Using EF Core 2.2.6 and Pomelo.EntityFrameworkCore.MySql 2.2.6 (with MySqlConnector 0.59.2)). I have a model for UserData:
public class UserData
{
[DatabaseGenerated(DatabaseGeneratedOption.None)]
public ulong ID { get; private set; }
[Required]
public Dictionary<string, InventoryItem> Inventory { get; set; }
public UserData()
{
Data = new Dictionary<string, string>();
}
}
I have a REST method that can be called that will add items to the user inventory:
using (var transaction = context.Database.BeginTransaction())
{
UserData data = await context.UserData.FindAsync(userId);
// there is code here to detect duplicate entries/etc, but I've removed it for brevity
foreach (var item in items) data.Inventory.Add(item.ItemId, item);
context.UserData.Update(data);
await context.SaveChangesAsync();
transaction.Commit();
}
If two or more calls to this method are made with the same user id then I get concurrent accesses (despite the transaction). This causes the data to sometimes be incorrect. For example, if the inventory is empty and then two calls are made to add items simultaneously (item A and item B), sometimes the database will only contain either A or B, and not both. From logging it appears that it is possible for EF to read from the database while the other read/write is still occurring, causing the code to have the incorrect state of the inventory for when it tries to write back to the db. So I tried marking the isolation level as serializable.
using (var transaction = context.Database.BeginTransaction(System.Data.IsolationLevel.Serializable))
Now I sometimes see an exception:
MySql.Data.MySqlClient.MySqlException (0x80004005): Deadlock found when trying to get lock; try restarting transaction
I don't understand how this code could deadlock... Anyways, I tried to proceed by wrapping this whole thing in a try/catch, and retry:
public static async Task<ResponseError> AddUserItem(Controller controller, MyContext context, ulong userId, List<InventoryItem> items, int retry = 5)
{
ResponseError result = null;
try
{
using (var transaction = context.Database.BeginTransaction(System.Data.IsolationLevel.Serializable))
{
UserData data = await context.UserData.FindAsync(userId);
// there is code here to detect duplicate entries/etc, but I've removed it for brevity
foreach (var item in items) data.Inventory.Add(item.ItemId, item);
context.UserData.Update(data);
await context.SaveChangesAsync();
transaction.Commit();
}
}
catch (Exception e)
{
if (retry > 0)
{
await Task.Delay(SafeRandomGenerator(10, 500));
return await AddUserItem(controller, context, userId, items, retry--);
}
else
{
// store exception and return error
}
}
return result;
}
And now I am back to the data being sometimes correct, sometimes not. So I think the deadlock is another problem, but this is the only method accessing this data. So, I'm at a loss. Is there a simple way to read from the database (locking the row in the process) and then writing back (releasing the lock on write) using EF Core? I've looked at using concurrency tokens, but this seems overkill for what appears (on the surface to me) to be a trivial task.
I added logging for mysql connector as well as asp.net server and can see the following failure:
fail: Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Database.Command[20102]
=> RequestId:0HLUD39EILP3R:00000001 RequestPath:/client/AddUserItem => Server.Controllers.ClientController.AddUserItem (ServerSoftware)
Failed executing DbCommand (78ms) [Parameters=[#p1='?' (DbType = UInt64), #p0='?' (Size = 4000)], CommandType='Text', CommandTimeout='30']
UPDATE `UserData` SET `Inventory` = #p0
WHERE `ID` = #p1;
SELECT ROW_COUNT();
A total hack is to just delay the arrival of the queries by a bit. This works because the client is most likely to generate these calls on load. Normally back-to-back calls aren't expected, so spreading them out in time by delaying on arrival works. However, I'd rather find a correct approach, since this just makes it less likely to be an issue:
ResponseError result = null;
await Task.Delay(SafeRandomGenerator(100, 500));
using (var transaction = context.Database.BeginTransaction(System.Data.IsolationLevel.Serializable))
// etc
This isn't a good answer, because it isn't what I wanted to do, but I'll post it here as it did solve my problem. My problem was that I was trying to read the database row, modify it in asp.net, and then write it back, all within a single transaction and while avoiding deadlocks. The backing field is JSON type, and MySQL provides some JSON functions to help modify that JSON directly in the database. This required me to write SQL statements directly instead of using EF, but it did work.
The first trick was to ensure I could create the row if it didn't exist, without requiring a transaction and lock.
