I've spent a better part of a day trying to figure out the correct JSON body and arguments to update an OU; I'm actually trying to rename an OU. I'm close but in any case, the solution has so far escaped me.
I've referenced these docs so far:
https://developers.google.com/admin-sdk/directory/v1/reference/orgunits/update#http-request
https://developers.google.com/resources/api-libraries/documentation/admin/directory_v1/python/latest/admin_directory_v1.orgunits.html#update
I have tried a few variations on arguments in the object with parameters passed to AdminDirectory.Orgunits.update. Ultimately, there are no examples so I'm not 100% sure what the correct parameters are.
Here's my test function thus far as well:
function test_renameOU(){
/* Args:
customerId: string, Immutable ID of the G Suite account (required)
orgUnitPath: string, Full path of the organizational unit or its ID (required) (repeated)
body: object, The request body. (required)
The object takes the form of:
{ # JSON template for Org Unit resource in Directory API.
"kind": "admin#directory#orgUnit", # Kind of resource this is.
"parentOrgUnitPath": "A String", # Path of parent OrgUnit
"name": "A String", # Name of OrgUnit
"etag": "A String", # ETag of the resource.
"orgUnitPath": "A String", # Path of OrgUnit
"parentOrgUnitId": "A String", # Id of parent OrgUnit
"blockInheritance": True or False, # Should block inheritance
"orgUnitId": "A String", # Id of OrgUnit
"description": "A String", # Description of OrgUnit
}
*/
/* Function to perform rename */
function renameOU(customerId, orgUnitPath, body){
Logger.log(customerId + ", " + orgUnitPath + ", " + JSON.stringify(body))
try{
var org = AdminDirectory.Orgunits.update(customerId, orgUnitPath, body)
}catch(e){
Logger.log(JSON.stringify(e));
}
}
/* Arguments */
var customerId = 'my_customer';
var oldOUname = "Education";
var parentOrgUnitPath = "/Users/200 COGS";
var orgUnitId = "id:03ph8a2z39wdr3v";
var orgUnitPath = parentOrgUnitPath + "/" + oldOUname;
var parentOrgUnitId = "id:03ph8a2z1lakohp";
var newOUname = "255 Education";
Logger.log(orgUnitPath);
var body = { //# JSON template for Org Unit resource in Directory API.
"kind": "admin#directory#orgUnit", //# Kind of resource this is.
"parentOrgUnitPath": parentOrgUnitPath, //# Path of parent OrgUnit
"name": newOUname, //# Name of OrgUnit
"orgUnitPath": parentOrgUnitPath + "/" + newOUname, //# Path of OrgUnit
"parentOrgUnitId": parentOrgUnitId, //# Id of parent OrgUnit
"blockInheritance": false, //# Should block inheritance
"orgUnitId": orgUnitId, //# Id of OrgUnit
}
/* Call Rename Function */
Logger.log(customerId + ", " + orgUnitId + ", " + JSON.stringify(body))
renameOU(customerId, orgUnitId, body)
}
I expect the result of the OU to change from "/Users/200 COGS/Education" to "/Users/200 COGS/255 Education".
