I have here AJAX + HTML and it seems not to be working as it should.
Basically it (work with / use) only the first number (count) and it seems like the rest is forgotten?
My code
<script id="ajax">
var count = 200;
var counter = setInterval(a2, 1000);
function a2() {
count = count - 1;
if (count < 0) {
clearInterval(counter);
return;
}
document.getElementById("a2").innerHTML = count;
}
</script>
<div id="a2"></div>
<script id="ajax">
var count = 100;
var counter = setInterval(a3, 1000);
function a3() {
count = count - 1;
if (count < 0) {
clearInterval(counter);
return;
}
document.getElementById("a3").innerHTML = count;
}
</script>
<div id="a3"></div>
Anyone knows what could be the issue? I feel like I'm totally lost.
Issue no2:
When I push the script into a real-usage, it only seems to execute the first script/code and the next script is being executed after the first script time is runs over. Therefore it second timer appears to be blank if first one is running.
It does work though when I manually put the script into the console.
Any ideas?
Thank you!
The problem here is var in JS is function scoped. Since you used it out of a function, it is pretty much global throughout the whole script. How about you make the counter implementation into a function and call it like this?
<script id="ajax">
function counter (elem, count) {
var counter = setInterval(func, 1000);
function func() {
count = count - 1;
if (count < 0) {
clearInterval(counter);
return;
}
document.getElementById(elem).innerHTML = count;
}
}
counter("a2", 200);
</script>
<div id="a2"></div>
<script id="ajax">
counter("a3", 100);
</script>
<div id="a3"></div>
No, you should add two codes in one setInterval function for executing on same time:
var count1=10;
var count2=5;
var counter=setInterval(a2, 1000);
function a2()
{
if (count1 != 0)
{
count1--;
//Some functions that are dependent of count1, eg.
if(count1==3){document.getElementById("a2").style.color="red";}
}
if (count2 != 0)
{
count2--;
//Some functions that are dependent of count2 eg.
if(count2==3){document.getElementById("a3").style.color="red";}
}
if(count1==0 && count2==0){
clearInterval(counter);
}
console.log('counting!');
document.getElementById("a2").innerHTML=count1;
document.getElementById("a3").innerHTML=count2;
}
<div id="a2"></div>
<div id="a3"></div>
If you have two different functions that are dependent of counters then go with above code
Try this one
var count_a2 = 200;
var counter_a2 = setInterval(a2, 1000);
function a2() {
count_a2 = count_a2 - 1;
if (count_a2 < 0) {
clearInterval(counter_a2);
return;
}
document.getElementById("a2").innerHTML = count_a2;
}
var count = 100;
var counter = setInterval(a3, 1000);
function a3() {
count = count - 1;
if (count < 0) {
clearInterval(counter);
return;
}
document.getElementById("a3").innerHTML = count;
}
<div id="a2"></div>
<div id="a3"></div>
Related
I am trying to make a basic search function. if input.value does exist in array alert message, if not, push it to array ans show in HTML. I think I have already most of work done, but there is somewhere a mistake. Thank you in advance for your help guys .)
<div id="main">
<input id="inputForMyDict">
<button id="ButtonForInputSave" onclick="buttonSave()">Speichern</button>
<p id="demo"></p>
</div>
<script>
var myDict = [];
var buttonSave = function() {
for (var i = 0; i < myDict.length; i++) {
if (document.getElementById("inputForMyDict").value = myDict[i]) {
alert("your input is already in your list");
} else {
myDict.push(document.getElementById("inputForMyDict").value);
document.getElementById("demo").innerHTML = myDict;
}
}
}
In javascript, there are 2 ways to do a comparison.
Strict Equality Operator === strict equality operator.
If you are not sure about the exact datatype for the values being compared, then you can use the == for comparison.
The line document.getElementById("inputForMyDict").value = myDict[i] needs comparison operator and not the assignment operator (=). So you need to replace the = with either == or ===.
so your javascript code should look like
var buttonSave = function() {
for (var i = 0; i < myDict.length; i++) {
if (document.getElementById("inputForMyDict").value == myDict[i]) {
// If you know exact data type, then use the below line instead and comment the above line if (document.getElementById("inputForMyDict").value === myDict[i]) {
alert("your input is already in your list");
} else {
myDict.push(document.getElementById("inputForMyDict").value);
document.getElementById("demo").innerHTML = myDict;
}
}
}
Update1: Based on the clarification, provided by comments, you don't need to have a for loop to check for existence of element in array. Javascript provides a convenient way by indexOf method on an array. indexOf method check for the existence of an element in an array and returns the index of the element in the Array. However, if the element is not found then it returns -1.
