I'm following Firebase's Tutorial for SSR with Angular. Unfortunately the Tutorial is outdated, since as for Angular 6 angular-cli.json was replaced with angular.json. How do I translate the step, you can find by using the link, to the angular.json file?
For comparison, here's what my file looks like:
{
"$schema": "./node_modules/#angular/cli/lib/config/schema.json",
"version": 1,
"newProjectRoot": "projects",
"projects": {
"norebro": {
"root": "",
"sourceRoot": "src",
"projectType": "application",
"prefix": "app",
"schematics": {
"#schematics/angular:component": {
"style": "scss"
}
},
"architect": {
"build": {
"builder": "#angular-devkit/build-angular:browser",
"options": {
"outputPath": "dist/norebro",
"index": "src/index.html",
"main": "src/main.ts",
...
To answer your question, since you are using Angular 8 you can run this command to make your project use SSR:
ng add #nguniversal/express-engine --clientProject norebro
After you run this command you should get everything setup properly by Angular for you. To check if everything is working first build your project:
npm run build:ssr
and then serve it (and check if everything is working correctly):
npm run serve:ssr
Specifically, the things that need to be modified inside angular.jsonare:
In "projects"->"norebro" (your_project_name)->"architect"->"build"->"options" section modify outputPath like this:
"architect": {
"build": {
"builder": "#angular-devkit/build-angular:browser",
"options": {
"outputPath": "dist/browser",
Then in "architect" section, add a new server section like this:
"server": {
"builder": "#angular-devkit/build-angular:server",
"options": {
"outputPath": "dist/server",
"main": "src/main.server.ts",
"tsConfig": "src/tsconfig.server.json"
},
"configurations": {
"production": {
"fileReplacements": [
{
"replace": "src/environments/environment.ts",
"with": "src/environments/environment.prod.ts"
}
],
"sourceMap": false,
"optimization": {
"scripts": false,
"styles": true
}
}
}
}
As for publishing an Angular SSR application to Firebase please check this answer.
The key point is that we cannot deploy Angular SSR application using Firebase Hosting but we can do it by using Firebase Cloud Functions.
P.S: Initially, the answer was posted here but users may not find the answer to Firebase deployment here when querying (since the OP is not about deployment to Firebase). That's why I created a separate Q&A just to address that issue.
Hope this helps...
Immediately under build(but not inside) you should add the configuration for your server application. It would look something like this:
"server": {
"builder": "#angular-devkit/build-angular:server",
"options": {
"outputPath": "dist/server",
"main": "src/main.server.ts",
"tsConfig": "src/tsconfig.server.json",
"stylePreprocessorOptions": {
"includePaths": [
"src/styles"
]
}
},
"configurations": {
"production": {
"fileReplacements": [
{
"replace": "src/environments/environment.ts",
"with": "src/environments/environment.prod.ts"
}
],
"outputHashing": "media"
},
"dev": {
"fileReplacements": [
{
"replace": "src/environments/environment.ts",
"with": "src/environments/environment.dev.ts"
}
]
}
}
},
Note that this one has some irrelevant properties, such as stylePreprocessorOptions. Let's focus on those relevant, which are the builder, outputPath, main, and tsConfig. Those are the files that would potentially change between a Server Side Rendered application and a Client Side Rendered application.
I have also struggled with many tutorials while I was building a project with Angular Universal, the documentation of AngularFire2 was really straightforward.
Related
I'm creating a VScode theme.
My project structure is very simple:
mytheme
|_ .vscode
|_ launch.json
|_ assets
|_ ...some png files
|_ themes
|_ mytheme.json
.vscodeignore
package.json
README.md
The mytheme.json is something like this:
{
"name": "mytheme",
"type": "dark",
"colors": {
//////////////////////////////
// CONTRAST COLOR
// The contrast colors are typically only set for high contrast themes.
// If set, they add an additional border around items across the UI to increase the contrast.
//////////////////////////////
// An extra border around active elements to separate them from others for greater contrast.
"contrastActiveBorder": "#fa0000",
// "contrastActiveBorder": "#FFFFFF00",
// An extra border around elements to separate them from others for greater contrast.
//"contrastBorder": "#fa0000",
//////////////////////////////
// BASE COLORS
//////////////////////////////
// Overall border color for focused elements. This color is only used if not overridden by a component.
"focusBorder": "#9B6DFF66",
// Overall foreground color. This color is only used if not overridden by a component.
"foreground": "#D9E0E8",
// Shadow color of widgets such as Find/Replace inside the editor.
