My web project is based on SPA and I setup a journey for marketing reason. I set a filter that journey is shown for a specific url.
Journey works well as I access the specific url directly in browser (typing in url input). If I access root url first and do in app routing to the specific url, Journey doesn't work.
Is this by design of Journey?
No, The journey should show up if you navigate from your root. This would need more investigation to check your Journeys setup and Branch Web SDK implementation. Please get in touch with Branch Support by sending an email to integrations#branch.io
Related
The Azure APIM developer portal (new one) has been edited and now some of the menues dont work.
Is it possible reset the content ?
I have tried the capture.bat (from another APIM instance) and generate.bat into the broken instance but it didnt appear to work - i even made changes to one of the jpg files in the scripts.v3/media directory but it didnt get changed in the portal when i ran generate.
I find the "run your own hosted developer portal" scenario confusing. I am unclear on:
where is the content held for the unpublished managed portal ?
where is the content held for the published managed portal ?
where is the content held for the unpublished "own hosted" portal ?
ie when running locally (npm start on the Github repo code)
where is the content held for the published "own hosted" portal ?
When developing on a self hosted scenario, ideally i think it would be benefitial to hold the content locally so that it could be placed in source control. Failing that, is it possible to customise such that the "run your own hosted developer portal" content is in an accessible location such as a blob in a container on the same storage account that the code is being published to? That way I could copy content from an unbroken APIM into a storage account and develop with that.
Is it possible reset the content ?
Yes. Have you actually tried the simplest solution?
Open developer portal in edit mode:
Click reset content
where is the content held for the unpublished managed portal ?
where is the content held for the published managed portal ?
Same place - in the APIM resources. When you edit developer portal and you save it,
other users won't see those changes until you click publish.
You can also use developer portal revisions, from REST API or directly from Azure Portal. This will give you an opportunity to go back to previous revisions. So if you are publishing manually, after you edit and save developer portal I recommend to go to the revisions tab in azure portal and publish it from there - this way you will have simple version control.
For managed version, important thing to understand is, "content" consists of:
content types and content items which are just json template files describing your pages on developer portal. Those can be accessed by REST API here and here (this is a parent child relation).
and your uploaded custom media (images, fonts etc.) that can be retrieved from APIM Blob Storage. To get SAS URL for APIM Blob Storage and connect to it, just call your APIM Management API with address POST /portalSettings/mediaContent/listSecrets/ - this URL is not documented but you can call it like any other endpoint.
And that's it. That's all you need - json file and media files. The rest is managed for you. And in fact that's what those scripts from github repository are doing. capture.bat for example is downloading all the media and json from developer portal and saves it to your local folder. So you can for example save it to source control or/and upload to another APIM developer portal instance.
When managed developer portal and online editor is not enough for you and you need more customization, like custom widgets etc., you can go with self hosted version. It gives you more freedom but the downside of course is you are responsible for its upgrades.
where is the content held for the unpublished "own hosted" portal ? ie
when running locally (npm start on the Github repo code)
When you run npm start it just runs locally like when you develop any other webpage. In this case it uses webpack-dev-server to host the page.
where is the content held for the published "own hosted" portal ?
Wherever you feel like it. That's the idea behind the self-hosted version. After you are happy with the changes you've made, just run npm run publish and files will appear in dist folder. Then you can upload them to the resource of your choice. This tutorial shows you how to enable hosting of static websites for your blob storage and host your developer portal there. Everything is explained, just follow the article carefully step by step (don't skip any step, every single one is important in order to successfully configure and deploy your self-hosted developer portal). Good luck.
Basically, my question is the same than this topic but it's now 2018. So, how can I still have ECMAScript executed on my phone (to send geolocation position) even if it is asleep? We now have Open Web Apps and Progressive Web Apps (PWA) with service workers, even Apple is jumping in, I'm sure there are ways to do that.
While we can hope that things should've changed on this, unfortunately, it has not.
This article from Google on PWA GeoLocatoin API dated Jan-2018 says clearly that this API works "only while the page is open".
Why not available yet (in my opinion)? Thinking of users privacy, it makes sense. Think of tons of wep pages we visit and for how many we tend to five permission accidentally or we intend to give for a while(until we finish some transaction/booking). Currently there is no way for us to go and check on all location permissions that we've given to web sites in a browser, like we do for Native/Hybrid apps and having option to change it.
