those places.
Now here is my question:
I want to automaticly sum up every entry with the same object and location inside of table one and save this value inside of table two.
BUT
Sometimes there are special entrys in table one which should not be summed up with the other values. They should overwrite the value.
I have an example of how this summing up should look like:
n = normal value, s = special value
n: 1 sum: 1
n: 2 sum: 3
s: 7 sum: 7
n: 5 sum: 12
n: 4 sum: 16
n: 7 sum: 23
s: 20 sum: 20
To help you help me I have some additional informations:
There are 4 columns inside of table one
The first one is called object and contains the object number for which this entry takes effect.
The second column contains the amount of that object. Whether it was bought or sold.
The third column tells me on which locations this transaction belongs to. Which also means that every object has different amounts depending on the location.
The fourth column contains an information why this transaction happend. It tells me if this transaction happend because I bought something or because I sold something OR because I counted my stock.
This is the special indicator which should tell my database not to sum up this value but instead overwrite the previous one with this.
The fifth and last column contains the date when this transaction happend. This is very important because the whole table is sorted by the date. And it tells when those special values come in place.
The other table just contains the summed up value for every object in every location.
This below will return the sum of each record for a particular Object 'MyObj' starting from the last instance of a 'Special' entry (inclusive).
(Untested)
SELECT Sum(a.Amount) AS TheSum
FROM tblMyTable a
WHERE ID_PK> = nz((
SELECT max(ID_PK)
FROM tblMyTable
WHERE Object=a.Object AND IsSpecial=1
),0)
AND a.Object='MyObj'
I have to get distinct rows sum in SSRS expression.
**StudentId TestScoreMath CurriculumEnrolled EnrollStatus**
100 200 Nursing Enrolled
100 200 Physical Enrolled
200 100 Tech Enrolled
Total Student TestScoreMath should be 300 not 400. I tried using the expression
=Sum(Fields!TestScoreMath .Value, "table1_Group3")
How can I SUM the value of TestScore of distinct students? I need this only in SSRS.
In SSRS 2005, this is not too easy. I would add embedded code to keep a running total. You can have the custom code to check to see if the current student ID matches the last. If so, then don't add another test score to the total. Or you could group by Student ID and call your custom code only in the header or footer of that group.
This sample shows totaling all rows: you'll need to add to this to track the studentID.
Ok, here's the condensed form. I have three main tables to draw data from:
StudentData - PK is the student's ID Number. Contains contact info, their current status ('00' for none, 'P' for Probation, 'S' for Suspension), and cumulative gpa data.
CourseData - PK is the CRN. Contains just the abbreviated subject and the course number (IE ECON 200)
StudentCourses - PK is an AutoNum. Many-to-Many relationship table between StudentData and CourseData. Also contains stats for the particular student's class (grade, credit hours, etc).
So some sample data would look like:
-
StudentData
ID: 12345678
Name: John Doe; ...[Other contact info]; 00; CumCreditHours: 100; CumCoursePoints: 190
-
CourseData
CRN: 0001; Abbrev: ECON; CourseNumber: 101
CRN: 0002; Abbrev: CSCI; CourseNumber 201
-
StudentCourses
AutoNum: 1
StudentID: 12345678; CRN: 0001; Grade: A-; Credits: 3
AutoNum: 2
StudentID 12345678; CRN: 0002; Grade: B; Credits: 3
-
At this point, this is how I have things set up:
First, a query runs that finds all of the courses a student takes and converts the letter grades into a point value. Another query based on the first sums the point totals and the credit hours. A third query takes those totals and calculates the GPA by dividing their point total by the credit hour total.
Separately, a query runs that calculates the student's cumulative GPA by taking their cumulative points and hours from the StudentData table (again dividing the points by the hours).