"widget.shadow": "#1F2330",
// Background color of text selections in the workbench (for input fields or text areas, does not apply to selections within the editor and the terminal).
"selection.background": "#9B6DFF99",
// Foreground color for description text providing additional information, for example for a label.
"descriptionForeground": "#808182",
// Overall foreground color for error messages (this color is only used if not overridden by a component).
"errorForeground": "#9B6DFF",
// The default color for icons in the workbench.
"icon.foreground": "#D9E0E8",
...
}
}
and my package.json:
{
"name": "mytheme",
"version": "1.0.0",
"publisher": "...",
"icon": "assets/logo_square.png",
"galleryBanner": {
"color": "#1F2330",
"theme": "dark"
},
"engines": {
"vscode": "^1.42.0"
},
"displayName": "Mytheme",
"description": "...",
"categories": [
"Themes"
],
"contributes": {
"themes": [
{
"label": "Mytheme",
"uiTheme": "vs-dark",
"path": "./themes/mytheme.json"
}
]
},
"repository": {
"type": "git",
"URL": "....git"
},
"bugs": {
"URL": "..."
},
"author": {
"name": "...",
"email": "...",
},
"license": "MIT",
"keywords": [
"vscode",
"theme",
"color-theme",
"dark"
],
"private": false
}
Very simple. It works like a charm. But there is a big problem: it's very difficult to maintain because mytheme.json is a very very long file and it's a simple .json and If I want to modify for example the accent color, I need to do a find and replace.
I would like to develop my theme in a smarter way, I would like to use variables, save my N colors in variables and use them.
json format doesn't support variables so I ask you how can I do that?
I don't know if there is a standard way to do that, I imagine developing in js and then running a script that transforms my work into a valid json but how?
For example:
const PURPLE = "#9B6DFF"
const baseColors = {
...
errorForeground: PURPLE,
...
}
return ...
I didn't find a guide to follow.
Following the suggestion of #rioV8, I created these files:
.vscode/launch.json:
{
"version": "0.2.0",
"configurations": [
{
"type": "extensionHost",
"request": "launch",
"name": "Launch Extension",
"runtimeExecutable": "${execPath}",
"args": [
"--extensionDevelopmentPath=${workspaceFolder}"
],
"outFiles": [
"${workspaceFolder}/out/**/*.js"
],
"preLaunchTask": "parseToJson",
},
],
}
.vscode/tasks.json:
{
"version": "2.0.0",
"tasks": [
{
"label": "parseToJson",
"command": "tsc",
"type": "shell",
"presentation": {
"reveal": "silent",
"panel": "new"
},
"args": [
"--target",
"ES5",
"--outDir",
"js",
"--sourceMap",
"--watch",
"parse.ts"
],
"problemMatcher": "$tsc"
}
]
}
.vscode/parse.ts:
const PURPLE = "#9B6DFF"
const baseColors = {
errorForeground: PURPLE,
}
// create json
const mytheme = {
"name": "mytheme",
"type": "dark",
"colors": {...baseColors}
}
function createJsonTheme() {
// save to json
const file = new File(mytheme, "../themes/mytheme.json", {
type: "text/plain",
});
}
createJsonTheme()
When I run it, I get:
error TS6053: File 'parse.ts' not found. The file is in the program
because:
Root file specified for compilation
The path seems ok to me, where is The problem?
The createJsonTheme function goal is to create an object to save then in a json file inside themes folder.
Variables won't help. The theme file is a mapping of token values to color values. A theme editor tool could help you to be more productive, but I don't know any.
I solved doing like this:
launch.json:
{
"version": "0.2.0",
"configurations": [
{
"name": "Run Extension",
"type": "extensionHost",
"request": "launch",
"runtimeExecutable": "${execPath}",
"args": [
"--extensionDevelopmentPath=${workspaceFolder}"
],
"preLaunchTask": "npm: build"
},
{
"name": "Run Extension Without Build",
"type": "extensionHost",
"request": "launch",
"runtimeExecutable": "${execPath}",
"args": [
"--extensionDevelopmentPath=${workspaceFolder}"
]
}
]
}
tasks.json:
{
"version": "2.0.0",
"tasks": [
{
"type": "npm",
"script": "start",
"group": {
"kind": "build",
"isDefault": true
},
"problemMatcher": [],
"label": "npm: start",
"detail": "nodemon --watch src src/index.js"
},
{
"type": "npm",
"script": "build",
"group": "build",
"problemMatcher": [],
"label": "npm: build",
"detail": "node src/index.js"
}
]
}
package.json:
...
