I am upgrading from version 6 to version 7, which means switching from from instantiating a Broker to using the SystemLauncher.
In particular, I had specified the keystore with a variable, and am now providing that via the systemConfigAttributes to start. But it reports that it can't find they keystore, and names my ${variable} as the keystore, rather than the value I provided.
I've also tried using one of the standard variables ${qpid.amqp_port} instead, just in case, and it's still reporting that variable name rather than a value.
Is this a feature that doesn't work any more, or am I plugging it in wrong?
The feature is still used in the broker configuration, and so you should be able to use it. Can you share your code / config so we can see what the problem might be?
Related
Note: this is not a dupe of this or this other question. Read on: this question is specific to the Code-Sharing template.
I am doing some pretty basic experiments with NativeScript, Angular and the code sharing templates (see: #nativescript/schematics).
Now I am doing some exploration / poc work on how different "build configuration" are supported by the framework. To be clear, I am searching for a simple -and hopefully official- way to have the application use a different version of a specific file (let's call it configuration.ts) based on the current platform (web/ios/android) and environment (development/production/staging?).
Doing the first part is obviously trivial - after all that is the prime purpose of the code sharing schematics. So, different versions of the same file are identified by different extensions. This page explain things pretty simply.
What I don't get as easily is if the framework/template supports any similar convention-based rule that can be used to switch between debug/release (or even better development/staging/production) versions of a file. Think for example of a config.ts file that contains different parameters based on the environment.
I have done some research in the topic, but I was unable to find a conclusive answer:
the old and now retired documentation for the appbuilder platform mentions a (.debug. and .release.) naming convention for files. I don't think this work anymore.
other sources mention passing parameters during the call to tns build / tns run and then fetching them via webpack env variable... See here. This may work, but seems oddly convoluted
third option that gets mentioned is to use hooks to customize the build (or use a plugin that should do the same)
lastly, for some odd reason, the #nativescript/schematics seems to generate a default project that contains two files called environment.ts and environment.prod.ts. I suspect those only work for the web version of the project (read: ng serve) - I wasn't able to get the mobile compiler to recognize files that end with debug.ts, prod.ts or release.ts
While it may be possible that what I am trying to do isn't just supported (yet?), the general confusion an dissenting opinions on the matter make me think I may be missing something.. somewhere.
In case this IS somehow supported, I also wonder how it may integrate with the NativeScript Sidekick app that is often suggested as a tool to ease the build/run process of NativeScript applications (there is no way to specify additional parameters for the tns commands that the Sidekick automates, the only options available are switching between debug/release mode), but this is probably better to be left for another question.
Environment files are not yet supported, passing environment variables from build command could be the viable solution for now.
But of course, you may write your own schematics if you like immediate support for environment files.
I did not look into sharing environment files between web and mobile yet - I do like Manoj's suggestion regarding modifying the schematics, but I'll have to cross that bridge when I get there I guess. I might have an answer to your second question regarding Sidekick. The latest version does support "Webpack" build option which seems to pass the --bundle parameter to tns. The caveat is that this option seems to be more sensitive to typescript errors, even relatively benign ones, so you have to be careful and make sure to fix them all prior to building. In my case I had to lock the version of #types/jasmine in package.json to "2.8.6" in order to avoid some incompatibility between that and the version of typescript that Sidekick's cloud solution is using. Another hint is to check "Clean Build" after npm dependency changes are made. Good luck!
Must all the server addresses be known and well-defined before starting the ensemble? It looks like the config file always has a list of servers,
tickTime=2000
dataDir=/var/zookeeper/
clientPort=2181
initLimit=5
syncLimit=2
server.1=zoo1:2888:3888
server.2=zoo2:2888:3888
server.3=zoo3:2888:3888
But I want the servers to join (by using something like a common token or one known peer)
Dynamic configuration is only supported starting from 3.5.0
The documentation can be found here
Also worth reading this page for similar discussion
In the Cloudbees wiki, this page explains how to add configuration parameter for an app deployment, using cloudbees-web.xml.
But, is the content of:
<appid>APP_ID</appid>
injected as a well ? How can I retrieve this value from my application's code ?