The output is a parse error though:
[19-06-17 17:39:39:165 PDT] /Users/200 COGS/Education
[19-06-17 17:39:39:166 PDT] my_customer, id:03ph8a2z39wdr3v, {"kind":"admin#directory#orgUnit","parentOrgUnitPath":"/Users/200 COGS","name":"255 Education","orgUnitPath":"/Users/200 COGS/255 Education","parentOrgUnitId":"id:03ph8a2z1lakohp","blockInheritance":false,"orgUnitId":"id:03ph8a2z39wdr3v"}
[19-06-17 17:39:39:166 PDT] my_customer, id:03ph8a2z39wdr3v, {"kind":"admin#directory#orgUnit","parentOrgUnitPath":"/Users/200 COGS","name":"255 Education","orgUnitPath":"/Users/200 COGS/255 Education","parentOrgUnitId":"id:03ph8a2z1lakohp","blockInheritance":false,"orgUnitId":"id:03ph8a2z39wdr3v"}
[19-06-17 17:39:39:198 PDT] {"message":"API call to directory.orgunits.update failed with error: Parse Error","name":"GoogleJsonResponseException","fileName":"GSuiteOrgUnits","lineNumber":573,"stack":"\tat GSuiteOrgUnits:573 (renameOU)\n\tat GSuiteOrgUnits:600 (test_renameOU)\n","details":{"message":"Parse Error","code":400,"errors":[{"domain":"global","reason":"parseError","message":"Parse Error"}]}}
If you use the patch endpoint you only need to pass in the fields you want to change:
AdminDirectory.Orgunits.patch({
name: 'New Name'
}, customerId, ouIdOrPath);
It worked for me. Do not pass the Unit Path org as it is automatically adjusted by the api based on the "name" field
var orgUnit = new OrgUnit()
{
Name = "new name",
Description = "new description"
};
var request = service.Orgunits.Patch(orgUnit, customerId, orgUnitPath);
request.Execute();
Related
Please refer to below code
data "amazon-ami" "ubuntu" {
most_recent = true
filters = {
virtualization-type = "hvm"
name = "ubuntu/images/*ubuntu-focal-20.04-amd64-server-*"
root-device-type = "ebs"
}
owners = ["099720109477"]
}
source "null" "one" {
communicator = "none"
}
build {
name = "source-ouput"
sources = ["source.null.one"]
provisioner "shell-local" {
inline = [
"echo ${data.amazon-ami.ubuntu}", ##### <--- problem happens here
]
}
}
As you can see in the code, I want to print out the return value of data "amazon-ami" "ubuntu"
If I run this with packer build .. error occurs like below
Error: Failed preparing provisioner-block "shell-local" ""
on main.pkr.hcl line 20:
(source code not available)
main.pkr.hcl:22,15-37: Invalid template interpolation value; Cannot include the
given value in a string template: string required.
Is there any solution to print the object that returned by data?
I am creating some resources using the for_each method on Terraform version 0.14.15. The resource has an attirbute, input_parameters that takes a string in JSON format as its value. I am defining this value in a map variable utilizing separate objects. The value I am specifying as a string in JSON format, and I am getting an error upon execution that I need to declare a string. Any insight on fixing this error would be helpful. Below is how I have my resource and variable declared.
Resource
resource "aws_config_config_rule" "managed_rules" {
for_each = var.managed_rules
name = each.value.name
description = each.value.description
input_parameters = each.value.input_parameters
source {
owner = each.value.owner
source_identifier = each.value.source_identifier
}
depends_on = [aws_config_configuration_recorder.config_recorder]
}
Variable
variable "managed_rules" {
type = map(object({
name = string
description = string
owner = string
source_identifier = string
# Is there a variable for strings in JSON format?
input_parameters = string
}))
default = {
"1" = {
name = "alb-http-to-https-redirection-check"
description = "Checks whether HTTP to HTTPS redirection is configured on all HTTP listeners of Application Load Balancers. The rule is NON_COMPLIANT if one or more HTTP listeners of Application Load Balancer do not have HTTP to HTTPS redirection configured."
owner = "AWS"
source_identifier = "ALB_HTTP_TO_HTTPS_REDIRECTION_CHECK"
input_parameters = {
"MaximumExecutionFrequency" : "TwentyFour_Hours",
}
}
Error
This default value is not compatible with the variable's type constraint:
element "2": attribute "input_parameters": string required.
After updating code with jsonencode function and changing input_parameters to any, this is the error:
This default value is not compatible with the variable's type constraint:
collection elements cannot be unified.
You have a couple things going on here:
The resource requires input_parameters to be a JSON-encoded string
You have the variable type as a string
You're passing an object type into the variable that only accepts a string type
So (2) and (3) are conflicting. At some point, you have to convert your object into a JSON string. You can either do that before passing it in as an input variable, or change your input variable to accept objects and convert the object to JSON when providing it to the resource.