Full code below which should work.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<body>
<div id="main">
<input id="inputForMyDict">
<button id="ButtonForInputSave" onclick="buttonSave()">Speichern</button>
<p id="demo"></p>
</div>
<script>
var myDict = [];
var buttonSave = function() {
//for (var i = 0; i < myDict.length; i++) {
var valueInTextbox = document.getElementById("inputForMyDict").value;
if(myDict.indexOf(valueInTextbox) > -1){
alert("your input is already in your list");
} else {
myDict.push(valueInTextbox);
document.getElementById("demo").innerHTML = myDict;
}
}
//}
</script>
</body>
</html>
This may be a naive question, sorry for that, but I'm trying to sort out a potential concurrency issue. I have a registration procedure which begins with the user selecting their category from a drop down menu. That triggers a query to a particular page in a google sheet where it retrieves an available ID number that is displayed to the user. There are a couple steps required before the final submit button is pressed. This (I think) creates a chance for more than one person to retrieve the same ID. I do use google's lockservice but on the function which writes the form information to my spreadsheet (based on a script of Martin Hawksley). If it was possible to determine how many people were currently viewing the registration page I could use that value in the query with an if statement such that a different row number is retrieved. This would eliminate the chance of duplicates.
Does that sound reasonable? Perhaps there is a much better way.
Any advice would be most appreciated.
If it was possible to determine how many people were currently viewing
the registration page
If you don't want to use Google Analytics. Here is a simple example of how you can poll with a client to maintain a session, and count how many users are active.
NOTE: I threw this together, it could be refactored a bit to be prettier, but it should get the gist of it across
Working Example Open this a couple times, you will see your session IDs in each and a count. Sessions expire after 60 seconds of no activity, and auto-end if you close the page.
Project file structure:
Code.gs
index.html
javascript.html
Apps Script
var sessionTimeout = 60; //60 seconds
//Triggered when the page is navigated to, serves up HTML
function doGet(){
var template = HtmlService.createTemplateFromFile('index');
template.userID = NewSession();
return template.evaluate()
.setTitle('Active Users')
.setSandboxMode(HtmlService.SandboxMode.IFRAME);
}
/*================ Polling ================*/
//Client calls this function to poll, updates cache, returns active users
function ClientPoll(id){
var scriptCache = CacheService.getScriptCache();
UpdateScriptCache(id, 0, scriptCache, true);
var activeIDs = GetActiveIDs(scriptCache);
return activeIDs;
}
function EndSession(id){
var scriptCache = CacheService.getScriptCache();
scriptCache.remove(id);
var activeIDs = GetActiveIDs(scriptCache);
activeIDs.splice(activeIDs.indexOf(id), 1);
UpdateScriptCache('ActiveIDs', activeIDs, scriptCache, false);
}
//Server calls every minute to check for inactive sessions
function CheckForInactiveSessions(){
var scriptCache = CacheService.getScriptCache();
var activeIDs = GetActiveIDs(scriptCache);
var allSessions = scriptCache.getAll(activeIDs);
if(Object.keys(allSessions).length > 0){
var keys = Object.keys(allSessions);
var newActiveIDs = [];
for(var i = 0; i < keys.length; i++){
newActiveIDs.push(keys[i]);
}
Logger.log(keys.length);
UpdateScriptCache('ActiveIDs', newActiveIDs, scriptCache, false);
}
}
/*================ Session Creation & Cache ================*/
//Handles setting up a new session, called when page is opened
function NewSession(){
var id = GenerateUID();
AddNewActiveID(id);
return id;
}
//Gets a list of all active IDs
function GetActiveIDs(scriptCache){
if(!scriptCache){
scriptCache = CacheService.getScriptCache();
}
var active = scriptCache.get('ActiveIDs');
if(active !== null){
