I need to train watson assistant on the following utterance, what is the order status of Bob/Jane or some name.
I tried with #sys-person but it does not recognize all names.
I defined an intent like this
what is order status of #name
and created entity #name as \b[A-Za-z0-9]\b
This is a good use for contextual entities. You can read up on those here:
Contextual Entities with IBM Watson Assistant
All about entities: Contextual entities with Watson Assistanthttps://medium.com/ibm-watson/all-about-entities-contextual-entities-with-watson-assistant-part-2-7697d2b73db0)
The idea is that you don't need your bot to know all possible names in advance, but instead it can recognize a name based on the context within an intent.
To set this up, you'd go to your order status intent and add some training examples such as:
what is the order status of Name
what is the order status of Another Name
what is the order status of Yet Another Name
(These examples can have any kind of name, whether fake or real.)
And then you'll annotate each of those to associate the name with the #name entity, by double-clicking on the name portion of the training examples (i.e. Name, Another Name, Yet Another Name) to bring up the entity selection UI and specifying your #name entity.
After Watson finishes training, you can test it in the "Try it out" window. Enter something like "what is the order status of Charles Flint" or "what is the order status of Thomas Watson" and you should see your #name entity matched. From there, you can access the name specified by the user with #name.value.
Hi JohnDon't wish to dismiss your entity pattern, however from experience I have seen its almost impossible to determine a complete list of people names. I use both #sys-person and my own #names entity which contains over 6,000 common names, and we are still adding missing values to the list. We also have a #bad_names list which contains names that match common words like; summer, cherry, star, cj, etc. By using both your intent or #sys-person or #names, etc in your condition you have a good chance to catch a high percent of the users messages.
Related
In Enovia Mql, if we want to print the details of a connection between a person and its company object what is the command. For Ex: Business objects can be explored using "Expand", similarly what is the way for Admin Objects?
I think we need some clarification on question as when you talk about "connection between a person and its company object" that means you are talking about business objects.
But for admin objects query is different.
I will try to answer both the questions.
A. Admin object query
print person PERSONNAME;
B. Business object information:
as you need all connection information below query will help you.
expand bus Person PERSONNAME - type Company select rel id attribute.value;
as we have mentioned "type Company" the expand will only consider connected Company type of objects.
"select rel" clause selects information from relationships.
You can add any selectable for relationship in above query.
also for more information on expand you can use following query in mql and check expand bus section.
help bus;
Please try to perform below query:
Print person XYZ selectable;
Thanks_Sachin
May be it would be good if you have mentioned specific admin object names.
As per current schema design admin objects are not connected in the way business object are connected. But admin objects are referenced/added to another admin object.
For example Attribute admin object is added to type object.
print type Part select attribute
Similarly type admin object is added into policy admin object.
Print policy Engineering selet type store format;
In above example we can see type ,store and format admin objects being referenced from policy.
Similar way each admin object is referenced/added to another admin object
Hi I am using an API from Postcode Anywhere, the idea being to add a company by searching by postcode to select the address, this is pretty standard and the code works fine.
Just some background info, PAW works in two stages, 1 the post code search criteria is sent off to their services, which returns an array of possible addresses, you then select the address you want, and in stage 2, the full PAF file for that ID is returned and stored to the table.
The problem I am having is that the array they send includes an Address Field which includes house number and street address in one field, making it difficult to sort alphanumerically.
This is the sample data I have in my table:
and this is how it looks in my application:
As you can see it is not ideal and I have no control on how they send the data.
Does anyone have any ideas on how I can search a string based on numbers that can be 1, 11, 2, instead of 01, 02, 03, etc, or at the very least be able to split this into two rows. Also please note, that it most cases, the post code search will result business/property names as well as house numbers, as seen in this example.
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
Have you considered using a different API provider for the data, Allies Computing (who I work for) have a single step API, where the initial postcode search returns all fields in the response. It also orders these results by premise number/name.
Give it a try here - https://developers.alliescomputing.com/postcoder-web-api/address-lookup/premise
There are also other providers of PAF data that do it this way such as Crafty Clicks and Ideal Postcodes.
It might also be worth checking the PAF license with your provider to ensure you comply with that too.
Basically, if user uploads same c-cda document again or other documents containing same entries of like medications, vitals, allergies, surgeries, etc than I want to make sure they do not get duplicated in database and want to skip those from inserting again.
Each entry inside an HL7 CDA could have an id attribute, which definition form HL7 V3 RIM is:
3.1.1.3
Act.id :: SET (0..N)
Definition:A unique identifier for the Act.
Use it in order to uniquely identify you entries, and avoid duplicates.
This element is not mandatory, but if you are implementing C-CDA, this template for substance administration specifies that this element is mandatory, so you should ask document sender to inform it. Here is a substance administration example form C-CDA:
<substanceAdministration classCode="SBADM" moodCode="EVN">
<templateId root="2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.16"/>
<id root="cdbd33f0-6cde-11db-9fe1-0800200c9a66"/>
<text>
<reference value="#med1/>
Proventil 0.09 MG/ACTUAT inhalant solution, 2 puffs QID PRN wheezing
</text>
<statusCode code="completed"/>
<effectiveTime xsi:type="IVL_TS">
<low value="20110301"/>
<high value="20120301"/>
</effectiveTime>
<effectiveTime xsi:type="PIVL_TS" institutionSpecified="true" operator="A">
<period value="6" unit="h"/>
</effectiveTime>
...
