The cloud function should display bucketname on different environment like testing and production
Based on the Firebase a doc I have set config
runtimeconfig.json
{
"project": {
"environment": "testing"
}
}
The config file does not have environment production because I am not sure how the structure should be like for switch from testing to production
index.ts
exports.bucketName = functions.https.onRequest((req, res) => {
const bucketName = functions.config().project.environment;
res.send(bucketName);
});
The bucketname should dynamically changed based on the environment.
Package.json
{
"name": "functions",
"scripts": {
"lint": "tslint --project tsconfig.json",
"build": "tsc",
"build-and-watch": "tsc -w",
"serve": "npm run build && firebase serve --only functions",
"shell": "npm run build && firebase functions:shell"
}
}
Can someone suggest whats the best way to switch environment for Cloud Function?
For example a command like npm run build --configuration=test which loads the testing environment likewise for dev npm build --configuration=dev for dev environment.
As #Doug Stevenson suggested set the config based on what environment should do the job. I am using the firebase set and then deploy.
Related
Has anyone ever tried using pkg with featherjs before? I'm having trouble getting it to work.
I get the following error when running my executable:
WARNING: No configurations found in configuration directory:/../project/config
WARNING: To disable this warning set SUPPRESS_NO_CONFIG_WARNING in the environment.
pkg/prelude/bootstrap.js:1172
throw error;
^
TypeError: root path required
at Function.serveStatic [as static] (/snapshot/../project/node_modules/serve-static/index.js:40:11)
Not sure where to go from here if anyone has any guidance.
"bin": "src/index.js",
"scripts": {
"test": "npm run eslint && npm run mocha",
"dev": "./node_modules/nodemon/bin/nodemon.js src/",
"eslint": "eslint src/. test/. --config .eslintrc.json",
"mocha": "mocha test/ --recursive --exit",
"start": "node src/",
"pkg": "pkg . -t node9-macos-x64 --out-path pkg"
},
"pkg": {
"assets": [
"src/**/*",
"public/**/*",
"config/**/*",
"node_modules/config/**/*.*"
],
"scripts": [
"src/**/*.js",
"config/**/*.json"
]
},
The error is coming from node-config used by #feathersjs/configuration which trying to load config/default.json from the folder of the running application, not the the bundled package. You can either try building with the NODE_CONFIG environment variable set to the content of config/defualt.json or remove app.configure(configuration()) and app.set the configuration options your application needs, for example by requiring config/default.json (which should also work in theh packaged environment):
const config = require('../config/default.json');
Object.keys(config).forEach(key => {
app.set(key, config[key]);
});
I created a project using npm scripts in order to avoid the use of gulp. The thing is, my project has two scripts:
prepare.sh (uses wget to download some files and do mkdirs)
process.js (transform a json file into another overriding some keys)
package.json
{
"scripts": {
"process": "./process.js",
"prepare": "./prepare.sh $npm_package_config_source $npm_config_env",
"config": "npm run prepare && npm run process"
},
"config": {
"source": "https://myurl"
},
"devDependencies": {
"fs": "0.0.1-security",
"json-override": "^0.2.0"
}
}
So, if I want to apply the transform in this project I run npm run config, but I want this project to be part of another as a local module of a front-end project.
How can I set up my project? And when I add it as a dependency of my front project, how can I call the config script from the package.json of the front project?
You can add a bin object to your package.json which will result in files installed into the node_modules/.bin folder docs.npmjs.com/files/package.json#bin
example
{
"bin": {
"process": "./process.js",
"prepare": "./prepare.sh"
},
"scripts": {
"config": "prepare && process"
},
"devDependencies": {
"fs": "0.0.1-security",
"json-override": "^0.2.0"
}
}
Also since npm runs scripts with node_modules/.bin as part of the path you can simply call them by name only. Just remember to add #!/usr/bin/env node to the top of process.js
I'm trying to test out spectron for electron in terms of testing but as I'm going through a tutorial, I keep getting this error message whenever I run npm run test:e2e. My test file syntactically correct but im not sure why i run into an error through compilation
Specs:
Nodejs 6.10.3
Electron 1.6.1
here's the error message
here's the json file package.json
{
"name": "your-app",
"version": "0.1.0",
"main": "main.js",
"scripts": {
"start": "C:/Users/Livs/Documents/imdc/logger/node_modules/.bin/electron .",
"test:e2e": "C:/Users/Livs/Documents/imdc/logger/test.js"
},
"devDependencies": {
"electron-chromedriver": "^1.7.1",
"electron-prebuilt": "^1.4.13",
"electron-rebuild": "^1.5.11",
"chai": "^3.5.0",
"chai-as-promised": "^5.3.0",
"electron": "^1.3.4",
"mocha": "^3.0.2",
"spectron": "^3.4.0"
}
}
Heres the testing file test.js
const Application = require('spectron').Application;
const path = require('path');
const chai = require('chai');
const chaiAsPromised = require('chai-as-promised');
var electronPath = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'node_modules', '.bin', 'electron');
if (process.platform === 'win32') {
electronPath += '.cmd';
}
var appPath = path.join(__dirname, '..');
var app = new Application({
path: electronPath,
args: [appPath]
});
Your npm run e2e just calls the test.js file. You'll need a test runner, mocha for instance. Then you would run mocha test.js. Or change the e2e script inside package.json to run that command.