"scripts": {
"start": "nodemon --watch src src/index.js",
"build": "node src/index.js && mkdir -p build",
"prepublishOnly": "npm run build && vsce publish"
}
...
src/index.js:
const fs = require('fs').promises
const getTheme = require('./theme')
const ohlalaTheme = getTheme({
theme: 'dark',
name: 'Mytheme',
})
// write theme
fs.mkdir('./themes', { recursive: true })
.then(() =>
Promise.all([
fs.writeFile('./themes/mytheme.json', JSON.stringify(ohlalaTheme, null, 2)),
])
)
.catch(() => process.exit(1))
src/theme.js
const { colors } = require('./colors')
function getTheme({ theme, name }) {
const themes = (options) => options[theme]
return {
name: name,
colors: {
focusBorder: colors.green,
},
semanticHighlighting: true,
...
}
}
module.exports = getTheme
src/colors.js:
const colors = {
green: '#......',
}
module.exports = { colors }
While building my Angular 6 application, I need to specify 2 things at once:
If it's production or development build
The locale I'm using
In my angular.json I have:
"build": {
...
"configurations": {
"production": {
"fileReplacements": [
{
"replace": "src/environments/environment.ts",
"with": "src/environments/environment.prod.ts"
}
],
"optimization": true,
"outputHashing": "all",
"sourceMap": false,
"extractCss": true,
"namedChunks": false,
"aot": true,
"extractLicenses": true,
"vendorChunk": false,
"buildOptimizer": true
},
"pl": {
"fileReplacements": [
{
"replace": "src/assets/i18n/translations.json",
"with": "src/assets/i18n/pl.json"
}
]
},
"en": {
"fileReplacements": [
{
"replace": "src/assets/i18n/translations.json",
"with": "src/assets/i18n/en.json"
}
]
}
}
}
But when I'm doing ng build --configuration=en --configuration=production I'm getting an error Configuration 'en,production' could not be found. I understand it means you can specify only 1 configuration at a time.
This means I need to create separate en, pl, productionEn, productionPl configurations. Though not the cleanest pattern, I can live with that.
"build": {
...
"configurations": {
"production": {
"fileReplacements": [
{
"replace": "src/environments/environment.ts",
"with": "src/environments/environment.prod.ts"
}
],
"optimization": true,
"outputHashing": "all",
"sourceMap": false,
"extractCss": true,
"namedChunks": false,
"aot": true,
"extractLicenses": true,
"vendorChunk": false,
"buildOptimizer": true
},
"pl": {
"fileReplacements": [
{
"replace": "src/assets/i18n/translations.json",
"with": "src/assets/i18n/pl.json"
}
]
},
"en": {
"fileReplacements": [
{
"replace": "src/assets/i18n/translations.json",
"with": "src/assets/i18n/en.json"
}
]
},
"productionPl": {
"fileReplacements": [
{
"replace": "src/environments/environment.ts",
"with": "src/environments/environment.prod.ts"
},
{
"replace": "src/assets/i18n/translations.json",
"with": "src/assets/i18n/pl.json"
}
],
"optimization": true,
"outputHashing": "all",
"sourceMap": false,
"extractCss": true,
"namedChunks": false,
"aot": true,
"extractLicenses": true,
"vendorChunk": false,
"buildOptimizer": true
},
"productionEn": {
"fileReplacements": [
{
"replace": "src/environments/environment.ts",
"with": "src/environments/environment.prod.ts"
},
{
"replace": "src/assets/i18n/translations.json",
"with": "src/assets/i18n/en.json"
}
],
"optimization": true,
"outputHashing": "all",
"sourceMap": false,
"extractCss": true,
"namedChunks": false,
"aot": true,
"extractLicenses": true,
"vendorChunk": false,
"buildOptimizer": true
}
}
}
But what I can't live with is copying and pasting the whole production configuration contents into productionEn and productionPl. If I add even more locales, or some third separate aspect that I'd like to specify during build, this pattern would become a total nightmare to maintain. Unfortunately it seem it's the pattern that Angular team recommends in their documentation.
Is there a way to tell Angular CLI that productionEn extends production, so to not duplicate the same configuration code multiple times? Something like the code below:
"build": {
...
"configurations": {
"production": {
(...)
},
"pl": {
"extends": "production",
(...)
},
"en": {
"extends": "production",
(...)