MartÃ
martipamies#vico.org
I am new with MDS, and I have a question about one to many relation mapping in MDS
I have a product, contains descriptions in multiple languages. I have created two entities with derived hierarchy structure: product (P_ID, P_name)and Addtional description(P_ID, P_Name_in_German, P_name_in_English).
Additonal description is a drop down from product table from MDS UI, but I only want to populate info that releated with its same P_ID. How can I achieve that? Can I use business rules here and how it should look like?
(2012 Master data service' web interface)
I have also faced a similar problem. I have decided to add multiple fields for languages and apply business rules for them. Let's see how it would work for your entity:
Product entity
{
Code
Name
Name_in_English (text)
Name_in_German (text)
Default_language (domain based, points to Languages entity)
}
Languages entity
{
Code
Name
}
Add values to the Languages entity:
Code = "EN", Mane = "EN"
Code = "DE", name = "DE"
Now we need to add the following business rules to the Product entity:
BR1:
{
IF Condition - Equals: Default_language equals "EN"
THEN Action - Change value: Name = Name_in_English
}
BR2:
{
IF Condition - Equals: Default_language equals "DE"
THEN Action - Change value: Name = Name_in_German
}
After that You will see the product names in your product entity only in proper language which is chosen by drop-down field Default_language.
The second option:
If You want user to see only the Name field and don't want him to see additional fields,
You can hide those fields (Name_in_English and Name_in_German) by setting their width to zero.
Moreover, You can use attribute groups to separate two modes of view:
first mode (for the regular user) - You see only Code and Name
second mode (for the administrator) - You see fields: Name_in_English, Name_in_German, Default_language.
For it to work You need to create two attribute groups:
1) attribute group "EN" (add attributes Name and Code to the group)
2) attribute group "DE" (add attributes Name_in_English, Name_in_German, Default_language to the group)
Hope something of that is helpful!
You're missing something. You said you have a derived hierarchy structure but you don't show a domain based attribute on the Additional description entity with a pointer back to the Product entity. Perhaps you were thinking that the P_ID for Additional Description is the pointer back but it isn't (based on your explanation). It is the entity Code identifier for the Additional Description entity and not the key you need that points back to Product. Perhaps you meant One to One. One to Many implies you have a separate Parent_P_ID back to the Product entity.
Add the Domain Based Parent_P_ID attribute to the Additional Description entity and then reconstruct your derived hierarchy structure. This may not be that helpful because I think you have left something out of the explanation of what you are trying to do.
Hi Cocunuts,
We can not assign derived hierarchy to entities in MDS 2012,but we can achieve this in MDS 2016 , Your Domain based attribute(Drop down) cannot be further filtered in MDS 2012.
Background
I'm faced with the following problem, relating to three tables
class_sectors table contains three categories of classes
classes table contains a list of classes students can attend
class_choices contains the first, second and third class choice of the student, for each sector. So for sector 1 Student_A has class_1 as first choihce, class_3 as second choice and class_10 as third choice for example, then for sector 2 he has another three choices, etc...
The class_choices table has these columns:
kp_choice_id | kf_personID | kf_sectorID | kf_classID | preference | assigned
I think the column names are self explanatory. preference is either 1, 2 or 3. And assigned is a boolean set to 1 once we have reviewed a student's choices and assigned them to a class.
Problem:
Writing an sql query that tells the students what class they are assigned to for each sector. If their class hasn't been assigned, it should default to show their first preference.
I have actually got this to work, but using two (very bloated??) sql queries as follows:
$choices = $db -> Q("SELECT
*, concat_ws(':', `kf_personID`, `kf_sectorID`) AS `concatids`
FROM
`class_choices`
WHERE
(`assigned` = '1')
GROUP BY
`concatids`
ORDER BY
`kf_personIDID` ASC,
`kf_sectorID` ASC;");
$choices2 = $db -> Q("SELECT
*, concat_ws(':', `kf_personID`, `kf_sectorID`) AS `concatids`
FROM
`class_choices`
WHERE
`preference` = '1'
GROUP BY
`concatids`
HAVING
`concatids` NOT IN (".iimplode($choices).")
ORDER BY
`kf_personID` ASC,
`kf_sectorID` ASC;");
if(is_array($choices2)){
$choices = array_merge($choices,$choices2);
}
Now $choices does have what I want.
But I'm sure there is a way to simplify this, merge the two SQL queries, and so it's a bit more lightweight.
Is there some kind of conditional SQL query that can do this???
Your solution uses two steps to enable you to filter the data as needed. Since you are generating a report, this is a pretty good approach even if it looks a bit more verbose than you might like.
The advantage of this approach is that it is much easier to debug and maintain, a big plus.
To improve the situation, you need to consider the data structure itself. When I look at the class_choices table, I see the following fields: kf_classID, preference, assigned which contain the key information.
For each class, the assigned field is either 0 (default) or 1 (when the class preference is assigned for the student). By default, the class with preference = 1 is the assigned one since you display it in the report when assigned=0 for all the student's class choices in a particular sector.
The data model could be improved by imposing a business rule as follows:
For preference=1 set the default value assigned=1. When the class selection process
takes place, and if the student gets assigned the 2nd or 3rd choice, then preference 1 is unassigned and the alternate choice assigned.
This means a bit more code in the application but it makes the reporting a bit easier.
The source of the difficulty is that the assignment process does not explicitly assign the 1st preference. It only updates assigned if the student cannot get the 1st choice.
In summary, your SQL is good and the improvements come from taking another look at the data model.
Hope this helps, and good luck with the work!