INSERT INTO UserData VALUES ({0},'{{}}','{{}}') ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE ID = {0};
I used JSON_REMOVE to delete keys from the JSON field:
UPDATE UserData as S set S.Inventory = JSON_REMOVE(S.Inventory,{1}) WHERE S.ID = {0};
and JSON_SET to add/modify entries:
UPDATE UserData as S set S.Inventory = JSON_SET(S.Inventory,{1},CAST({2} as JSON)) WHERE S.ID = {0};
Note, if you're using EF Core and want to call this using FromSql then you need to return the entity as part of your SQL statement. So you'll need to add something like this to each SQL statement:
SELECT * from UserData where ID = {0} LIMIT 1;
Here is a full working example as an extension method:
public static async Task<UserData> FindOrCreateAsync(this IQueryable<UserData> table, ulong userId)
{
string sql = "INSERT INTO UserData VALUES ({0},'{{}}','{{}}') ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE ID = {0}; SELECT * FROM UserData WHERE ID={0} LIMIT 1;";
return await table.FromSql(sql, userId).SingleOrDefaultAsync();
}
public static async Task<UserData> JsonRemoveInventory(this DbSet<UserData> table, ulong userId, string key)
{
if (!key.StartsWith("$.")) key = $"$.\"{key}\"";
string sql = "UPDATE UserData as S set S.Inventory = JSON_REMOVE(S.Inventory,{1}) WHERE S.ID = {0}; SELECT * from UserData where ID = {0} LIMIT 1;";
return await table.AsNoTracking().FromSql(sql, userId, key).SingleOrDefaultAsync();
}
Usage:
var data = await context.UserData.FindOrCreateAsync(userId);
await context.UserData.JsonRemoveInventory(userId, itemId);
Related
I am testing Couchbase, and I am making a very simply query:
public async Task SelectRandomJobs(int nbr)
{
IBucket bucket = await cluster.BucketAsync("myBucket");
IScope scope = bucket.Scope("myScope");
IQueryResult<JObject> result = await scope.QueryAsync<JObject>("SELECT * FROM myCollection WHERE Id = {id}");
// The Metrics.* has default values
Console.WriteLine(result.MetaData.Metrics.ElaspedTime);
}
Here are the values:
I was expecting ElaspedTime (misspelled!) and ExecutionTime to be not null. There is a AnalyticsQueryAsync method, but that did work for me (error 24045).
Why are those values null?
-- UPDATE --
I followed the advice of Eric, but I got the same results:
So you will need to enable Metrics for this query, I have provided a code sample below with two possible ways of doing this, it is covered in our docs but maybe could be easier to find or have better examples, this is something I will investigate further and see if we can make it clearer in future editions of the docs.
I have used the travel-sample dataset and tried to set the code up similar to your example so that it will be easy to implement for you.
As for why the times are null by default and the other fields are zero, that seems to just be a design decision for this class.
About the misspelling, we have filed a ticket to get the spelling corrected. Thank you for pointing that out.
using System;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using Couchbase;
using Couchbase.Query;
namespace _3x_simple
{
class Program
{
static async Task Main(string[] args)
{
var cluster = await Cluster.ConnectAsync("couchbase://localhost", "Administrator", "password");
var bucket = await cluster.BucketAsync("travel-sample");
var myScope = bucket.Scope("inventory");
//scope path
var options = new QueryOptions().Metrics(true);
var queryResult = await myScope.QueryAsync<dynamic>("SELECT * FROM airline LIMIT 10;", options);
//cluster path
//var queryResult = await cluster.QueryAsync<dynamic>("SELECT * FROM `travel-sample`.inventory.airline LIMIT 10;", options => options.Metrics(true));
Console.WriteLine($"Execution time before read: {queryResult.MetaData.Metrics.ExecutionTime}");
await foreach(var row in queryResult){
Console.WriteLine(row);
}
Console.WriteLine($"Execution time after read: {queryResult.MetaData.Metrics.ExecutionTime}");
Console.WriteLine("Press any key to exit...");
Console.Read();
}
}
}
You won't see the execution time until after the results are read. The reason you are seeing default values for those fields is because you are trying to read that information at the wrong time/place considering your async operation.
I'm seeing "caching" behavior with database (MySQL 5) records. I can't seem to see the new data application side w/o logging in/out or restarting the app server (Glassfish 3). This is the only place in the application where db records are "stuck." I'm guessing I'm missing something with JPA persistence.
I've attempted changing db records by hand, there's still some sort of caching mechanism in place "helping" me.
This is editFile() method that saves new data.
