I am performing an UPDATE operation such that all the non-null properties set in the incoming POJO shall be copied into another object (same type) and this shall happen for nested properties too.
Ex:
POJO:
public class Person {
private String homePhoneNumber;
private String officePhoneNumber;
private Address address;
public String getHomePhoneNumber() {
return homePhoneNumber;
}
// getter/setters
}
public class Address {
private String street;
private String houseNumber;
public String getStreet() {
return street;
}
// getter/setters
}
// Source
Person sourcePerson = new Person();
sourcePerson.setHomePhone("123");
Address address1 = new Address();
address1.setStreet("Street");
sourcePerson.setAddress(address1);
//Dest person
Person destPerson = new Person();
destPerson.setOfficePhone("456");
destPerson.setHomePhone("123");
Address address2 = new Address();
address2.setStreet("Street2");
address2.setHouseNumber("246");
destPerson.setAddress(address2);
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
//skip setters for null values
mapper.setDefaultSetterInfo(JsonSetter.Value.forValueNulls(Nulls.SKIP));
Person result = mapper.updateValue(destPerson, sourcePerson);
So I want to copy all non-null properties set in sourcePerson to get copied in destPerson i.e overriding only those properties of destperson which sourcePerson has set, keeping other properties unchanged.
Using
Person result = mapper.updateValue(destPerson, sourcePerson);
is not working for nested properties. It's replacing the whole Address object from source to destination
I searched through jackson to find merge feature in jackson which:
mapper.setDefaultMergeable(true);
However, adding this configuration is making null values in sourcePerson nullify those in destPerson too, which seems strange.
mapper.configOverride(Address.class).setMergeable(true);
This above configuration works for what I wanted. But I have many POJO nested resources, so I don't want specific configurations for each POJO.
Is this can be achieved with jackson in a clean way ?
You can start by enabling error reporting with respect to merging
com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.MapperFeature#IGNORE_MERGE_FOR_UNMERGEABLE
This needs to be false.
It's indeed strange that mapper.configOverride() sort of works, but not mapper.setDefaultMergeable().
I don't see setters in your example. Aren't you using #JsonSetter annotations in Person class by any chance? Then they would override mapper configuration.
In jackson-databind Unit Tests I see they are using mapper.readerForUpdating() rather than mapper.updateValue():
private final ObjectMapper MAPPER = objectMapperBuilder()
// 26-Oct-2016, tatu: Make sure we'll report merge problems by default
.disable(MapperFeature.IGNORE_MERGE_FOR_UNMERGEABLE)
.build();
public void testBeanMergingWithNullDefault() throws Exception
{
// By default `null` should simply overwrite value
ConfigDefault config = MAPPER.readerForUpdating(new ConfigDefault(5, 7))
.readValue(aposToQuotes("{'loc':null}"));
assertNotNull(config);
assertNull(config.loc);
// but it should be possible to override setting to, say, skip
// First: via specific type override
// important! We'll specify for value type to be merged
ObjectMapper mapper = newObjectMapper();
mapper.configOverride(AB.class)
.setSetterInfo(JsonSetter.Value.forValueNulls(Nulls.SKIP));
config = mapper.readerForUpdating(new ConfigDefault(137, -3))
.readValue(aposToQuotes("{'loc':null}"));
assertNotNull(config.loc);
assertEquals(137, config.loc.a);
assertEquals(-3, config.loc.b);
// Second: by global defaults
mapper = newObjectMapper();
mapper.setDefaultSetterInfo(JsonSetter.Value.forValueNulls(Nulls.SKIP));
config = mapper.readerForUpdating(new ConfigDefault(12, 34))
.readValue(aposToQuotes("{'loc':null}"));
assertNotNull(config.loc);
assertEquals(12, config.loc.a);
assertEquals(34, config.loc.b);
}
Also worth trying using com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonMerge directly in Person class.
Related
Actually I try to invoke a get request with the restTemplate in Spring. Debbuging my application clearly shows that the JSON is downloaded but the automatic mapping does not work. My List of domain object includes only 0 values and null values.
