I have a really simple component using Connect from aws-amplify-react
const EmployeeExpensesTable = () => {
const [user, setUser] = useState(null)
useEffect(() => { Auth.currentAuthenticatedUser().then(user => setUser(user)) }, [])
console.log(user)
if(!user) { return null }
return (
<Connect
query={graphqlOperation(queries.listTransactions, { owner: user.username })}
subscription={graphqlOperation(subscriptions.onCreateTransaction, { owner: user.username })}
onSubscriptionMsg={(prev, { onCreateTransaction }) => {
console.log('oncreatetransaction:', onCreateTransaction)
console.log('prev', prev)
return onCreateTransaction
}}
>
{
({ data: { listTransactions }, loading, errors }) => {
console.log('transactions', listTransactions)
if (errors.length) return (<h3>Error</h3>)
if (loading || !listTransactions) return (<p>loading...</p>)
return (<core.components.Table data={listTransactions.items} />)
}
}
</Connect>
)
}
export default EmployeeExpensesTable
I have an external ETL process that adds transactions to the DynamoDB table. The subscription is firing and my oncreatetransaction message is being displayed with the new data, and the Connect component re-renders, but it renders using it's original data, not the new data. What am I doing wrong?
Turns out that onSubscriptionMsg is like the reducer for the Connect component's state. You are given the previous value and the new value to the function and you need to return the new state.
onSubscriptionMsg={(prev, data) => ({
listTransactions: {
items: [...prev.listTransactions.items.slice(-9), data.onCreateTransaction ]
}
})
The above works great for me. The .slice(-9) is because I only care about the last 10 rows that were added.
Related
I am trying to have a grid column layout, (2 columns) inside a single droppable container. The project is for an online menu where you can create a menu item, which goes into a droppable container, then you can drag that onto the menu that will be displayed to the user. So there is currently two columns. However the style of the menu demands two columns. Currently I am assigning different classNames to the mapped columns so I can make one of them grid but its pretty messy. Maybe there is a way I can hardcode the droppable instead of map them and run the map on the lists themselves inside each of the hardcoded droppables? Sorry if this is confusing, it sure is for me.
'results' is API data that is initially mapped into savedItems array where newly created menu items will go. Later on menuItems array will pull from the database as well. Right now just trying to have better styling control over the different droppables.
you can see where im assigning different classNames to the droppable during the mapping and its really not a reliable option.
//drag and drop states
const [state, setState] = useState({
menuItems: {
title: "menuItems",
items: []
},
savedItems: {
title: "savedItems",
items: results
}
})
useEffect(() => {
setState({ ...state, savedItems: { ...state.savedItems, items: results } })
}, [results])
// console.log("state", state)
console.log("dummy data", dummyArry)
// updating title graphql mutation
const [elementId, setElementId] = useState(" ");
const updateTitle = async () => {
//api data
const data = await fetch(`http://localhost:8081/graphql`, {
method: 'POST',
body: JSON.stringify({
query: `
mutation {
updateMenu(menuInput: {_id: ${JSON.stringify(elementId)},title: ${JSON.stringify(inputValue)}}){
title
}
}
`
}),
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json'
}
})
//convert api data to json
const json = await data.json();
}
//drag end function
const handleDragEnd = (data) => {
console.log("from", data.source)
console.log("to", data.destination)
if (!data.destination) {
// console.log("not dropped in droppable")
return
}
if (data.destination.index === data.source.index && data.destination.droppableId === data.source.droppableId) {
// console.log("dropped in same place")
return
}
//create copy of item before removing from state
const itemCopy = { ...state[data.source.droppableId].items[data.source.index] }
setState(prev => {
prev = { ...prev }
//remove from previous items array
prev[data.source.droppableId].items.splice(data.source.index, 1)
//adding new item to array
prev[data.destination.droppableId].items.splice(data.destination.index, 0, itemCopy)
return prev
})
}
const columnClass = [
"menuItems-column",
"savedItems-column"
]
let num = 0
return (
<>
<div className='app'>
{results && <DragDropContext onDragEnd={handleDragEnd}>
{_.map(state, (data, key) => {
return (
<div key={key} className='column'>
<h3>{data.title}</h3>
<Droppable droppableId={key}>
{(provided, snapshot) => {
return (
<div
ref={provided.innerRef}
{...provided.droppableProps}
className={columnClass[num]}
// className="droppable-col"
><span className='class-switch'>{num++}</span>
{data.items.map((el, index) => {
return (
<Draggable key={el._id} index={index} draggableId={el._id}>
{(provided) => {
return (
<div className='element-container'
ref={provided.innerRef}
{...provided.draggableProps}
{...provided.dragHandleProps}
>
<div contentEditable="true">
{el.title}
</div>
</div>
)
}}
</Draggable>
)
})}
{provided.placeholder}
</div>
)
}}
</Droppable>
</div>
)
})}
</DragDropContext>}
</div>
</>
)
}
I'm just trying to fetch some JSON data from a url. The JSON data is formatted like so (reduced to two entries for simplicity):
[
{
"id": 1
"name": "Brett",
"gender": "male"
},
{
"id": 2
"name": "Sandra",
"gender": "female"
}
]
I can print profiles using console.log(profiles) and see all the entries in the console, but when i try to access the .name field i get the error
Property 'name' does not exist on type 'never'.
