I have three seperate SPSS files with information about roughly 7500 hemicolectomy patients. One file contains the information about the hemicolectomies, the second one about other surgeries the patients have had during their lifetime and the last one contains information about their sick leaves during their lifetime.
I have merged (idnumber is the common variable) the files to a single SPSS document but i ran into a problem with filtering out the surgeries and sick leaves that have nothing to do with the hemicolectomy. I'm quite new to SPSS so the simplest way i could think of doing this is by somehow copying the hemicolectomy info to every case and then just using the date/time calculator to choose which sick leaves and surgeries to discard. Switching to wide format is unpractical due to the large number of unrelated surgeries and sick leaves: I'd have thousands of variables.
So basically I'd like to do the following:
IF idnumber = idnumber THEN variable1=variable1 AND variable2=variable2 etc
How would I go about doing this?
All help will be appreciated!
the IF command can only be used with one transformation:
IF [condition] [transformation].
Assuming both of your files are sorted by idnumber:
UPDATE file=[master_file_reference]
/file=[secondary_file_reference]
/BY idnumber.
EXECUTE.
The file reference can be made either by their dataset name, or by their full path.
More on the UPDATE command:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLVMB_24.0.0/spss/base/syn_update_examples.html
I cant comment yet, so Im sorry if I misunderstand the problem. I wouldve asked for clarification in the comments to the question... here goes...
So you have three sources of data which have dates (?) of hemicolectomies, one for each case; dates (?) of other surgeries, multiple for each case; and sickleaves even more for each case. Is that right?
I'd try solving the problem before matching all three file by matching the file that contains one observation per patient (presumably hemicolectomies) to the one with the second most observations (presumably other surgeries) per patient with the /table keyword:
MATCH FILES /FILE= 'surgeries.sav' /table = 'hemicolectomies.sav'
/by idnumber.
EXECUTE.
this will "fill up" the blank cells for each patient with the hemicolectomy data.
now use the datetime to check which surgeries "belong" to the hemicolectomies, thus reduce your data and match it to the sickleave data using the /table keyword again.
Seems like the easiest solution to me.
I have a model called lists, which has a column called item_ids. item_ids is a JSON column (MySQL) and the column contains array of UUIDs, each referring to one item.
Now when someone creates a new list, I need to search whether there is an existing list with same set of UUIDs, and I want to do this search using query itself for faster response. Also use ActiveRecord querying as much as possible.
How do i achieve this?
item_ids = ["11E85378-CFE8-39F8-89DC-7086913CFD4B", "11E85354-304C-0664-9E81-0A281BE2CA42"]
v = List.new(item_ids: item_ids)
v.save!
Now, how do I check whether a list exists which has item ids exactly matches with that mentioned in query ? Following wont work.
list_count = List.where(item_ids: item_ids).count
Edit 1
List.where("JSON_CONTAINS(item_ids, ?) ", item_ids.to_json).count
This statement works, but it counts even if only one of the item matches. Looking for exact number of items.
Edit 2
List.where("JSON_CONTAINS( item_ids, ?) and JSON_LENGTH(item_ids) = ?", item_ids.to_json, item_ids.size).count
Looks like this is working
You can implement a has many relation between lists and items and then access like this.
List.includes(:item).where('items.id in (?)',item_ids)
To implement has_many relation:
http://guides.rubyonrails.org/association_basics.html#the-has-many-through-association
LoadTableQuery.Qry = #"
SELECT `orders`.`ordID`,
`orders`.`OrderType`,
`prt`.`Name`,
`orders`.`prtID`,
`orders`.`ReqRef`,
`orders`.`DateOrdered`,
`orders`.`orderETA`,
`orders`.`DateRcvd`,
`orders`.`Status`,
`orders`.`ShipCost`,
`orders`.`Duties`,
`orders`.`Currency`,
`orders`.`Conv`,
`orders`.`Terms`,
`orders`.`Shipping`,
`orders`.`BuyerID`,
`orders`.`ShipTo`,
`orders`.`Notes2`,
`orders`.`Notes3`,
`orders`.`legacyID`,
`prt`.`Address`,
`prt`.`City`,
`prt`.`StateProv`,
`prt`.`PostalZip`,
`prt`.`Tel`,
`prt`.`Contact`,
`prt`.`Email`,
`prt`.`OrderTaxPc`
FROM `n2000`.`orders` left join `n2000`.`prt`
on (orders.prtID = prt.prtID)
prtID is a unique identifier which I'm using to pull the data I need about the party (their name, address, city..). The way it's written above works, accomplishing what I need it to do. getting and inserting the data into my table.
The issue is, I need a SECOND set of party data, based on orders.ShipTo instead of orders.prtID . ShipTo is really just a different prtID.
