I would like a div to be pushed down (see "Search while I move the map" in the screenshot), to float above the map, but so that if I use any constants for margin-top or top, then that's relative to the parent div (map), not the browser window.
How can I do so? Website link I have tried to add position: relative; to the parent #map but this is what I get (the map gets hidden):
This is my CSS code:
#map {
#searchCheckboxContainer {
position: absolute;
display: inline-table;
white-space: nowrap;
margin-top: 24px; // sure, this works, but it's 24px *from the browser window*
top: 0px; // any way to make it relative to the parent div (map)?
left: 50%;
transform: translateX(-50%);
background: rgb(255, 255, 255) !important;
}
#searchCheckboxContainer {
height: 40px;
}
}
HTML:
<div id="map" v-cloak>
<div id="searchCheckboxContainer">
<div id="searchCheckbox">
<input id="checkbox" class="form-check-input" type="checkbox" value="" id="defaultCheck1">
<label class="form-check-label" for="defaultCheck1">
Search as I move the map
</label>
</div>
</div>
<div id="mapid"></div>
</div>
Adding as an answer to avoid the comment noise:
All of the #map element children are positioned absolute. So, essentially they aren't in the normal document flow and will not affect the height of the #map div.
You need to add:
position: relative;
height: 100vh (or whatever)
To your #map div.
Then, to your #searchCheckboxContainer, add a z-index: 100 //could be anything but that worked
This will put the box above the map.
I assume you need it to look like that:
In this case you need to modify the following:
#map {
position: relative;
height: calc(100vh - 86px); // The height of header on mobile and you need to add responsive media queries to handle it.
}
#map #searchCheckboxContainer{
position: absolute;
display: inline-table;
white-space: nowrap;
margin-top: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
top: auto;
transform: none;
background: #ffffff !important;
z-index: 2;
width: 100%;
padding: 15px;
}
#searchCheckbox .form-check-input{
position: relative;
margin-top: 0;
margin-left: 0;
}
#map #mapid{
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
position: absolute;
background-color: yellow;
z-index: 1;
}
Related
Codepen link: https://codepen.io/lolcatBH/pen/OJbgLyd
I have the following html:
<div id="page">
<div class="overlay"></div>
<div class="click">SHOW POPUP</div>
<div class="popup">
<h1>Korean language</h1>
<button class ="close">X</button>
<div class="desc">Korean (North Korean: 조선말/朝鮮말, chosŏnmal; South Korean: 한국어/韓國語, hangugeo) is an East Asian language spoken by about 77 million people.</div>
</div>
</div>
And CSS:
#page {
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 25%;
}
.popup {
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
border: 1px solid black;
z-index: 1;
position: absolute;
top: -10%;
transform: scale(0);
padding: 20px;
}
#page .overlay {
position: fixed;
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
width: 100vw;
height: 100vh;
background: rgba(0,0,0,0.7);
z-index: 1;
display: none;
}
#page.active .overlay {
display: block;
}
.popup.active {
transform: scale(1);
background-color: white;
}
.close {
position: absolute;
right: 0%;
top: 0%;
color: white;
background: black;
border-radius: 50%;
}
.click {
border: 1px solid black;
padding: 20px;
font-size: 20px;
text-align: center;
z-index: 0;
cursor: pointer;
}
h1, desc {
text-align: center;
}
JS:
const click = document.querySelector('.click');
const x = document.querySelector('.close');
const page = document.querySelector('#page');
const popup = document.querySelector('.popup');
const showPopup = () => {
page.classList.toggle('active');
popup.classList.add('active');
}
const hidePopup = () => {
page.classList.toggle('active');
popup.classList.remove('active');
}
click.addEventListener('click', showPopup);
x.addEventListener('click', hidePopup);
At first, what I tried to do is instead of creating a separate overlay div, I was going to put a background color on the #page element. However, in effect, the background only applies to the button element (.click). I don't actually understand why in this case, since the background-color doesn't seem to affect the .popup element.
Imgur: https://imgur.com/a/UEgXSlY
So my question is, why does the #page element not cover all of its children's width and height? In this case, I thought it would have cover the whole page. I've also tried putting width: 100vw and height:100vh but it in turn only applied the dimensions to the button.