After I fire this, I see the data updated in the db as expected.
this.file is the class level property that the view uses to show file data. It shows old data. I attempt to move db data back in to it after I've fired my UPDATE queries with the filesList setter: this.setFilesList(newFiles);
When the application reads it back out though, GlassFish seems to resond with requests for this data w/ old data.
public void editFile(Map<String, String> params) {
// update file1 record
File1 thisFile = new File1();
thisFile.setFileId(Integer.parseInt(params.get("reload-form:fileID")));
thisFile.setTitle(params.get("reload-form:input-small-name"));
thisFile.setTitle_friendly(params.get("reload-form:input-small-title-friendly"));
this.filesFacade.updateFileRecord(thisFile);
//update files_to_categories record
int thisFileKeywordID = Integer.parseInt(params.get("reload-form:select0"));
this.filesToCategoriesFacade.updateFilesToCategoriesRecords(thisFile.getFileId(), thisFileKeywordID);
this.file = this.filesFacade.findFileByID(thisFile.getFileId());
List<File1> newFiles = (List<File1>)this.filesFacade.findAllByRange(low, high);
this.setFilesList(newFiles);
}
Facades
My Facades are firing native SQL to update each of those DB tables. When I check the DB after they fire, the data is going in, that part is happening as I expect and hope.
File1
public int updateFileRecord(File1 file){
String title = file.getTitle();
String title_titleFriendly = file.getTitle_friendly();
int fileID = file.getFileId();
int result = 0;
Query q = this.em.createNativeQuery("UPDATE file1 set title = ?1, title_friendly = ?2 where file_id = ?3");
q.setParameter(1, title);
q.setParameter(2, title_titleFriendly);
q.setParameter(3, fileID);
result = q.executeUpdate();
return result;
}
FilesToCategories
public int updateFilesToCategoriesRecords(int fileId, int keywordID){
Query q = this.em.createNativeQuery("UPDATE files_to_categories set categories = ?1 where file1 = ?2");
q.setParameter(1, keywordID);
q.setParameter(2, fileId);
return q.executeUpdate();
}
How do I un-cache?
Thanks again for looking.
I don't think caching is the Problem, I think it's transactions.
em.getTransaction().begin();
Query q = this.em.createNativeQuery("UPDATE file1 set title = ?1, title_friendly = ?2 where file_id = ?3");
q.setParameter(1, title);
q.setParameter(2, title_titleFriendly);
q.setParameter(3, fileID);
result = q.executeUpdate();
em.getTransaction().commit();
I recommend to surrond your Writings to the DB with Transactions to get them persisted. Unless you commit requests may return results without the changes.
Ok, JTA does the Transactionmanagement.
Why are you doing this, when you are using JPA.
public int updateFileRecord(File1 file){
String title = file.getTitle();
String title_titleFriendly = file.getTitle_friendly();
int fileID = file.getFileId();
int result = 0;
Query q = this.em.createNativeQuery("UPDATE file1 set title = ?1, title_friendly = ?2 where file_id = ?3");
q.setParameter(1, title);
q.setParameter(2, title_titleFriendly);
q.setParameter(3, fileID);
result = q.executeUpdate();
return result;
}
This should work and update the internal State that comes with JPA
public int updateFileRecord(File1 file){
em.persist(file);
}
#daniel & #Tiny got me going on this one, thanks again guys.
I wanted to point out that I used the .merge() method out of the Entity Manager class.
It's important to note that for .merge() to UPDATE the record instead of INSERTing a new one; that the object you're submitting to .merge() must include all properties respective of the fields in the database table (that your DAO knows about) or you will INSERT new database records.
public void updateFileRecord(File1 file){
em.merge(file);
}
I'm working in report module, in order to do that I'm creating different stored procedures. I create the procedure with in parameters and then create a class to map the row (resultSet)
I think that's the best way to work arround performance and clarity.(what do you think about that?)
I'm using play framework and ebean orm (2.7.7)
I'm calling the store procedure and getting the resultSet, but I would like to use ebean in order to cast automaticly the row to model... other option is take the row-cell and cast it in a property but I'm trying to avoid it.
This is the current approach
Is this the best way to call an stored procedure?
Transaction tx = Ebean.beginTransaction();
String sql = "{CALL report(?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)}";
CallableStatement callableStatement = null;
try {
Connection dbConnection = tx.getConnection();
callableStatement = dbConnection.prepareCall(sql);
callableStatement.setInt(1, 3);
callableStatement.setInt(2, 5);
callableStatement.setInt(3, 2013);
callableStatement.setInt(4, 1);
callableStatement.setInt(5, 2014);
callableStatement.setInt(6, 5);
ResultSet rs = callableStatement.executeQuery(sql);
while (rs.next()) {
//HOW TO CONVER row -> model ?