I'd like to be able to just run it again with
on (orders.ShipTo = prt.prtID).
I've tried using UNION, but that creates a new row, instead of adding columns to my current row. Which is where I'm looking to pull my data from.
The best way to understand it is, I've expanded prtID to add the Name, Address, City.. column data. I'd like to expand ShipTo as well. I don't know how to do that though without simply overwriting the prtID expansion.
The solution was actually quite simple. Hope this helps someone else
Solution
The solution was actually quite simple. Alias the different tables and do a double left join
Solution
The 1,500 page Access 97 Bible (don't laugh!) that I've been given by my boss to solve his problem doesn't solve my problem of how to solve his problem, because it has nee VBA code.
Let me first make clear that I've made attempts to solve this without (much) coding, and that I've coded quite a bit in VBA already, so I'm basically familiar with most things including recordsets, queries, etc etc but have problems with MS Access limits on how to form a report with data coming from VBA variables. I'm also versatile in most programming languages, but this is not a language problem but rather a "how to/what's possible" problem.
My problem right now is that dragging the query fields into the Detail subform and putting them into cells in columns setting Left and Top with VBA code are moving them alright, but each cell is on a new page. Unfortunately, there is multiple data in each cell that won't conform to the Create Report Guide options available.
So my question is simply this: Can someone point me to working examples of code that create, place, and fill with VBA variable strings, text fields at any coordinate I please on a paper size of my choice?
Edit: The above is not an option, as I understand this will prohibit the client from getting an .mde database. What remains, then, is to merely ask for some sound advice on how to get several rows GROUPed BY weekday and machine (see below) into a recordset or similar for each cell. I guess the best way is to count the number of columns in the table (machines in the sql result) and create 5 rows of these with dummy data, then go through the result rows and place the data in the relevant controls. But if you have ideas for doing this work better and faster, write them as answers.
Sorry for this, I knew there was something I wasn't understanding. Basically, I thought Access supported creating reports dynamically via VBA, ie. "generating pages with data" rather than "preparing a flow of controls connected to datasources". But Access requires that you create an ample amount of dummy, unlinked controls manually, then either fill or hide them and that's how they become "dynamic".
This is for Access 2003 on a remote server accessing local and remote ODBC SQL database tables, if relevant. The goal is to make a week schedule of n columns (n=number of machines at a certain plant) x 5 rows (weekday Mon-Fri), and put 1 or more recordset rows (=scheduled activities for that day on that machine) in each of the "n by 5 table" cells.
If you detect venting frustration in this post I can only ask your forgiveness and hope for your understanding.
So, has many techniques for this:
Ex: 1) using dinamic sql for this:
'Create a function to make sql query
Function MakeMySQlReport(Parameters):
Dim strSql as string
Dim strMyVar as string
strsql = vbnullstring
strsql = "Select " & myVar1 & " as MyFieldVar1, * from myTable where Fieldx =" & Parameters
MyReport.recordSource = ssql
End Function
Ex: 2) create function that returns yours strings:
Function MyString1() as string
MyString1 = 'ABC'
end Function
An in your report, select the textbox will receive the value and type =MyString1()]
I hope this help to you, need more examples?
Solution:
Create many objects manually (grr!)
name them systematically
put them in a Control Array (get all Me.Controls, sift out the ones you're interested in, and put them in an indexed array)
go through the array and change their properties
Our win32 application assembles objects from the data in a number of tables in a MySQL relational database. Of such an object, multiple revisions are stored in the database.
When storing multiple revisions of something, sooner or later you'll ask yourself the question if you can visualize the differences between two revisions :) So my question is: what would be a good way to "diff" two such database objects?
Would you do the comparison at the database level? (Doesn't sound like a good idea: too low-level, and too sensitive to the schema).
Would you compare the objects?
Would you write a function that "manually" compares the properties and fields of two objects?
How would you store the diff? In a separate, generic "TDiff" object?
Any general recommendations on how to visualize such things in a user interface?
Advice, or stories about your own experiences with this, are very welcome; thanks a bunch!
Extra info on use case (20090515)
In reply to Antony's comment: this specific application is used to schedule training courses, run by teams of teachers. The schedule of a teacher is stored in various tables in the database, and contains info such as "where does she have to go on which day", "who are her colleagues in the team", etc. This information is spread out over multiple tables.
Once in a while, we "publish" the schedule, so the teachers can see it on a webpage. Each "publication" is a revision, and we'd like to be able to show the users (and later also the teachers) what's changed between two publications --- if anything.