return JSON.parse(active);
}
return [];
}
//Adds a new ID to the cache
function AddNewActiveID(id){
var scriptCache = CacheService.getScriptCache();
var activeIDs = JSON.parse(scriptCache.get('ActiveIDs'));
if(activeIDs == null){
activeIDs = [];
}
activeIDs.push(id);
//Update the Active ID List
UpdateScriptCache('ActiveIDs', activeIDs, scriptCache, false);
//Add new ID to cache
UpdateScriptCache(id, 0, scriptCache, true);
}
//Handles updating the Active IDs cache and prevents race conditions or collisions
function UpdateScriptCache(key, data, cache, timeout){
var lock = LockService.getScriptLock();
lock.waitLock(15000);
if(timeout){
cache.put(key, JSON.stringify(data), sessionTimeout);
} else {
cache.put(key, JSON.stringify(data), 21600)
}
lock.releaseLock();
}
/*================ ID Generation ================*/
//Handles generating and returning a new ID
function GenerateUID(){
var generator = new IDGenerator();
var id = generator.generate();
return id;
}
//Generates a random(ish) ID;
function IDGenerator() {
this.length = 10;
this.timestamp = new Date().getTime();
var getRandomInt = function( min, max ) {
return Math.floor( Math.random() * ( max - min + 1 ) ) + min;
}
this.generate = function(){
var timestamp = this.timestamp.toString();
var parts = timestamp.split('').reverse();
var id = '';
for(var i = 0; i < this.length; i++){
var index = getRandomInt(0, parts.length - 1);
id += parts[index];
}
return id;
}
}
JavaScript:
<script>
//Initilization
$(function(){
//Set the users ID in HTML
$('#userID').text(userID);
//Setup handler to end the session before the page closes
$(window).bind('beforeunload', function(){
EndSession();
});
//Start the timer
var deadline = new Date(Date.parse(new Date()) + 5000);
initializeTimer('pollingIn', deadline);
});
//Polls the server to update session and get active users
function PollServer(){
console.log('Polling server');
google.script.run.withSuccessHandler(UpdateActiveUsers).ClientPoll(userID);
var deadline = new Date(Date.parse(new Date()) + 5000);
initializeTimer('pollingIn', deadline);
}
//Ends the session right before the page closes
function EndSession(){
google.script.run.withSuccessHandler().EndSession(userID);
}
//Updates the active users div
function UpdateActiveUsers(users){
console.log(users)
var userText = '';
for(var i = 0; i < users.length; i++){
if(i == 0){
userText += users[i];
continue;
}
userText += ', ' + users[i];
}
$('#activeUsersCount').text(users.length);
$('#activeUsers').text(userText);
}
//Initilizes the timer
function initializeTimer(id, endtime) {
var timer = $('#'+id);
function updateTimer() {
var time = Date.parse(endtime) - Date.parse(new Date());
var seconds = Math.floor((time / 1000) % 60);
timer.text(seconds);
if (time <= 0) {
clearInterval(timeInterval);
PollServer();
}
}
updateTimer();
var timeInterval = setInterval(updateTimer, 1000);
}
</script>
HTML:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<base target="_top">
<link href="https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/script/css/add-ons1.css" rel="stylesheet">
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.4/jquery.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
</head>
<body>
<div id="mainForm">
<h1>Active Users</h1>
<div class="box">
Active Users Count:
<span id="activeUsersCount">0</span>
</div>
<div class="box">
Active Users:
<span id="activeUsers"></span>
</div>
<div class="box">
Polling in:
<span id="pollingIn"></span>
</div>
<div class="box">
You Are:
<span id="userID"></span>
</div>
</div>
<?!= HtmlService.createHtmlOutputFromFile('javascript').getContent(); ?>
<script>
var userID = <?= userID ?>;
</script>
</body>
</html>
<style>
.box {
display: block;
padding: 0.5em;
}
body {
padding: 1em;
}
</style>
From the https://gist.github.com/oshliaer/d468759b3587cfb424348fa722765187 , It is possible to select a particular word from the findText, I want to implement the same for bold words only
I have a function to find bold. How do I modify the above gist?