}
Ebean.commitTransaction();
} catch (SQLException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}
I've discarded RawSQL and Query because received an error
RuntimeException: Error parsing sql, can not find SELECT keyword in: xxxxx
Also I found other option... using CallableSql
String sql = "{call sp_order_mod(?,?)}";
CallableSql cs = Ebean.createCallableSql(sql);
cs.setParameter(1, "turbo");
cs.registerOut(2, Types.INTEGER);
Ebean.execute(cs);
// read the out parameter
Integer returnValue = (Integer) cs.getObject(2);
but in this case I need to return a ResultSet not simply parameter.
I'm going to share my own solution.
I get a class called ResultSetUtils.(you can google it some implementation)
I added a generic method in order to return a typed list from resultset
public static <T> List<T> populateInList(Class<T> c, final ResultSet rs) {
List<T> listTyped = new ArrayList<T>();
try {
if (rs != null) {
while (rs.next()) {
T o = c.newInstance();
// MAGIC LINE
populate(o, rs);
listTyped.add(o);
}
rs.close();
}
} catch (final Exception e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
System.err.println(e.getMessage());
}
return listTyped;
}
This class to do the population use org.apache.commons.beanutils package
BeanUtils.populate(bean, propertiesRealName);
Using
private static void callingProcedureTest() {
Logger.debug("Init callingProcedureTest");
Transaction tx = Ebean.beginTransaction();
// String sql = "{CALL sp_report_test(3, 5, 2013, 1, 2014, 5)}";
String sql = "CALL sp_report_test(?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?);";
try {
Connection dbConnection = tx.getConnection();
CallableStatement callableStatement = dbConnection.prepareCall(sql);
callableStatement.setInt(1, 3);
callableStatement.setInt(2, 5);
callableStatement.setInt(3, 2013);
callableStatement.setInt(4, 1);
callableStatement.setInt(5, 2014);
callableStatement.setInt(6, 5);
Logger.debug("SQL > " + sql);
ResultSet rs = callableStatement.executeQuery();
Class<ReportTestResult> c = ReportTestResult.class;
//************** MAGIC LINE, converting ResultSet to Model
List<ReportTestResult> listResult = ResultSetUtils.populateInList(c, rs);
for (ReportTestResult item : listResult) {
Logger.debug("item.firstName> " + item.firstName);
Logger.debug("item.lastName > " + item.lastName);
Logger.debug("item.year > " + item.year);
}
Ebean.commitTransaction();
} catch (Exception e) {
Ebean.rollbackTransaction();
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}finally{
Ebean.endTransaction();
}
}
Plus about architecture and implementation
For each report I'm going to create:
a Result class (eg ReportTestResult)
intention: represent a row of report | simple DTO
a Param class (eg ReportTestParam),
intention: represent the parameters (inputs / ouputs), filters of the report
This class should implements
public interface ReportParam {
public int countParameteres();
public void setParametersInCallableStatement(CallableStatement callableStatement) throws SQLException;
}
a Report class (eg ReportTestReport) this class should extends ReportBase
intention: Knows the stored procedure's name, parameters and dto result
public class ReportTestReport extends ReportBase<ReportTestResult, ReportTestParam> {
#Override
protected String getProcedureName() {
return STORED_NAME;
}
}
many Adapters...
Each report could displayed in different charts, In this case I'm using HighCharts. Order to arrange it, I'm creating different adapters to do that.
EG:
class ReportTestHighChartsAdapter
intention: convert a list of ReportTestResult to series and configure different options of report (eg, title, xAxis etc)
public OptionsHC buildColumnReportV1(){
OptionsHC optionChart = new OptionsHC();
optionChart.chart = new ChartHC("column");
this.setTitle(optionChart);
optionChart.yAxis = new AxisHC(new TitleHC("Fruit eaten"));
.....
return optionChart;
}
OptionsHC is a class that represent option obj in the HighCharts framework.
The final step is converting OptionHC to Json and use it in JavaScript (common use of highCharts)
What's ReportBase?