Then, another query takes both the semester GPA, cumulative GPA, current status, and cumulative credit hours and calculates the recommended action for the student. So for our example data it would look like:
_
SemesterGPA: 3.33; CumulativeGPA: 1.90; CurrentStatus: 00; CumulativeCreditHours: 100
_
I have the formula to determine their recommended action set up as a series of nested IIF statements that looks like:
IIf([CurrentStatus]="00" And [CumulativeGPA]<2 And [CumulativeCreditHours]>=12 And [CumulativeCreditHours]<=23,"PFY",IIf([CurrentStatus]="00" And [CumulativeGPA]>=1.7 And [CumulativeGPA]<=1.99 And [CumulativeCreditHours]>=24,"P",IIf([CurrentStatus]="00 " And [CumulativeGPA]<2 And [SemesterGPA]<2 And [CumulativeCreditHours]<12,"W",IIf([CurrentStatus]="00" And [CumulativeGPA]>=2 And [CumulativeGPA]<=2.5 And [SemesterGPA]<2 And [CumulativeCreditHours]>=12,"WUP",IIf([CurrentStatus]="00" And [CumulativeGPA]<1.7 And [CumulativeCreditHours]>=24,"SUSP",IIf([CurrentStatus]="P" And [CumulativeGPA]<2 And [SemesterGPA]>=2 And [CumulativeCreditHours]>=12,"CP",IIf([CurrentStatus]="P" And [CumulativeGPA]>=2 And [SemesterGPA]<2 And [CumulativeCreditHours]>=12,"SPCP",IIf([CurrentStatus]="P" And [CumulativeGPA]>=2 And [CumulativeCreditHours]>=12,"RP",IIf([CurrentStatus]="P" And [CumulativeGPA]<2 And [SemesterGPA]<2 And [CumulativeCreditHours]>=12,IIf(IsNull([PriorSuspension]),"S(FD)","D(SD)"),"None")))))))))
For our example, John Doe's recommended action would be 'P' since his current status is 00, he has over 24 cumulative credits, and his cumulative gpa is between 1.7 and 1.99.
Now for the problem: I would like to be able to make a report that can filter by the recommended action. I've detailed the issues I've had previously, but in short, the way I have the reports set up now (with the information being displayed in a sub-report inside a report that is based on the StudentData table to provide the aforementioned queries with the StudentID) doesn't allow me to do this because the field I want to filter by exists in the sub-report and not the main report (and you can't set the filter properties for a sub-report).
Any ideas?
Ok, I've got this to work now. I realized that as I was calculating the semester GPAs that I had grouped the results together by ID at some point during the process. This allowed me to remove the part of the initial query that grabbed the ID number from the form. Since the last query in the process linked everything together by student ID, the individual records held all of the information I needed and everything fell into place after that.
I half expected something simple like this to be the answer to my problem, but I'm still disappointed that it took me this long to figure it out...
Anyway, thanks to anyone who might have been thinking of possible solutions for this problem.
I need to create report with table which looks like this
Country 1 Country 2 Country 3 Total
Category 1 1(2) 2(1) 5(6) 8(9)
Category 2 2(3) 2(1) 4(0) 8(4)
Category 3 3(2) 2(1) 3(1) 8(4)
Total 6(7) 6(3) 12(7) 24(17)
Report contains data about TFS WI's and has information about current week's WI count and last weeks WI count (in brackets)
Data set on which this report is based on MDX query against TFS warehousw cube and has such structure:
Category Country Week Count
1 1 this 1
1 2 this 2
1 3 this 5
1 1 last 2
1 2 last 1
1 3 last 6
Trouble is, I cann't find a way how to concatenate data about current and last weeks incident count in one cell. I have toyed around with idea to do it in MDX, but with my limited MDX skills I can't see how it could be done.
Rowgroup on Category.
Columngroup on Country.
Inside the cell you should be able to have 2 placeholders with the second one in brackets. The first expression should be:
=Sum(iif(Fields!Week.Value = "this", Fields!Count.Value, 0))
The second one should be:
=Sum(iif(Fields!Week.Value = "last", Fields!Count.Value, 0))
In MDX you could create two calcs - this and last week (of course you'll need to change this to work with your cube):
WITH
MEMBER [Measures].[thisWeekCount] AS
([Date].[Week].[this], [Measures].[Count])
MEMBER [Measures].[lastWeekCount] AS
([Date].[Week].[last], [Measures].[Count])
SELECT
{
[Measures].[thisWeekCount],
[Measures].[lastWeekCount]
} ON 0,
{
...
} ON 1
FROM [Your Cube]
Then, you can use them within placeholders as jimconstable explained, but without the iif functions.
Thank you all for your answers!
I found out that main problem (reporting services allows only one measure on columns) can be solved by using Analysis server OLE DB provider. There are some drawbacks, like that parameters are not supported, but I can live with this.