I have created a website using the Bulma CSS framework for the styling. I also used the Bulma Carousel for a text carousel. I used the column feature in Bulma to have a carousel on the left of an image/video. This was working perfectly on my screen, until I wrapped the images in a tag with the class "image is-16by9" Now, the images are below the carousel. In addition, when the browser get small enough or I'm on mobile, the images get huge.
The goal is to have the images below the carousel and be scaled correctly on smaller devices and be larger and next to the carousel on desktops, along with the carousel.
.slick-prev::before,
.slick-next::before {
color: black !important;
}
.carousel {
overflow: hidden;
}
<section data-aos="fade-up" id="rendering" class="hero is-fullheight child">
<div class="hero-body">
<div class="container">
<div class="content is-large">
<h3>Title Here</h3>
<div id="columns is-vcentered">
<div class="column is-7">
<div class="3dCarousel">
<div class="item-1">
Item 1
</div>
<div class="item-2">
Item 2
</div>
<div class="item-3">
Item 3
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="column">
<figure class="image is-16by9">
<img
src="./images/render.png"
alt="Render"
/>
</figure>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</section>
The code gets an okay result on desktop, expect the images don't scale and aren't next to the carousel. I've been playing around with different fixes for a while but they either mess something else up or don't work at all.
Try adding is-mobile and is-multiline to your columns class
Related
I have tried to copy my section in the webpage as it is but when I copied my HTML5 code one below the previous it gave me an error, Such that the image in the first is at left and the text to right and I want it reverse for second section.
<div id="showcase-container">
<div class="showcase1">
<div class="col-2">
<img class="showcase1pic" src="images/apple.jpeg">
</div>
<div class="col-2">
<div class="feature-text">
<h1 class="section-title">Yes, it even looks good on an iPhone</h1>
<p class="section-left">It is important to make sure that you are coding for responsive design.We want all of our work to function property on all devices. This is the awesome way</p>
</div>
</div> <!-- End of Feature Text -->
</div>
</div>
<div id="showcase-container">
<div class="showcase1">
<div class="col-2">
<img class="showcase1pic" src="images/apple.jpeg">
</div>
<div class="col-2">
<div class="feature-text">
<h1 class="section-title">Yes, it even looks good on an iPhone</h1>
<p class="section-left">It is important to make sure that you are coding for responsive design.We want all of our work to function property on all devices. This is the awesome way</p>
</div>
</div> <!-- End of Feature Text -->
</div>
</div>
This is the image i want to display consecutively below it
This is the output I am getting
I am working on a Bootstrap 3 grid (unfortunately, the CMS is not allowing me to use Bootstrap 4). At the moment I cannot link to the page, so maybe this question is too hard to answer.
Here is how the row containing 5 columns is looking in the CMS:
The max-width is 1200px.
The problem is that every time I add a column containing an image, the image height is not the same. In this example I set a height on 255px on all images, but the image in the first column is much taller than the others.
When I enter the code in a JSfiddle it is looking normal
See jsfiddle here
So it must be something in the CMS there is doing it? Is there some kind of clue what I could look after?
Best regards
/* Latest compiled and minified CSS included as External Resource*/
/* Optional theme */
#import url('//netdna.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.0.0/css/bootstrap-theme.min.css');
.padding-y {
padding: 20px;
background-color: #fff;
}
<link href="https://stackpath.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.0.0/css/bootstrap.min.css" rel="stylesheet" />
<div class="section padding-y">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-sm-4">
<img src="http://placehold.it/348x255">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="http://placehold.it/233x255">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="http://placehold.it/233x255">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="http://placehold.it/233x255">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="http://placehold.it/233x255">
</div>
</div>
</div>
Step 1. Let's reproduce the problem
We don't need the bootstrap-theme.min.css. This file uses for the decoration only. First of all wee need bootstrap.min.css.
The 3.0.0 version is too old. Let'use the 3.4.1. instead. It's the latest Bootstrap 3 version.
Bootstrap assumes the row is inside the container. Sometimes the CMS has its own containers, and then you can get by with them, but to reproduce the problem, we need the correct code with the container.
Looking at your screenshot, I dare to assume that something on your site adds the max-width: 100%; restriction to all images. This is a fairly common solution for different themes.
I removed the block with the section padding-y classes, because the problem was reproduced without it.