Here is the code for the app:
const URL = 'someurl'
function App() {
const [curId, setId] = useState(0);
//const [curProfile, setCurProfile] = useState(undefined);
const [profiles, setProfiles] = useState([])
useEffect(() => {
fetch(URL)
.then((response) => {
if (response.ok) {
return response.json();
} else {
throw new Error("Something went wrong!");
}
})
.then(
(response) => {
setProfiles(response);
setId(1);
//setCurProfile(profiles[curId - 1]);
})
.catch((error) => {
console.log(error)
})
}, []);
return (
<div className="App">
<p>
{profiles[curId].name}
</p>
</div>
);
}
export default App;
Also as a side question, I'm having some problems storing the current profile in the curProfile variable. Could someone point me in the right direction for that? Thanks!
The initial state of profiles is empty array and curId is 0, so profiles[curId] should be undefined thus profiles[curId].name would be error as initial rendering.
You should always check if profiles is empty or not.
return (
<div className="App">
{profiles.length > 0 &&
<p>
{profiles[curId].name}
</p>
}
</div>
)
You've got to type your state, otherwise Typescript won't know what to expect. You also need to type the response.
Something like:
type Profile = {
id: number,
name: string,
gender: string
}
const [profiles, setProfiles] = useState <Profile[]> ([]);
(...)
setProfiles(response as Profile[]);
I need to check if entry with specific ID exists in the database using Sequelize in Node.js
function isIdUnique (id) {
db.Profile.count({ where: { id: id } })
.then(count => {
if (count != 0) {
return false;
}
return true;
});
}
I call this function in an if statement but the result is always undefined
if(isIdUnique(id)){...}
I don't prefer using count to check for record existence. Suppose you have similarity for hundred in million records why to count them all if you want just to get boolean value, true if exists false if not?
findOne will get the job done at the first value when there's matching.
const isIdUnique = id =>
db.Profile.findOne({ where: { id} })
.then(token => token !== null)
.then(isUnique => isUnique);
Update: see the answer which suggests using findOne() below. I personally prefer; this answer though describes an alternative approach.
You are not returning from the isIdUnique function:
function isIdUnique (id) {
return db.Profile.count({ where: { id: id } })
.then(count => {
if (count != 0) {
return false;
}
return true;
});
}
isIdUnique(id).then(isUnique => {
if (isUnique) {
// ...
}
});
You can count and find.
Project
.findAndCountAll({
where: {
title: {
[Op.like]: 'foo%'
}
},
offset: 10,
limit: 2
})
.then(result => {
console.log(result.count);
console.log(result.rows);
});
Doc link, v5 Beta Release
I found the answer by #alecxe to be unreliable in some instances, so I tweaked the logic:
function isIdUnique (id, done) {
db.Profile.count({ where: { id: id } })
.then(count => {
return (count > 0) ? true : false
});
}
As Sequelize is designed around promises anyway, alecxe's answer probably makes most sense, but for the sake of offering an alternative, you can also pass in a callback:
function isIdUnique (id, done) {
db.Profile.count({ where: { id: id } })
.then(count => {
done(count == 0);
});
}
}
isIdUnique(id, function(isUnique) {
if (isUnique) {
// stuff
}
});
Extending #Jalal's answer, if you're very conscious about performance implications while maintaining a simple Sequelize structure and you do not need the row data, I suggest you only request one column from the database. Why waste bandwidth and time asking the database to return all columns when you won't even use them?
const isIdUnique = id =>
db.Profile.findOne({ where: { id }, attributes: ['id'] })
.then(token => token !== null)
.then(isUnique => isUnique);
The attributes field tells Sequelize to only request the id column from the database and not sending the whole row's content.