Imgur: https://imgur.com/a/QOMlnTs
The reason is that most of your elements have position set to absolute or fixed, which makes them completely (fixed) or partly (absolute) independent from their parent, i.e. there is no space of its own reserved for them, therefore they typically overlap other elements.
So the parent doesn't span or cover them, but only those elements which don't have a set position or which have position: relative or static.
Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I have recently started to code again after a long break and now I'm trying hard to see what is it that I'm doing wrong.
I made a JSFiddle here: http://jsfiddle.net/mtsgp3gg/
This is the output I'd like to see: http://puu.sh/jwi3d/233c917986.png
I have a container with 3 images:
<div class="container">
<img src="main picture">
<img id="tape left" src="">
<img id="tape right" src="">
</div>
I would like to put some little "tape thingies" over my main picture using position: relative; and top:0; but so far I failed.
Can anyone point out what I'm doing wrong please?
css position: is somewhat confusing, especially at the start (and it is misused almost 99% of all times).
You use position: relative because you want it to be relative to the container, right? Although this is the obvious behavior, it is not what css does.
position: relative means "I'll give you top/right/... values and want that the element is moved by that amount from where it would occur normally."
You almost always want to use position: absolute which basically means "pick the boundaries of the parent (being specific: the first parent that is not position: static which is the default) and move this element to what I define with top/right/...". (There are more implications like absolute removing the element from the document flow, but that's out of scope at the moment.)
This means you have to
position your container not static. position: relative works fine here, as it does not alter the element if you don't specify top/... .
position your items with position: absolute as they will then be defined relative to their container (not relative to their original position, as they would be with position: relative).
Your example would look like
body {
background: gray;
}
.container {
position: relative;
margin-left: 20px;
margin-top: 20px;
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
background: navy;
}
.container [id] {
position: absolute;
top: -5px;
}
.container #one {
left: -5px;
}
.container #two {
right: -5px;
transform: rotate(90deg);
}
<div class="container">
<img src="http://www.animal-photography.com/thumbs/blue_eyed_white_long_hair_cat_~AP-G3KLBP-TH.jpg">
<img id="one" src="http://fenrir.info.uaic.ro/~elena.chiosa/img/scoci.png">
<img id="two" src="http://fenrir.info.uaic.ro/~elena.chiosa/img/scoci.png">
</div>
You're using position:relative when you should be using position:absolute.
body {
background: gray;
}
.container {
margin-left: 20px;
margin-top: 20px;
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
background: navy;
position: relative;
}
.container #one {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
transform: translate(-25%, -25%)
}
.container #two {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 100%;
transform: translate(-75%, -25%) rotate(90deg);
}
<div class="container">
<img src="http://www.animal-photography.com/thumbs/blue_eyed_white_long_hair_cat_~AP-G3KLBP-TH.jpg" />
<img id="one" src="http://fenrir.info.uaic.ro/~elena.chiosa/img/scoci.png" />
<img id="two" src="http://fenrir.info.uaic.ro/~elena.chiosa/img/scoci.png" />
</div>
That said, I'd prefer not to have presentational images in the HTML at all. So I'd be using pseudo-elements using the same techniques.
body {
background: gray;
}
.container {
margin-left: 20px;
margin-top: 20px;
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
background: navy;
position: relative;
}
.container::before {
position: absolute;
content: '';
width: 20px;
height: 20px;
background-image: url(http://fenrir.info.uaic.ro/~elena.chiosa/img/scoci.png);
top: 0;
left: 0;
transform: translate(-25%, -25%);
z-index: 1;
}
.container::after {
position: absolute;
content: '';
width: 20px;
height: 20px;
background-image: url(http://fenrir.info.uaic.ro/~elena.chiosa/img/scoci.png);
top: 0;
left: 100%;
transform: translate(-75%, -25%) rotate(90deg);
}
<div class="container">
<img src="http://www.animal-photography.com/thumbs/blue_eyed_white_long_hair_cat_~AP-G3KLBP-TH.jpg" />
</div>
In this way, the presentational part is now in the CSS and the class can be re-used without having multiple instances of the tape image cluttering up your HTML.
