Grid align horizontal center is not works - html

.parent{
border:1px solid red;
display:grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(12, 1fr);
}
.child{
background:green;
align-self:center;
}
<div class="parent">
<div class="child" style="justify-self: center;">
I am child
</div>
</div>
I am looking a solution to let child should align itself to center. so i can create a class name for left, right, and center will use across.

What's happening here for you is automatic grid placement. Technically speaking the item is aligned to the center inside the first column you created. The problem is that it ends up all the way on the left because that's where your first column actually is.
There's a few ways you can approach this if you want to continue using CSS Grid for this layout concept. But the problem with a 12 col grid is that there won't be a "center" without some offsetting or transforms.
I recommend you use the following if you really only need one row with 3 possible placements. It's a 13 col grid with a defined height of a single row, this ensures if the items are being shuffled out of order (if left is second like my example) that they won't jump to a second implied row.
.parent{
border:1px solid red;
display:grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(13, 1fr);
grid-template-rows: 60px;
}
.center{
background:green;
grid-column: 7/8;
grid-row: 1/2;
}
.left {
background: red;
grid-column: 1/2;
grid-row: 1/2;
}
.right {
background: blue;
grid-column: 13/14;
grid-row: 1/2;
}
<div class="parent">
<div class="center">
I am child
</div>
<div class="left">
Me too
</div>
<div class="right">
Also me
</div>
</div>
Edit: You can also use flexbox and drop some of the complexity and get better responsiveness by using the order property and justifying the content as space-between.
.parent {
border: 1px solid red;
display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.center {
background: green;
order: 2
}
.left {
background: red;
order: 1
}
.right {
background: blue;
order: 3
}
<div class="parent">
<div class="center">
I am child
</div>
<div class="left">
Me too
</div>
<div class="right">
Also me
</div>
</div>

Here is an optimized version with flexible values that can work with any number of columns.
I will consider CSS variables to easily adjust the template and the center element. For the left and right we only need 1 and -1
.parent{
--n:6;
display:grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(calc(2*var(--n)), 1fr);
grid-auto-flow:dense;
margin:5px;
outline:1px solid;
}
.left{
grid-column-start:1;
}
.right{
grid-column-end:-1;
text-align:right;
}
.center {
grid-column:calc(var(--n))/span 2;
text-align:center;
}
.parent > * {
border:1px solid red;
}
<div class="parent">
<div class="left">
left
</div>
<div class="right">
right
</div>
<div class="center">
center
</div>
</div>
<div class="parent" style="--n:3">
<div class="left">
left
</div>
<div class="right">
right
</div>
<div class="center">
center
</div>
</div>
<div class="parent" style="--n:10">
<div class="left">
left
</div>
<div class="right">
right
</div>
<div class="center">
center
</div>
</div>

.parent {
border: 1px solid red;
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(1, 1fr);
}

Related

How to have a grid in CSS with columns of different sizes? [duplicate]