I'd choose the second option because it's more intuitive to pass the object into the module instead of a string. So, try this:
resource "aws_config_config_rule" "managed_rules" {
for_each = var.managed_rules
name = each.value.name
description = each.value.description
input_parameters = jsonencode(each.value.input_parameters)
source {
owner = each.value.owner
source_identifier = each.value.source_identifier
}
depends_on = [aws_config_configuration_recorder.config_recorder]
}
variable "managed_rules" {
type = map(object({
name = string
description = string
owner = string
source_identifier = string
# Is there a variable for strings in JSON format?
input_parameters = any
}))
default = {
"1" = {
name = "alb-http-to-https-redirection-check"
description = "Checks whether HTTP to HTTPS redirection is configured on all HTTP listeners of Application Load Balancers. The rule is NON_COMPLIANT if one or more HTTP listeners of Application Load Balancer do not have HTTP to HTTPS redirection configured."
owner = "AWS"
source_identifier = "ALB_HTTP_TO_HTTPS_REDIRECTION_CHECK"
input_parameters = {
"MaximumExecutionFrequency" : "TwentyFour_Hours",
}
}
Note that I've used jsonencode in the resource's input_parameters and I've changed the variable type for that field to any (so it will accept an object of any structure).
You can create your json string as follows:
variable "managed_rules" {
type = map(object({
name = string
description = string
owner = string
source_identifier = string
# Is there a variable for strings in JSON format?
input_parameters = string
}))
default = {
"1" = {
name = "alb-http-to-https-redirection-check"
description = "Checks whether HTTP to HTTPS redirection is configured on all HTTP listeners of Application Load Balancers. The rule is NON_COMPLIANT if one or more HTTP listeners of Application Load Balancer do not have HTTP to HTTPS redirection configured."
owner = "AWS"
source_identifier = "ALB_HTTP_TO_HTTPS_REDIRECTION_CHECK"
input_parameters = <<EOL
{
"MaximumExecutionFrequency" : "TwentyFour_Hours",
}
EOL
}
}
}
But then you have to use jsondecode if you want to parse this string. You can't use functions in variables, so it must be done later.
To add to Jordan's answer. I Had a similar concern when trying to add a json policy to a module.
I used the any object type in place of the string object type.
Here's how I fixed it:
Module main.tf
resource "aws_ecr_repository_policy" "main" {
repository = var.repository_name
policy = var.repository_policy
}
Module variables.tf
variable "repository_name" {
type = string
description = "Name of the repository."
}
variable "repository_policy" {
type = any
description = "The policy document. This is a JSON formatted string."
}
Resource Creation main.tf
# ECR Repository for container images
module "ecr_repository_1" {
source = "../../../../modules/aws/ecr-repository"
ecr_repository_name = var.ecr_repository_name.1
image_tag_mutability = var.image_tag_mutability
image_scan_on_push = var.image_scan_on_push
tag_environment = local.tag_environment
tag_terraform = local.tag_terraform.true
}
# ECR Repository policies
module "ecr_repository_policy_1" {
source = "../../../../modules/aws/ecr-repository-policy"
repository_name = var.ecr_repository_name.1
repository_policy = var.repository_policy.1
}
Resource creation variables.tf
variable "ecr_repository_name" {
type = map(string)
description = "Name of the repository."
default = {
"1" = "my-backend-api"
}
}
variable "image_tag_mutability" {
type = string
description = "The tag mutability setting for the repository. Must be one of: MUTABLE or IMMUTABLE. Defaults to MUTABLE."
default = "MUTABLE"
}
variable "image_scan_on_push" {
type = bool
description = "Indicates whether images are scanned after being pushed to the repository (true) or not scanned (false)."
default = true
}
variable "repository_policy" {
type = any
description = "The policy document. This is a JSON formatted string."
default = {
"1" = <<EOF
{
"Version": "2008-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "new policy",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Principal": "*",
"Action": [
"ecr:GetDownloadUrlForLayer",
"ecr:BatchGetImage",
"ecr:BatchCheckLayerAvailability",
"ecr:PutImage",
"ecr:InitiateLayerUpload",
"ecr:UploadLayerPart",
"ecr:CompleteLayerUpload",
"ecr:DescribeRepositories",
"ecr:GetRepositoryPolicy",
"ecr:ListImages",
"ecr:DeleteRepository",
"ecr:BatchDeleteImage",
"ecr:SetRepositoryPolicy",
"ecr:DeleteRepositoryPolicy"
]
}
]
}
EOF
}
}
input_parameters = {
"MaximumExecutionFrequency" : "TwentyFour_Hours",
}
This has to be a string instead of Object, Since you defined it as String
I'm in the process of learning the Forge platform. I'm currently using an example (Jigsawify) written by Kean Walmsley because it most accurately describes my goals. I'm running into an issue of getting my file to download from an Azure Storage Account to Forge. The error I receive is "The value for one of the HTTP headers is not in the correct format." My question is how does someone go about troubleshooting HTTP protocol when writing, in this case, a workitem in code? I can put in a breakpoint to view the workitem, but I'm not versed enough to understand where the flaw is in the HTTP header, or even where to find it. Is there a specific property of the workitem I should be looking at? If I could find the HTTP statement, I could test it, but I don't where I should find it.