Hope that makes the scenario a bit more tangible :)
Some final remarks
Well, the bounty has come to an end, so I've accepted an answer. If it'd somehow be possible to slice a couple of extra 100's off of my rep and give it to some of the other answers, I would do so without hesitation. All your guys' help has been great, and I am very grateful! ~ Onno 20090519
Just an idea, but would it be worthwhile for you to convert the two object versions being compared to some text format and then comparing these text objects using an existing diff program - like diff for example? There are lots of nice diff programs out there that can offer nice visual representations, etc.
So for example
Text version of Object 1:
first_name: Harry
last_name: Lime
address: Wien
version: 0.1
Text version of Object 2:
first_name: Harry
last_name: Lime
address: Vienna
version: 0.2
The diff would be something like:
3,4c3,4
< address: Wien
< version: 0.1
---
> address: Vienna
> version: 0.2
Assume that a class has 5 known properties - date, time, subject, outline, location. When I look at my schedule, I'm most interested in the most recent (ie current/accurate) version of these properties. It would also be useful for me to know what, if anything, has changed. (As a side note, if the date, time or location changed, I'd also expect to get an email/sms advising me in case I don't check for an updated schedule :-))
I would suggest that the 'diff' is performed at the time the schedule is amended. So, when version 2 of the class is created, record which values have changed, and store this in two 'changelog' fields on the version 2 object (there must already be one parent table that sits atop all your tables - use that one!). One changelog field is 'human readable text' eg 'Date changed from Mon 1 May to Tues 2 May, Time changed from 10:00am to 10:30am'. The second changelog field is a delimted list of changed fields eg 'date,time' To do this, before saving you would loop over the values submitted by the user, compare to current database values, and concatenate 2 strings, one human readable, one a list of field names. Then, update the data and set your concatenated strings as the 'changelog' values.
When displaying the schedule load the current version by default. Loop through the fields in the changelog field list, and annotate the display to show that the value has changed (a * or a highlight, etc). Then, in a separate panel display the human readable change log.
If a schedule is amended more than once, you would probably want to combine the changelogs between version 1 & 2, and 2 & 3. Say in version 3 only the course outline changed - if that was the only changelog you had when displaying the schedule, the change to date and time wouldn't be displayed.
Note that this denormalised approach won't be great for analysis - eg working out which specific location always has classes changed out of it - but you could extend it using an E-A-V model to store the change log.
Doing a comparison at the database level would be good if what you cared about was changes to the database. That makes the most sense if you're trying to design a layer of generic functionality on top of the database itself.
Doing a comparison at the object level would be good if you care about changes to the data. For example, if the data was the input to a program and you were interested in looking at changes in the input to verify that changes to the output were correct.
Your use case doesn't appear to be either of these. You appear to care about the output and want differences from that perspective. If that's the case, I would do differences on the output report (or a pure-text version of it) instead of on the underlying data. You can do that with any off-the-shelf diff tool. To make things easier for your end-users you could parse the diff results and render them as HTML. There are lots of options here: side-by-side with color coding to indicate changes, one document with markup for changes (e.g. red strikethrough for deletions and green for additions), maybe just highlight areas that have changed and use balloons to show the previous/current values on demand.
I've thought about doing database comparisons but never tried to implement it. As you noted, any such attempts are intimately intertwined with the schema.
I have done object-level comparisons. The general algorithm was this:
Do a set comparison on the lists of object IDs. This creates three result groupings: added objects, deleted objects, and objects that live in both sets.
Report the deletions.
Report the additions.
For the things in both sets, do an attribute-by-attribute comparison.
If any differences are found, report the object ID, the attributes that differ, and the respective values. If appropriate, highlight the portion of the attribute value that has changed.
In my case, the comparison algorithms were hand-written to match the object attributes. This gave me control over which attributes were compared and how. A generic comparator might be possible for some cases but would depend on the situation and at least partially on the implementation language.
I've looked into MysQL Diffing a number of times. Unfortunately, there aren't any really good solutions available.
One tool I've tried was mysqldiff (www.mysqldiff.org). mysqldiff is a tool written in PHP which is capable of diffing mysql schemas. Unfortunately, it doesn't do a great job a lot of the time.
MySQL Workbench, MySQLs own SQL IDE provides the option to generate an alter script and I would imagine it does this by performing some kind of diff operation internally.
Aqua Data Studio is another tool that is capable of comparing schemas and outputing a diff of the two. While the ADS diff is quite nice, it does not provide a tool to create an alter script.
If I were writing my own I guess I would write code capable of comparing structure of two tables. Such code could be tuned to be highly sensitive (Ig if column order differs from from version to the next, it's a difference) or more moderately sensitive (Eg Column order is not a major issue, datatypes and lengths are important, as are indices and constraints).
Storage, I'm not to sure. I would look into how a version control system such as Mercurial stores its diff information for revisions and use that to elaborate a method appropriate for the DB.