I tried to achieve the masonry style using css with the column layout like the markup below.
I want to know if it's possible to make the .green one to take two columns instead of one?
Thank you in advance!
.parent{
column-gap: 1rem;
column-count: 2;
}
.element{
display:inline-block;
background:red;
width:100%;
height:100px;
}
.green{
background:green;
}
<div class="parent">
<div class="element green">
</div>
<div class="element">
</div>
<div class="element">
</div>
<div class="element">
</div>
</div>
With CSS grid you can use grid-column: span 2:
.wrapper {
display: grid;
grid-gap: 0.5rem;
grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr 1fr;
grid-auto-flow: dense;
padding: 0.5rem;
}
.box {
background-color: lightblue;
padding: 0.5rem;
}
.a,
.d,
.e,
.f {
background-color: lightcoral;
grid-column: span 2; /* <-- here is the trick */
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="box a">A</div>
<div class="box b">B</div>
<div class="box c">C</div>
<div class="box d">D</div>
<div class="box e">E</div>
<div class="box f">F</div>
<div class="box g">G</div>
<div class="box h">H</div>
</div>
Learn more about it here: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/grid-column
Regarding masonry style: At the time of writing, Level 3 of the CSS Grid Layout specification includes a masonry value for grid-template-columns and grid-template-rows layout, though browser support is pretty non-existent: https://caniuse.com/?search=masonry
Learn about it here: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/CSS_Grid_Layout/Masonry_Layout
So instead I used grid-auto-flow: dense; on the grid, which makes grid item G come before grid item F. It's not really masonry style (placing elements in optimal position based on available vertical space), but it comes close by making the grid dense filling up all available horizontal space with the next grid item that fits that space.
"dense" packing algorithm attempts to fill in holes earlier in the grid
Learn about it here: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/grid-auto-flow
Oh, if you are new to CSS grid, I recommend watching Wes Bos' talk “CSS Grid in 45 Minutes!”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCZdCKjnBCs
CSS Grid layout provides a simple, easy and efficient solution.
.parent {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr;
grid-auto-rows: 100px;
grid-gap: 1rem;
}
.element.green {
grid-column: 1 / -1;
background: green;
}
.element {
background: red;
}
<div class="parent">
<div class="element green"></div>
<div class="element"></div>
<div class="element"></div>
<div class="element"></div>
</div>
More information:
Make a grid column span the entire row
CSS-only masonry layout
I would say, no you can't make the single .green element take up two columns, becuase you are specifically telling the browser to use two columns. If you need it to span the two columns, then I would suggest using a separate element. Perhaps a more suitable solution for this would be to use the CSS grid layout. The snippet below contains an example of both of these solutions:
.parent {
column-gap: 1rem;
column-count: 2;
}
.element {
display: inline-block;
background: red;
width: 100%;
height: 100px;
}
.green {
background: green;
width: 100%;
height: 100px;
margin-bottom: 1rem;
}
.grid-container {
margin-top: 20px;
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: auto auto;
grid-gap: 1rem;
}
.greenGrid {
background: green;
height: 100px;
grid-column-start: 1;
grid-column-end: 3;
}
.redGrid {
background: red;
height: 100px;
}
<div class="green">
</div>
<div class="parent">
<div class="element">
</div>
<div class="element">
</div>
<div class="element">
</div>
</div>
<div class='grid-container'>
<div class='greenGrid'></div>
<div class='redGrid'></div>
<div class='redGrid'></div>
<div class='redGrid'></div>
</div>

