Set column to different span dynamically using CSS grid [duplicate] - html

I know there are similar questions but this is specifically asking how to do this using CSS Grid Layout.
So we have this basic grid setup:
HTML (with sidebar):
<div class="grid">
<div class="content">
<p>content</p>
</div>
<div class="sidebar">
<p>sidebar</p>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.grid {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 1fr 200px;
}
To create a layout that looks something like this:
| content | sidebar |
If the page doesn't have a sidebar though, ie. the html looks like this but with the same CSS:
HTML (no sidebar):
<div class="grid">
<div class="content">
<p>content</p>
</div>
</div>
The page layout looks like this (dashes represent empty space)
| content | ------- |
I know why it does that, the grid column is still defined in the grid-template-columns rule.
I'm just wondering how to tell the grid that if there is no content, then fill the remaining space similar to how flex-grow works for flexbox.
The desired result would look like this if no sidebar is present.
| content |

Don't define the columns explicitly with grid-template-columns.
Make the columns implicit instead and then use grid-auto-columns to define their widths.
This will allow the first column (.content) to consume all space in the row when the second column (.sidebar) doesn't exist.
.grid {
display: grid;
grid-auto-columns: 1fr 200px;
}
.content {
grid-column: 1;
}
.sidebar {
grid-column: 2;
}
.grid > * {
border: 1px dashed red; /* demo only */
}
<p>With side bar:</p>
<div class="grid">
<div class="content">
<p>content</p>
</div>
<div class="sidebar">
<p>sidebar</p>
</div>
</div>
<p>No side bar:</p>
<div class="grid">
<div class="content">
<p>content</p>
</div>
</div>

You can get closer by using content sizing keywords, something like:
.grid {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 1fr fit-content(200px);
}
.sidebar {
width: 100%;
}
The fit-content keyword will look at the size of the content and act like max-content until it gets to the value you pass in.
In reality you probably wouldn't need to stick a size on sidebar as the content is likely to dictate a size of at least 200 pixels (for example) but you can play around with this.

I think I know the definitive answer to this question now. The problem with the answers so far is that they don't explain how to handle a sidebar that is on the left side of the main content (mainly because I didn't ask for it in the original question).
<div class="grid">
<nav>
<p>navigation</p>
</nav>
<main>
<p>content</p>
</main>
<aside>
<p>sidebar</p>
</aside>
</div>
You can use this CSS:
.grid {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: fit-content(200px) 1fr fit-content(200px);
}
nav, aside {
width: 100%;
}
/* ensures that the content will always be placed in the correct column */
nav { grid-column: 1; }
main { grid-column: 2; }
aside { grid-column: 3; }
This is also a good use case for grid-areas
.grid {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: fit-content(200px) 1fr fit-content(200px);
grid-template-areas: "nav content sidebar";
}
nav, aside {
width: 100%;
}
/* ensures that the content will always be placed in the correct column */
nav { grid-area: nav; }
main { grid-area: content; }
aside { grid-area: sidebar; }
An IE compatible version would look like this:
.grid {
display: -ms-grid;
display: grid;
-ms-grid-columns: auto 1fr auto;
grid-template-columns: auto 1fr auto;
}
nav, aside {
width: 100%; /* Ensures that if the content exists, it takes up max-width */
max-width: 200px; /* Prevents the content exceeding 200px in width */
}
/* ensures that the content will always be placed in the correct column */
nav {
-ms-grid-column: 1;
grid-column: 1;
}
main {
-ms-grid-column: 2;
grid-column: 2;
}
aside {
-ms-grid-column: 3;
grid-column: 3;
}

