I'm actually trying to fix an image to a div with text on it regardless of the screen resolution the user may have.
So the image doesn't move and stays fixed in that div.. forever
On Html:
<div class="config">
<img id="uC1"></img>
<div class="config-title">Settings</div>
</div>
On Css:
.config-title {
transform: rotate(-10deg);
text-align: center;
margin: 20px 0px 0px 0px;
position: relative; }
#uC1 {
background-image: url(/images/tinta2.png);
width: 32px;
height: 23px;
position: absolute;
top: 5%;
left: 60%; }
The problem is, when neither using % nor px on top and left, other screen resolutions moves the image.
I've already tried to play with the #media (min-width: 575px) {} options and thats working but then will need to fix the position in all the widths, and maybe there's a better and much simple solution that i don't know
I'm aware that creating an image with the div's content plus image will do the thing but i want to be able to change the text eventually
And sorry if i type like yoda, but remember:
In a dark place we find ourselves, and a little more knowledge lights our way.
From the comments, it looks like you are just wanting your icon before your text. In this case, I would use a pseudo element before the actual text:
.config-title {
transform: rotate(-10deg);
text-align: center;
margin: 20px 0px 0px 0px;
position: relative;
line-height: 23px; /* same height as your image (unless your font size is larger, then make it the same size as your font */
}
.config-title:before { /* this will place a pseudo element at the beginning of the config title div */
content: '';
display: inline-block; /* make it inline block so it appears before the element and is centred with it */
background: url(/images/tinta2.png) top left no-repeat;
background-size: contain;
width: 32px;
height: 23px;
margin-right: 10px; /* spacing to your text */
vertical-align: middle;
}
<div class="config">
<div class="config-title">Settings</div>
</div>
If I understand the question correctly, you can achieve this with the position attribute.
position: absolute will be positioned relatively to the container div with position: relative. If you want to place in the top left corner, you can use top: 0; left: 0.
Working JSFiddle
.container {
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
margin: 15px;
height: 200px;
width: 200px;
border: 2px solid red;
}
.container--image {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
}
<div class="container">
<img src="https://placekitten.com/g/50/50" class="container--image">
<p>Content</p>
</div>
<div class="container">
<img src="https://placekitten.com/g/50/50" class="container--image">
<p>Content</p>
</div>
<div class="container">
<img src="https://placekitten.com/g/50/50" class="container--image">
<p>Content</p>
</div>
Related
So I have an issue and despite spending on research a while now I still cannot figure out what I am doing wrong.
Consider the following:
/* Main row */
.main-row {
width: 100%;
display: inline-flex;
z-index: -1;
position: relative;
}
.spacer {
width: 100%;
background-color: #0a0826;
height: 250px;
background-image: url("../img/purple-wave.png");
background-position: 0px 17%;
z-index: 10;
position: relative;
}
and HTML
<div class="main-row">
<div class="main-row left-pane">
<h1 class="main-row title">Changing The Way</h1>
<p class="main-row subtitle">We understand <a>intelligent</a>telecommunication</p>
</div>
<div class="main-row right-pane">
<img src="<?php echo base_url("assets/vid/ai_brain.gif");?>" />
</div>
</div>
<div class="spacer"></div>
I am expecting to see the spacer (with some fancy graphics) to overlay the main row but this isn't happening. The position is specified, the z index is set correctly, the two divs are independent of each other. Whatever I do the graphic still is displayed below the main-row div
I think you're confusing background-position and element positioning. Background positioning changes the position of your background relative to wherever the element is on the screen. The background is still contained by the element, and otherwise does not affect the element's size or position on the screen.