Or am I just completely off base?
Anyway here's the code. It's a modified version of what Kean wrote:
static void SubmitWorkItem(Activity activity)
{
Console.WriteLine("Submitting workitem...");
CloudStorageAccount storageAccount =
CloudStorageAccount.Parse(Microsoft.Azure.CloudConfigurationManager.GetSetting("StorageConnectionString"));
StorageCredentials crd = storageAccount.Credentials;
CloudFileClient fileClient = storageAccount.CreateCloudFileClient();
CloudFileShare ShareRef = fileClient.GetShareReference("000scrub");
CloudFileDirectory rootDir = ShareRef.GetRootDirectoryReference();
CloudFile Fileshare = rootDir.GetFileReference("3359fort.dwg");
// Create a workitem
var wi = new WorkItem()
{
Id = "", // Must be set to empty
Arguments = new Arguments(),
ActivityId = activity.Id
};
if (Fileshare.Exists())
{
wi.Arguments.InputArguments.Add(new Argument()
{
Name = "HostDwg", // Must match the input parameter in activity
Resource = Fileshare.Uri.ToString(),
StorageProvider = StorageProvider.Generic // Generic HTTP download (vs A360)
});
}
wi.Arguments.OutputArguments.Add(new Argument()
{
Name = "Results", // Must match the output parameter in activity
StorageProvider = StorageProvider.Generic, // Generic HTTP upload (vs A360)
HttpVerb = HttpVerbType.POST, // Use HTTP POST when delivering result
Resource = null, // Use storage provided by AutoCAD.IO
ResourceKind = ResourceKind.ZipPackage // Upload as zip to output dir
});
container.AddToWorkItems(wi);
container.SaveChanges();
// Polling loop
do
{
Console.WriteLine("Sleeping for 2 sec...");
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(2000);
container.LoadProperty(wi, "Status"); // HTTP request is made here
Console.WriteLine("WorkItem status: {0}", wi.Status);
}
while (
wi.Status == ExecutionStatus.Pending ||
wi.Status == ExecutionStatus.InProgress
);
// Re-query the service so that we can look at the details provided
// by the service
container.MergeOption =
Microsoft.OData.Client.MergeOption.OverwriteChanges;
wi = container.WorkItems.ByKey(wi.Id).GetValue();
// Resource property of the output argument "Results" will have
// the output url
var url =
wi.Arguments.OutputArguments.First(
a => a.Name == "Results"
).Resource;
if (url != null)
DownloadToDocs(url, "SGA.zip");
// Download the status report
url = wi.StatusDetails.Report;
if (url != null)
DownloadToDocs(url, "SGA-Report.txt");
}
Any help is appreciated,
Chuck
Azure requires that you specify the x-ms-blob-type header when you upload to a presigned URL. See https://github.com/Autodesk-Forge/design.automation-.net-input.output.sample/blob/master/Program.cs#L167
So, I was able to figure out how to download my file from Azure to Forge using Albert's suggestion of moving to a blob service. Here's the code:
static void SubmitWorkItem(Activity activity)
{
Console.WriteLine("Submitting workitem...");
CloudStorageAccount storageAccount =
CloudStorageAccount.Parse(Microsoft.Azure.CloudConfigurationManager.GetSetting("StorageConnectionString"));
CloudBlobClient BlobClient = storageAccount.CreateCloudBlobClient();
CloudBlobContainer cloudBlobContainer = BlobClient.GetContainerReference("000scrub");
CloudBlockBlob blockBlob = cloudBlobContainer.GetBlockBlobReference("3359fort.dwg");
// Create a workitem
var wi = new WorkItem()
{
Id = "", // Must be set to empty
Arguments = new Arguments(),
ActivityId = activity.Id
};
if (blockBlob.Exists())
{
wi.Arguments.InputArguments.Add(new Argument()
{
Name = "HostDwg", // Must match the input parameter in activity
Resource = blockBlob.Uri.ToString(),
StorageProvider = StorageProvider.Generic, // Generic HTTP download (vs A360)
Headers = new System.Collections.ObjectModel.ObservableCollection<Header>()
{
new Header() { Name = "x-ms-blob-type", Value = "BlockBlob" } // This is required for Azure.