My preference is to avoid coding an application to contain explicit references to the container within which it runs. So I would favour using techniques that do not tie your code to CloudBees (a.k.a. us).
Thus I would use a container specific descriptor file that configures a context parameter, then your application just reads the context parameter and uses that parameter directly.
There are two techniques for doing this:
Application Environments personally I love this way... though if you want to deploy the application to your own test environment that you have just spun up yourself, your cloudbees-web.xml will likely be missing the required environment definition... so better is to use the newer
Configuration Parameters so that when you need your own test instance you just define the configuration parameters for that test environment and then deploy the exact same artifact to that instance... it also prevents the issue of deploying to the test instance with the production environment turned on.
I am sure one of the RUN# team may well have some other trick such as a System property that tells you the app id... but keep in mind that when running locally, e.g. using a local jetty/tomcat/bees:run container your code will then blow up!
Currently I am trying to pass some values through command line arguments and then parse it using GenericOptionsParser with tool implemented.
from the Master node I run something like this:
bin/hadoop jar MYJAR.jar MYJOB -D mapred.reduce.tasks=13
But this only get applied on the Master!! Is there any way to make this applied on the slaves as well?
I use Hadoop 0.20.203.
Any help is appreciated.
But this only get applied on the Master!! Is there any way to make this applied on the slaves as well?
According to the "Hadoop : The Definitive Guide". Setting some of the property on the client side is of no use. You need to set the same in the configuration file. Note, that you can also create new properties in the configuration files and read them in the code using the Configuration Object.
Be aware that some properties have no effect when set in the client configuration. For
example, if in your job submission you set mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum with
the expectation that it would change the number of task slots for the tasktrackers running your job, then you would be disappointed, since this property only is only honored
if set in the tasktracker’s mapred-site.html file. In general, you can tell the component
where a property should be set by its name, so the fact that mapred.task.tracker.map.tasks.maximum starts with mapred.tasktracker gives you a clue that it can be set only for the tasktracker daemon. This is not a hard and fast rule, however, so in some cases you may need to resort to trial and error, or even reading the source.
You can also configure the environment of the Hadoop variables using the HADOOP_*_OPTS in the conf/hadoop-env.sh file.
Again, according to the "Hadoop : The Definitive Guide".
Do not confuse setting Hadoop properties using the -D property=value option to GenericOptionsParser (and ToolRunner) with setting JVM system properties using the -Dproperty=value option to the java command. The syntax for JVM system properties does not allow any whitespace between the D and the property name, whereas GenericOptionsParser requires them to be separated by whitespace.
JVM system properties are retrieved from the java.lang.System class, whereas Hadoop properties are accessible only from a Configuration object.
I currently use RoleEnvironment.GetConfigurationSettingValue(propertyName) to get the value of a setting defined in my WebRole config file (csdef + cscfg). Ok, sounds right.
This works well if the setting exists but failed with an Exception if the setting is not defined in the csdef and the cscfg.
I'm migrating an existing app to Azure which has many configuration settings in web.config. In my code, to read a setting value, I d'like to test : if it exists in the webRole config (csdef + cscfg) I read it from here, otherwise I read it with ConfigurationManager from web.config.
This would prevent to migrate all settings from my web.config and allow to custom one when the app is already deployed.
Is there a way to do this ?
I don't want to encapsulate the GetConfigurationSettingValue in a try/catch (and read from web.config if I enter the catch) because it's really an ugly way (and mostly it's not performance effective !).
Thanks !
Update for 1.7 Azure SDK.
The CloudConfigurationManager class has been introduced. The allows for a single GetSetting call to look in your cscfg first and then fall back to web.config if the key is not found.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/LIBRARY/jj157248
Pre 1.7 SDK
Simple answer is no. (That I know of)
The more interesting topic is to consider configuration as a dependency. I have found it to be beneficial to treat configuration settings as a dependency so that the backing implementation can be changed over time. That implementation may be a fake for testing or something more complex like switching from .config/.cscfg to a database implementation for multi-tennent solutions.
Given this configuration wrapper you can write that TryGetSetting as internal method for whatever your source of configuration options are. When this feature is added to the RoleEnvironment members, you would only have to change that internal implementation.