Flex positioning of sidebar when in particular order

I have a simple 2-column layout with 3 sections. Depending on a media query, I want to change the order of them - for this I am using flex order.
This works fine, except I get my narrow sidebar section starting at the end of the first section, or similar to this. Is there a way I can get them to position more like jigsaw pieces?
Fiddle example of issue:
https://jsfiddle.net/an7m3yvs/
HTML:
<div class="page-wrapper">
<div class="container">
<div class="box1">
BOX 1
</div>
<div class="box2">
BOX 2
</div>
<div class="box3">
BOX 3 Sidebar
</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.page-wrapper{
width:100%;
max-width:500px;
margin:0 auto;
}
.container{
display:flex;
flex-wrap:wrap;
}
.box1{
display:inline-block;
background:red;
width:70%;
height:400px;
order:1;
}
.box2{
display:inline-block;
background:green;
width:70%;
height:150px;
order:2;
}
.box3{
display:inline-block;
background:grey;
width:30%;
height:600px;
order:3;
}
How I want it:
(I know this can be done simpler but the idea is so I can change the order with a media query, as in mobile I want a single column and them in a different order.)
GRID ATTEMPT: https://jsfiddle.net/w489b2fj/
The 3rd element is not positioned according to the first element but to its predecessor. The sidebar will occupy the remaining space after the 2nd element and not the 1st.
To achieve the desired result, I think it is better to manage 2 flexbox containers. The first includes box1 and box2. The second includes box container and the sidebar.
Edit HTML:
<div class="page-wrapper">
<div class="container">
<div class="content-wrapper">
<div class="box1">
BOX 1
</div>
<div class="box2">
BOX 2
</div>
</div>
<div class="box3">
BOX 3 Sidebar
</div>
</div>
</div>
And edit the CSS:
.container, .content-wrapper{
display:flex;
flex-wrap:wrap;
}
.content-wrapper {
width: 70%;
}
.box1, .box2 {
width: 100%;
}
EDIT:
Ok, with this new information I have another solution:
.container {
position: relative;
}
.box3 {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
right: 0;
}
You can achieve that by adding flex-direction: column; to the container. But in this case (in order to wrap the items) you also need to set a fixed height, in your case height: 550px;.
And actually, you don't need the order settings for the flex items in this simple case...
.page-wrapper {
width: 100%;
max-width: 500px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
.container {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
flex-direction: column;
height: 550px;
}
.box1 {
display: inline-block;
background: red;
width: 70%;
height: 400px;
order: 1;
}
.box2 {
display: inline-block;
background: green;
width: 70%;
height: 150px;
order: 2;
}
.box3 {
display: inline-block;
background: grey;
width: 30%;
height: 600px;
order: 3;
}
<div class="page-wrapper">
<div class="container">
<div class="box1">
BOX 1
</div>
<div class="box2">
BOX 2
</div>
<div class="box3">
BOX 3 Sidebar
</div>
</div>
</div>
You wanted an answer using CSS Grid, where box3 places inbetween box1 and box2 in mobile viewports. Here you are:
.container{
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 1fr;
grid-template-rows: 1fr 1fr 1fr;
grid-template-areas:
"box1"
"box3"
"box2"
}
#media (min-width:768px){
.container{
display:grid;
grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr;
grid-template-rows: 1fr 1fr;
grid-template-areas:
"box1 box3"
"box2 box3"
}
}
.box1{
grid-area: box1;
background-color: #f00;
}
.box2{
grid-area: box2;
background-color: #0f0;
}
.box3{
grid-area: box3;
background-color: #00f;
}
<div class="page-wrapper">
<div class="container">
<div class="box1">
BOX 1
</div>
<div class="box2">
BOX 2
</div>
<div class="box3">
BOX 3 Sidebar
</div>
</div>
</div>
Try using position property and place the boxes relative to page wrapper.
if you can change HTML ( and always make good structure ) try this:
do the flex on c1 and c2 elements and you simply remove all inline-block instructions
<div class="page-wrapper">
<div class="container">
<div class=c1>
<div class="box1">
BOX 1
</div>
<div class="box2">
BOX 2
</div>
</div>
<div class=c2>
<div class="box3">
BOX 3 Sidebar
</div>
</div>
</div>
And css:
.page-wrapper{
width:100%;
max-width:500px;
margin:0 auto;
}
.container{
display:flex;
}
.box1{
background:red;
height:200px;
order:2;
}
.box2{
background:green;
height:150px;
order:1;
}
.box3{
background:grey;
width:100%;
height:400px;
}
.c2{
width:30%;
flex-basis:1;
}
.c1{
display:flex;
flex-direction:column;
width:70%;
flex-basis:1;
}