When I invoke the get request from the browser, I get the following response as JSON (I copied here the first two record out of the 3 192):
[{"OrderId":77862,"DateAdded":"2016-04-30T02:25:40.263","OrderItemCorpusId":"HUBW","OrderItemCorpusOriginalId":null,"OrderItemCurrency":"HUF","OrderItemExchangeRate":1.00000,"OrderItemOriginalLocation":"HU","OrderItemBuyLocation":"HU","OrderItemPrice":1337.80314,"OrderItemDiscountId":0,"OrderItemDiscountValue":"","DocumentId":25140,"Title":"Romana Gold 10. kötet","PublisherOriginalName":"Harlequin Kiadó","ISBN":"9789634073369"},{"OrderId":77864,"DateAdded":"2016-04-30T15:49:22.61","OrderItemCorpusId":"HUBW","OrderItemCorpusOriginalId":null,"OrderItemCurrency":"HUF","OrderItemExchangeRate":1.00000,"OrderItemOriginalLocation":"HU","OrderItemBuyLocation":"HU","OrderItemPrice":2748.03149,"OrderItemDiscountId":0,"OrderItemDiscountValue":"","DocumentId":25252,"Title":"Az eltűnt lány","PublisherOriginalName":"Harlequin Kiadó","ISBN":"9789634072423"}]
My POJO domain object which should keep the converted data from JSON:
#JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true)
public class BandWTransaction {
private long OrderId;
private Date DateAdded;
private String OrderItemCurrency;
private double OrderItemExchangeRate;
private String OrderItemBuyLocation;
private double OrderItemPrice;
private String OrderItemDiscountValue;
private long DocumentId;
private String Title;
private String PublisherOriginalName;
private String ISBN;
//getters and setters
Finally the code snippet I use for the rest get request:
String startDate = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd").format(start.getTime());
String endDate = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd").format(end.getTime());
UriComponents uri = UriComponentsBuilder.newInstance().scheme("http").host("www.bookandwalk.hu")
.path("/api/AdminTransactionList").queryParam("password", "XXX")
.queryParam("begindate", startDate).queryParam("enddate", endDate).queryParam("corpusid", "HUBW")
.build().encode();
LOG.log(Level.INFO, "{0} were called as a rest call", uri.toString());
HttpHeaders headers = new HttpHeaders();
headers.setAccept(Arrays.asList(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON));
headers.set("User-Agent", "Anything");
HttpEntity<String> entity = new HttpEntity<String>(headers);
ResponseEntity<List<BandWTransaction>> transResponse = restTemplate.exchange(uri.toString(), HttpMethod.GET,
entity, new ParameterizedTypeReference<List<BandWTransaction>>() {
});
List<BandWTransaction> transactions = transResponse.getBody();
When I debug the app I realized that the transactions list includes objects with full of null and 0 values. More precisely, there is no and objcet within the list having other values as 0 and null in the properties.
I have also checked that spring boot automatically registered in the restTemplate.messageConverters ArrayList 9 HttpMessageConverter. The 7th element of this ArrayList is the org.springframework.http.converter.json.MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter which supports the application/json and application/+json media types.
Any idea is appreciated to solve this problem as I am newbie in spring and in JSON mapping in general.
It seems you have a naming convention issue due to your field variables starts with a uppercase. When Jackson finds a pair getTitle/setTitleasumes that the name of this variable is title (starting with lowercase). Of course, if you change the capitalization of your variables, json properties and java variables has different names, so mapping still fails. The best solution is change your names to meet Java conventions, and use Jackson annotations to define your mappings.
#JsonProperty(value="OrderId")
private int orderId;
#JsonProperty(value="DateAdded")
private Date dateAdded;
Hope it helps.
I can suggest you to write a test and check how fasterxml ObjectMapper read a json and unmarshall json to your object:
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
String somestring = objectMapper.readValue("somestring", String.class);
just replace String with your class and "somestring" with your json. So you check if there is problem with it.
And try to use #JsonPropery cause all this capital letters fields start with looks messy:
#JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true)
public class BandWTransaction {
#JsonProperty("OrderId")
private long OrderId;
[...]
With this stuff I read json correct. You can come in from other side remove ignoring unknown properties:
#JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true) //remove it and run test
public class BandWTransaction {
and you get :
(11 known properties: "dateAdded", "orderItemExchangeRate",
"documentId", "orderItemPrice", "orderId", "orderItemBuyLocation",
"orderItemDiscountValue", "orderItemCurrency", "isbn", "title",
"publisherOriginalName"])
So problem in variables naming and you can fix it with #JsonProperty
How can I set Spring MVC to serialize float or double numbers to json with a limited number of decimals?
If you are serializing from bean, the easiset would be to write a custom deserializer, e.g.
public class FloatSerializer extends JsonSerializer<Float> {
#Override
public void serialize(Float value, JsonGenerator jgen, SerializerProvider provider) throws IOException {
if (null == value) {
jgen.writeNull();
} else {
final String serializedValue = null;
// do your customization here
jgen.writeNumber(serializedValue);
}
}
}
and apply it to the field, e.g.
#JsonSerialize(using = FloatSerializer.class)
public Float getFloatField()
or simply convert the value in the setter of the property if its a one time conversion that works for you
-- Update with respect to the comment
If you want to apply globally than you'll have to use a custom jackson object mapper in your spring mvc and follow the guide for adding modules http://wiki.fasterxml.com/JacksonFeatureModules, the gist is along the following lines
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
// basic module metadata just includes name and version (both for troubleshooting; but name needs to be unique)
SimpleModule module = new SimpleModule("EnhancedDatesModule", new Version(0, 1, 0, "alpha"));
// functionality includes ability to register serializers, deserializers, add mix-in annotations etc:
module.addSerializer(MyBean.class, new MyCustomSerializer());
module.addDeserializer(MyBean.class, new MyCustomSerializer());
// and the magic happens here when we register module with mapper:
mapper.registerModule(module);
i'm coding a restService who can update some datas in a database via Nhibernate.
The service receive DTO objects from a client.
I'm using Automapper to map my Dto to NhibernateObject.