}
}
}
There finally is a way to do it, specifying multiple configurations in the command line:
ng build --configuration=en,production
Relevant issue in Angular repo
Note that --prod flag is ignored when you use --configuration (so you need to add production to the configuration list explicitly).
Angular docs for --configuration=configuration:
A named build target, as specified in the "configurations" section of angular.json. Each named target is accompanied by a configuration of option defaults for that target. Setting this explicitly overrides the "--prod" flag
Aliases: -c
Update: see accepted answer for building with multiple configurations. The details below are now outdated
Reading through some issues and angular.json documentation, it appears that the options act as the defaults for the project
"architect": {
"build": {
"options": {...}
These are overridden with partial options set in the configurations. From the Angular CLI workspace wiki:
configurations (object): A map of alternative target options.
configurationName (object): Partial options override for this builder.
This issue comment also mentions using configurations as an override
This sounds like all of the defaults for the project can be added to the options object e.g. move any duplicates from production, productionPl to the options: {}, and then add the fileReplacements, and the few other overrides that you require
Note: I have not tested this yet, it's just a suggestion based on the docs and issues
But this doesn't work for ng serve you say?
Here's what probably happened:
First, here's my configuration for angular12/architect/build/configurations:
"development": {
"customWebpackConfig": {
"path": "custom-webpack.dev.config.js",
"replaceDuplicatePlugins": true
},
"buildOptimizer": false,
"optimization": false,
"vendorChunk": true,
"extractLicenses": false,
"sourceMap": false,
"namedChunks": true,
"aot": true
},
"quick": {
"fileReplacements": [
{
"replace": "src/app/app-routing.module.ts",
"with": "src/app/app-routing.module.quick.ts"
}
]
}
I have a standard development config, with an added configuration called quick which is what I want to set in addition to the options from development.
(So my quick is the same as OP's en and pl.)
Sorry this isn't a magic new 'quick Angular build' feature (!) - I simply made a copy of my app-routing file, commented out every lazy module except the one I'm currently working with and configured the fileReplacements option to override the standard file. The build is significant faster for a large project. Clearly though I didn't want to accidentally deploy this which is why I needed a separate configuration.
What happens when you run ng serve --configuration development,quick is it looks in the serve part of the configuration (below). As you can see I added quick here as a browser target, referencing what I have above.
"serve":
{
"builder": "#angular-builders/custom-webpack:dev-server",
"options": {
"browserTarget": "angular12:build"
},
"configurations":
{
"production": {
"browserTarget": "angular12:build:production"
},
"development": {
"browserTarget": "angular12:build:development"
},
"quick": {
"browserTarget": "angular12:build:quick"
}
},
"defaultConfiguration": "development"
},
What's actually happening when you ask for --configuration development,quick is it merges these two nodes:
"development": {
"browserTarget": "angular12:build:development"
}
"quick": {
"browserTarget": "angular12:build:quick"
}
Which results in:
"development": {
"browserTarget": "angular12:build:development"
}
Makes sense why it didn't work now :-)
Solution:
The solution is fortunately as simple as updating serve/quick to:
"quick": {
"browserTarget": "angular12:build:development,quick"
}
Then simply run:
ng-serve --configuration quick
This will in turn will merge your development and quick configurations under architect/build as if you were running ng build.
PS. You may see I'm using customWebpackConfig. That is the #angular-builders/custom-webpack package that allows for customization. It's irrelevant to my answer, but allowed me to prove to myself that it was indeed working as I was able to observe both my customWebpack plugins running and only the single lazy chunk I wanted was built.
are you ask about ?
"scripts": {
[...]
"build-i18n": "for lang in en es fr pt;
do ng build --config=$lang;
done"
}
In my composer setup I load packages from 2 repos. One composer repo and a private gitlab repo. When I try to do a composer install on my local windows machine, I get the following error messages:
GitLab: The project you were looking for could not be found. fatal:
Could not read from remote repository. Please make sure you have the
correct access rights and the repository exists. ... The requested
package sv-test/testextension could not be found in any version, there
may be a typo in the package name.
Authentification is done via lokal ssh-key and password, that doesnt seem to be the problem. Whats wrong with my setup?