}
});
}
wi.Arguments.OutputArguments.Add(new Argument()
{
Name = "Results", // Must match the output parameter in activity
StorageProvider = StorageProvider.Generic, // Generic HTTP upload (vs A360)
HttpVerb = HttpVerbType.POST, // Use HTTP POST when delivering result
Resource = null, // Use storage provided by AutoCAD.IO
ResourceKind = ResourceKind.ZipPackage, // Upload as zip to output dir
});
container.AddToWorkItems(wi);
container.SaveChanges();
// Polling loop
do
{
Console.WriteLine("Sleeping for 2 sec...");
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(2000);
container.LoadProperty(wi, "Status"); // HTTP request is made here
Console.WriteLine("WorkItem status: {0}", wi.Status);
}
while (
wi.Status == ExecutionStatus.Pending ||
wi.Status == ExecutionStatus.InProgress
);
// Re-query the service so that we can look at the details provided
// by the service
container.MergeOption =
Microsoft.OData.Client.MergeOption.OverwriteChanges;
wi = container.WorkItems.ByKey(wi.Id).GetValue();
// Resource property of the output argument "Results" will have
// the output url
var url =
wi.Arguments.OutputArguments.First(
a => a.Name == "Results"
).Resource;
if (url != null)
DownloadToDocs(url, "SGA.zip");
// Download the status report
url = wi.StatusDetails.Report;
if (url != null)
DownloadToDocs(url, "SGA-Report.txt");
}
What isn't complete is the result section. The ZIP has nothing in it, but hey, baby steps right?
Thanks Albert.
-Chuck
I'm simply trying to execute the standard example bulkImport sproc for documentDB API and I can't seem to pass it an array of objects. I always get 400 errors despite the documentation giving clear direction to send an array of objects
.. very frustrating.
Additional details: Even if I wrap the array in an object with the array under a property of 'items' and include it in my sproc it still errors out saying the same bad request, needs to be an object or JSON-serialized. When I try to do JSON.stringify(docs) before sending it fails to parse on the other side.
Bad Request: The document body must be an object or a string representing a JSON-serialized object.
bulkInsert.js:
https://github.com/Azure/azure-documentdb-js-server/blob/master/samples/stored-procedures/BulkImport.js
My Code (using documentdb-util for async):
execProc(docs, insertProc);
async function execProc(docs, insertProc){
let database = await dbUtil.database('test');
let collection = await dbUtil.collection(database, 'test');
let procInstance = await dbUtil.storedProcedure(collection, insertProc);
try{
let result = await dbUtil.executeStoredProcedure(procInstance, docs);
console.log(result);
} catch(e){
console.log(e.body)
}
}
Header
Object {Cache-Control: "no-cache", x-ms-version: "2017-11-15",
User-Agent: "win32/10.0.16299 Nodejs/v8.9.0 documentdb-nodejs-s…",
x-ms-date: "Mon, 11 Dec 2017 07:32:29 GMT",
Accept:"application/json"
authorization: myauth
Cache-Control:"no-cache"
Content-Type:"application/json"
User-Agent:"win32/10.0.16299 Nodejs/v8.9.0 documentdb-nodejs-sdk/1.14.1"
x-ms-date:"Mon, 11 Dec 2017 07:32:29 GMT"
x-ms-version:"2017-11-15"
Path
"/dbs/myDB/colls/myColl/sprocs/myBulkInsert"
Params
Array(3) [Object, Object, Object]
length:3
0:Object {id: "0001", type: "donut", name: "Cake", …}
1:Object {id: "0002", type: "donut", name: "Raised", …}
2:Object {id: "0003", type: "donut", name: "Old Fashioned", …}
[{
"id": "0001",
"type": "donut",
"name": "Cake",
"ppu": 0.55
},
{
"id": "0002",
"type": "donut",
"name": "Raised",
"ppu": 0.35
},
{
"id": "0003",
"type": "donut",
"name": "Old Fashioned",
"ppu": 0.25
}]
The "docs" must be an array of array of params, otherwise, the procedure executor will treat them as multiple params of the procedure, not a single-array-param.
the following code works when call storedProcedure to pass argument with array type.
