I am getting the following error stack trace, when I am trying to connect an SMB share that I connect using the library most of the time, so yes the code mostly works but sometimes not. I could not try anything yet because I do not have any idea about what can be wrong, the share config, the network or the code, no idea.
com.hierynomus.mssmb2.SMBApiException: STATUS_NETWORK_NAME_DELETED (0xc00000c9): Authentication failed for 'your-user' using com.hierynomus.smbj.auth.NtlmAuthenticator#565d98da
com.hierynomus.smbj.connection.Connection.authenticate(Connection.java:182)
Here is my SmbConfig and I am using the 0.9.1 of smbj.
SmbConfig config = SmbConfig.builder()
.withMultiProtocolNegotiate(true)
.withSigningRequired(true)
.withDfsEnabled(true)
.build();
Here https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-smb/6ab6ca20-b404-41fd-b91a-2ed39e3762ea it gives more information about 0xC00000C9 - STATUS_NETWORK_NAME_DELETED exception and says
The network name specified by the client has been deleted on the
server. This error is returned if the client specifies an incorrect
TID or the share on the server represented by the TID was deleted.
Should I think something happened to the share on the windows server during the execution of the code?
Related
I'm using win xp Professional x64 Edition and I'm trying to send message to Windows Message Service like using net send. I'm using mailslot:
LPCTSTR SlotName = TEXT("\\\\.\\mailslot\\messngr");
hFile = CreateFile(SlotName,
GENERIC_WRITE | GENERIC_READ,
FILE_SHARE_WRITE | FILE_SHARE_READ,
(LPSECURITY_ATTRIBUTES)NULL,
CREATE_ALWAYS,
FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL,
(HANDLE)NULL);
and after launching it, I got error 5 from GetLastError() in CreateFile. I don't know how to fix it. I gave all VM permission, I turned message service ofc, and I can open it to be notpad like others suggested in: CreateFile() Failed With GetLastError() = 5. I tried many flags, but it didn't change anything. Any guess?
Like it says in the mailslot documentation, only the process that created the mailslot can read from it. Mailslots are one-way communication.
Remove the request for read access.
I browsed through the other threads - there was no concrete answer.
I implemented a service worker for notifcations
http://docs.pushwoosh.com/docs/chrome-web-push
I checked everything - all scripts are in root, the keys are well implemented. However, I do not get prompted to allow notifs.
Console output reads:
GET https://mydomain/service-worker.js net::ERR_FILE_EXISTS
Note: I do have the correct URL (just changed it here).
What causes the service worker error? How do I fix this?
It isn't anything to worry about. See the internal bug report: https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=541797 the TL'DR is that when Chrome tries to fetch a new SW if there is no change and thus nothing to install it throws this error message to indicate that state. There is nothing that you need to do.
Here is the params that I sent along with create shared link and got "Internal Server Error"
{"shared_link":{"access":"Collaborators","permissions":{"download": true}}}
This is a case of (1) bad documentation and (2) a bad error response.
You're seeing an error because the permissions parameter can only be used with the Open and Company access types*.
On (1) we should have this documented (I just updated our documentation to reflect this). On (2) we should be returning a more descriptive error (e.g. a 400 Bad Request and a message of " doesn't work with this access type. This is also in our development pipeline) "
*If you're really curious, it doesn't work with the Collaborators type because it's expected that the permissions set by the collaboration for each user will define their shared link access. Not the most straightforward thing, I understand.
I have configured 2 AppFabric instances and try to connect from a test client to the cache.
At first, I had trouble establishing the cache using the DataCacheFactory, but after opening the 22233-22235 ports in the firewall I have managed to get the cache using the DataCacheFactory.
As soon as I try to use the cache for a very small object (using a simple get), I get the following with a null InnerException:
ErrorCode:SubStatus:The connection was terminated, possibly due to server or network problems or serialized Object size is greater than MaxBufferSize on server. Result of the request is unknown.
I don't believe it's the MaxBufferSize issue (I also modified the transportProperties in the config just to make sure), but on the other hand - I'm able to get the cache, which I believe should indicate that the client can communicate with the server. So what is it? -How can I get more details on this issue?
Thanks in advance,
Nir.
Got this to work!
All I needed to do was just to add the host names, as appear in ClusterConfig file to the hosts file of the client, and that's it!
Hope that helps anyone,
Nir.
My site was valid until today, wondering wether it is my site's or the validator's fault.
I am getting this message:
The error encountered was: 500 Can't connect to localhost:8888 (connect: Connection refused)
HTTP Error 500 is an Internal Server Error, so that will be their fault. Try validator.nu whilst you are waiting.
W3C validator maintainer here. Tip: Next time you see that message, try validating your document directly at http://validator.w3.org/nu/ instead.
Because if you see that 500 error it means the validator is trying to reach the HTML5 backend, which runs as a separate service/process responding at localhost:8888 on the validator host.
But we actually run several validator hosts, round-robin, so if you see that 500 error it could mean that only one of the HTML5 backends on one of the hosts is temporarily down. And if you go to http://validator.w3.org/nu/ you might get lucky and hit a different host and it'll work.
On the other hand if you get a 404 from http://validator.w3.org/nu/
it most likely means you caught me in the middle of restarting/redeploying the W3C HTML5 validator backends to pull in changes I've made to the sources from https://github.com/validator/validator
But that never takes me more than a few minutes, so on your end you should never be seeing that 500 error for more than, say, 10 minutes at most. So if/when you do see it for any longer than that, please report it either by tweeting to #w3c or #sideshowbarker on twitter, or pinging me on IRC (MikeSmith on #whatwg or #w3c on irc.freenode.net).
I think it's pretty clear from the error that it's a problem at their end:
Checking the Document Type of this document requires the help of an external tool which was either not enabled in this validator, or is currently unavailable. Check in the validator's system configuration that HTML5 Validator is enabled and functional.
The error encountered was: 500 Can't connect to localhost:8888 (connect: Connection refused)
(My emphasis.) I expect they'll get it fixed Right Quick Like.
We were getting the following error while checking the domain in W3C validator and we managed to fix it by installing CA Bundle and Intermediate Root certificates for the same domain. Now, the domain is able to pass through the W3C validation check and reporting appropriate result.
===================================
Sorry! This document cannot be checked.
Error
I got the following unexpected response when trying to retrieve <https://our-xx-domain.in/>:
500 Can't connect to our-xx-domain.in:443
If you made recent changes to your domain name (DNS) configuration, you may also want to check that your domain records are correct, or ask your hosting company to do so.
===================================