The composer.json of the project looks like this:
{
"repositories": [
{
"type": "composer",
"url": "https://composer.typo3.org/"
},
{
"type": "git",
"url": "git#gitlab.xydevbox.de:sv-test/Testproject.git"
}
],
"name": "svdev/master-dev-box",
"description": "",
"type": "project",
"license": "MIT",
"homepage": "https://www.xydevbox.de/",
"authors": [
{
"name": "Sacha Vorbeck",
"email": "sacha.vorbeck#xydevbox.de",
"homepage": "https://www.xydevbox.de/",
"role": "Developer"
}
],
"require": {
"sv-testbox/testextension": "*",
"helhum/typo3-console": "^4.5",
"typo3/cms": "^8.7"
},
"config": {
"sort-packages": true,
"process-timeout": 2000,
"preferred-install": {
"typo3/cms": "source",
"*": "dist"
}
},
"extra": {
"typo3/cms": {
"cms-package-dir": "{$vendor-dir}/typo3/cms",
"web-dir": "web"
}
}
}
The composer.json from the package to be included from the gitlab private repo looks like this:
{
"name": "sv-testbox/testextension",
"type": "typo3-cms-extension",
"description": "",
"homepage": "https://www.xydevbox.de/",
"license": ["GPL-2.0+"],
"keywords": ["TYPO3 CMS"],
"version": "master",
"dist": {
"url": "git#gitlab.xydevbox.de:sv-test/Testproject.git",
"type": "git"
}
}
Maybe the latest composer version 1.5.2 is something for you if you take a look at the release notes
Fixed GitLabDriver looping endlessly in some conditions
Fixed
GitLabDriver support for unauthenticated requests
Fixed GitLab zip
downloads not triggering credentials prompt if unauthenticated
Fixed
path repository support of COMPOSER_ROOT_VERSION, it now applies to
all path repos within the same git repository
Fixed path repository
handling of copies to avoid copying VCS files and others
Fixed
sub-directory call to ignore list and create-project commands as well
as calls to Composer using --working-dir
Fixed invalid warning
appearing when calling remove on an non-stable package
https://github.com/composer/composer/releases
Thank you Georg and NextThursday. With some help on TYPO3 slack I finally got it running. The replace part was missing. I also learned that one should not edit composer.json files manually - always use the command line options to modify it. This example: https://github.com/TYPO3-Console/TYPO3-Console/blob/master/composer.json was also helpful.
project composer.json:
{
"repositories": [
{
"type": "composer",
"url": "https://composer.typo3.org/"
},
{
"type": "vcs",
"url": "https://github.com/svorbeck/masterconfig"
}
],
"name": "svorbeck/demo",
"description": "",
"type": "project",
"license": "MIT",
"homepage": "https://xydevbox.de/",
"authors": [
{
"name": "Sacha Vorbeck",
"email": "sacha.vorbeck#xydevbox.de",
"role": "Developer"
}
],
"require": {
"svorbeck/masterconfig": "dev-master",
"typo3/cms": "^8.7"
},
"config": {
"sort-packages": true,
"process-timeout": 2000,
"preferred-install": {
"typo3/cms": "source",
"svorbeck/masterconfig": "source",
"*": "dist"
}
},
"extra": {
"typo3/cms": {
"cms-package-dir": "{$vendor-dir}/typo3/cms",
"web-dir": "web"
},
"helhum/typo3-console": {
"install-extension-dummy": "0"
}
}
}
ext composer.json:
{
"name": "svorbeck/masterconfig",
"type": "typo3-cms-extension",
"description": "svorbeck master configuration",
"require": {
"typo3/cms-core": "^8.7"
},
"replace": {
"masterconfig": "self.version",
"svorbeck/masterconfig": "self.version"
}
}
I'm new in angular2 and i have tried to create a project with cli, but when I try to change the css adding it in angular-cli.json, I have detected that this file is not created...
Can I create manually or this file has been changed for another one?
Thanks!!
Angular 6 and later
angular-cli.json file has been renamed/replaced with angular.json in version 6 of Angular.
It's a different file format and not just a rename :
https://github.com/angular/angular-cli/wiki/angular-workspace
The file was changed to be a hidden file now on unix/linux systems. It is now .angular-cli.json.
The angular-cli.json should be located in the root folder of the project. This is using the latest version "#angular/cli": "1.0.0-beta.32.3".