Try to use position: absolute; instead of position: relative;
.container #one{
position: absolute;
top: 10px;
left:20px;
}
.container #two{
position: absolute;
top: 10px;
left:215px;
transform: rotate(90deg);
}
Demo here
Hey guys I am relatively very new to HTML and CSS and have the following difficulty I made a small input box and I am trying to add a few CSS transforms and create a small animation on the input box. Code below:
* {
-webkit-box-sizing: border-box;
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
box-sizing: border-box;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
.input {
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
max-width: 350px;
width: 100%;
}
.akira-input {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
display: block;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
background: transparent;
z-index: 10;
}
.akira-label {
display: block;
height: 100%;
padding: 0;
width: 100%;
background: #696a6e;
color: #cc6055;
cursor: text;
}
.akira-label:before {
content: '';
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
background: red;
-webkit-transform: scale3d(0.97, 0.50, 1);
transform: scale3d(0.97, 0.50, 1);
-webkit-transition: .3s;
-o-transition: .3s;
transition: .3s;
}
.label-content {
color: #000;
font-size: 1.3em;
text-transform: uppercase;
position: relative;
display: block;
text-align: center;
padding: 1.6em 0;
width: 100%;
-webkit-transition: .3s;
-o-transition: .3s;
transition: .3s;
}
<span class="input">
<input type="text" id="akira" class="akira-input">
<label for="akira" class="akira-label">
<span class="label-content">Akira</span>
</label>
</span>
My difficulty is, if I apply position:relative to <span class="label-content">Akira</span>, it shows, if I remove position:relative , that element disappears from view.
My question is why is position:relative functioning like z-index?
Can somebody elaborate ??
EDIT :: refering to Justinas answer , i have the folloing question ,
Does applying position:relative places an element
higher in the stack , even without applying z-index ??
z-index is only working for non-static elements, so when you remove position: relative than element becomes statically positioned and moves below higher index elements (disappears from view). When you add position: relative to element, than z-index will take effect and so element appears in your view.
Also position and z-index is two different properties
position - how element is positioned according to other elements on page. Default to static
z-index - how high element is in z-axis (z-index: 2 - is behind element with z-index: 10). Default to 5
.wrapper {
position: relative;
}
#static {
position: static;
z-index: 999;
width: 400px;
height: 150px;
background-color: #ddd;
padding: 3px;
}
#top-1 {
position: absolute;
z-index: 10;
left: 8px;
top: 45px;
width: 330px;
height: 80px;
background-color: #888;
padding: 3px;
}
#relative {
position: relative;
z-index: 11;
background-color: #88a;
width: 330px;
height: 80px;
padding: 3px;
top: 30px;
left: 8px;
}
#top-2 {
position: absolute;
z-index: 10;
left: 0;
top: 0;
width: 400px;
height: 150px;
background-color: #dda;
padding: 3px;
}
<div class='wrapper'>
<div id="static">
I'm static, so behind #top-1, but have z-index higher than #top-1... Means z-index has no effect.
<br/>Text that is not visible, because behind #top-1 element
</div>
<div id='top-1'>
I'm above #static, because i have non-static position, so my z-index has effect.
</div>
</div>
<hr/>
<div class='wrapper'>
<div id="relative">
I'm relative and above #top-2, because my z-index higher than #top-2... Means z-index has taken effect.
</div>
<div id='top-2'>
I'm below #relative, because i have lover z-index.
<br/>Text that is not visible, because behind #top-1 element
</div>
</div>
z-index only works on positioned elements so position:absolute, position:relative or position:fixed
It does not behave like a z-index, because z-index specifies an ordering rule, but not the way how the element is displayed.
position: relative; says to go to the relative mode where it can compete the absolutely positioned elements.
Your problem here is that :before pseudo-element is a hierarchical sibling of span, and it takes the whole available parent width. So it fully covers a static span element.
When you make it relative, it becomes shown because when z-index is not specified for both non-static elements they are shown in the same order like they are placed in HTML (so element which is defined in HTML later is always on top).
Your structure is:
label
:before
span
so the span becomes visible.
I have a button that is in a div, that is behind another div. The second div overlaps the first by using the css: position: absolute;
Therefore the button is not clickable. Is there any way I can make it clickable like a normal button?
