How to perform multiple updates with a unique index in MySQL - mysql

I have the following table with a unique index by field "position_in_list":
CREATE TABLE `planned_operation` (
`id` bigint(20) NOT NULL,
`position_in_list` bigint(20) NOT NULL,
`name` varchar(255) not null
) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
ALTER TABLE `planned_operation`
ADD PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
ADD UNIQUE KEY `position_in_list` (`position_in_list`);
ALTER TABLE `planned_operation`
MODIFY `id` bigint(20) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, AUTO_INCREMENT=3;
INSERT INTO `planned_operation` (`id`, `position_in_list`, `name`) VALUES
(1, 1, 'first'),
(2, 2, 'second');
Then I have a trivial task, this is a change in position when updating the list. Accordingly, you need to update the list of items before which the record was inserted. In order not to perform thousands of updates, I execute one query:
update planned_operation
set position_in_list = case position_in_list
when 2 then 3
when 1 then 2
end
where position_in_list in (1, 2)
But when executing an error is issued:
#1062 - Duplicate entry '1' for key 'position_in_list'
Is there any way to avoid an error? Without disabling the unique index

You want deferrable constraints.
Unfortunately, MySQL does not implement deferrable constraint checks -- an integral part of SQL that few database engines implement.
As far as I know only PostgreSQL and Oracle (partial) do implement them.
In simple words, this means that MySQL checks the unique constraint on every single row change inside an UPDATE statement. With deferrable constraints you could defer this check to the end of the statement, or even to the end of the database transaction.
Now, you would need to switch to PostgrSQL or Oracle to defer contraints checks to the end of the statement (as you seem to want). I guess that's way out of the scope for you, but it's a theoretical option.
For a more in depth discussion you could look into Deferrable Constraints answer.

Related

How to implement conditional unique constraint

I have a table that needs a unique constraint on 3 columns, but, if the "date" column in for that insert transaction is a newer date than the current record's date, then I want to update that record (so the unique constraint is still true for the table).
Postgres has the concept of deferrable constraints, MySQL does not.
I do want to implement it with the SQL object tools available, though.
Here is my table DDL with column names obfuscated:
CREATE TABLE `apixio_results_test_sefath` (
`ID` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`number` varchar(20) DEFAULT NULL,
`insert_date` datetime DEFAULT NULL,
`item_id` int(5) DEFAULT NULL,
`rule` tinyint(4) DEFAULT NULL,
`another_column` varchar(20) DEFAULT NULL,
`another_column1` varchar(20) DEFAULT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`ID`),
KEY `insert_date_index` (`insert_date`),
KEY `number` (`number`),
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=627393 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1
and here is the unique constraint statement
Alter Table dbname.table add unique constraint my_unique_constraint (number, item_id, rule);
but I can not add a condition here in this constraint (unless there is a way I'm not aware of?)
The logic I need to run before inserts are blocked by the constraint is to check if the three values: number, item_id, and rule are unique in the table, and if they aren't, then I want to compare the existing record's insert_date with the insert_date from the transaction, and only keep the record with the newest insert_date.
This could be achieved with a trigger I suppose, although I've heard triggers are only to be used if really needed. And on every insert, this trigger would be quite computationally taxing on the DB. Any advice? Any other sql tricks I can use? Or anything to help point me to how to make this trigger?
I tried the unique constraint statement
Alter Table dbname.table add unique constraint my_unique_constraint (number, item_id, rule);
But it will never update with the newer insert_date.
You can do this with an insert statement like:
insert into apixio_results_test_sefath (number, item_id, rule, insert_date, another_column, another_column1)
values (?,?,?,?,?,?)
on duplicate key update
another_column=if(insert_date>values(insert_date),another_column,values(another_column),
another_column1=if(insert_date>values(insert_date),another_column1,values(another_column1),
insert_date=greatest(insert_date,values(insert_date)
for each column besides the unique ones and insert_date, testing to see if the existing insert_date is greater than the value supplied with the insert and conditionally using the existing value or new value for the other column based on that, and ending with updating insert_date only if it is now greater.
mysql 8 has an alternate syntax it prefers to using the values function, but the values function still works.
If you want this to happen automatically for all inserts, you would need to use a trigger.

Complex unique constraints with MySQL

Consider the following table:
CREATE TABLE `demo` (
`id` BIGINT(20) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`from_val` BIGINT(20) DEFAULT NULL,
`to_val` BIGINT(20) DEFAULT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
);
Is it possible to create a constraint that prevents a second record existing in the same table with a from_val or to_val between another record's from_val and to_val? So, from an empty table the second query should fail with a constraint failure:
INSERT INTO `demo` (`from_val`, `to_val`) VALUES (1,10),(11,20);
INSERT INTO `demo` (`from_val`, `to_val`) VALUES (5,15);
Validating the data on the way in/update is trivial, I was just curious to see whether MySQL could enforce this at a RDBMS level.
No, MySQL does not support (or enforce) any declarative constraint which would raise an exception given the conditions you specify.
The values in the tuple (5,15) ("the second query") do not conflict with any values in any of the rows previously inserted into the table... (1,10),(11,20), at least in terms of what is available to declarative constraints in MySQL.
The workaround is to define BEFORE INSERT and BEFORE UPDATE triggers on the table; those can perform whatever checks you need, and raise an exception.

MySQL: INSERT .... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE: affected-rows == 3?