All your file paths for the scripts inside package.json should be relative to the package root, ie logger/test.js. Regarding the npm bins you only need to type the bin name, ie electron.
To solve your problem you should change your package.json test:e2e command to mocha test.js.
(You can also change your start command to electron . since custom npm commands will always look for binaries in ./node_modules/.bin
I am using Polymer and reloading changes in files manually. So I tried using using browser-sync and also browser-sync with gulp but not able to succeed.
I tried two following ways :
1) npm scripts in package.json
"scripts": {
"dev": "polymer serve | npm run watch",
"watch": "browser-sync start --proxy localhost:8080 --files 'src/*.html, src/*.js, images/*' "
},
Running it using npm run dev ,it ran but not able to detect the changes in the file.
2) Using gulp with browser-sync
var gulp = require('gulp');
var bs = require('browser-sync').create();
gulp.task('browser-sync', function() {
bs.init({
port : 5000,
proxy: {
target : "localhost:8080"
}
});
});
gulp.task('watch', ['browser-sync'], function () {
gulp.watch("*.html").on('change', bs.reload);
});
It also ran but not able to detect the changes in *.html file which is present in src folder.
Can anybody help me why changes of files not being detected.
I figured it myself, i was doing one small mistake in npm scripts. I have modified as :
"scripts": {
"dev": "polymer serve --port 8081 | npm run watch",
"test": "polymer test",
"watch": "browser-sync start --proxy localhost:8081 --files \"src/**/*.*, index.html, *.js\""
},
Now it is working fine !!
As shown in the screen shot below I am not able to run gulp to concat the JavaScript files. Its saying that gulp is not defined.
I have tried the following commands:
npm install -g gulp
npm install gulp
npm install gulp --save-dev
I have also set the environment variables as following:
C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Roaming\npm;C:\Python27;C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Roaming\npm\node_modules;C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Roaming\npm\node_modules\gulp;
var concat = require('gulp-concat');
var rename = require('gulp-rename');
var uglify = require('gulp-uglify');
//script paths
var jsFiles = 'scripts/*.js',
jsDest = 'dist/scripts';
gulp.task('scripts', function() {
return gulp.src(jsFiles)
.pipe(concat('scripts.js'))
.pipe(gulp.dest(jsDest));
});
you just need to install and require gulp locally, you probably only installed it globally
At the command line
cd <project-root> && npm install --save-dev gulp
In your gulpfile.js
var gulp = require('gulp');
this is a different dependency than the command line dependency (that you installed globally). More specifically, it is the same NPM package, but the command line program will execute code usually from a different entry point in the NPM package then what require('X') will return.
If we go to the package.json file in the Gulp project on Github, it will tell the whole story:
{
"name": "gulp",
"description": "The streaming build system",
"version": "3.9.1",
"homepage": "http://gulpjs.com",
"repository": "gulpjs/gulp",
"author": "Fractal <contact#wearefractal.com> (http://wearefractal.com/)",
"tags": [ ],
"files": [
// ...
],
"bin": {
"gulp": "./bin/gulp.js"
},
"man": "gulp.1",
"dependencies": {
// ...
},
"devDependencies": {
// ...
},
"scripts": {
"prepublish": "marked-man --name gulp docs/CLI.md > gulp.1",
"lint": "eslint . && jscs *.js bin/ lib/ test/",
"pretest": "npm run lint",
},
"engines": {
"node": ">= 0.9"
},
"license": "MIT"
}
so at the command line:
$ gulp default
will execute this:
"bin": {
"gulp": "./bin/gulp.js"
},
on the other hand, require('gulp') in your code will return the value of this:
https://github.com/gulpjs/gulp/blob/master/index.js
normally we see this in a package.json file as:
"main": "index.js"
but since this is the default, they just omitted it (which is dumb IMO, better to be explicit, but they aren't the first project I have seen take the lame shorthand route.).
Its occurs on Windows and usually one of the following fixes it:
If you didn't, run npm install gulp on the project folder, even if
you have gulp installed globally.
Normally, It isn't a problem on Windows, but it could be a issue with
the PATH. The package will try to get the PATH from the environment,
but you can override it by adding exec_args to your gulp settings.
For example, on Ubuntu:
"exec_args": {
"path": "/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin"
}
Hope It will be OK.
Source: https://github.com/NicoSantangelo/sublime-gulp/issues/12