Is there a way to graft a commit onto somewhere other than the current revision?
The documentation makes it sound like there isn't:
hg graft [OPTION]... [-r REV]... REV...
copy commits from a different location
And I don't see any parameters that can be passed to hg graft to do so. I'm surprised though that hg rebase allows this with the -d flag, but hg graft doesn't. Just like how sometimes I want to rebase a branch to somewhere other than the current revision, sometimes I want to graft a branch to somewhere other than the current revision.
You can use the rebase extension to achieve this. Do hg rebase -r <rev> -d <dest> --keep to rebase the onto while keeping the old rev.
Fundamentally the answer is "no", but you can still get the desired effect.
The help text for graft says "copy changes from other branches onto the current branch
" which implies that if you first update to the destination changeset, you can get the result you want.
Presumably you want to use graft to make an actual copy, vs rebase which would "move" the changeset. So this will get that result although it requires several steps.
To summarize:
hg up <destination revision>
hg graft <source revision>
hg up tip
Related
At the moment I am looking at transitioning from subversion to Mercurial at work, and as such the Mercurial repository is not yet published.
I have used the authormap argument to transform our usernames to the Mercurial format, which went fine.
Unfortunately two people have been commiting under the same name. The repository is not very large, so I would like to change the authors to match the right people. For that reason I would like to ask:
Is there any way to change the author for a specific changeset, or a list of changesets?
You can use the bundled extension Mercurial Queues (MQ) to change commit authors. Note that MQ will only work as long as history is linear. If there are branches you need to first rebase them off to a temporary side branch, and then after editing rebase them back.
First qimport the changes up till the first changeset you want to modify:
hg qinit
hg qimport -g -r <first-revnr>:tip
Then use qpop or qgoto to navigate to the respective changesets:
hg qgoto <revnr>.diff
And then use qrefresh to change the user info on the currently active changeset:
hg qrefresh -u "Some User <user#example.com>"
You can verify with hg log whether the user was correctly updated. After this, repeat for all other changesets.
When you are done, qpush all patches and use qfinish to finalize the repository.
hg qpush -a
hg qfinish -a
You could as well use the evolve extension. After setting up the extension
hg amend -U && hg prev
for a stack of commits and then hg evolve --all at the end.
Evolve introduces a meta-graph that says which commit replaces which commit.
So when we do hg amend -U a bunch of times, we create commits with a different author that replaced the old commits. hg evolve --all the will use the replacement information to figure out where to move commits that were based on our pre-replaced commits.
Credits to mercurial developers on IRC #mercurial.
Let's say that I have a named branch 'B1' which I'm doing feature development on.
I am at a good stopping point before a demo though not done with the feature so I:
hg up default
hg merge B1
hg ci -m "merged in feature drop"
hg push
Now I continue working for a half an hour or so and go to commit only to realize that I forgot to update back to B1 and that my current working directory is on default - uhoh. In theory I should be able to just mark my working directory parent as the tip of B1 - is there an easy way to do this?
I could of course commit, update back to B1, and merge my changes back, but then there's an unstable changeset in default and this happens often enough to me that I would like a real solution.
Two ways. First, the obvious way:
hg diff > foo
hg up -C b1
hg import --no-commit foo
rm foo
Second, the magical way:
hg up -r 'ancestor(., b1)' # take working dir back to the fork point
hg up b1 # take it forward to the branch head
This way involves merges. Depending on how much your branches have diverged, this may be painless. Or it may be complicated, and you may make a mess of your changes that you haven't saved anywhere. Which is why even magicians like myself prefer to do it the first way.
I would use the shelve extension. I think it’s distributed along with TortoiseHg, you can also use it from the UI:
hg shelve --all
hg up B1
hg unshelve
Rebase extension allow you to change parent for any commit for wrongly commited changeset.
If you want just change branch for future commit - MQ (as mentioned) or Shelve
Typically for this sort of dynamic approach, I favor mercurial queues.
In your situation, what I would do would be to create a patch on default with the changes, pop the patch off, switch over to B1, and apply the patch.
It goes something like:
hg qnew OOPSPATCH
hg qrefresh
hg qpop
hg up B1
hg qpush
<hack hack>
hg qrefresh
hg qfinish
All you need is simple hg up -m B1
From hg up --help:
options:
…
-m --merge merge uncommitted changes
…
I am using Mercurial.
I have some uncommitted changes but I am on the wrong branch, how do I update to the right branch and take the changes with me?