ReportBase class has the strategy to implements the final called to DB, also manage the transaction
public class ReportTestReport extends ReportBase<ReportTestResult, ReportTestParam> {
...
protected List<TResult> execute(Class<TResult> classT) {
List<TResult> resultDTO = null;
CallableStatement callableStatement = null;
Logger.debug("Running procedure> " + this.getProcedureName());
Transaction tx = Ebean.beginTransaction();
String sql = ProcedureBuilder.build(this.getProcedureName(), this.countParameters());
Logger.debug("SQL > " + sql);
try {
Connection dbConnection = tx.getConnection();
callableStatement = dbConnection.prepareCall(sql);
this.getFilter().setParametersInCallableStatement(callableStatement);
ResultSet rs = callableStatement.executeQuery();
resultDTO = ResultSetUtils.populateInList(classT, rs);
Ebean.commitTransaction();
Logger.debug("commitTransaction > " + sql);
} catch (Exception e) {
Ebean.rollbackTransaction();
Logger.debug("rollbackTransaction > " + sql);
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}finally{
Ebean.endTransaction();
}
return resultDTO;
}
...
}
Currently the support for stored procedures in Ebean is not orientated to what you are trying to do. Hence you are not going to get much joy from using CallableSql or RawSql.
>> a class to map the row (resultSet) I think that's the best way to work around performance and clarity
Yes, I can understand your motivation.
>> How to convert ResultSet into model
Currently there is no good solution. The best solution would be to enhance RawSql so that you can set a ResultSet onto it. One of the things RawSql does is provide the mapping of resultSet columns to model properties and that is what Ebean needs internally. The enhancement/code change would be to be able to set a resultSet onto the RawSql object ... and get Ebean internally to skip the creation of the resultSet ( preparedStatement, binding parameters and executeQuery()). In terms of Ebean internals this is all done in the CQuery.prepareBindExecuteQueryWithOption() method. That is, if the RawSql has already provided a resultSet skip those things.
The big benefit of doing this rather than just rolling your own row -> model mapping code is that the resulting beans would all still have lazy loading / partial object knowledge etc. They would behave exactly like any other beans that Ebean builds as part of it query mechanism.
So that said, I'm personally away for a week ... so you aren't going to hear back from me until after that. If you want to get into it yourself then internally CQuery.prepareBindExecuteQueryWithOption() is the code you will need to modify.
If you have been following the ebean google group you'll know that but just in case you have not been note that the Model and Finder objects from Play have been incorporated into Ebean just in the last week. This helps both projects ... reduces confusion etc. The Ebean source in github master is at 4.0.4 and the bytecode enhancement in 4.x is different and I don't believe supported in Play.
I'm basically going offline for a week now so I'll look back into this after that.
Cheers, Rob.
The weird behavior is that a java.sql.Timestamp that I create using the System.currentTimeMillis() method, is stored in my MySQL database as 1970-01-01 01:00:00.
The two timestamps I am creating are to mark the beginning and end of a monitoring task I am trying to perform, what follows are excepts from the code where the behavior occurs
final long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
while(numberOfTimeStepsPassed < numTimeStep) {
/*
* Code in here
*/
}
final long endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
return mysqlConnection.insertDataInformation(matrixOfRawData, name,Long.toString(startTime),
Long.toString(endTime), Integer.toString(numTimeStep),
Integer.toString(matrixOfRawData[0].length), owner,
type);
And here is the code used for inserting the time stamps and other data into the MySQL database
public String insertDataInformation(final double [][] matrix,
final String ... params) {
getConnection(lookUpName);
String id = "";
PreparedStatement dataInformationInsert = null;
try {
dataInformationInsert =
databaseConnection.prepareStatement(DATA_INFORMATION_PREPARED_STATEMENT);
id = DatabaseUtils.createUniqueId();
int stepsMonitored = Integer.parseInt(params[STEPS_MONITORED]);
int numberOfMarkets = Integer.parseInt(params[NUMBER_OF_MARKETS]);
dataInformationInsert.setNString(ID_INDEX, id);
dataInformationInsert.setNString(NAME_INDEX, params[0]);
dataInformationInsert.setTimestamp(START_INDEX, new Timestamp(Long.parseLong(params[START_INDEX])));
dataInformationInsert.setTimestamp(END_INDEX, new Timestamp(Long.parseLong(params[END_INDEX])));
dataInformationInsert.setInt(STEPS_INDEX, stepsMonitored);
dataInformationInsert.setInt(MARKETS_INDEX, numberOfMarkets);
dataInformationInsert.setNString(OWNER_INDEX, params[OWNER]);
dataInformationInsert.setNString(TYPE_INDEX, params[TYPE]);
dataInformationInsert.executeUpdate();
insertRawMatrix(matrix, id, Integer.toString(stepsMonitored), Integer.toString(numberOfMarkets));
} catch (SQLException sqple) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
sqple.printStackTrace();
System.out.println(sqple.getSQLState());
} finally {
close(dataInformationInsert);
dataInformationInsert = null;
close(databaseConnection);
}
return id;
}
The important lines of code are :
dataInformationInsert.setTimestamp(START_INDEX, new Timestamp(Long.parseLong(params[START_INDEX])));
dataInformationInsert.setTimestamp(END_INDEX, new Timestamp(Long.parseLong(params[END_INDEX])));
The JavaDocs on the TimeStamp ( http://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/java/sql/Timestamp.html ) says that it takes in time in milliseconds since 1st January 1970 and a simple print test confirms this.