The problem is my DTO class reference itself. here an example :
public class UserDto
{
public String Name{get;set;}
public string Lastname{get;set;}
public UserDto UserOwner{get;set;}
}
here's my BusinessClass
public class User
{
public String Name{get;set;}
public string Lastname{get;set;}
public String Adress{get;set;}
public User UserOwner{get;set;}
}
Sometimes User object and UserOwner properties references the same object.
So when i do that
User usr = Automapper.Mapper.Map<UserDto,User>(myUserDtoObject); // this works fine
but when i do
Automapper.Mapper.Map(myUserdtoObject,MyUserNhibernateObject); // i've got a stackoverflowexception
I can use the first option but if i do that, when my new UserEntity returned by Map function is created the value of "Adress" properties is not set (UserDto does not contains it).
You need to use MaxDepth - AutoMapper doesn't know how far to go down your rabbit hole.
ForMember(dest => dest.UserOwner, opt => opt.MaxDepth(1))
This is important for NHibernate, which uses proxy objects to load indefinitely. The other option is to ignore the UserOwner member, but that's likely not your intent here.
I have a class that has more than a dozen properties. For most of the properties of primitive type, I hope to use the default BeanSerializer and BeanDeserializer or whatever to reduce the cumbersome code I need to write. For other properties of custom and array types, I want to do some custom serializer/deserializer. Note that I am not able to change the underlying JSON string. But I have full access to the android code. I am using Jackson 1.7.9/Ektorp 1.1.1.
shall I subclass BeanDeserializer? I am having trouble with that. It expects a default constructor with no parameters but I don't know how to call the super constructor.
class MyType{
// a dozen properties with primitive types String, Int, BigDecimal
public Stirng getName();
public void setName(String name);
// properties that require custom deserializer/serializer
public CustomType getCustom();
public void setCustom(CustomType ct);
}
class MyDeserializer extends BeanDeserialzer{
// an exception is throw if I don't have default constructor.
// But BeanDeserializer doesn't have a default constructor
// It has the below constructor that I don't know how to fill in the parameters
public MyDeserializer(AnnotatedClass forClass, JavaType type,
BeanProperty property, CreatorContainer creators,
BeanPropertyMap properties,
Map<String, SettableBeanProperty> backRefs,
HashSet<String> ignorableProps, boolean ignoreAllUnknown,
SettableAnyProperty anySetter) {
super(forClass, type, property, creators, properties, backRefs, ignorableProps,
ignoreAllUnknown, anySetter);
}
#Override
public Object deserialize(JsonParser jp, DeserializationContext dc, Object bean)
throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
super.deserialize(jp, dc, bean);
MyType c = (MyType)bean;
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
JsonNode rootNode = mapper.readValue(jp, JsonNode.class);
// Use tree model to construct custom
// Is it inefficient because it needs a second pass to the JSON string to construct the tree?
c.setCustom(custom);
return c;
}
}
I searched Google but couldn't find any helpful examples/tutorial. If anyone can send me some working examples that would be great! Thanks!
To sub-class BeanSerializer/-Deserializer, you would be better off using a more recent version of Jackson, since this area has been improved with explicit support via BeanSerializerModifier and BeanDeserializerModifier, which can alter configuration of instances.
But just to make sure, you can also specify custom serializer/deserializer to just be used on individual properties, like so:
class Foo {
#JsonSerialize(using=MySerializer.class)
public OddType getValue();
}
In the Play framework i have a few models that have fields which are object references to other models. When i use renderJSON, i don't want those object references to be included. Currently for my needs i create a separate view model class which contains the fields i want, and in the controller i create instances of this view class as needed. Ideally i would like to be able to use the model class itself without having to write the view class.
Is there a way to annotate a field so that it will not be serialized when using renderJSON?
because play uses Gson for its Json serialization you can try the following:
public static void test()
{
Object foo = new SomeObject("testData");
Gson gson = new GsonBuilder()
.excludeFieldsWithModifiers(Modifier.TRANSIENT)
.create();
renderJSON(gson.toJson(foo));
}
now each field marked as transient will not be serialized. There is also another (better) way. You can use the com.google.gson.annotations.Expose annotation to mark each field you want to serialize.
public static void test()
{
Object foo = new SomeObject("testData");
Gson gson = new GsonBuilder()
.excludeFieldsWithoutExposeAnnotation()
.create();
renderJSON(gson.toJson(foo));
}
Using FlexJSON with play is another option, explained in this article: http://www.lunatech-research.com/archives/2011/04/20/play-framework-better-json-serialization-flexjson
Not sure why no one has written the most direct solution to this answer so I will do it here:
Simply mark the fields you do not want serialized via Gson as transient.
Here's an example:
public class Animal
{
private String name = "dog";
transient private int port = 80;
private String species = "canine";
transient private String password = "NoOneShouldSeeThis";
}
None of the items which are marked transient will be serialized.
When deserialized they will be set to their default (class default) values.
Resulting JSON will look like the following:
{"name":"dog","species":"canine"}
For more information on transient you can see the SO
Why does Java have transient fields?
I would override renderJSON to check a the field name against a member array of serialization exclusions.