Related

CSS Grid auto-height columns to content

I'm trying to create a layout like this:
I want the grid height to be according to the content. The pagination area height to be according to its box-sizing and the image area to take up the rest of the available space. I'm relatively new to grid. Help would be highly appreciated.
This is what I'm getting:
.grid {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(12, 1fr);
grid-template-rows: repeat(2, min-content);
}
The problem is pagination and image sections takes half of the grid area. I do not want any section to have a fixed height in pixels.
Based on the response to a previous awnser here i have tried to make the changes that are being looked for.
From what i can gather you are describing 3 total elements Image, Pagination, Content
of these 3 total elements you would like
Content to occupy 100% of the width of the right side
Pagination to live on the left side and occupy a small amount that is just enough to fit the pagination
Image to live on the left side an occupy the remaining space
To do this we can still use grid we just need to specify different values for our template which I have done below. The key here is min-content
html body{
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
}
.your_main_class {
width: 100vw;
height: 100vh;
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 50vw 50vw;
grid-template-rows: 1fr min-content;
grid-template-areas: "image cont"
"pagination cont";
}
div{
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
.image{
grid-area: image;
background: red;
}
.pagination{
grid-area: pagination;
background: blue;
}
.content{
grid-area: cont;
background: black;
}
<div class="your_main_class">
<div class="image"> Image </div>
<div class="pagination"> Pagination </div>
<div class="content"> content </div>
</div>
You can do that by specifying the area of the divs. Check the snippet bellow.
.your_main_class {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(12, 1fr);
grid-template-rows: repeat(3, 1fr);
}
.image{
grid-area: 1 / 1 / 3 / 6;
background: red;
}
.pagination{
grid-area: 3 / 1 / 4 / 6;
background: blue;
}
.content{
grid-area: 1 / 6 / 4 / 13;
background: black;
}
<div class="your_main_class">
<div class="image"> </div>
<div class="pagination"> </div>
<div class="content"> </div>
</div>

CSS Grid Styling

I am trying to understand how CSS grids work. I've tried to make an example of a store item as practice, but I am at a loss.
Here's my how my CSS currently looks. Cut off at the top, weird spacing, and the right side is not coming together at all.
How's how it would ideally look
Here is my current CSS, I hope someone can help explain where I am misunderstanding the use of
CSS grids.
.store-currency {
height: 3vh;
}
.item {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
grid-row: 1 / span 2;
}
.currency {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
}
#num-bought-item0 {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: right;
margin-right: 10px;
grid-column: 1 / span 2;
}
.store-item {
height: 15vh;
width: 100%;
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 2fr;
grid-template-rows: 1fr 1fr;
font-size: 24px;
color: white;
border: 5px white solid;
justify-content: left;
align-items: center;
}
.store-item img {
margin: 10px;
height: 8vh;
}
.store-container {
display: flex;
height: 100%;
width: 30vw;
z-index: 0;
background-color: saddlebrown;
left: 0;
position: absolute;
text-align: center;
}
HTML:
<div class="store-container">
<div class="store-item" id="item0">
<div class ="item">
<img src="dumbell.png" alt="">
<span>Dumbbell</span>
</div>
<div id="num-bought-item0">
<span>Owned</span>
<span id="count-item0">0</span>
</div>
<div class="currency">
<img class="store-currency" src="coin.png" alt="">