We can expect to have tracking option for PWA when it is installed to home screen, where native app like permission handling will be possible to user.
End of the story, we are not there yet!!
Alternate option: While you can use navigator.geolocation.watchPosition to track the user when he is actively using the app, You can complement your app with a separately installed (Native) Android service to update the users location to your back end server, till PWA supports naively.
I programmed a service for the teachers of a school a tool which they can use to automate their classroom.
For easier access, i want to implement authentication via URL. The teacher WLAN is on a seperate subnet than the others.
The URL is a subdomain of a domain I own and added a SSL certificate. Now I am ready to deploy some beacons for test purposes and I noticed that Google Chrome won't show the beacons with my internal URL. URLs like google.com and facebook.com work just fine.
The physical Web browser app recognizes the internal URL.
What should I do?
Unfortunately, you cannot use Chrome to display physical web URLs pointing to a private subnet. Part of the Chrome system is a server-side component hosted at Google that checks the URL, validates that it resolves, and pulls metadata about the page it points to. If the page is not accessible on the open Internet, this check will fail and Chrome will silently ignore the physical web URL transmitted by the beacon.
While you cannot use Chrome to display such URLs, you can display them in your own custom app using detection SDKs like the Android Beacon Library.
i know that the index.html page (the PhoneGap startup page) needs to reside on the device. but if we want to create an app who uses third party user authentication before proceeding to core application, so then what we have to do?
Thanks in advance
On android you can change the starting page in the main activity or you can make a redirect in index.html
Well, you don't say if you are platform specific..
And there are lots of third party auth options..
But I can offer two solutions (admittedly my own code etc),
both of them use PhoneGap for Android and PhoneGap Plugins. The key piece of code for me has been the onLocationChange callback feature of the ChildBrowser plugin. Your app can take the user to other sites for auth or whatever, but still get control back.
Tutorial on Using Twitter REST API (OAuth 1, ChildBrowser, jsOAuth plugin)
Free Android App + Source on github : AppLaud App (OpenID, ChildBrowser, custom server)
For authentication, you can have a form in your index.html (maybe under login div) to do a post to an actual webserver.
Then, fetch the data returned from the webserver to let your user access the functionality of your native phonegap application.
You can have the functionality disabled until you receive the successful login from the webserver. If you post via ajax, the webview won't even blink, but you will still get the successful login response from webserver and simply enable functionality on your app after this.
Let me know if this is confusing and I'll try to explain more clearly and
I hope this helps.
Could a chrome extension be made that maintains a bitcoin wallet while also making it easy for web stores to integrate a one-click purchase experience.
Suppose a button on a webpage is clicked. Is it possible for that to trigger a function call to the chrome extension to send bitcoins?
Obviously letting webpages unlimited access to chrome extensions would never have been designed. But is there some way to make this work securely?
Chrome extensions can insert arbitrary code into web pages (content scripts).
Content scripts are JavaScript files that run in the context of web
pages. By using the standard Document Object Model (DOM), they can
read details of the web pages the browser visits, or make changes to
them.
This code can communicate with the original web page via the DOM and with the rest of the extension via message passing.
In theory, this should suffice. But make it secure, please.
Multibit provides an external application solution
Clicking on a "bitcoin:" protocol URI in Chrome (or any other browser) will transfer the URI over to MultiBit (v0.3+), starting the application if necessary. This approach removes the need for private keys to be held (and potentially shared) within the browser.
This is very dangerous because a single security hole in Chrome could allow any website to empty your wallet.
First, any payment have to be confirmed with the wallet password. But, as that password is typed inside Chrome itself, it might be possible for an attacker to read that password.
In fact, there are so many security issues to solve that I think it's better to let the bitcoin client do that job.
What should be done is a way for any software to ask the bitcoin client for a transaction. The first idea that comes to mind is using DBus.
That way, the Chrome extension would only have to transform any bitcoin address by a button which calls a DBus method.
The blockchain.info Bitcoin Wallet provides some support for this
by using navigator.registerProtocolHandler and Bitcoin URI's. Unfortunately it only works in firefox at present.