What I am looking for is:
A reason for this behavior when trying to store timestamps in a MySQL database through java.sql.Timestamp?
Any solutions to this behavior?
Any possible alternatives?
Any possible improvements?
EDIT:
Been asked to include what START_INDEX and END_INDEX are:
private static final int END_INDEX = 4;
private static final int START_INDEX = 3;
Apologises for not putting them in the original post.
Okay, look at your call:
insertDataInformation(matrixOfRawData, name, Long.toString(startTime),
Long.toString(endTime), Integer.toString(numTimeStep),
Integer.toString(matrixOfRawData[0].length), owner,
type);
So params will have values:
0: name
1: start time
2: end time
3: numTimeStep
4: matrixOfRowData[0].length
5: owner
6: type
Then you're doing:
dataInformationInsert.setTimestamp(START_INDEX,
new Timestamp(Long.parseLong(params[START_INDEX])));
... where START_INDEX is 3.
So you're using the value corresponding to numTimeStep as the value for the timestamp... I suspect you don't want to do that.
I would strongly advise you to create a simple object type (possibly a nested type in the same class) to let you pass these parameters in a strongly typed, simple to get right fashion. The string conversion and the access by index are both unwarranted, and can easily give rise to errors.
I have a form that returns me a List of FlatSessie objects
in my edit view I edit a few FlatSessie's and get them returned to my Post method in that List object.
In my DB I have Sessies, which I map using Automapper to FlatSessie's and back
now I can not get linq to make the update to the DB for me.
the code:
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Sessies(int id, int? modID, int? projID, string schooljaarparam, List<FlatSessie> sl) {
if (ModelState.IsValid) {
foreach (FlatSessie s in sl) { //i run over all FlatSessies which i get
Models.Sessies ses = Mapper.Map<FlatSessie, Sessies>(s); // i map them to the Sessies object
List<Sessies> origReeks = _db.Sessies.Where(p => p.Ses_ID == ses.Ses_ID).ToList(); //i get the original Session by ID. if there is a Session with that ID, if not (the ID will be 0) i do an Insert. if there is i want to do an Update.
if (origReeks.Count > 0) {
//it's an update
UpdateModel(origReeks.First(); //doesnt work
//_db.Sessies.Attach(ses, origReeks.First()); //doesnt work, gives me an error on used ID...
_db.SubmitChanges();
} else {
//no sessies yet, add them, this works.
_db.Sessies.InsertOnSubmit(ses);
_db.SubmitChanges();
}
}
TempData["okmsg"] = "De sessies zijn opgeslagen";
return RedirectToAction("Index");
}
//if not valid, i return the viewdata which i need.
Module m = _db.Modules.First(md => md.Mod_ID == modID.Value);
int antses = m.Mod_AantalSessies.Value;
List<List<SelectListItem>> lpllst = new List<List<SelectListItem>>(antses);
for (int i = 0; i < antses; i++) {
lpllst.Add(MvcApplication.lesplaatsList(schooljaarparam, -1));
}
ViewData["lesplist"] = lpllst;
ViewData["lglist"] = MvcApplication.lesgeverList();
return View(sl);
}
It might work to provide a prefix to UpdateModel (FlatSessie[n], where n is such that it matches the actual input name of the model element in question) so that it knows which properties to map onto the object, but because you are getting a list of these it might not. Have you tried updating the retrieved model using the data from the matching FlatSessie object directly?
Also, once you get this to work, you might want to do a single SubmitChanges for all inserts/updates (outside the loop) so that you get the entire submit wrapped in a single transaction. This will make it easier if there are errors to correct them and resubmit -- since you won't have some changes already committed causing further potential errors.