Is the CSS [attribute="value"] Selector unnecessary? [duplicate] - html

This question already has answers here:
Select elements by attribute in CSS
(6 answers)
Closed 3 years ago.
I'm taking one of the edX classes on CSS and they've included:
[class*='example'] { background-color: orange; }
in the CSS stylesheet. Not familiar with that type of an attribute, so I looked it up. Essentially it just adds a style to anything using a specific class [(or id), depending on the specific attribute]. Why wouldn't you just add:
background-color: orange;
to the appropriate class, or id, and be done with it? Is there a significant purpose to this type of attribute that I'm missing?

The * in [class*='example'] is a selector that retrieves all elements that contains example in the class-name and not just elements with the class-name example.
So [class*='example'] will target all of the following:
<div class="iamanexample"></div>
<div class="example"></div>
<div class="whereisyourexample"></div>
Whereas .example or [class='example'] will only target the second element <div class="example"></div> from the above three.
Other attribute selectors in CSS includes the:
~ selector: This selector retrieves all elements whose targeted attribute's value contains the exact queried value. This selector can include multiple values in the form of a whitespace-separated list of words.
| selector: This selector retrieves all elements whose targeted attribute's value is exactly the queried value or begins with queried value immediately followed by a hyphen.
^ selector: This selector retrieves all elements whose targeted attribute's value starts with the queried value.
$ selector: This selector retrieves all elements whose targeted attribute's value ends with the queried value.
Check and run the following Code Snippet for a practical example and explanation in the code comments on how each of the above selector works:
/* all elements whose abc value contains "ment" */
div[abc*="ment"] { font-weight: 700; }
/* all elements whose abc value is exactly "element-1" */
div[abc~="element-1"] { color: blue; }
/* all elements whose abc value is exactly "element" or begins with "element" immediately followed by a hyphen */
div[abc|="element"] { background-color: green; }
/* all elements whose abc value starts with "x" */
div[abc^="x"] { background-color: red; }
/* all elements whose abc value ends with "x" */
div[abc$="x"] { background-color: yellow; }
div { margin: 5px 0px; }
<div abc="element-1">Hello World!</div>
<div abc="element-2">Hello World!</div>
<div abc="xElement1">Hello World!</div>
<div abc="xElement2">Hello World!</div>
<div abc="element1x">Hello World!</div>
<div abc="element2x">Hello World!</div>

Related

What is the equivalent of the '.' CSS selector for any attribute?

I'd like to select things similarly to how classes are selected (but I would like to use other attributes). In the same way that class='item-button item-button-selected' can be selected with both .item-button and .item-button-selected.
The equivalent of an HTML class selector for any attribute is [attribute~=value], matching one of a set of space-separated values:
[data-foo~="a"] {
color: red;
}
[data-foo~="a"][data-foo~="b"] {
color: blue;
}
<p data-foo="a">a
<p data-foo="a b">a b
<p data-foo="b">b
In case you're worried about specificity (if this is a non-CSS use case, you don't need to worry), attribute selectors and class selectors are equally specific.

What is the different between [att|=val] and [att~=val] in css

I am facing very difficulty to understand these two different attribute in CSS [att|=val] and [att~=val]. Can anyone simply give me explanation for it
thanks
[attr|=val] matches a word in val in any form, so [class=div] would match .my-div, .div, but not .mydiv.
[attr~=val] matches a complete word in val, so [class~=div] would match .div, but not .mydiv or .my-div.
Example:
HTML
<div id="myDiv"></div>
<div id="myDiv2"></div>
<div id="new-div"></div>
CSS
div[id|=myDiv] {
/* Matches the first div */
}
div[id|=my]{
matches first two divs
}
div[id|=new]{
/* Matches second div - the hyphen counts as a word separator */
}
div[id~=Div]{
/* Matches nothing - "Div" is not a separate word */
}

Is an attribute selector for the ID attribute less specific than an ID selector?

What do I need to do to give the [id^=value] selector the same specificity as a regular ID, and why isn't it equal or greater already? (considering that I gave it html as well)
html div[id^="blue"] {
background-color: blue
}
#blue4 {
background-color: red
}
jsfiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/bjwe6yr0/1/
An attribute selector will always be less specific than an ID selector; its specificity value does not change based on the attribute name. Selectors only maps specific attribute names to class selectors and ID selectors; an attribute selector is a generic concept and does not contain any such mappings.
The only way for a complex selector to have ID specificity is if it contains one or more ID selectors. Implementation limits aside, it is theoretically not possible to override even a single ID selector with any number of attribute selectors or any other type of simple selector.
Here is how your two selectors compare:
/* 1 attribute, 2 types -> specificity = 0-1-2 */
html div[id^="blue"] {
background-color: blue
}
/* 1 ID -> specificity = 1-0-0 */
#blue4 {
background-color: red
}
Even the addition of html doesn't help because it's just a type selector. Change it to :root and you get a pseudo-class which is equally specific to an attribute selector, and thus still less specific than an ID.
You may consider the not() selector in order to append a random ID and you will then have a higher or the same specifity since the specifity of not() is equal to the specifity of the selector inside it:
html body div[id^="blue"]:not(#randomID) {
background-color: blue
}
#blue4 {
background-color: red
}
div {
height: 50px;
width: 50px
}
<div id="blue1"></div>
<div id="blue2"></div>
<div id="blue3"></div>
<div id="blue4"></div>