How can i place two divs side by side and a third div aligning with the second

I have two divs (div1 and div2) side by side and I would like to place a third div (div3) under div2.
I've tried adding a margin to div3 to try and line it up, but div1 width is dynamic. I've also tried floating div3 to the right but then the content is too far and doesn't line up with the start of div2 like in the image above
.row {
display: flex;
}
.div1 {
margin-right: 1em;
}
<div class="row">
<div class="div1">
<p> some content with unknown width</p>
</div>
<div class="div2">
<p> some content </p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<p> some content that should be under div2 </p>
</div>
The default behaviour is div3 being under div1. I am trying to put div3 below div 2
You can do this with below:
.wrapper {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
justify-content: flex-end;
}
.div {
flex-basis: 50%;
min-height: 100px;
}
.div1 {
background: red;
}
.div2 {
background: blue;
}
.div3 {
background: aqua;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="div div1">div1</div>
<div class="div div2">div2</div>
<div class="div div3">div3</div>
</div>
And here is a codepan
Use float and inline-block:
[class*="div"] {
display:inline-block;
border:2px solid;
}
.div1 {
float:left;
margin-right: 1em;
margin-bottom:10px; /*mandatory margin to push the div3*/
}
<div class="row">
<div class="div1">
<p> some content with unknown width</p>
</div>
<div class="div2">
<p> some content </p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<p> some content that should be under div2 </p>
</div>
You can make use of the CSS Grid structure. In this way you can have all child elements inside a single parent container.
.row {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(2, 1fr);
grid-template-rows: repeat(2, 1fr);
grid-column-gap: 5px;
grid-row-gap: 5px;
}
.div1 {
grid-area: 1 / 1 / 2 / 2;
}
.div2 {
grid-area: 1 / 2 / 2 / 3;
}
.div3 {
grid-area: 2 / 2 / 3 / 3;
}
/* Snippet styling */
.row > div {
background: #6A67CE;
color: white;
text-align: center;
text-transform: capitalize;
font-family: sans-serif;
}
<div class="row">
<div class="div1">
<p> some content with unknown width</p>
</div>
<div class="div2">
<p> some content </p>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<p> some content under div2 </p>
</div>
</div>
Here is a flex solution, you can use the slider to change the width of the left box to see that the width doesn't matter.
In case you are not familiar with flex, here is what happens.
display: flex; tells the container to act as a flex container, flex is just another display behavior just like float.
flex-flow: row wrap;, now that the container is flex, tells the children to display in a row, and wrap if necessary, not in this case.
That is all, after adding two boxes in the right div, and set some demo width and height, we are done.
window.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', e => {
let left = document.querySelector('.left')
let range = document.querySelector('.range')
range.addEventListener('input', e => {
left.style.width = e.target.value + 'px'
})
})
div {
border: 3px solid green;
}
.container,
.right {
border: none;
}
.container {
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
}
.left,
.one,
.two {
min-width: 50px;
min-height: 50px;
}
.left {
margin-right: 1em;
}
.one {
min-width: 80px;
}
.two {
margin-top: 1em;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="left"></div>
<div class="right">
<div class="one"></div>
<div class="two"></div>
</div>
</div>
<input class="range" type="range" min="50" max="300"></input>
Since div do not share the same parent , you could use display:contents and set a grid-layout one level upper , unfortunately, display:contents is not yet supported every where .
here is an example (body is the wrapper and .row not seen anymore)
body {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: auto 1fr;
grid-gap: 10px;
}
.row {
display: contents;
/* removed from the tree */
}
div {
border: solid;
/* show me */
grid-column: 2;
/* make it the defaut column position */
width: max-content;
}
.div1 {
grid-column: 1;
/*a single reset enough here */
}
#supports (display:grid) {
.disclaimer {
display: none;
}
}
<div class="row">
<div class="div1">
<p> some content with unknown width</p>
</div>
<div class="div2">
<p> some content </p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<p> some content that should be under div2 </p>
</div>
<p class="disclaimer">Your browser do not support <code>display:contents</code>.</p>
Another possibility is the table-layout algorythm
example with display:table (widely supported) , but every cell of each columns are of the same width.
body {
display: table;
border-spacing: 10px;
}
.div3,
.row {
display: table-row;
}
.row>div,
.div3>p,
.div3::before {
display: table-cell;
border: solid;
}
.div3::before {/* it stands in column 1 */
content: '';
border: none;
}
<div class="row">
<div class="div1">
<p> some content with unknown width</p>
</div>
<div class="div2">
<p> some content </p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<p> some content that should be under div2 </p>
</div>
Nothing is perfect ;)
hi i coded this if that helps
.first-container {
display: flex;
flex-direction: row;
}
.first-container div{
margin: 10px;
}
.container {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="first-container">
<div class="first">first</div>
<div class="second">second</div>
</div>
<div class="third">third</div>
</div>

