I've been struggling to build a query that calculate the sum of column called 'TIDAL_VOLUME' with respect to date value that's coming from another table.
Please see the content of the Table_1:
Please see the content of the Table_2:
Note: TIDAL_VOLUME might have NULL as well.
Now, the start time for O2_Device value 'Endotracheal tube' is '2013-08-06 08:10:05' for same HADM_ID and SUBJECT_ID. and end time is whenever new O2_Device value comes in. In this case which is 'Nasal cannula'. Which means start time for 'Endotracheal tube' is '2013-08-06 08:10:05' and end time is '2013-08-06 10:15:05' for HADM_ID = 1 and SUBJECT_ID = 100.
Using that start time and end time criteria, I have to look for TIDAL_VALUE in Table_2. In this example it's 700, 800. Ans for TIDAL_VOLUME is 1500.
Please see the resultant output look like this:
Thanks in advance.
If you can add End_Time to the first table, you can use BETWEEN when you join the tables.
SELECT t1.HADM_ID, t1.Subject_ID, t1.ChartTime, SUM(t2.tidal_volume) AS tidal_volume
FROM Table_1 AS t1
JOIN Table_2 AS t2
ON t1.HADM_ID = t2.HADM_ID
AND t1.Subject_ID = t2.Subject_ID
AND t2.ChartTime BETWEEN t1.ChartTime AND t1.End_Time
GROUP BY t1.HADM_ID, t1.Subject_ID, t1.ChartTime
Related
I've got a machine log available in an SQL table. I can do a bit in SQL, but I'm not good enough to process the following:
In the data column there are entries containing "RUNPGM: Recipe name" and "RUNBRKPGM: Recipe name"
What I want is a view containing 4 columns:
TimeStamp RUNPGM
TimeStamp RUNBRKPGM
Recipe Name
Time Difference in seconds
There is a bit of a catch:
Sometimes the machine logs an empty RUNBRKPGM that should be ignored
The RUNBRKPGM is sometimes logged with an error message. This entry should also be ignored.
It's always the RUNBRKPGM entry with just the recipe name that's the actual end of the recipe.
NOTE: I understand this is not a full/complete answer, but with info available in question as of now, I believe it at least helps give a starting point since this is too complicated (and formatted) to put in the comments:
If Recipe is everything in the DATA field except the 'RUNPGM = ' part you can do somethign similar to this:
SELECT
-- will give you a col for TimeStamp for records with RUNPGM
CASE WHEN DATA LIKE 'RUNPGM%' THEN TS ELSE '' END AS RUNPGM_TimeStamp,
-- will give you a col for TimeStamp for records with RUNBRKPGM
CASE WHEN DATA LIKE 'RUNBRKPGM%' THEN TS ELSE '' END AS RUNBRKPGM_TimeStamp,
-- will give you everything after the RUNPGM = (which I think is the recipe you are referring to)
CASE WHEN DATA LIKE 'RUNPGM%' THEN REPLACE(DATA, 'RUNPGM = ', '' AS RUNPGM_Recipe,
-- will give you everything after the RUNBRKPGM = (which I think is the recipe you are referring to)
CASE WHEN DATA LIKE 'RUNBRKPGM:%' THEN REPLACE(DATA, 'RUNBRKPGM = ', '' AS RUNPGM_Recipe
FROM TableName
Im not sure what columns you want to get the Time Difference on though so I dont have that column in here.
Then if you need to do additional logic/formatting on the columns once they are separated you can put the above in a sub select.
As a first swing, I'd try the following:
Create a view that uses string splitting to break the DATA column into a its parts (e.g. RunType and RecipeName)
Create a simple select that outputs the recipe name and tstamp where the runtype is RUNPGM.
Then add an OUTER APPLY:
Essentially, joining onto itself.
SELECT
t1.RecipeName,
t1.TimeStamp AS Start,
t2.TimeStamp AS Stop
--date func to get run time, pseudo DATEDIFF(xx,t1.TimeStamp, t2.TimeStamp) as RunTime
FROM newView t1
OUTER APPLY ( SELECT TOP ( 1 ) *
FROM newView x
WHERE x.RecipeName = t1.RecipeName
AND RunType = 'RUNBRKPGM'
ORDER BY ID DESC ) t2
WHERE t1.RunType = 'RUNPGM';
I'm trying to write a MYSQL Query that updates a cell in table1 with information gathered from 2 other tables;
The gathering of data from the other 2 tables goes without much issues (it is slow, but that's because one of the 2 tables has 4601537 records in it.. (because all the rows for one report are split in a separate record, meaning that 1 report has more than 200 records)).