Finally, for visual output I recommend you take a look at the Aqua Data Stduio compare feature (You can use the Trial version to test this...). Its diff output is pretty good.
My application dbscript compares hierarchical data (database schemas) in a stored procedure, which of course has to compare each field/property of every object with its counterpart. I guess you won't get around that step (unless you have a generic object description model)
As for the UI part of your question, have a look at screenshots to view and select differences.
I would think about some sort of common text representation of the objects and let the texts compare with an existing diffing tool like WinMerge.
I see no need to invent diffing by myself since there are already plenty of nice tools I can use.
In your situation in PostgreSQL I used a difference tables with the schema:
history_columns (
column_id smallint primary key,
column_name text not null,
table_name text not null,
unique (table_name, column_name)
);
create temporary sequence column_id_seq;
insert into history_columns
select nextval('column_id_seq'), column_name, table_name
from information_schema.columns
where
table_name in ('table1','table2','table3')
and table_schema=current_schema() and table_catalog=current_database();
create table history (
column_id smallint not null references history_columns,
id int not null,
change_time timestamp with time zone not null
constraint change_time_full_second -- only one change allowed per second
check (date_trunc('second',change_time)=change_time),
primary key (column_id,id,change_time),
value text
);
And on the tables I used a trigger like this:
create or replace function save_history() returns trigger as
$$
if (tg_op = 'DELETE') then
insert into historia values (
find_column_id('id',tg_relname), OLD.id,
date_trunc('second',current_timestamp),
OLD.id );
[for each column_name] {
if (char_length(OLD.column_name)>0) then
insert into history values (
find_column_id(column_name,tg_relname), OLD.id,
OLD.change_time, OLD.column_name
)
}
elsif (tg_op = 'UPDATE') then
[for each column_name] {
if (OLD.column_name is distinct from NEW.column_name) then
insert into history values (
find_column_id(column_name,tg_relname), OLD.id,
OLD.change_time, OLD.column_name
);
end if;
}
end if;
$$ language plpgsql volatile;
create trigger save_history_table1
before update or delete on table1
for each row execute procedure save_history();
This isn't really an answer to the question you asked rather an attempt to re-imagine the problem. Would you consider altering your database and object model to store the aggregate root and a series of deltas? That is, model and store RevisionSets that are collections of Revisions; a Revision is an entity property paired with a value. In a sense this is internalizing the revision structure into your architecture that the other posters are suggesting that you bolt-on to what you already have via "logs".
It's trivial to display the aggregate from the deltas, and even easier to display the deltas as a change history. The fact that you are using a rich client with state and local memory makes this even more compelling. You could very easily display "all the changes since date xxxx" without revisiting the database.
Credit for the basic idea goes to Greg Young and his work with financial data streams, but it is imminently applicable to your problem.
I'm riffing off of what Harry Lime suggested: Output your properties to text format, then hash the results. That way you can compare the hash values and easily flag the data that has been altered. This way you get the best of both worlds as you can visually see differences but programmatically identify differences. With the has you'll have a good source for an index should you want to store and retrieve the deltas.
Given you want to create a UI for this and need to indicate where the differences are, it seems to me you can either go custom or create a generic object comparer - the latter being dependent on the language you are using.
For the custom method, you need to create a class that takes to two instances of the classes to be comparied. It then returns differences;
public class Person
{
public string name;
}
public class PersonComparer
{
public PersonComparer(Person old, Person new)
{
....
}
public bool NameIsDifferent() { return old.Name != new.Name; }
public string NameDifferentText() { return NameIsDifferent() ? "Name changed from " + old.Name + " to " + new.Name : ""; }
}
This way you can use the NameComparer object to create your GUI.
The gereric approach would be much the same, just that you generalize the calls, and use object insepection (getObjectProperty call below) to find differences;
public class ObjectComparer()
{
public ObjectComparer(object old, object new)
{
...
}
public bool PropertyIsDifferent(string propertyName) { return getObjectProperty(old, propertyName) != getObjectProperty(new, propertyName) };
public string PropertyDifferentText(string propertyName) { return PropertyIsDifferent(propertyName) ? propertyName + " " + changed from " + getObjectProperty(old, propertyName) + " to " + getObjectProperty(new, propertyName): ""; }
}
}
I would go for the second, as it makes things really easy to change GUI on needs. The GUI I would try 'yellowing' the differences to make them easy to see - but that depends on how you want to show the differences.
Getting the object to compare would be loading your object with the initial revision and latest revision.
My 2 cents... Not as techy as the database compare stuff already here.
Have you looked at Open Source DiffKit?
www.diffkit.org
I think it does what you want.
Example with Oracle.
Export ordered objects to text with dbms_metadata
Export ordered tables data into CSV or query format
Make big text file
Diff