<span>100000</span>
</div>
</div>
you did the first steps.
To get started you have to define a container element as a grid with display: grid, set the column and row sizes with grid-template-columns and grid-template-rows, and then place its child elements into the grid with grid-column and grid-row.
.store-container {
display: grid | inline-grid;
}
grid – generates a block-level grid
inline-grid – generates an inline-level grid
With grid-template-columns you can define how many columns will appear in your layout.
P.S Fr unit is a fractional unit and 1fr is for 1 part of the available space. In this example each column would take ~ 25% from the available space.
.container {
grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr 1fr 1fr;
}
For your task, you can use grid-template-areas feature.
The grid-template-areas CSS property specifies named grid areas,
establishing the cells in the grid and assigning them names.
For example:
.item-a {
grid-area: header;
}
.item-b {
grid-area: main;
}
.item-c {
grid-area: sidebar;
}
.item-d {
grid-area: footer;
}
.container {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 50px 50px 50px 50px;
grid-template-rows: auto;
grid-template-areas:
"header header header header"
"main main . sidebar"
"footer footer footer footer";
}
This will generates something like that in modern browsers:
If you need more examples, take a look here:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/grid-template-areas
https://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/complete-guide-grid/
Some of the examples are taken from the second site.
It looks like you are mixing flex and grid properties. grid-row and grid-column are only avalaible for a grid display (2D), not a flex display (1D).
You can try to play around with flex (worse choice since it is drawing a 1D layout) , you can use grid , which is made for this kind of layout.
Here a couple example with flex and grid
/* GRID make it simple*/
.grid {display:grid;}
#num-bought-item2 {grid-row:1/3;grid-column:2;}
#num-bought-item2 {display:grid;margin:auto;text-align:center}
/* layout done */
/* some reset for the demo*/
*{box-sizing:border-box;}
.store-container {display:grid;justify-content:center;}
.store-item {border:solid;}
.store-item>div {padding:0.5em;}
img{vertical-align:middle;}
[src="https://dummyimage.com/25/ff0"]{border-radius:50%}
big{color:darkgreen;background:lightyellow;}
/* FLEX make it a mess */
.flex {display:flex}
.column {flex-flow:column wrap;height:120px;}/* here an height is to be set so it wraps*/
/* since it is not made for this, we need to mess around */
.flex #num-bought-item1{order:2}/* reorder item */
.flex .item {height:0;min-height:60%;}/* hide it, then show it */
.flex .currency {height:0;min-height:40%;}/* hide it, then show it */
.flex #num-bought-item1{display:flex;flex-direction:column;justify-content:center;text-align:center;margin:auto;}
/* and flex did not do it */
<p>Let's try via flex</p>
<div class="store-container">
<div class="store-item flex column" id="item1">
<div class="item">
<img src="https://dummyimage.com/50" alt="">
<span>Dumbbell</span>
</div>
<div id="num-bought-item1" >
<span>Owned</span>
<span id="count-item1">0</span>
</div>
<div class="currency">
<img class="store-currency" src="https://dummyimage.com/25/ff0" alt="">
<span>100000</span>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>And via <big>grid</big> </p>
<div class="store-container">
<div class="store-item grid" id="item2">
<div class="item">
<img src="https://dummyimage.com/50" alt="">
<span>Dumbbell</span>
</div>
<div id="num-bought-item2" >
<span>Owned</span>
<span id="count-item1">0</span>
</div>
<div class="currency">
<img class="store-currency" src="https://dummyimage.com/25/ff0" alt="">
<span>100000</span>
</div>
</div>
</div>