Again this may seem a bit excessive but at scale and if you have many columns that hold a lot of data, this could make a giant difference in performance.
Try the below solution. I tried it and it works well.
const isIdUnique = async (id, model) => {
return await model.count({ where: { id: id } });
};
const checkExistId = await isIdUnique(idUser, User);
console.log("checkExistId: ", checkExistId);
A large json file is fetched with the below. It works as expected, however, since the case_data.json is large, the page takes up to two minutes to render.
export default {
name: "cases",
data() {
return {
columns: ['Case number', 'Summary', 'Name', 'Address'],
cases: []
};
},
methods: {
fetchData(){
axios.get('/case_data.json').then(response => {
this.cases = response.data;
})
}
},
created(){
this.fetchData();
}
};
It contains cases from several months, so the idea is to break it down into daily or weekly data portions and only import what is required at the time. The expectation is to improve performance. I would like to pass an input parameter to fetchData() and load a smaller dataset. Does the below approach make sense? Is the fetchData() code correct?
export default {
name: "cases",
props: {
day: {
required: true,
type: String
}
},
data() {
return {
columns: ['Case number', 'Summary', 'Name', 'Address'],
cases: []
};
},
methods: {
fetchData(this.day){
if(this.day == 'day1') axios.get('/case_data_day1.json').then(response => {this.cases = response.data;})
else if(this.day == 'day2') axios.get('/case_data_day2.json').then(response => {this.cases = response.data;})
...
else if(this.day == 'dayN') axios.get('/case_data_dayN.json').then(response => {this.cases = response.data;})
}
},
created(){
this.fetchData();
}
};
use the below code instead, its dynamic, you don't have to write manual condition and it will fetch the data upon this.day and use fetchData() on mounted hook.
methods: {
fetchData(){
let that = this
axios.get(`/case_data_${that.day}.json`).then(response => {that.cases = response.data;})
}
},
mounted(){
this.fetchData();
}
I am developing an application with React and I have a problem. I have made a fetch from a json and the values are repeated. I want only each value to appear once.
I hope that it only returns once each of the elements of "Padre": "CRM", "Permisos" and "Telefonia". The same for "Hijo".
I've tried changing ".concat" to ".reduce" because I've read that it can be done like this, but it does not work. I have seen examples but none of them works on "this.state" so I do not know how to do it.
Can you help me with the correct way to do it?
This is a part of my json file
[
{
"Id":"114",
"Padre":"CRM",
"Hijo":"Argumentarios"
},
{
"Id":"115",
"Padre":"CRM",
"Hijo":"Argumentarios"
},
{
"Id":"116",
"Padre":"CRM",
"Hijo":"Argumentarios"
},
{
"Id":"44",
"Padre":"Permisos",
"Hijo":"root"
},
{
"Id":"45",
"Padre":"Permisos",
"Hijo":"root"
},
{
"Id":"46",
"Padre":"Permisos",
"Hijo":"root"
},
{
"Id":"47",
"Padre":"Permisos",
"Hijo":"root"
},
{
"Id":"50",
"Padre":"Telefonia",
"Hijo":"Audio"
},
{
"Id":"51",
"Padre":"Telefonia",
"Hijo":"Audio"
},
{
"Id":"52",
"Padre":"Telefonia",
"Hijo":"Configuracion"
},
{
"Id":"70",
"Padre":"Telefonia",
"Hijo":"Rutas"
}
]
For confidential reasons I can not show the actual file.
In my next code I change the fetch for a fake json url
I Edit my code with #Avanthika and #blaz code. Currently the code works but shows only the first value it finds of "Father" and "Son". I need to show only once each of the different values of "Father" and "Son". Example result:
Father:
CRM
PERMISOS
Son:
ARGUMENTARIOS
ROOT
Currenly, with my new code i see only: CRM (Padre) and Argumentarios (Son). The rest of the elements are not shown.