The Query that I use to Join the two tables together is:
# First Table, containing Report_ID's: RE
# Table that has to be updated: REGI
# Join Table: JT
SELECT JT.report_id as ReportID, REGI.Serienummer as SerialNo FROM Blancco_Registration.TrialTable as REGI
JOIN (SELECT RE.Value_string, RE.report_id
FROM Blancco_new.mc_report_Entry as RE
WHERE RE.path_id=92) AS JT ON JT.Value_string = REGI.Serienummer
WHERE REGI.HardwareType="PC" AND REGI.BlanccoReport=0 LIMIT 100
This returns 100 records (I limit it because the database is in use during work hours and I don't want to steal all resources).
However, I want to use these results in a Query that updates the REGI table (which it uses to select the 100 records in the first place).
However, I get the error that I cannot select from the table itself while updateing it (logically). So I tried selecting the select statement above into a temp table and than Update it; however, then I get the issue that I get to much results (logically! I only need 1 result and get 100) however, I'm getting stuck in my own thougts.. I ultimately need to fill the ReportID into each record of REGI.
I know it should be possible, but I'm no expert in MySQL.. is there anybody that can point me into the right direction?
Ps. fixing the table containing 400k records is not an option, it's a program from an external developer and I can only read that database.
The errors I'm talking about are as follows:
Error Code: 1093. You can't specify target table 'TrialTable' for update in FROM clause
When I use:
UPDATE TrialTable SET TrialTable.BlanccoReport =
(SELECT JT.report_id as ReportID, REGI.Serienummer as SerialNo FROM Blancco_Registration.TrialTable as REGI
JOIN (SELECT RE.Value_string, RE.report_id
FROM Blancco_new.mc_report_Entry as RE
WHERE RE.path_id=92) AS JT ON JT.Value_string = REGI.Serienummer
WHERE REGI.HardwareType="PC" AND REGI.BlanccoReport=0 LIMIT 100)
WHERE TrialTable.HardwareType="PC" AND TrialTable.BlanccoReport=0)
Then I tried:
UPDATE TrialTable SET TrialTable.BlanccoReport = (SELECT ReportID FROM (<<and the rest of the SQL>>> ) as x WHERE X.SerialNo = TrialTable.Serienummer)
but that gave me the following error:
Error Code: 1242. Subquery returns more than 1 row
Haveing the Query above with a LIMIT 1, gives everything the same result
Firstly, your query seems to be functionally identical to the following:
SELECT RE.report_id ReportID
, REGI.Serienummer SerialNo
FROM Blancco_Registration.TrialTable REGI
JOIN Blancco_new.mc_report_Entry RE
ON RE.Value_string = REGI.Serinummer
WHERE REGI.HardwareType = "PC"
AND REGI.BlanccoReport=0
AND RE.path_id=92
LIMIT 100
So, why not use that?
EDIT:
I still don't get it. I can't see what part of the problem the following fails to solve...
UPDATE TrialTable REGI
JOIN Blancco_new.mc_report_Entry RE
ON RE.Value_string = REGI.Serinummer
SET TrialTable.BlanccoReport = RE.report_id
WHERE REGI.HardwareType = "PC"
AND REGI.BlanccoReport=0
AND RE.path_id=92;
(This is not an answer, but maybe a pointer towards a few points that need further attention)
Your JT sub query looks suspicious to me:
(SELECT RE.Value_string, RE.report_id
FROM Blancco_new.mc_report_Entry as RE
WHERE RE.path_id=92
GROUP BY RE.report_id)
You use group by but don't actually use any aggregate functions. The column RE.Value_string should strictly be something like MAX(RE.Value_string) instead.
I have two table --> tbl_book_details and tbl_table_traking
tbl_book_details has columns bd_book_code,
bd_isbn,
bd_title,
bd_edition,
bd_author,
bd_publisher,
bd_supplier,
bd_page,
bd_price_type,
bd_cost_price,
bd_price,
bd_Tax,
bd_covering,
bd_availability,
bd_keywords,
bd_notes,
bd_details,
bd_news_latter,
bd_etDate,
bd_weight,
bd_expire_date,
bd_status
tbl_table_traking has columns
tt_id,
tt_action,
tt_table,
tt_record_id,
tt_on_date,
tt_user,
tt_status
the process is a trigger is defined on tbl_book_details which in case of insert/modify insert the data in tbl_table_traking for traking when and who has modified the records.
till now i have been using following query which is not a join -->
SELECT
tbl_books_details.bd_book_code AS bkid,
tbl_books_details.bd_isbn,
tbl_books_details.bd_title AS title,
-- This part is what I believe is slowing down my query
(SELECT
tt_on_date
FROM
tbl_table_tracking
WHERE tt_action = 'MODIFY'
AND tt_record_id = tbl_books_details.bd_book_code ORDER BY tt_on_date) AS bd_etdate
it was working fine when the records count were below 3 million, but now script time out is occurring.