How to place content below a position absolute item without affect div changes

I have html div like
div A
div B
Div D
div c
Div E
i want structure like
div A Div C
div B div D
Div E
i did for
.c {
top: 0;
right: 220px;
position: absolute;
}
now div c is in top,Next i want Div D
.d {
top: 566px;
position: absolute;
right: 291px;
}
i can adjust this but problem is that when i extend content from Div c it will overlap to div D?How can i move Div D under Div C?please help
Here is my code
<div>
<ul>
<li>
<h3>Our Team</h3>
</li>
<li>a</li>
<li>b</li>
<li>c</li>
<li>d</li>
<li style="top:20px; position:absolute; right:120px">e</li>
<li style="top:20px; position:absolute; right:120px">f</li>
</ul>
</div>
You Can use CSS Grid Instead:
Complete Grid Guide
First Define your Grid Template Areas:
grid-template-areas: "i1 i3" ". ." "i2 i4" "i5 .";
grid-template-rows: repeat(4,1fr);
grid-template-areas: Defines a grid template by referencing the names of the grid areas which are specified with the grid-area property
each "" refer to row.
For example: first row have two columns:
1- i1 takes 1 of 2 from the first row.
2- i2 takes 1 of 2 from the first row.
grid-template-rows: repeat(4,1fr): will make sure that all rows have same height (even empty ones).
To apply this area to div:
1- Define the div in html:
<div class="item i1">Div A</div>
2- add to css:
.i1 { grid-area: i1}
and so on.
Working Demo:
.grid {
display: grid;
grid-template-areas: "i1 i3" ". ." "i2 i4" "i5 .";
grid-template-rows: repeat(4, 1fr);
grid-gap: 10px;
margin: 25px;
}
.i1 {
grid-area: i1
}
.i2 {
grid-area: i2
}
.i3 {
grid-area: i3
}
.i4 {
grid-area: i4
}
.i5 {
grid-area: i5
}
.item {
min-height: 50px;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
border: 1px solid black;
}
<div class="grid">
<div class="item i1">Div A</div>
<div class="item i2">Div B</div>
<div class="item i3">Div C</div>
<div class="item i4">Div D</div>
<div class="item i5">Div E</div>
</div>
You can use columns are rows to create that layout
Demo:
.column {
float: left;
width: 50%;
}
/* Clear floats after the columns */
.row:after {
content: "";
display: table;
clear: both;
}
<div class="row">
<div class="column">
<div class="a">div a</div>
</div>
<div class="column">
<div class="c">div c</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="column">
<div class="b">div b</div>
</div>
<div class="column">
<div class="d">div d</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="column">
<div class="e">div e</div>
</div>
</div>
You can use CSS Grids if you just want to adjust the content
[Updated]I was warned that you want a specific position so I made the changes that can solve the problem
main{max-width: 1170px; margin:0 auto; background:#f8f8f8; min-height:100vh;}
.grid-div div { border:1px solid #ccc; background: #f0f0f0; min-height:150px; }
.grid-div {
display:grid;
grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr;
grid-gap:20px;
}
.a{grid-column: 1; grid-row: 1; }
.b{grid-column: 1; grid-row: 2; margin-top:60px; }
.c{grid-column: 2; grid-row: 1; }
.d{grid-column: 2; grid-row: 2; margin-top:60px; }
.e{grid-column: 1; grid-row: 3; }
.f{grid-column: 2; grid-row: 3; }
<DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>Grid Test</title>
</head>
<body>
<main>
<div class="grid-div">
<div class='a'>A</div>
<div class='b'>B</div>
<div class='c'>C</div>
<div class='d'>D</div>
<div class='e'>E</div>
<div class='f'>F</div>
</div>
</main>
</body>
<html>
if you want to check more options to use in grid see here https://www.w3schools.com/css/css_grid.asp

How to prevent grid-row span from changing column placement?