The MySQL documentation states that when using INSERT ... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE, the affected-rows value will be 1 when a record was inserted, 2 if an existing record was updated.
We're getting an affected-rows value of 3 when a record is updated, although I'm only seeing this when the updates are performed via MySQL calls using Connector-J from Java; when I invoke the stored procedure from the MySQL Workbench, I get the expected result of 2 rows updated.
Does anyone have any idea what this might mean? Is this perhaps a Connector-J annomaly? I'd be inclined to just run with it, but without a reasonable explanation, I'm left with concerns for my data integrity (which is, after all, one of the reasons to check the affected-rows value).
MySQL server version: 5.1.57; Connector-J version: 5.1.7 (Java 1.6)
Additional details:
This is the table being modified:
CREATE TABLE `UserContactProperty` (
`id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`UserContactId` int(11) NOT NULL,
`Property` varchar(45) NOT NULL,
`Value` tinytext,
`Date` timestamp NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
UNIQUE KEY `Contact-Property` (`UserContactId`,`Property`),
KEY `FK_UserContact` (`UserContactId`),
CONSTRAINT `FK_UserContact` FOREIGN KEY (`UserContactId`) REFERENCES `UserContact` (`id`) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=28685 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1
The stored procedure performing the insert/update is as follows:
CREATE PROCEDURE `setUserContactProperty`(
UID VARCHAR(50),
CID INT,
Prop VARCHAR(45),
Val TINYTEXT
)
BEGIN
INSERT INTO UserContactProperty ( UserContactId, Property, Value )
VALUES ( CID, Prop, Val )
ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE Value = Val, Date = CURRENT_TIMESTAMP;
END
It seems as a bug. please check the following link:
http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=46675
As reported there, the bug is related to another bug where the generated key list is wrong and the count is wrong too. (the second bug originated from here http://slava-technical.blogspot.co.il/2011/05/mysql-on-duplicate-key-update-breaks.html)
I think you need to find a workaround. probably by querying the database prior to inserting to see if the row with this key exists or not. or insert and catch duplicate key exception and then make the update in that case.

Batch Insert with generated keys deals duplicate entry on unique

I am using MySql with JDBC...the below is my table definition
CREATE TABLE `A` (
`id` int(255) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`type` varchar(255) NOT NULL,
`value` varchar(255) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
UNIQUE KEY `unq` (`type`(50),`value`(50))
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=1 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
At the moment i am using statement in order to batch insert rows to that table with RETURN_GENERATED_KEYS option in order to relate the id to other table.
I want the ability to perform that operation but when / if DUPLICATE ENTRY occur ( the same combination of type & value ) to continue with the transaction as like nothing happens but still to get the generated keys, and if DUPLICATE ENTRY occur retrieve the existing key.
Thanks
use IGNORE keyword
INSET IGNORE ....
as Quoted in Mysql
If you use the IGNORE keyword, errors that occur while executing the
INSERT statement are treated as warnings instead. For example, without
IGNORE, a row that duplicates an existing UNIQUE index or PRIMARY KEY
value in the table causes a duplicate-key error and the statement is
aborted. With IGNORE, the row still is not inserted, but no error is
issued.
alternative syntax
INSERT ... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE

When to use different never-rejected ("insert or update") MySQL statements?

A standard problem in applications is to insert a record if one doesn't exist - or update if it does. In cases where the PRIMARY KEY is unknown this is usally solved by issuing a SELECT and then running either an INSERT or UPDATE if the record was found.
However, there seems to be at least three ways I know of that you can insert a record into a database even when a record already exists. Personally, I would rather drop the new insert request if one already exists, but then there might be cases where you would rather drop the record in the database and use the new one.
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `table` (
`id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`foo` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL,
`bar` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
KEY `row` (`foo`,`bar`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
Here are the three methods:
INSERT IGNORE INTO table (foo, bar) VALUES (2,3);
INSERT INTO table (foo, bar) VALUES (2,3) ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE;
REPLACE INTO table (foo, bar) VALUES (2,3);
At what times should each of these methods be used?
Can someone give some examples of correct usage scenarios?
INSERT should be used when you just want to insert a new row
Lets say you are storing log entries, you'll want to log every event, use INSERT.
INSERT IGNORE should be used when you just want there to be a specific key exists in the table, it doesn't matter if it's the current insert that creates it, or if it's already present.
Let's say you have a table of phone-numbers and the number of uses, you find a new phone number that you are not sure exists in the table, but you want it to be there.
You use INSERT IGNORE to make sure that it's there.
REPLACE INTO should be used when you want to make sure that a specific key exists in the table, if it exists you'd like the new values to be used, instead of that present.
You have another table with phone-numbers, this time you find a new number and a name to associate it with.
You use REPLACE INTO to find and update a complete record, or just insert the new information.
INSERT INTO ... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE ...
Please not that this is not an alternative method of writing REPLACE INTO, the above should be used whenever you'd like to make sure that a specific key exists, but if it does update some of the columns, not all of them.
For example if you are storing the numbers of visits from a certain IP, and the first page the user ever visited.
INSERT INTO visitors (ip,visits,first_page) VALUES (<ip>,1,<current_page>) ON DUPLICATE KEY visits = visits +1;
In your question, you have
INSERT INTO `table` (foo, bar) VALUES (2,3) ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE;
That can only work if the row index was UNIQUE:
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `table` (
`id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`foo` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL,
`bar` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
UNIQUE KEY `row` (`foo`,`bar`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
Otherwise, why have just an index?
Also the ON DUPLICATE KEY clauses allows you to update non-indexed columns.
As for REPLACE, keep in mind that REPLACE is actually DELETE and INSERT under the hood.