JS:
var docs = [{'id':1},{'id':2}];
executeStoredProcedure(proc, [docs])
C#
var docs = new[] {new MyDoc{id=1, source="abc"}, new MyDoc{id=2, source="abc"}];
dynamic[] args = new dynamic[] {docs};
ExecuteStoredProcedureAsync<int>(
procLink,
new RequestOptions {PartitionKey = new PartitionKey("abc")},
args);
NOTE: you must ensure the 'docs' have the same partition key, and pass partion key in RequestionOptions
I had the same problem. I was able to get it to work by Stringify the Array and parse it in the stored procedure. I opened an issue on the github where that code originated as well. Below is what worked for me. Good luck.
---- Stringify Array
var testArr = []
for (var i = 0; i < 50; i++) {
testArr.push({
"id": "test" + i
})
}
var testArrStr = JSON.stringify(testArr)
//pass testArrStr to stored procedure and parse in stored procedure
---- Slightly altered original BulkImport
exports.storedProcedure = {
id: "bulkImportArray",
serverScript:function bulkImportArray(docs) {
var context = getContext();
var collection = context.getCollection();
var docsToCreate = JSON.parse(docs)
var count = 0;
var docsLength = docsToCreate.length;
if (docsLength == 0) {
getContext().getResponse().setBody(0);
}
var totals = ""
function insertDoc(){
var msg = " count=" + count+" docsLength=" +docsLength + " typeof docsToCreate[]=" + typeof docsToCreate+ " length =" + docsToCreate.length
if(typeof docsToCreate[count] != 'undefined' ) {
collection.createDocument(collection.getSelfLink(),
docsToCreate[count],
function (err, documentCreated) {
if (err){
// throw new Error('Error' + err.message);
getContext().getResponse().setBody(count + " : " + err);
}else{
if (count < docsLength -1) {
count++;
insertDoc();
getContext().getResponse().setBody(msg);
} else {
getContext().getResponse().setBody(msg);
}
}
});
}else{
getContext().getResponse().setBody(msg);
}
}
insertDoc()
}
}
If you want to test it in the portal Script Explorer I had to create an escaped string i.e.
var testArr = []
for(var i=200; i<250; i++){
testArr.push({"id":"test"+i})
}
var testArrStr = JSON.stringify(testArr)
console.log('"'+testArrStr.replace(/\"/g,'\\"') + '"')
I am trying to iterate over this JSON:
{
"info":{
"version": "0.0.1",
"status": "prototype"
},
"config":{
"display_random": true,
"welcome_message": "Welcome to MagSee!",
"welcome_display_sec": 10
},
"config_form":{
"display_random":{
"label":"Display Random Image on Start",
"type": "Boolean",
"default": true
},
"welcome_message":{
"label": "Welcome Message",
"type": "TextInput",
"default": "Welcome to MagSee"
}
}
}
I read this from a file, then parse it and pass it into jade template:
router.get('/view_config', function(req, res){
var fs = require('fs');
var file = './config.json';
var json_data = null;
var buffer = fs.readFileSync(file, 'utf8');
json_data = JSON.parse(buffer);
if (json_data == null){
console.log('Null json_data. Does the file exist?');
//todo: need to return 500/null config data message instead
return;
}
res.render('admin_view_config',{'config': json_data.config, 'config_form': json_data.config_form});
});
then within Jade template I am trying to display the properties nicely:
h1='Config Form'
p
ul
each object in config_form
li=object
- console.dir(object)
ul
each value, key in object
li=key+": "+value
And the outcome is almost there but I am missing the actual names of the object and can't figure how to get it:
Config Form
[object Object]
label: Display Random Image on Start
type: Boolean
default: true
[object Object]
label: Welcome Message
type: TextInput
default: Welcome to MagSee
the console.dir(object) will only show it's portion within the {} and no name (such as "welcome_message") but I can't figure how to access it from within the config_form itself.
There is NO way of knowing which object it came from.
Although, you can modify your loops to achieve this. Like this,
- for(i=0; i<Object.keys(config_form).length; i++)
- var key = Object.keys(config_form)[i]
li=key
- console.dir(config_form[key])
ul
each val, index in config_form[key]
li= index + ': ' + val