I have a 3 X 3 CSS Grid.
I have a row in which I have three items A, B & C.
I want item C to have a rowspan of 2.
To do so, I am using grid-row: 1 / span 2;. It is taking two rows, but it's being placed in the first column instead of simply lying in the 3rd column. I don't know why this is happening.
I want item C to stay at the place where it is in the HTML.
One work around to this problem is to explicitly setting grid-column: 3 / span 1 which I don't want to do. I want items to be placed the way they are in HTML.
Is there any way to suppress this behavior?
.grid-container {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(3, 1fr);
grid-template-rows: repeat(3, 1fr);
}
h1 {
border: 2px solid;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
font-size: 20px;
}
.a {
grid-row: 1 / span 2;
background: orange;
}
<div class="grid-container">
<div>
<h1>A</h1>
</div>
<div>
<h1>B</h1>
</div>
<div class="a">
<h1>C</h1>
</div>
</div>
Another way of solving it (That points to the reason why is stating a row for the other items):
.grid-container {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(3, 1fr);
grid-template-rows: repeat(3, 1fr);
}
h1 {
border: 2px solid;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
font-size: 20px;
}
.a {
grid-row: 1 / span 2;
background: orange;
}
.b {
grid-row: 1;
}
<div class="grid-container">
<div class="b">
<h1>A</h1>
</div>
<div class="b">
<h1>B</h1>
</div>
<div class="a">
<h1>C</h1>
</div>
</div>
And the reason of this behaviour is that the more restrictive elements get positioned first. This way, the possibilities of the grid algorithm to achieve a solution are bigger.
That is, an element that has a requirement will be positioned first, elements that don't have a requirement last.
Steps 2 (for a item) and 4 (for the remaining items) in this part of the spec
If only one gets stock to a row number it will come first and stick there ahead in the flow. To avoid this, other grid items needs to be set to a defaut row as well.
.grid-container {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(3, 1fr);
grid-template-rows: repeat(3, 1fr);
}
div {
grid-row: 1;/* here is the basic fix but will set each item on first row */
}
h1 {
border: 2px solid;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
font-size: 20px;
}
.a {
grid-row: 1 / span 2;
background: orange;
}
<div class="grid-container">
<div>
<h1>A</h1>
</div>
<div>
<h1>B</h1>
</div>
<div class="a">
<h1>C</h1>
</div>
</div>
Else you need also to tell in which grid-column it should stand
.a {
grid-row: 1 / span 2;
grid-column:3;
background: orange;
}
.grid-container {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(3, 1fr);
grid-template-rows: repeat(3, 1fr);
}
h1 {
border: 2px solid;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
font-size: 20px;
}
.a {
grid-row: 1 / span 2;
grid-column:3;
background: orange;
}
<div class="grid-container">
<div>
<h1>A</h1>
</div>
<div>
<h1>B</h1>
</div>
<div class="a">
<h1>C</h1>
</div>
</div>
or let auto placement do its job while only setting how many rows to span, wich is here, in my own opinion, the most flexible way with a minimum of css rules/selector to set, too much grid kills grid :) , make it simple :
.a {
grid-row: span 2;
background: orange;
}
snippet with a few example letting the .aclass do its job without setting the column nor the row number where to stand, it will just be spanning where it stans in the flow
.grid-container {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(3, 1fr);
grid-template-rows: repeat(3, 1fr);
}
h1 {
border: 2px solid;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
font-size: 20px;
}
.a {
grid-row: span 2;
background: orange;
}
<div class="grid-container">
<div>
<h1>A</h1>
</div>
<div>
<h1>B</h1>
</div>
<div class="a">
<h1>C</h1>
</div>
</div>
<div class="grid-container">
<div>
<h1>A</h1>
</div>
<div class="a">
<h1>B</h1>
</div>
<div>
<h1>C</h1>
</div>
</div>
<div class="grid-container">
<div>
<h1>A</h1>
</div>
<div>
<h1>B</h1>
</div>
<div>
<h1>C</h1>
</div>
<div>
<h1>D</h1>
</div>
<div>
<h1>E</h1>
</div>
<div class="a">
<h1>F</h1>
</div>
<div>
<h1>G</h1>
</div>
<div>
<h1>H</h1>
</div>
</div>
<hr/>
<div class="grid-container">
<div>
<h1>A</h1>
</div>
<div>
<h1>B</h1>
</div>
<div class="a">
<h1>C</h1>
</div>
<div>
<h1>D</h1>
</div>
<div>
<h1>E</h1>
</div>
<div>
<h1>F</h1>
</div>
<div>
<h1>G</h1>
</div>
<div>
<h1>H</h1>
</div>
</div>
Clearly, there's something in the spec that causes this behavior. I'm not yet sure what it is. (Update: see #Vals' answer for an explanation.)
However, here's a valid and simple solution:
Instead of:
.a {
grid-row: 1 / span 2;
}
Use:
.a {
grid-row-end: span 2;
}
From the spec:
9.3. Line-based Placement: the grid-row-start,
grid-column-start, grid-row-end, and grid-column-end
properties
The grid-row-start, grid-column-start, grid-row-end, and
grid-column-end properties determine a grid item’s size and location
within the grid by contributing a line, a span, or nothing (automatic)
to its grid placement, thereby specifying the inline-start,
block-start, inline-end, and block-end edges of its grid area.
...
For example, grid-column-end: span 2 indicates the second grid line
in the endward direction from the grid-column-start line.
Also, consider this single rule that gives you full control and makes it all work:
.a {
grid-area: 1 / 3 / 3 / 4;
}
jsFiddle
The grid-area shorthand property parses values in this order:
grid-row-start
grid-column-start
grid-row-end
grid-column-end
Note the counter-clockwise direction, which is the opposite of margin and padding.