Content not appearing on code using inspector - html

I am trying to crawl this website https://www.wego.ae/en/flights/searches/cDXB-cSFO-2020-03-09:cSFO-cDXB-2020-03-22/economy/1a:0c:0i?sort=price&order=asc and I can't find any of the actual page content on the html code that appears on the inspector.
Are they using some sort of frame to hide the code? Anyone had any experience with this?

The content of the page is stored in the #shadow-root element. You can read more about the ShadowRoot in the Mozilla Developer docs.
If you need help traversing elements within a shadow DOM, you can reference this answer.

Related

Page changes without loading the page

Does anyone know how to tell me how to change the page like the sites below?
https://numbered.studio/contact
https://5scontent.com/work/
https://www.cappen.com/about
Not a link? So there is no reload? Is it a framework that does this?
If there is no link, no problem? To make user browsing heavy?
Provided site maybe using any framework. But this can be possible using JS. I think the example of websites are single pages HTML template based on JS.
I think you would like to block the top of the site, making scrolling the page the top of the site is blocked. This section can definitely help you:
https://www.w3schools.com/html/html_blocks.asp
First create a <div>. After you have customized and entered the information, insert a block that can block <div>. Better if you also create a <span> block to define the affected area.

How to select only HTML and/or CSS code from any existing webpage's inspect element?

I am trying to understand an html structure of a website but there is too much Javascript and other stuff. How can I selectively copy only HTML code and/or only CSS code from any existing webpage from the inspect element?
Went through all the existing questions-answers on stackoverflow but could not find anything that could let me separate the complete HTML and/or CSS code from a webpage.
Are there any tools which can help me with this? or there is any technique that I can use to select only HTML and/or CSS code from any existing webpage?
Use Chrome DevTools to see and manage the content of the web page.
Basically any DevTools, from any browser. Its must have for web developer.

Why would a web page render plain html before taking css into account?

When I load my web page I first see plain html during almost 1 second, and then I see the web page with the css design.
Why would the page be rendered first in plain html? and how can I avoid that?
I tried investigating with Google Speedtracer tool but the trace shows lots of 'paint' DOM events before the 'DOMContentLoaded' DOM event, so I am not sure what to look for...
How can I pinpoint the moment or event that renders the plain html using the Speedtracer tool or any other tool?
Additional infos: I have the problem both in Chrome and IE. Also I call the css files in my html header. So none of the answers on this question helped me solve the problem.

GWT Chrome issue with anchors inside HTML widgets

I'm having a Chrome only issue when adding anchor tags for internal links inside an HTML widget. This may sound quite unimportant but it's quite annoying for myself and many users.
When a page is loaded, if the links are middle-clicked or Ctrl-clicked the 1st time, they only open in a new tab/window like they should, but the 2nd time they act as though they were left clicked and use the same tab/window. For some reason this problem doesn't happen when I use Hyperlink or Anchor widgets. It also isn't an issue in Firefox or IE8.
I've verified that the final HTML of the Hyperlinks and my manually scripted tags are exactly the same. I applied the same styles to the HTML widget to do this. I even tried creating a Hyperlink and calling toString() to generate the HTML, but the bug still occurs.
Does anybody know why this could be happening or have any ideas of how to remedy it? This is a situation where I can't use Widgets so I need to create the tag HTML manually. I'm not a GWT expert, but I don't understand how the compiled code be handling the Hyperlink and Anchor widgets differently than the ones inside the HTML widgets. Any incite into this could be helpful.
I'd be interested in knowing if anybody else could reproduce this as well. I'm running Chrome 23.0.1271.97 and GWT-2.5.0. I know this happens in older versions of Chrome and GWT because it's been a problem for a while, at least since GWT-2.4.
Uninteresting nuances:
If there are two different links inside the same HTML, they bug will happen independently. Meaning that you can middle-click each one, and they will both work correctly, just not the 2nd time. Refreshing the page also resets them so the bug won't happen on the next middle-click. I also found that if the same link is twice contained in the HTML widget, they actually wont work independently. Meaning middle-clicking one will cause the other to incorrectly handle it's 1st middle click.
Just finished debugging this. It is not a GWT issue but a Chrome issue.
I created a bug report: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=177502
You can reproduce using this simple HTML page:<!DOCTYPE html>
LOCAL

How to show html template using inline styles only?

I want to display html template in a webpage. The styles of that template is specified inline.
But when i try to display it in my webpage, some styles that are defined in my css are adding into it and the template is not displayed properly. This template is used to create mails and when i send this template as mail to my gmail account it is displayed correctly. How its done in gmail? How they show the template using inline styles only?
The question is actually pretty clear. I think you're looking for an iframe tag. That will allow you to display a document within another page, with its own independent style.
One thing to add: if you ever wonder how another site does something, just install firebug (on Firefox) and check out their source.
I solved this problem using the tinymce editor. I used tinymce editor in read mode and displayed the html template in it. I dont know whether its correct method or not. But it was perfect for my requirement. Thanks Greg for your reply..:)