So we get an example of a code that reproduces your screenshot.
img {
max-width: 100%;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-sm-4">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/348x255/69c/fff">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/233x255/c69/fff">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/233x255/c69/fff">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/233x255/c69/fff">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/233x255/c69/fff">
</div>
</div>
</div>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.4.1/css/bootstrap.min.css">
Step 2. What's happened
4 small images are wider than their columns. With a total content width of 1200 pixels, a column in one sixth of the width is 200 pixels. In addition, each column also has a horizontal padding of 15 pixels. There are 170 pixels left for the 233-pixel wide image.
And something adds a limit for the maximum width of images. Because of this, these images become smaller and their height becomes smaller too.
Step 3. What can be done
Since we do not know your layouts for screens of different widths, I can only fantasize.
Suppose you want to put 5 pictures of different sizes in one line on the desktop so that their heights coincide.
Variant with backgrounds
For example you can replace the images with blocks and use the images as a background. Then the height can be set in the CSS, the gaps between the pictures will be the same, but the visible part of the pictures can decrease.
.image-box {
background-repeat: no-repeat;
height: 255px;
}
#media (min-width: 768px) {
.image-box {
background-position: center;
background-size: cover;
}
}
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-sm-4">
<div class="image-box" style="background-image:url(https://via.placeholder.com/348x255/69c/fff)"></div>
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<div class="image-box" style="background-image:url(https://via.placeholder.com/233x255/c69/fff)"></div>
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<div class="image-box" style="background-image:url(https://via.placeholder.com/233x255/c69/fff)"></div>
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<div class="image-box" style="background-image:url(https://via.placeholder.com/233x255/c69/fff)"></div>
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<div class="image-box" style="background-image:url(https://via.placeholder.com/233x255/c69/fff)"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.4.1/css/bootstrap.min.css">
Variant with flexbox
You can also make Bootstrap 3 columns behave like a flexbox. This solution is suitable if the sizes of the images are known in advance and you can calculate which part of the row each of them occupies.
In the comments you have wrote that you wish to stretch the images on mobile. So I use this info in the new solution.
.row-of-images img {
width: 100%;
}
#media (min-width: 768px) {
.row-of-images {
display: flex;
}
.row-of-images > div {
box-sizing: content-box;
/* images will be resized taking into account the padding of the columns */
flex: 1 1 18.203125%;
/* 18.203125% = 100% * 255px / (348px + 4 * 255px) */
}
.row-of-images > div:first-child {
flex-basis: 27.1875%;
/* 27.1875% = 100% * 348px / (348px + 4 * 255px) */
}
}
<div class="container">
<div class="row row-of-images">
<div class="col-xs-12">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/348x255/69c/fff">
</div>
<div class="col-xs-12">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/233x255/c69/fff">
</div>
<div class="col-xs-12">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/233x255/c69/fff">
</div>
<div class="col-xs-12">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/233x255/c69/fff">
</div>
<div class="col-xs-12">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/233x255/c69/fff">
</div>
</div>
</div>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.4.1/css/bootstrap.min.css">
The reason the images are different heights on the problem page "(domain) dot com slash da-dk/page/sbp" (but not in the posted source above) is because the images on the problem page have the .img-responsive class:
<div class="row">
<div class="col-sm-4">
<img src="http://placehold.it/348x255" class="img-responsive">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="http://placehold.it/233x255" class="img-responsive">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="http://placehold.it/233x255" class="img-responsive">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="http://placehold.it/233x255" class="img-responsive">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="http://placehold.it/233x255" class="img-responsive">
</div>
</div>
From the Bootstrap 3.3 documentation, .img-responsive applies:
max-width: 100%;, height: auto; and display: block; to the image so that it scales nicely to the parent element.
The first image is scaling to the width of the first column, which is col-sm-4. The other images are scaling to the width of a col-sm-2 column. So it's clear why the images are different height.
The simplest fix is to remove .img-responsive from all the images.
But if you want to keep the images responsive, you'll need to adjust the image aspect ratios so the wider and narrow images end up the same height.