Prevent CSS grid from causing overflow

I have a CSS grid, but I'm finding that the grid rows are not all fitting onto the page - instead, they're causing an overflow. How can I resize the grid rows so that they don't overflow the page? I thought the 1fr value was supposed to do this, but it doesn't seem to be working in my code.
I've had a look at Prevent content from expanding grid items and tried the suggested answers there (such as changing grid-template-rows: repeat(5, 1fr) to grid-template-rows: repeat(5, minmax(0, 1fr)); but to no avail.
I've tried adding height: 100% to the grid and it's container, but it is still overflowing.
JsFiddle https://jsfiddle.net/4g9b2qkL/
body,
html {
margin: 0;
height: 100%;
}
#container {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 1fr 5fr;
height: 100%;
}
#left {
grid-column: 1 / 2;
background: lightblue;
height: 100%;
}
#right {
grid-column: 2 / 3;
height: 100%;
}
#results {
display: grid;
grid-template-rows: repeat(5, 1fr);
height: 100%;
}
img {
max-height: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
}
<div id="container">
<div id="left">
<p>
Some stuff on the left....
</p>
</div>
<div id="right">
<h1>
Title
</h1>
<div id="results">
<div class="result">
<img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/62/Paracas_National_Reserve%2C_Ica%2C_Peru-3April2011.jpg" />
</div>
<div class="result">
Result 2
</div>
<div class="result">
Result 3
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
A few things to consider:
missing height reference
Using a percentage value to set the height of the img is problematic because there is no defined height on the container. Generally speaking, percentage heights should have a height reference on the parent for reliable rendering. Your declarations may or may not be ignored / misinterpreted.
See: Working with the CSS height property and percentage values
height: 100%
Setting the #results element to height: 100% is problematic, if you want to prevent a vertical overflow, because it doesn't factor in the height of the sibling (the h1).
height: 100% + height of h1 title > height of container (resulting in an overflow)
use a flexible height instead
Instead of using a percentage height, set a more flexible height, such as flex-grow. This tells the container to simply consume remaining space.
override the minimum height default
Grid and flex items are set by default to stop shrinking at the size of their content. Override that setting with min-height: 0.
See: Why don't flex items shrink past content size?
cross browser compatibility
Chrome can do the layout with less code (than posted below). It makes more assumptions about an author's intentions. Firefox, Edge and Safari assume less, so require more rules.
#container {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 1fr 5fr;
height: 100vh;
}
#left {
background: lightblue;
}
#right {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
height: 100vh;
}
#results {
flex-grow: 1;
min-height: 0;
display: grid;
grid-template-rows: repeat(5, 1fr);
}
.result {
min-height: 0;
}
img {
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
}
body {
margin: 0;
}
<div id="container">
<div id="left">
<p>Some stuff on the left....</p>
</div>
<div id="right">
<h1>Title</h1>
<div id="results">
<div class="result">
<img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/62/Paracas_National_Reserve%2C_Ica%2C_Peru-3April2011.jpg" />
</div>
<div class="result">Result 2</div>
<div class="result">Result 3</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
You need to consider min-height:0 in different places and make some adjustment like below:
body,
html {
margin: 0;
height: 100%;
}
#container {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 1fr 5fr;
height: 100%;
}
#left {
grid-column: 1 / 2;
background: lightblue;
/*height: 100%; removed */
}
#right {
grid-column: 2 / 3;
/*height: 100%; removed */
min-height:0; /* here */
/* added */
display:flex;
flex-direction:column;
/**/
}
#results {
display: grid;
grid-template-rows: repeat(5, 1fr);
/*height: 100%; removed */
flex-grow:1; /* added */
min-height:0 /* here */
}
.result {
min-height:0 /* here */
}
img {
max-height: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
}
<div id="container">
<div id="left">
<p>
Some stuff on the left....
</p>
</div>
<div id="right">
<h1>
Title
</h1>
<div id="results">
<div class="result">
<img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/62/Paracas_National_Reserve%2C_Ica%2C_Peru-3April2011.jpg" />
</div>
<div class="result">
Result 2
</div>
<div class="result">
Result 3
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>

Flex - changing order of nested elements?

On small screens i'm trying to get my .image div to slot in between .title and .text divs, something like:
title
image
text
.title and .text are wrapped in a container, this is so on a different screen size (medium up) I can do:
title | image
text | continuation of image element
I've thought about using a flex column layout for small screens, and changing the order of elements, but order doesn't seem to have an effect on a nested child element.
Here's the code for small:
HTML:
<div class="container">
<div class="content">
<div class="title"></div>
<div class="text"></div>
</div>
<div class="image"></div>
</div>
CSS:
.container {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.image {
order: 2;
}
.title {
order: 1;
}
.text {
order: 3;
}
For reference my code for medium is (cascading upwards from small):
.container {
flex-direction: row;
}
.content {
flex-basis: 50%;
}
.image {
flex-basis: 50%;
}
You can ordering only sibling elements. Title and text aren't sibling with image. You need wrap title, text and image in general parent block
I have similar case, but for solution CSS grid is used, however there is also another support is recommended: CSS subgrid
For a simple design like even columns or rows it is not that hard to replicate, but if parent container contain more complex grid sizes, then CSS subgrid will be requirement for an only CSS solution.
Here is full demo: https://codepen.io/XCanG/pen/vYaNZPo?editors=1100
HTML I have in the demo have very similar structure with having parent, some container for 2 nested elements and 3rd element.
This is quote from my demo, except I rename class names according to your example:
.container {
display: grid;
grid-template-rows: repeat(3, 1fr);
}
.container .content {
display: grid;
grid-column: 1;
grid-row: 1 / span 3;
grid-template-rows: repeat(3, 1fr); /* Fallback */
grid-template-rows: subgrid; /* Limited support: https://caniuse.com/css-subgrid */
grid-template-columns: subgrid;
}
.container .title {
grid-colimn: 1;
grid-row: 1;
}
.container .text {
grid-column: 1;
grid-row: 3;
}
.container .image {
grid-column: 1;
grid-row: 2;
}
CSS make that nested element follow grid columns and rows, with subgrid support you will have exactly defined part of the grid (otherwise you will need to define fallback). And with grid-column and grid-row it is possible to sort elements.
Grid-template-areas will come in pretty handy in this type of layout as they are not siblings. And grid-template-areas have full browser support.
.container {
display: grid;
grid-template-areas: "title img"
"txt img";
}
.title{grid-area: title;}
.text{grid-area: txt;}
.image{grid-area: img;}
#media(max-width: 800px){
.container{
grid-template-areas: 'title'
'img'
'txt';
}
}
<div class="container">
<div class="content">
<div class="title">title</div>
<div class="text">text</div>
</div>
<div class="image">img</div>
</div>