import React, { Component } from 'react';
class Nav extends Component{
constructor(props){
super(props)
this.state = {
menuSubmenu:[]
}
}
componentWillMount(){
fetch('http://FAKE.php')
.then(response => response.json())
.then(menuSubmenu =>{
menuSubmenu.forEach(datos => {
let data = {
menu:datos.Padre,
submenu:datos.Hijo,
id:datos.Id
}
//console.log( data )
//console.log (data.menu);
this.setState({
menuSubmenu:this.state.menuSubmenu.concat([data])
})
})
})
}
render() {
const array = [...this.state.menuSubmenu];
const distinctValues = array.filter(
({ Padre, Hijo }, index) => {
return array.findIndex(item => item.Padre === Padre && item.Hijo === Hijo) === index;
});
//console.log(this.state.menuSubmenu);
//console.log(distinctValues);
if (distinctValues.length > 0) {
return(
<div>
{distinctValues.map(datos => <Navegacion key={datos.id} menu={datos.menu} submenu={datos.submenu} />)}
</div>
);
}
return (<p>Cargando usuarios...</p>);
}
}
class Navegacion extends Component{
render(){
return (
<ul className="list">
<li className="list__item">{this.props.menu}
<ul className="list">
<li className="list__item">
{this.props.submenu}
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
)
}
}
export default Nav;
This image is the result of my json.My json result
I hope you can help me with the "reduce" function.
¡Thanks a lot!
Hi you can use lodash and function uniqBy https://lodash.com/docs#uniqBy
_.uniqBy(menuSubmenu, function (e) {
return e.Padre;
});
You can use new Set to unique your array list by Padre and Hijo.
const array = [{"Id":"114","Padre":"CRM","Hijo":"Argumentarios"},
{"Id":"115","Padre":"CRM","Hijo":"Argumentarios"},
{"Id":"116","Padre":"CRM","Hijo":"Argumentarios"},
{"Id":"44","Padre":"Permisos","Hijo":"root"},
{"Id":"45","Padre":"Permisos","Hijo":"root"},
{"Id":"46","Padre":"Permisos","Hijo":"root"},
{"Id":"47","Padre":"Permisos","Hijo":"root"},
{"Id":"50","Padre":"Telefonia","Hijo":"Audio"},
{"Id":"51","Padre":"Telefonia","Hijo":"Audio"},
{"Id":"52","Padre":"Telefonia","Hijo":"Configuracion"},
{"Id":"70","Padre":"Telefonia","Hijo":"Rutas"}];
const distinctValues = Array.from(new Set(array.map(elem => `${elem.Padre}-${elem.Hijo}`))).map(distinctVal => {
const [ Padre, Hijo ] = distinctVal.split("-");
return ({
Id: array.find(elem => elem.Padre === Padre && elem.Hijo === Hijo).Id,
Padre,
Hijo
});
});
console.log(distinctValues);
Or you can go for lodash as mentioned to extract uniq values. You have to use uniqBy.
const array = [{"Id":"114","Padre":"CRM","Hijo":"Argumentarios"},
{"Id":"115","Padre":"CRM","Hijo":"Argumentarios"},
{"Id":"116","Padre":"CRM","Hijo":"Argumentarios"},
{"Id":"44","Padre":"Permisos","Hijo":"root"},
{"Id":"45","Padre":"Permisos","Hijo":"root"},
{"Id":"46","Padre":"Permisos","Hijo":"root"},
{"Id":"47","Padre":"Permisos","Hijo":"root"},
{"Id":"50","Padre":"Telefonia","Hijo":"Audio"},
{"Id":"51","Padre":"Telefonia","Hijo":"Audio"},
{"Id":"52","Padre":"Telefonia","Hijo":"Configuracion"},
{"Id":"70","Padre":"Telefonia","Hijo":"Rutas"}];
const distintValues = _.uniqBy(array, elem => [elem.Padre, elem.Padre].join());
console.log(distintValues);
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.11/lodash.min.js"></script>
You need to fix the solution this way:
render() {
const array = [...this.state.menuSubmenu];
// Put the solution you like here.
// const distinctValues = the solution you like
if (distinctValues.length > 0) {
return(
<div>
{distinctValues.map(datos => <Navegacion key={datos.id} menu={datos.menu} submenu={datos.submenu} />)}
</div>
);
}
return (<p>Cargando usuarios...</p>);
}
Original solution from Avanthika doesn't work because in your data, some item might possibly have Padre value containing dash character ("-"). Use a character that will never appear in Padre value as separator instead and you will be good.
My solution:
Use Array.prototype.filter
const distinctValues = this.state.menuSubmenu.filter(
({ Padre, Hijo }, index) => {
return this.state.menuSubmenu.findIndex(item => item.Padre === Padre && item.Hijo === Hijo) === index;
});
With Array.prototype.reduce it will look more bulky:
const distinctValues = this.state.menuSubmenu.reduce(
(array, item) => {
if (array.findIndex(i => i.Padre === item.Padre && i.Hijo === item.Hijo) === -1) {
array.push(item);
}
}, []);