Everything will overlap if you adjust the actual position of the spacer, like so:
.spacer {
top: -200px; /* This */
width: 100%;
background-color: #0a0826;
height: 250px;
background-image: url("../img/purple-wave.png");
background-position: 0px 17%;
z-index: 10;
position: relative;
}
I recently have created this banner for my website, but I realized that I only want the main part of my site to be 900px long. However, I want the banner to run off the page, but have the part where it runs off be darkened (through opacity). So, this means, I need to make the image of my site positioned in the middle. Here is what I developed so far:
https://jsfiddle.net/h3w89t9y/4/
As you can see, this doesn't really get what I need. Here's the issue:
.banner {
background:url(https://i.gyazo.com/74f0fa6b9d9ed6652f3e220ceae113cf.png) no-repeat;
background-position: center;
margin: 0 auto;
height:185px;
}
The banner isn't 800px. If I add in a width of 800px, it will go to the middle just like I wanted. However, the image will be limited to only be 800px long rather than overflowing off of 800px.
This is what I'm trying to get it to look like:
https://i.gyazo.com/c38cae7bd34379477a6fcc8eeb160c22.png
How do I make it to where my banner is centered to the middle, but has the sides overlapped with opacities?
You can achieve what you want using pseudo like this:
body {
margin: 0;
}
.wrapper {
background:url(https://i.gyazo.com/74f0fa6b9d9ed6652f3e220ceae113cf.png) no-repeat center;
width: 100%;
}
.wrapper:before, .wrapper:after {
content:'';
width: calc((100% - 900px) / 2); /*setting the width to the 100% minus your desired header's width / 2 so it will occupy the rest of your content*/
height:185px;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
background: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.3); /*set the desired opacity*/
}
.wrapper:before {
left: 0;
}
.wrapper:after {
right: 0;
}
.banner {
width: 900px;
height:185px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
<div class="wrapper" style="">
<div class="banner"></div>
</div>
So the idea is your pseudo elements occupy the rest of the content and setting them your desired transparency, notice that in this way you also can set them blur or whatever filter that you want.
Here a working jsfiddle to play with
You can't control opacity of a single background like that, you need another element. For example:
.banner, .bannert {
background:url(https://i.gyazo.com/74f0fa6b9d9ed6652f3e220ceae113cf.png) no-repeat;
background-position: center;
margin: 0 auto;
height:185px;
}
.banner {
max-width: 800px;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
right: 0;
top: 0;
}
.bannert {
background-repeat: repeat-x;
opacity: 0.5;
}
<div style="width: 100%; background: black; padding: 1px;position: relative;">
<div class="bannert"></div>
<div class="banner"></div>
</div>
https://jsfiddle.net/h3w89t9y/6/
Try this; add two divs first, one for the left side, and one for the right,hence you can apply your desired opacity to them and make the banner sides filtered, look at the snippets below;
HTML
<div style="width: 100%; padding: 1px;">
<div class="banner">
<div class="trans_right"></div>
<div class="trans_left"></div>
</div>
</div>
CSS
.trans_right {
padding: 2rem;
width: 13%;
float: right;
background: rgba(71,67,255,0.9);
height: 65%;
}
.trans_left {
padding: 2rem;
width: 13%;
float: left;
background: rgba(71,67,255,0.9);
height: 65%;
}
I'm really not sure if there is a better way to do this, but it gives you what you're looking for, checkout the link:
Transparent Sides
I'm creating a gallery with images having an overlay dark background and caption text. The placement is alright but the overlay div is falling out of the bounds of the image because a padding is used on the container element.
I read about it at several places and learned that border-box could solve this problem but it isn't. Am I doing something wrong here? Check out the code:
HTML:
<div class="dest-item">
<img src="http://lorempixel.com/500/400">
<div class="dest-caption">
<div class="dest-text">
<h3>This is a caption</h3>
</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.dest-item{
position:relative;
overflow:hidden;
z-index:1;
padding:10px;
width: 500px;
}
.dest-item img{
width: 100%;
}
.dest-caption{
position: absolute;
top: 0px;
background: rgba(0,0,0,0.2);
z-index: 2;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
.dest-text{
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
background: rgba(255,255,255,0.9);
width: 100%;
padding: 0px 10px;
}
Playground link: Code Pen
Try this (fork here:http://codepen.io/anon/pen/RNqbjB)
CSS:
/*remove the padding*/
.dest-item{
position:relative;
overflow:hidden;
z-index:1;
padding:0px;
width: 500px;
}
HTML:
<!--Add a wrapper and add the padding to that-->
<div style="padding:10px;">
<div class="dest-item">
<img src="http://lorempixel.com/500/400">
<div class="dest-caption">
<div class="dest-text">
<h3>This is a caption</h3>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Remove the padding from whole dest-item div. you don't need that padding over there as I think:
.dest-item {
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
z-index: 1;
/* padding: 10px; */
width: 500px;
}
Not sure if this is along the right lines?