I have made the index on tbl_table_traking on 'tt_ondate' and on tt_action,
If there any way i can convert it to a join or improve the performance?
the table traking query is returning the mostrecent date on which the record was modified.
my database is in mysql.
You should be able to do something like this.
SELECT
tbl_books_details.bd_book_code AS bkid,
tbl_books_details.bd_isbn,
tbl_books_details.bd_title AS title,
tbl_table_traking.tt_on_date
FROM
tbl_books_details
INNER JOIN tbl_table_tracking
tbl_books_details.bd_book_code = tbl_table_tracking.tt_record_id
WHERE tt_action = 'MODIFY';
Hope this helps...
Hey guys how do you add two values on separate fields but on the same table
for example:
tblbooks
Quantity
Borrowed
each time a user issue a book to a borrower the Quantity its reduce by 1 and Borrowed is added by 1....
INSERT INTO tablename(field1,field2)
VALUES(v1,v2)
In your case I guess you need to update.
Update yourtable
SET Quantity =Quantity-1,
Borrowed=Borrowed+1
Where userid=1
The way I generally do it is select the row I want to update using LinQ and then just update the values.
For example:
With (From rw In tblBooks Select rw Where rw.Item("MyCondition").ToString = "Condition").First
.Item("Quantity") = .Item("Quantity") - 1
.Item("Borrowed") = .Item("Borrowed") + 1
End With
... I didn't test this code, and it doesn't take into account conversion, error checking, etc, but I hope it conveys the idea...
I have three tables
glSalesJournal
HMISAdd
HMISMain
Now what i am trying to do is add the glSalesJournal amt with HMISAdd amt while grouping up with various Fields and inserting the result into glSalesJournal
The glSalesJournal contains 633173 records
The HMISAdd contains 4193 records
HMISAdd and glSalesJournal contains the same columns which are
loc
glAcct
glSubAcct
batchNbr
contractNbr
amt
I added indexes to the table still the results are the same.
Here is my code:
INSERT INTO hmismain
(loc,
glacct,
subacct,
batchnbr,
contractnbr,
amt)
SELECT glsalesjournal.loc,
glsalesjournal.glacct,
glsalesjournal.glsubacct,
( glsalesjournal.amt + hmisadd.amt ) AS sumAmt,
glsalesjournal.batchnbr,
glsalesjournal.salescontnbr
FROM glsalesjournal
LEFT OUTER JOIN hmisadd
ON ( glsalesjournal.loc = hmisadd.loc
AND glsalesjournal.glacct = hmisadd.glacct
AND glsalesjournal.glsubacct = hmisadd.subacct
AND glsalesjournal.batchnbr = hmisadd.batchnbr
AND glsalesjournal.salescontnbr = hmisadd.contractnbr )
GROUP BY glsalesjournal.loc,
hmisadd.loc,
glsalesjournal.glacct,
hmisadd.glacct,
glsalesjournal.glsubacct,
hmisadd.subacct,
glsalesjournal.batchnbr,
hmisadd.batchnbr,
glsalesjournal.salescontnbr,
hmisadd.contractnbr
The time taken by the script to execute is more than 2 hours. Even when I limit the Records to 100 the time taken is the same.
Can someone please guide me how can I optimize the script.
Thanks
1) It looks like it's a one off query, am I correct here? If not than you are inserting the same data into hmismain table every time.
2) You are grouping on fields from TWO separate tables, so no amount of indexing will ever help you. The ONLY index that will help is an index over a view linking these two tables in the same way.
Further note:
What is the point of
GROUP BY glsalesjournal.loc,
hmisadd.loc,
glsalesjournal.glacct,
hmisadd.glacct,
glsalesjournal.glsubacct,
hmisadd.subacct,
glsalesjournal.batchnbr,
hmisadd.batchnbr,
glsalesjournal.salescontnbr,
hmisadd.contractnbr
You are grouping the data by the same fields twice
glsalesjournal.loc, hmisadd.loc
glsalesjournal.glacct, hmisadd.glacct,
...
Remove the duplicates from GROUP BY and it should run fast
Did you add an index on this fields:
glSalesJournal.loc
glSalesJournal.glAcct
glSalesJournal.glSubAcct
glSalesJournal.batchNbr
glSalesJournal.salesContNbr
HMISAdd.Loc
HMISAdd.GlAcct
HMISAdd.SubAcct
HMISAdd.batchNbr
HMISAdd.contractNbr
If this fields are unindexed, it will perform fulltable scan for each individual record thus causing slow performance.
MySQL Create Index Syntax