Reverse order of columns in CSS Grid Layout

I was hoping to use CSS Grid to reverse the apparent order of two side-by-side divs, where one of the divs grows arbitrarily (I don't want to use floats).
I've created a plunkr here: http://plnkr.co/edit/6WZBnHbwhD7Sjx2ovCO7?p=preview
#container {
grid-template-columns: 240px 1fr;
display: grid;
}
.a {
background: yellow;
}
.b {
background: blue;
color: white;
}
#container>.a {
grid-column: 1;
}
#container>.b {
grid-column: 2;
}
#container.reverse>.a {
grid-column: 2;
}
#container.reverse>.b {
grid-column: 1;
}
<div id="container" class="reverse" style="width: 800px;">
<div class="a">A</div>
<div class="b">B</div>
</div>
The crux of it is that when I have the .reverse class applied (so that you should see B | A), B is offset to a new line so it looks more like:
| A
B
If I invert the document ordering of .a with .b, this goes back to normal (but of course, if I drop the .reverse class, I get the same problem).
Why is this, and how can I address?
As the Grid auto-placement algorithm lays out items in the container, it uses next available empty cells (source).
In your source code the A element comes before the B element:
<div id="container" class="reverse" style="width: 800px;">
<div class="a">A</div>
<div class="b">B</div>
</div>
Therefore, the grid container first places A, then uses the next available space to place B.
By default, the auto-placement algorithm looks linearly through the grid without backtracking; if it has to skip some empty spaces to place a larger item, it will not return to fill those spaces. To change this behavior, specify the dense keyword in grid-auto-flow.
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-grid-layout/#common-uses-auto-placement
grid-auto-flow: dense
One solution to this problem (as you have noted) is to override the default grid-auto-flow: row with grid-auto-flow: dense.
With grid-auto-flow: dense, the Grid auto-placement algorithm will look to back-fill unoccupied cells with items that fit.
#container {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 240px 1fr;
grid-auto-flow: dense; /* NEW */
}
7.7. Automatic Placement: the grid-auto-flow
property
Grid items that aren’t explicitly placed are automatically placed into
an unoccupied space in the grid container by the auto-placement
algorithm.
grid-auto-flow controls how the auto-placement algorithm works,
specifying exactly how auto-placed items get flowed into the grid.
dense
If specified, the auto-placement algorithm uses a “dense” packing
algorithm, which attempts to fill in holes earlier in the grid if
smaller items come up later. This may cause items to appear
out-of-order, when doing so would fill in holes left by larger items.
#container {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 240px 1fr;
grid-auto-flow: dense; /* NEW */
}
.a {
background: yellow;
}
.b {
background: blue;
color: white;
}
#container>.a {
grid-column: 1;
}
#container>.b {
grid-column: 2;
}
#container.reverse>.a {
grid-column: 2;
}
#container.reverse>.b {
grid-row: 1;
grid-column: 1;
}
<div id="container" class="reverse" style="width: 800px;">
<div class="a">A</div>
<div class="b">B</div>
</div>
grid-row: 1
Another solution would be to simply define the row for the second item.
#container>.b {
grid-column: 2;
grid-row: 1; /* NEW */
}
#container {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 240px 1fr;
}
.a {
background: yellow;
}
.b {
background: blue;
color: white;
}
#container>.a {
grid-column: 1;
}
#container>.b {
grid-column: 2;
grid-row: 1; /* NEW */
}
#container.reverse>.a {
grid-column: 2;
}
#container.reverse>.b {
grid-row: 1;
grid-column: 1;
}
<div id="container" class="reverse" style="width: 800px;">
<div class="a">A</div>
<div class="b">B</div>