Example with the aspect ratios adjusted:
<link href="https://stackpath.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.0.0/css/bootstrap.min.css" rel="stylesheet"/>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-sm-4">
<img src="http://placehold.it/348x255" class="img-responsive">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="http://placehold.it/153x255" class="img-responsive">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="http://placehold.it/153x255" class="img-responsive">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="http://placehold.it/153x255" class="img-responsive">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="http://placehold.it/153x255" class="img-responsive">
</div>
</div>
I have 2 different partial views that I am calling in my main view like this:
<div class="col-md-6">
#Html.Action("Chart", "Teams")
</div>
<div class="col-md-6">
#Html.Action("SeriesWinsChart", "Teams")
</div>
<div class="next-game">
<h3 class="text-center">The Next Game Is:</h3>
</div>
<br />
<div class="text-center">
<h3 style="color:red;">#ViewBag.NextGame</h3>
</div>
Now my problem is this:
All I have done is put background-color: green in my CSS for the class .next-game (honestly just to see what it looked like.. green is not what I am going to use)... I have gone into Inspect Element on IE and I cannot find the problem as to why the background is so big. I just want the background to be around The Next Game Is:
CSS:
.next-game{
background-color: green;
}
How do I shrink the background? I have tried width: 50%; height: 10px; //etc just to see the different changes but can't figure this out
UPDATE:
I have changed the HTML to:
<div class="next-game">
<h3 class="text-center">The Next Game Is:</h3>
<div class="text-center">
<h3 style="color:red;">#ViewBag.NextGame</h3>
</div>
</div>
<div class="col-md-6">
#Html.Action("Chart", "Teams")
</div>
<div class="col-md-6">
#Html.Action("SeriesWinsChart", "Teams")
</div>
This at least made the background render properly. So this has something to do with the partial views?
The most likely cause for this issue is that your twitter bootstrap columns have no wrapping row. You generally need all three (container, row, column) for it to render properly. What you're running into here is probably a clearfix issue. The columns are floated, which makes the next available non-floating element appear to "wrap" them. Below is a possible solution to the problem.
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-6">
#Html.Action("Chart", "Teams")
</div>
<div class="col-md-6">
#Html.Action("SeriesWinsChart", "Teams")
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="next-game">
<h3 class="text-center">The Next Game Is:</h3>
</div>
<br />
<div class="text-center">
<h3 style="color:red;">#ViewBag.NextGame</h3>
</div>
Other solutions include adding a .clearfix class to a wrapper for the columns or adding clear:both to .next-game.
You need
.next-game h3{
background-color: green;
}
(it's just for the header h3 inside the element with that class .next-game)
I am trying to use the Enigma theme on my WP site.
It allows you to add a logo about 200px wide which works with the responsiveness of the site.
However, I want to upload a much wider image, which then resizes as the screen gets smaller.
I added a class to the image file and tried to target it with css
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
I am familiar with media queries but nothing I do is working.
Here is the theme, this is an example site, not the real site I am working on but it presents the same problem.
http://bestgirlsonearth.com
I've erased my work on it just to show the theme as is.
Due to fluid-system-column of bootstrap your image is located in a 6col "col-md-6" and by definition that class can't take more space or less than her parents middle weight (here row)
I'm not a user of Twitter Bootstrap but i think you should change in your header.php to have two rows and your full-sized img :
<div class="row ">
<div class="col-md-6 col-sm-12">
<div class="logo">
<a href="http://bestgirlsonearth.com/" title="Best Girls on Earth" rel="home">
<img src="http://bestgirlsonearth.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/bgeheader3.png" style="height:182px; width:1023px;">
</a>
<p>The finest women on the planet</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="col-md-6 col-sm-12">
<ul class="head-contact-info">
//you contact info
</ul>
</div>
</div>
by this :
<div class="row ">
<div class="col-md-12 col-sm-12">
<div class="logo">
<a href="http://bestgirlsonearth.com/" title="Best Girls on Earth" rel="home">
<img src="http://bestgirlsonearth.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/bgeheader3.png" style="/* height:182px; */ /* width:1023px; */"></a>
<p>The finest women on the planet</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12 col-sm-12">
<ul class="head-contact-info">
// Your contact infos
</ul>
</div>
</div>
cheers,
I have this template that I use to display product in a "grid" layout:
<div id="cols3-top"></div>
<div id="cols3" class="box" data-field="products">
<div data-field="product" class="col">
<h3>Sample Product</h3>
<p class="nom t-center"><img src="tmp/200x140.gif" alt="" data-field="imageurl"/></p>
<div class="col-text">
<p data-field="content">Product information</p>
<ul data-field="features" class="ul-01"></ul>
</div> <!-- /col-text -->
<div class="col-more"><a href="#">
<img src="design/cols3-more.gif" alt="" data-field="morebutton"/></a>
</div>
</div>
</div> <!-- /cols3 -->
<div id="cols3-bottom"></div>
However this is not optimized, since inf the image img size is not the same it would break the "grid" layout. How to optimize this layout such that it would "auto-crop" images to specific width and height?
Make sure your images don't get larger than the cols they are in. For example:
#cols3 img{
width:300px; /* width of #cols3 */
height:auto;
}
Most probably you can also use 100% instead of 300px