For uncommited changes you can use the Shelve extension:
hg shelve --all
hg up correct_branch_name
hg unshelve
I asked on irc
mpm said
hg diff > mychanges; hg up -C somewhere; hg import --no-commit mychanges
which I had considered but is what I was trying to avoid.
d70 said
i think you can easily do it by "hg update"ing to a changeset that is a
parent of the branch you're trying to switch to, and then "hg update"ing to the
tip of that branch
so I did that.
hg up -r <shared root rev>
hg up branchIwant
I asked about "why" and was told "you are not allowed to update across branches" which didn't make sense to me at first. Then I realized that because I went through the shared root rev, it isn't across branches.
I usually use
hg qnew
hg qpop
hg up -c <target-rev>
hg qpush
hg qfinish qtip
But I also use jrwren’s approach of going through an ancestor quite regularly.
For Mercurial, right now there is default branch and newfeature branch... is it true that if I am on
the newfeature branch, and do an hg pull and hg update, it will always ask me to merge? (if there are changesets that I pulled)
Also, it seems that I cannot just do hg merge? I need to use hg heads and then look at what the newfeature branch's head is (say it is revision 6880),
then I need to hg merge -r 6880? Because otherwise, will Mercurial merge the newfeature branch with the default branch automatically? I cannot do hg merge -b newfeature, it seems, as there is no -b option for hg merge.
Is there an easier way other than using hg heads to look for the revision to merge? Isn't there a more automatic way?
You've got two questions there, let me take them one at a time (with a little paraphrasing):
Q. When I hg pull and get a new head Mercurial suggest I hg merge. Do I have to?
A. No. Mercurial is just warning you you have more heads than than you did, and that if you don't like that arrangement you can merge to stop it. Named branches are heads, so you'll see that warning if pulling gets you a new head
Q. If I want to merge one named branch into another do I have to provide the revision number?
A. No. It's true that hg merge will only automatically select heads on the same named branch, but you can do hg merge -r newfeature and that merges in the changeset from the point of divergence up to the head on newfeature (6880 in your example) exactly the same as hg update -r 6880 would.
In either case, after committing that merge you'll have no heads on newfeature (the new, resulting head is on default because that was the branch name of your parent before you started the merge. However, just doing this after the merge:
hg update newfeature
...code....
hg commit
will create a new head on the newfeature branch, and you're right back as you were before the merge, except all of the changes that were on new feature are also available in default now.
If you pull a changeset or changesets from one branch into another branch that share the same root changeset. Mercurial will have multiple heads as you have so noticed. It will only suggest that you merge when you do an hg update on one of the branches.
You shouldn't have to specify which revision to merge to, assuming that you want to merge the tips of each of the branches. hg merge should suffice.
Your command structure should look as follow
hg pull -b 'branchYouWantToPullFrom`
hg update
hg merge
hg commit
hg merge works in your working copy, which is always connected to a specific branch.
You have to specify a branch name only if you want to merge your current branch with another branch: hg merge branch_name.
hg pull updates your repository with all remote changes. Then you have to update your working copy, that is connected to a specific branch. So, when you type hg update command, you update your working copy with all changes in your current branch.
If you want to switch to another branch you have to type hg update branch_name. You can type hg branch to know your current branch.
The only reason to merge with a specific revision is when you have three or more heads, a strange situation probably caused by some hg push -f (extremely bad practice). If you are in this situation, the right way to know which revisions you have to merge is hg heads. In a normal situation hg heads returns one head per branch, so you don't have to merge two heads of different branches if you don't want.
If you're working on a branch and someone has committed and pushed some changes on the same branch, you have to pull and merge before your push, simply with hg merge, no revision or branch.
I hope this will help you.
I'm trying to move changes from a couple of changesets into one changeset on the other branch. There are other changes in between that I want to skip, so I don't want to simply merge everything.
hg transplant moves the changes correctly, but now I'd like to flatten them into a single commit. How can I do that?
You can fold them by
Backup the repository, a failure during the process can destroy data
transplant the desired changes to the target branch
transform them there into a mercurial queue (hg qimport -r first-to-fold-rev:)
fold them into one patch (hg qpop until the first patch is applied, then hg qfold <<patch name>> the following patches into this one)
Edit the commit message (When there are NO OUTSTANDING CHANGES hg qrefresh -e)
apply the single patch to your repository (hg qfinish -a).
When there are further unfolded patches:
hg qpush until the head patch
hg qfinish -a
Review the new repo state (hg glog/hg incoming)
hg rebase has an '--collapse` option. I think this is what you are looking for.