.dest-item{
position:relative;
overflow:hidden;
z-index:0;
padding:10px;
width: 500px;
}
.dest-item img{
width: 100%;
}
.dest-caption{
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
background: rgba(0,0,0,0.2);
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
.dest-text{
color: black;
position: absolute;
text-shadow: 2px 2px 40px rgba(255,255,255, 1);
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
background: rgba(255,255,255,0.38);
width: 100%;
padding: 2px 0px 10px 20px;
}
<div class="dest-item">
<img src="http://lorempixel.com/500/400">
<div class="dest-caption">
<div class="dest-text">
<h3>This is a caption</h3>
</div>
</div>
</div>
You don't need border-box to do what you want.
There are 3 types of box-sizing:
content-box is the default behavior and only includes the width and height. It does not account for padding or border width. If you have an element with 500px width + 10px padding + 1px border then the display size of the whole element is 522px wide and the size of the available space for actual content is 500px.
padding-box includes the padding but not the border. Same example as above, if you are using padding-box then the display size is 502px but the available content space is 480px.
border-box covers everything. So in our example, the display size is 500px but available space for content is 478px.
Margins are never counted in the size, in any case.
Depending on how you want the end result to look, then you will achieve this differently but based on your Code Pen sample, it looks like you want to fill the entire item container so the overlay cover the 10px padding as well. You can do this without changing the box-sizing for anything.
First, you need to offset your .dest-caption element to the left by 10px to account for the padding. Then you need to add 10px padding and remove the border-box attribute.
Like this:
.dest-caption {
position: absolute;
top: 0px;
left: -10px; /* offset */
background: rgba(0,0,0,0.5);
z-index: 2;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
padding: 10px; /* add padding */
}
With that fixed, your text and its box is misaligned and the size of the box is not well-controlled. It is affected by the margin of the H3 tag. Fix this by removing the margins from the H3 tag inside of any .dest-text elements:
.dest-text H3 {
margin: 0px;
}
Without the margins on the H3 tag, the text overlay actually disappears out of the drawable area because it's misaligned. You can fix this by offsetting .dest-text from the bottom by the .dest-caption padding width (x2). You will probably also want top and bottom padding for .dest-text.
.dest-text {
position: absolute;
bottom: 20px; /* account for padding on .dest-caption */
background: rgba(255,255,255,0.9);
width: 100%;
padding: 10px 10px; /* add top/bottom padding */
}
Code Pen Link
I have a content div with a ragged border (using a border-image) and I place another div each below the content div left and right to hold an image. This image is supposed to have a link. While the image shows nicely through the border the link area gets hidden by it. Given that my ragged border is rather wide (almost 100px), this feels quite confusing. Therefore I would like to "float" the image below the border and the actual link area above so that the link is clickable as well were the image is under the border or visible through the border.
Despite not having the background-image uploaded the effect becomes visible since the border is wide black. The structure includes a minimal header, which is not vital to the problem but is part of the root structure.
Another problem is that the link area expands to more than the wrapped image in height, however this is a minor issue.