var startFlag = x;
var flag = false;
for (var i = x; i < y; i++) {
if (text.isBold(i) && !flag) {
startFlag = i;
flag = true;
} else if (!text.isBold(i) && flag) {
flag = false;
rangeBuilder.addElement(text, startFlag, i - 1);
doc.setSelection(rangeBuilder.build());
return;
}
}
if (flag) {
rangeBuilder.addElement(text, startFlag, i - 1);
doc.setSelection(rangeBuilder.build());
return;
}
Let's assume another algorithm
/*
* #param {(DocumentApp.ElementType.LIST_ITEM | DocumentApp.ElementType.PARAGRAPH)} element
*/
function hasBold(element, start) {
var text = element.editAsText();
var length = element.asText().getText().length;
var first = -1;
var end = -1;
while (start < length) {
if (first < 0 && text.isBold(start)) {
first = start;
}
if (first > -1 && !text.isBold(start)) {
end = start - 1;
return {
s: first,
e: end
}
}
start++;
}
if (first > -1) {
return {
s: first,
e: length - 1
}
}
return false;
}
It's not clean but I've tested it and it works fine.
hasBold lets us finding bolds in the current element.
Finally, we have to loop this feature within document.getBody().
You could to get the full code here find next bold text in google document.
Also you could try it on a copy
A new idea
The Direct searcing
The best way is to use a callback while it is checked
var assay = function (re) {
var text = re.getElement()
.asText();
for (var offset = re.getStartOffset(); offset <= re.getEndOffsetInclusive(); offset++) {
if (!text.isBold(offset)) return false;
}
return true;
}
function findNextBold() {
var sp = 'E.';
Docer.setDocument(DocumentApp.getActiveDocument());
var rangeElement = Docer.findText(sp, Docer.getActiveRangeElement(), assay);
rangeElement ? Docer.selectRangeElement(rangeElement) : Docer.setCursorBegin();
}
The Approx searching
var assay = function(re) {
var text = re.getElement().asText();
var startOffset = re.getStartOffset();
var endOffset = re.getEndOffsetInclusive() + 1;
for (var offset = startOffset; offset < endOffset; offset++) {
if (!text.isBold(offset)) return false;
}
return this.test(text.getText().slice(startOffset, endOffset));
}
function findNextBold() {
var searchPattern = '[^ ]+#[^ ]+';
var testPattern = new RegExp('^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+#[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$');
Docer.setDocument(DocumentApp.getActiveDocument());
var rangeElement = Docer.findText(searchPattern, Docer.getActiveRangeElement(), assay.bind(testPattern));
rangeElement ? Docer.selectRangeElement(rangeElement) : Docer.setCursorBegin();
}
Docer
Yes. it is possible to find bold text. You need to use findText(searchPattern) to search the contents of the element for the specific text pattern using regular expressions. The provided regular expression pattern is independently matched against each text block contained in the current element. Then, use isBold() to retrieve the bold setting. It is a Boolean which returns whether the text is bold or null.
Say I want to tailor my application to throttle throughput when running on battery power, but go full bore when it's plugged to a wall socket.
Is there an event to plug into to detect when these things happen like when internet connection is detected?
Apparently there's this trigger you can plug in to. It only fires off when the device is plugged in.
IE and WebView http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/HTML5/PowerMeter/Default.html can poll the cpu power states
eg: http://apps.microsoft.com/windows/app/plugged-in/2b91b1e1-9e30-4a96-bc95-b196e46bef9d
In c#/xaml try:
XAML
<WebView x:Name="BatteryCheck_WV" Source="ms-appx-web:///Assets/JSBatteryCheck.html" Height="50" Width="50" Visibility="Collapsed" />
c#
var PeriodicTimer = ThreadPoolTimer.CreatePeriodicTimer(async (timer) =>
{
await Dispatcher.RunAsync(Windows.UI.Core.CoreDispatcherPriority.Low,
async () =>
{
if (Window.Current.Visible) BatteryStatus.IsOn= Convert.ToBoolean(await BatteryCheck_WV.InvokeScriptAsync("IsPluggedIn", null));
});
}, new TimeSpan(0, 0, 0, 1, 0));
html/js
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>JSBatteryCheck</title>
<script type="text/javascript">
var batterytimeOut;
var timeOutGo = true;
var lastDisplayUpdateTime = new Date();