Example: jsfiddle
body {
background-color: blue;
}
.stack {
width: 320px;
height: 240px;
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
background-color: white;
margin-top: -120px;
margin-left: -160px;
}
.background {
width: 320px;
height: 240px;
background-image: url('http://www.userlogos.org/files/logos/ps1d3r/apple-black-i.png');
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
position: absolute;
}
.card {
pointer-events: none;
width: 320px;
height: 240px;
background-image: url('http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-OIHQM4x8l0U/UEiDLQyiTRI/AAAAAAAAHFs/i1a6rkqQ8tQ/s320/floral+swirl.png');
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
position: absolute;
}
<div class="stack">
<div class="background" onclick="alert('background clicked');">
<button onclick="alert('bg-button clicked');" style="left:65px; top:65px; position: absolute;">This is a background button</button>
<div class="card">
<button onclick="alert('card-button clicked');">This is a card button</button>
<textarea style="left:100px; top:100px; position: absolute;">This is a card textarea</textarea>
</div>
</div>
</div>
You can use pointer-events:none; on .card. This will disable the click event on the .card div and user can click on the button behind it. More info here (MDN).
Here is an example showing how you can enable the click envent on an element hidden behind another one :
button {
margin: 50px;
}
button:focus {
background: red;
}
button:hover {
background: teal;
}
.inFront {
pointer-events: none;
position: absolute;
top: 25px; left: 25px;
right: 25px; height: 150px;
border: 3px solid red;
background: rgba(0, 0, 0, .5);
}
<button onclick="alert('button clicked');">I am a button behind the .inFront div</button>
<div class="inFront"></div>
In this example, the .inFront div is over the button but the pointer-events: none; property on the div allows the button to be clicked, focused and hovered.
Regarding your example, the drawback is that it will also disable the textarea and the "card button" so you will have to change your HTML and move both textarea and card button out of the .card div so they are still clickable. Here is a demo :
DEMO
Use z-index in this case.
<button onclick="alert('bg-button clicked');" style="left:65px; top:65px; position: absolute; z-index:1;">This is a background button</button>
DEMO
This positions the element in the depth field higher than everything else. The higher the number, the higher the stack order.
z-index: 1;
Though, z-index requires positioning such as position: absolute; or position: relative;.
Read a great article about Z-Index here.
Give the button a positive z-index
button {
position: absolute;
z-index: 1;
}
For those who have the same issue as I do where(not restructuring your HTML):
div 1 is on top of div 2
Both div 1 and 2 needs to be clickable/interactive
However div 2 should be infront of div 1
Apply the following codes to div 2:
div2 {
position: absolute; // to manipulate position
z-index: 999; // manipulating the position, putting it in front of div1
pointer-events: visible; // making it interactive, clickable
}
Im trying to make a popup box that causes the surrounding area to get greyed out. My issue is that the opacity of the shadow div seems to overide that of the popup. I tried changing one from absolute to fixed position and increasing the z index of the popup but neither worked.
Here is a screensot of the problem.
And below is the relevent code (ask if you need to see more)
.textPopup
{
width: 1400px;
height: 600px;
background-color: White;
position: fixed;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
z-index: 15;
left: 0;
right: 0;
top: 50px;
bottom: 0;
opacity: 0.2;
}
#innerPopup
{
background-color: White;
width: 1350px;
height: 550px;
position: absolute;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
z-index: 15;
left: 0;
right: 0;
top: 50px;
bottom: 0;
opacity: 1;
}
... snip
<div id="popupShadow">
</div>
<div class="textPopup">
<div id="innerPopup">
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
The issue you have is that #innerPopup is inside #textPopup. The opacity is then inherited by the child and cannot be overridden with it's own property.
If it is not possible to separate them, then consider using an rgba value for the background as opposed to the opacity property:
#textPopup {
background-color: rgba(255,255,255,0.2);
}
You can see it working on jsfiddle.
You'll be able to make it work as expected by making the following changes in your CSS:
#innerPopup
{
position: relative; /* change this to relative - will allow you to override the parent specified opacity */
opacity: 1;
/* other properties */
}