http://jsfiddle.net/hc3jrkku/
Basestructure:
<header>
<nav>
<a href='?p=faq#faq' id='faq'>
FAQ
</a>
</nav>
</header>
<div class='leftSide'>
<a href="#anchor" class="bgImage"><img src="img/some.png" style="
position: relative;
z-index: -1;
opacity: .99;
border: 1px solid red;
width: 150px;
height: 200px;
background-color: red,
"></a>
</div>
<div class='rightSide'>{$right}</div>
<main>
<div class='container'>
{$content}
</div>
</main>
</body>
CSS:
* {
box-sizing: border-box
}
body {
margin: 0;
}
.leftSide{
position: fixed;
z-index: 0;
top: 20px;
right: 50%;
transform: translateX(-50%);
width: 808px;
height: 100%;
display: flex;
justify-content: flex-end;
margin-right:-93px;
padding: 15px 93px 90px 0;
}
.rightSide{
position: fixed;
z-index: 0;
top: 20px;
left: 50%;
transform: translateX(50%);
width: 808px;
height: 100%;
margin-left:-93px;
padding: 15px 0 90px 93px;
}
a.bgImage {
z-index:900;
opacity:.99;
border:2px dashed blue
}
.rightSide .bgImage {
margin-left: -93px;
}
.leftSide .bgImage {
margin-right: -93px;
}
main {
width: 808px;
min-height: 400px;
margin: 20px auto 0;
position: relative;
z-index: 50;
border-style: solid;
border-width: 0px 93px 127px 93px;
border-image: url(img/paperedge.png) 0 93 127 93 fill round;
padding-top:10px;
}
header {
height: 20px;
background: #ffffff url(img/header_bg.png) repeat-x bottom;
border-bottom: 1px solid #000000;
position: fixed;
width: 100%;
top: 0;
z-index: 100
}
nav {
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
}
Having read http://philipwalton.com/articles/what-no-one-told-you-about-z-index/, I tried creating new context(s) as well, and stripping the divs containing left/right background image of the z-index, However my current code depends on the transform/position thus creating a new context for the parent element either way. Is the sandwich stacking (some children above other parts of the page/others below) possible anyways?
If you want the image to be behind the border (or your content div), you can add this to the CSS of your div in the front:
main {
pointer-events: none;
}
This will kill the events on your div and make the behind events visible in the front: DEMO
You can also search more and find these similar topics:
HTML "overlay" which allows clicks to fall through to elements behind it
HTML/CSS: Make a div "invisible" to clicks?
I have an image in my website that is defined with the following CSS:
#settings_big{
border: none !important;
margin: auto 0 0 0 !important;
padding: 0 !important;
float: right;
}
Because of the float the image obviously sits on the right side of the content. The top margin causes the image to sit right beneath the lowest hanging element in the content. This looks OK, but I would really prefer that the image sit as low as possible in the browser window to somewhat frame the content. I've seen multiple examples that use fixed positioning to achieve this, and this would work, however my content has a max and min width of 960px; using a fixed position of
bottom: 0;
right: 0;
causes the image to get pushed far right outside of the content to the edge of the browser window. Is it possible to push the image to the bottom of the browser window while keeping the
float: right;
positioning? I would rather not use JavaScript or jQuery but it is an option I suppose. Thanks in advance.
New answer:
<div class="container contentCont">
<div id="content"></div>
</div>
<div class="container imageCont">
<div id="image"></div>
</div>
With CSS:
.container {
width: 200px;
margin: 0 auto;
background: #ccc;
}
.contentCont {
min-height: 600px;
}
.imageCont {
position: fixed;
bottom: 0;
right: 0;
left: 0;
}
#image {
float: right;
width: 20px;
height: 20px;
border: 4px solid red;
}
Does it right as in this JSFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/WYX7H/1/
The following might be close to what you need.
Assuming that your page layout vaguely looks like the following HTML:
<div class="wrapper">
<p>some words...</p>
<div class="slot">
<img src="http://placehold.it/200x200">
</div>
</div>
apply the following CSS:
.wrapper {
width: 600px;
height: 600px; /* for demo only, not critical... */
margin: 0 auto;
border: 1px solid blue;
}
.slot {
text-align: right;
position: fixed;
left: 50%;
bottom: 0;
margin-left: -301px;
width: 600px;
border: 1px dotted blue;
}
.wrapper img {
vertical-align: top;
}
See demo at: http://jsfiddle.net/audetwebdesign/6Xnxj/
If you don't know the width of the image (or you don't want to specify it),
create a wrapper that matches the width of the parent element and apply position: fixed to it.
The image can then be either floated or text-aligned to the right within the fixed block.
The fixed block can then be positioned to the left and bottom, and using margin-left
to keep it centered.