var MilliSeconds = 1000;
var displayUpdateInterval = 200;
var values = [];
var maxValues = displayUpdateInterval;
var PluggedIn = true;
var currentTicksPerMilliSecond = 0;
function GetTicksPerSecond() {
if ((new Date() - lastDisplayUpdateTime) >= displayUpdateInterval) {
lastDisplayUpdateTime = new Date;
currentTicksPerMilliSecond = Avg();
values = [];
if (!isNaN(currentTicksPerMilliSecond)) {
PluggedIn = (currentTicksPerMilliSecond > 9) ? false : true;
}
}
else Tick();
if (timeOutGo) batterytimeOut = setTimeout(function () { GetTicksPerSecond() }, 1);
}
function StartTimer() {
timeOutGo = true;
GetTicksPerSecond();
return "";
}
function Tick() {
if (values.length > maxValues) values.shift();
else values.push(new Date());
}
function Avg() {
if (values.length > 1) {
var earliest = values[0];
var latest = values[values.length - 1];
var elapsed = latest - earliest;
var elapsedSeconds = elapsed / MilliSeconds;
var avg = MilliSeconds / ((values.length - 1) / elapsedSeconds);
return parseInt(avg);
}
else return NaN;
}
function StopTimeOut() {
clearTimeout(batterytimeOut);
batterytimeOut = null;
timeOutGo = false;
}
function IsPluggedIn() {
return String(PluggedIn);
}
</script>
</head>
<body onload="GetTicksPerSecond()">
<div id="PowerStatus"></div>
<button onclick="StopTimeOut()">Stop timeout</button>
</body>
</html>
For background tasks SystemTriggerType.BackgroundWorkCostChange event is best but needs lock screen access
This is my grid of nodes:
I'm moving an object around on it using the A* pathfinding algorithm. It generally works OK, but it sometimes acts wrongly:
When moving from 3 to 1, it correctly goes via 2. When going from 1 to 3 however, it goes via 4.
When moving between 3 and 5, it goes via 4 in either direction instead of the shorter way via 6
What can be wrong? Here's my code (AS3):
public static function getPath(from:Point, to:Point, grid:NodeGrid):PointLine {
// get target node
var target:NodeGridNode = grid.getClosestNodeObj(to.x, to.y);
var backtrace:Map = new Map();
var openList:LinkedSet = new LinkedSet();
var closedList:LinkedSet = new LinkedSet();
// begin with first node
openList.add(grid.getClosestNodeObj(from.x, from.y));
// start A*
var curNode:NodeGridNode;
while (openList.size != 0) {
// pick a new current node
if (openList.size == 1) {
curNode = NodeGridNode(openList.first);
}
else {
// find cheapest node in open list
var minScore:Number = Number.MAX_VALUE;
var minNext:NodeGridNode;
openList.iterate(function(next:NodeGridNode, i:int):int {
var score:Number = curNode.distanceTo(next) + next.distanceTo(target);
if (score < minScore) {
minScore = score;
minNext = next;
return LinkedSet.BREAK;
}
return 0;
});
curNode = minNext;
}
// have not reached
if (curNode == target) break;
else {
// move to closed
openList.remove(curNode);
closedList.add(curNode);
// put connected nodes on open list
for each (var adjNode:NodeGridNode in curNode.connects) {
if (!openList.contains(adjNode) && !closedList.contains(adjNode)) {
openList.add(adjNode);
backtrace.put(adjNode, curNode);
}
}
}
}
// make path
var pathPoints:Vector.<Point> = new Vector.<Point>();
pathPoints.push(to);
while(curNode != null) {
pathPoints.unshift(curNode.location);
curNode = backtrace.read(curNode);
}
pathPoints.unshift(from);
return new PointLine(pathPoints);
}
NodeGridNode::distanceTo()
public function distanceTo(o:NodeGridNode):Number {
var dx:Number = location.x - o.location.x;
var dy:Number = location.y - o.location.y;
return Math.sqrt(dx*dx + dy*dy);
}
The problem I see here is the line
if (!openList.contains(adjNode) && !closedList.contains(adjNode))
It may be the case that an adjNode may be easier(shorter) to reach through the current node although it was reached from another node previously which means it is in the openList.
Found the bug:
openList.iterate(function(next:NodeGridNode, i:int):int {
var score:Number = curNode.distanceTo(next) + next.distanceTo(target);
if (score < minScore) {
minScore = score;
minNext = next;
return LinkedSet.BREAK;
}
return 0;
});
The return LinkedSet.BREAK (which acts like a break statement in a regular loop) should not be there. It causes the first node in the open list to be selected always, instead of the cheapest one.