CSS Dot Notation Naming Convention

I am getting started with learning CSS.
While looking through the tutorial on w3schools.
I realized some of the example start with
.awesome-text-box{}
Is there a different between
.awesome-text-box {} and awesome-text-box{}
without the dot?
What does the dot notation means here
p.one {
border-style: solid;
border-width: 5px;
}
p.two {
border-style: solid;
border-width: medium;
}
p referes to ?
A dot in css is for what is called a class.
They can be called almost anything, for example in your CSS you would create a class and add style for it (in this case, I'm making the background black);
.my-first-class {
background-color: #000;
...
}
and to apply this class to an HTML element, you would do the following
<body class="my-first-class">
...
</body>
this would mean the body of the page would become black.
Now, you can create classes for CSS style or you can reference HTML elements directly, for example (CSS again);
body {
background-color: #000;
}
would directly reference the <body> element on the page and do the same again.
The main difference between the two is that CSS classes are reusable. By comparison, referencing the HTML tag directly will affect all tags on the page (that are the same), for example (CSS again);
body {
background-color: #000;
}
.my-first-class {
background-color: #FFF;
}
and now for some HTML;
<body>
<p class="my-first-class">This is the first line</p>
<p class="my-first-class">This is the second line</p>
</body>
This would produce a black page, with 2 white boxes with text inside them (try it out!)
Now for your last part of the question about p.one {...} CSS.
This is a reference to a <p> tag that has class="one" added to it, <p class="one">...</p>
That CSS will only work on a <p> tag with the one class added (as above).
Extra for experts...
There is also one more selector type and it's called an ID (and I personally do not use these when doing CSS styling but some people like too and I don't know why...)
Much like a class, you can have an id on an HTML element; <p id="my-first-id"></p>
and to add CSS style to this, you would put (in the CSS);
#my-first-id {
...
}
and that would style all elements with that id added.
Hopefully that helped answer all the parts, ask again if you need an even better explanation :)
The dot denotes that the selector is a class. So it will select elements in your page as such:
.awesome-text-box {
}
<div class="awesome-text-box"></div>
Whereas without the dot denotes an element name. Such as:
div {
}
<div></div>
In the other example you gave, the dot notation is using chaining this is where you can select an element with numerous conditions. In your example:
p.one {
}
// Will find
<p class="one"></p>
// However it will not find
<div class="one"></div>
Whilst I am here I can give you a list of other common selectors too:
#awesome-text-box => <div id="awesome-text-box"></div> => ID
.btn.btn-style-1 => <span class="btn btn-style-1"></span> => Chaining classes
p > span => <p><span></span></p> => Child
p span => <p><a><span></span></a><span></span> => Descendant (anything below)
p + span => <p></p><span></span> => Sibling
A '.' refers to a class, while a '#' refers to a id.
When neither a '.' or a '#' are used, the CSS will apply the style to an HTML object.
So for p .one and p .two, the CSS will be applied to the '.one' and '.two' classes that exists within the 'p' object.
For a more detailed example;
<p class = "one">This text will have the CSS of "p .one"</p>
<p class = "two">This text will have the CSS of "p .two"</p>
. means a class. You can call that CSS class with HTML
example
<span class="awesome-text-box"> ABCD </span>
and P means <p> tag in HTML you can call
<p class="one"> ABCD </p>
Ref -
http://www.w3schools.com/css/css_selectors.asp
The dot notation is for class and without dot that would not work. The selector name like div, p don't need dot notation. And use hash (#) for the selector with id.
Ex-
<div id="foo">foo bar</div>
<div class="bar">foo bar</div>
#foo{} /* selects foo with id foo */
.bar{} /* selects foo with class bar */
div{} /* selects the div */
Here . is class selector. It means apply style to all elements which has class awesome-text-box ie,
<div class="awesome-text-box"></div>
while without dot it is tag name like you mention in second example p Here p is tag:
<p>Some text</p>
Similarly p.one apply the style to all p tags which has class one. ie,
<p class="one">Some text</p>

Target css group of class or id?

I have a group of class name:
.hSpace5{padding-top:0.3125em;}
.hSpace10{padding-top:0.625em;}
.hSpace15{padding-top:0.9375em;}
.hSpace20{padding-top:1.25em;}
.hSpace25{padding-top:1.5625em;}
.hSpace30{padding-top:1.875em;}
.hSpace35{padding-top:2.1875em;}
.hSpace40{padding-top:2.5em;}
Is it possible to target all this class names by referring to the to the first few characters .hSapce--?
you can do it like this in css3
div[class^="hSpace"]
OR
div[class*="hSpace"]
Both are not similar but in your scenario both will work.
First is "starts with class name" and second is "contains class name".
You can use the below selector to select all elements whose class attribute contains the value hspace. Note that this is a contains selector and hence the string can be present anywhere in the class name.
div[class*='hspace'] {
/* styles */
}
div[class*='hspace'] {
color: red;
}
<div class='hspace1'>aa</div>
<div class='hspace2'>bb</div>
<div class='hspace-b'>ab</div>
<div class='c-hspace'>cd</div>
<div class='hvspace'>cd</div>
<!-- will not be selected -->
But check out for browser support.
As mentioned in Rab Nawaz's answer, you can use the below also.
div[class^='hspace'] { }
In-fact, this method might be more suitable for your case because it selects all div whose class starts with hspace.
More information can be found in this W3C Selectors Level 3 Spec in the table present under Section 2.