As for creating it if it is missing or maybe accidentally deleted, you could try that since the original version is pretty generic. Here is what it should look like right after project creation:
{
"$schema": "./node_modules/#angular/cli/lib/config/schema.json",
"project": {
"version": "1.0.0-beta.32.3",
"name": "testproj"
},
"apps": [
{
"root": "src",
"outDir": "dist",
"assets": [
"assets",
"favicon.ico"
],
"index": "index.html",
"main": "main.ts",
"polyfills": "polyfills.ts",
"test": "test.ts",
"tsconfig": "tsconfig.json",
"prefix": "app",
"styles": [
"styles.css"
],
"scripts": [],
"environmentSource": "environments/environment.ts",
"environments": {
"dev": "environments/environment.ts",
"prod": "environments/environment.prod.ts"
}
}
],
"e2e": {
"protractor": {
"config": "./protractor.conf.js"
}
},
"lint": [
{
"files": "src/**/*.ts",
"project": "src/tsconfig.json"
},
{
"files": "e2e/**/*.ts",
"project": "e2e/tsconfig.json"
}
],
"test": {
"karma": {
"config": "./karma.conf.js"
}
},
"defaults": {
"styleExt": "css",
"component": {}
}
}
You could also try generating a new project with the cli with ng new PROJECT_NAME and see if it contains the angular-cli.json file.
If you are looking for the global CLI config, I found it here on Windows:
%USERPROFILE%\angular-config.json
Example config change
ng config -g cli.defaultCollection #angular-eslint/schematics
Change is saved here
C:\users\USERNAME-GOES-HERE\angular-config.json
{
"version": 1,
"cli": {
"defaultCollection": "#angular-eslint/schematics",
"packageManager": "yarn",
"warnings": {
"versionMismatch": false
}
}
}
So as the title says, i am wondering if its possible to do the equivalent of "npm run " with the dotnet cli?? e.g. this snippet is from my project.json:
{
"dependencies": {
"Microsoft.NETCore.App": {
"version": "1.1.0",
"type": "platform"
},
"Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics": "1.1.0",
"Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.IISIntegration": "1.1.0",
"Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel": "1.1.0",
"Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Console": "1.1.0",
"Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration": "1.1.0",
"Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.EnvironmentVariables": "1.1.0",
"Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.FileExtensions": "1.1.0",
"Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json": "1.1.0",
"Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.CommandLine": "1.1.0",
"Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc":"1.1.0",
"Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore": "1.1.0",
//"MySql.Data.Core": "7.0.4-ir-191",
//"MySql.Data.EntityFrameworkCore": "7.0.4-ir-191",
"SapientGuardian.EntityFrameworkCore.MySql": "7.1.14",
"Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity.EntityFrameworkCore": "1.0.0",
"moq": "4.6.38-alpha",
"Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design": "1.1.0",
"Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer": "1.1.0",
"Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Relational": "1.1.0"
},
"scripts": {
"migrate-identity": "dotnet ef database update --context 'ApplicationDbContext'"
},
The migrate-identity is one i added my self, is it possible to execute this script??
Otherwise i guess i will just have a scripts folder in my project, no big deal, but still :)
Just add the scripts you want in your scripts section in your project.json
"scripts": {
"prepublish": [ "gulp mifiny-js", "gulp minify-css", "gulp remove-non-minified-files" ],
"postpublish": [ "dotnet publish-iis --publish-folder %publish:OutputPath% --framework %publish:FullTargetFramework%" ]
}
I'm using gulp but this is the same with npm
Here is the full project.json schema
As you can see, the scripts section can receive a bunch of different properties corresponding to different events.
"scripts": {
"type": "object",
"description": "Scripts to execute during the various stages.",
"properties": {
"precompile": { "$ref": "#/definitions/script" },
"postcompile": { "$ref": "#/definitions/script" },
"prepack": { "$ref": "#/definitions/script" },
"postpack": { "$ref": "#/definitions/script" },
"prepublish": { "$ref": "#/definitions/script" },
"postpublish": { "$ref": "#/definitions/script" },
"prerestore": { "$ref": "#/definitions/script" },
"postrestore": { "$ref": "#/definitions/script" },
"prepare": { "$ref": "#/definitions/script" }
}
},
Also I see in your comment that you wish to execute them manually. It's possible with Visual Studio at least (never tried VS Code). Just use the Task Runner Explorer. You need to build your project in order to see your npm or gulp tasks.
I'm not able to open it using the shortcut (Ctrl + Alt + Backspace) but the window is also accessible through View -> Other Windows -> Task Runner Explorer
project.json files are no longer supported. However, it is possible to handle it by using XML-based csproj files.
Example:
<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Web">
...
<Target Name="MyTarget" AfterTargets="Build">
<Exec Command="echo 'I believe you will see this message right after a successfull building'" />
</Target>
...
</Project>
Result:
For further details:
MS Docs: Mapping between project.json and csproj