</div>
The simplest way is to add order: 1 to element B or order: -1 to element A in .reverse
It's also correct CSS rather than hack-y
I'm not sure how to reverse more grid items. But if you have 2 grid items in your grid, you can simply position 2nd grid item using below code.
#container > .b {
grid-column-start: 1;
grid-row-start: 1;
}
I had this same issue just now. I tried auto-row-dense and then set the direction of the container parent to rtl. It worked.
Just this, on the plunker link, seemed to do the trick.
.reverse{
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(2, 1fr);
grid-auto-flow: dense;
direction: rtl;
}
You can use direction property to reverse a grid x-axis order.
Nested elements will be reversed too so you have to make sure to add additional styles to fix this behavior.
<div class="grid">
<div class="grid-item"><div>
</div>
<style>
.grid { direction : rtl; }
.grid-item { direction : ltr; }
</style>
Edit: this may work but could cause accessibilty issues.
Round peg in square hole
Remember even if you're using fancy 'new' grid features the older flex layout will still work. You can combine them, nest them and sometime you have to admit that certain problems like this may just be better solved with good old
flex-direction: row-reverse
But I know some people will want to downvote me for that so here's another way with grid.
Use named template regions
You can use named template regions and reverse them in the definition.
#container
{
grid-template-areas: a b;
grid-template-rows: 240px 1fr;
display: grid;
}
#container.reverse
{
// note the order is flipped for both these properties
grid-template-areas: b a;
grid-template-rows: 1fr 240px;
}
.a {
grid-area: a;
background: yellow;
}
.b {
grid-area: b;
background: blue;
color: white;
}
Here's an more complex example that uses that technique with media queries
I found out: I need to apply grid-auto-flow: dense; on the container:
#container {
grid-template-columns: 240px 1fr;
display: grid;
grid-auto-flow: dense;
}
According to MDN, this algorithm attempts to fill in holes earlier in the grid.
I want to mention a solution which is also relevant to this question in some cases. When having a multi-row layout, and you want a reversed look of how you grid fills up.
You can play with grid-start combined with some :nth-child & :last-child selectors to achieve a reverse auto flow.
Reversed grid-auto-flow: column
.container{
display: grid;
width: 10rem;
gap: 0.5rem;
grid-template-rows: repeat(2, 1fr);
grid-auto-flow: column; /* => vertical grid*/
}
/* REMOVE THIS TO SEE THE DIFFERENCE */
.pixel:nth-child(odd):last-child { /* reversed auto-flow: column */
grid-row-start: 2;
}
.pixel{
width: 2rem;
height: 2rem;
background: red;
border: 1px solid black
}
<div class="container">
<!-- ADD/REMOVE SOME PIXELS to see the result -->
<div class="pixel"></div>
<div class="pixel"></div>
<div class="pixel"></div>
<div class="pixel"></div>
<div class="pixel"></div>
<div class="pixel"></div>
<div class="pixel"></div>
</div>
Reversed: horizontal & vertical
.container{
display: grid;
width: 10rem;
gap: 0.5rem;
grid-template-rows: repeat(2, 1fr);
grid-auto-flow: column;
direction: rtl; /* reversed horizontal */
}
/* REMOVE THIS TO SEE THE DIFFERENCE */
.pixel:nth-child(odd):last-child { /* reversed vertical */
grid-row-start: 2;
}
.pixel{
width: 2rem;
height: 2rem;
background: red;
border: 1px solid black
}
<div class="container">
<!-- ADD/REMOVE SOME PIXELS to see the result -->
<div class="pixel">1</div>
<div class="pixel">2</div>
<div class="pixel">3</div>
<div class="pixel">4</div>
<div class="pixel">5</div>
<div class="pixel">6</div>
<div class="pixel">7</div>
</div>
I found out: I need to apply grid-auto-flow: dense; on the container: