I have a table that is created in one componentA that has several table-row elements in the table. I then have another componentB that just has several table-row elements that will be reused throughout the app in the template code. The issue is that when using componentB inside of the table of componentA the table-row elements are not spanning the entire width of the table and seem to be broken outside of the table.
I have found references to several other similar issues, but they are using dynamic rows based on data that is passed in for each row. My issue is that I have a fixed set of rows that will be used throughout the app. I tried using the following examples:
--- componentA
<table>
<tr><td>Name</td></tr>
<tr componentB></tr> --- does not work
</table>
--- componentB --- selector: '[componentB]'
<tr><td>Phone Number</td></tr>
<tr><td>Email</td></tr>
--- componentA
<table>
<tr><td>Name</td></tr>
<componentB></componentB> --- does not work
</table>
--- componentB --- selector: 'componentB'
<tr><td>Phone Number</td></tr>
<tr><td>Email</td></tr>
Here is an example stackblitz of exactly the problem: https://stackblitz.com/edit/angular-ydsgaz
The elements in componentB should span the width of the table just like a normal element used in componentA, but they are not. Any help would be great!
ANSWER: either one of the following examples will work for this scenario
content-projection: https://stackblitz.com/edit/angular-dr6fqs
template reference (my preferred way): https://stackblitz.com/edit/angular-qgxzhv
Use angular content projection.
You just have to add a directive selector to table body.
app.component.html
<table>
<tbody app-table-rows>
<tr>
<td>name</td>
<td>bob</td>
</tr>
<tbody>
</table>
and then in table-rows.component.html add ng-content element. Angular will replace this ng-content element with content inside directive host element.
<ng-content></ng-content>
<tr>
<td>email</td>
<td>bob#gmail.com</td>
</tr>
...
Working example https://stackblitz.com/edit/angular-dr6fqs
For specific css requirements I'm using multiple <tbody> tags in my table design which looks something like this:
Use of multiple tbody tags
But I also require a wrapper for multiple tbody tags (something like a common tbody parent) such that this wrapper can be scrolled in order achieve the following effect:
A common tbody which can be scrolled
How do I achieve the latter srolling effect in the former one?
(P.S.: I know this can be done through nested table approach, but I'm looking for other alternatives if any)
As mentioned in the comments by FelipeAls and others that a <tbody> tag can be wrapped only by a <table> tag, I tried wrapping <thead> and <tbody>s in separate tables to create the desired effect in the following way:
<table>
<thead>
...
</thead>
</table>
<table>
<tbody>
...
</tbody>
<tbody>
...
</tbody>
<tbody>
...
</tbody>
</table>
This solved the issue.
Here's a Working Demo.
You cannot have a wrapper for tbody elements inside a table. The tbody element itself is a wrapper for tr elements. HTML syntax does not allow any other container for tbody but table. What matters more is that this syntax rules is actually enforced by the way browsers parse HTML.
If you try to use, say, a div element as a wrapper (the most reasonable approach), it will actually create a div element in the DOM, but an empty one, and before the table. All the tbody and tr elements are inserted into the table element; they are effectively extracted from the div element, which thus becomes empty, unless it contains something else than table-related elements.
An illustration, using intentionally invalid markup:
<style>
.x { outline: solid red }
</style>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr><td>foo
</tbody>
<div class=x>
FOO!
<tbody>
<tr><td>foo2
</tbody>
<tbody>
<tr><td>foo3
</tbody>
</div>
<tbody>
<tr><td>The end
</tbody>
</table>
The conclusion is that you need a different approach. The most obvious one is to use just a single tbody element. If this is not feasible, you should explain why, but this would be a topic for a new question.
I have a simple table
<tr>
<td class="first">I am the first</td>
<td class="second">You are the second</td>
<td class="third">He is third</td>
<td class="fourth">Someone else is fourth</td>
<td class="fifth">That guy is fifht</td>
<td class="sixth">Who care's about sixth</td>
</tr>
I want to apply css rules on some of classes in td only. I can write something like-
td.first, td.fourth, td.fifth
{
color:purple;
}
This works. Or i can use classes. I was wondering is there any efficient/ better way to write selectors in such case.
My concern:
Is browser, is going to look for all class and then search for td for each comma separation. That means it going to find all three classes and then evaluate tag. Is there any way that browser will find all three classes and then matches the tag other than using a single class.
Addressing Your Concern
You state:
My concern: Is browser, is going to look for all td for each comma
separation and find the class match. That means it going to find all
td tags three times. If this is true, how can i make browser to search
for td tags once and then find class matches.
But that is not how css evaluates, as it goes from right to left. In the case you give:
td.first, td.fourth, td.fifth
{
color:purple;
}
So it will not search "three times" through td elements. Rather, it will match the .first class in your document (where ever it is), then check to see if it is applied to td element, and if so, match. Then evaluate .fourth, etc. in a similar fashion.
So if your concern is iterations through td elements, then your concern is invalid. Your code is efficient as it is.
For specific properties, you can create separate classes.
For example, in your case, you can make a class .color and write like this:
<tr>
<td class="first color">I am the first</td>
<td class="second">You are the second</td>
<td class="third">He is third</td>
<td class="fourth color">Someone else is fourth</td>
<td class="fifth color">That guy is fifht</td>
<td class="sixth">Who care's about sixth</td>
</tr>
.color{color:purple;}
You can use the :nth-child property to achieve the same without giving all these different classes to your TDs
i.e:
td:nth-child(1),
td:nth-child(4),
td:nth-child(5) {
color:purple;
}
I have a table as follow:
<table>
<tr>
<td>
*PROBLEMATIC CELL*
</td>
<td rowspan="2">
</td>
<td rowspan="3">
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
</td>
</tr>
</table>
The first cell of the first row, has a padding at the bottom. Well it's not really padding but it looks like padding and using firebug I can not find what the space there actually is.
I think what is happening is that, firefox automatically adjusts the bottom padding of the first td in the first tr with the padding top of the first and only td of the second tr.
p.s. works perfectly fine in Chrome.
Basically what I am trying to achieve is for the height of the first td in the first tr, to be only as tall as required but not taller so that the content of that cell ends on the same place as where the td ends without any space between them.
The website URL is: http://mmamail.com/
It seems to have something to do with the padding-top placed on the first TD of the SECOND TR. The weird thing is that it works nicely on chrome.
You've presented the browser with an incomplete layout problem. You have a three-by-three grid, none of whose columns or rows have fixed sizes. So the issue is you end up with a taller first row than you intended, as the browser tries to allocate ‘spare’ height caused by the rowspan in the second column amongst the cells in the first column.
There isn't a standardised algorithm for this; browsers do different things, often including unpleasant things like looking at the raw number of bytes of markup in each cell. You don't want to rely on this behaviour. It also slows page rendering down and can give really weird, page-distorting effects when there's a very small or large amount of content. If you need to use tables for layout, make sure to use table-layout: fixed with explicit widths for the fixed-size columns, and set explicit heights for cells when there are rowspans, to avoid ambiguity.
But a proliferation of rowspan/colspan is often a hint you should be looking at a different form of layout. This example is very much easier to acheive using CSS instead. eg.:
<div id="ads">
<script type="text/javascript">//...google stuff...</script>
...
</div>
<div id="content">
<div id="video"><fieldset>
<legend>...</legend>
<object ...>
</fieldset></div>
<form id="poll" method="post" action="..."><fieldset>
<legend>...</legend>
...options...
</fieldset></form>
<form id="subscribe" method="post" action="..."><fieldset>
<legend>...</legend>
...fields...
</fieldset></form>
<div id="about">
...
</div>
</div>
with styles something like:
#ads { position: absolute; right: 0; width: 160px; }
#content { margin-right: 160px; }
#video { float: right; width: 440px; }
#poll, #subscribe { margin: 0 440px 0 0; }
#about { clear: right; }
I'd also advise you to move the JavaScript logic out from the inline event handler attributes you currently have to separate JavaScript blocks (either embedded <script> blocks or linked external scripts). Especially for the multi-line event handlers: quite apart from the horrible maintainability of mixing scripts into markup, in HTML/XML newlines in attributes are not preserved. That means your newlines in JS code are converted into spaces, so if you miss a single semicolon your script will break or behave oddly (where usually in a script block or external script, the auto-newline-semicolon-fallback would save you).
ie.
onsubmit="
var inputs = this.getElementsByTagName('input');
var checkedValue;
for(var i = 0; i < inputs.length; i++)
{
if(inputs[i].getAttribute('type') == 'radio' && inputs[i].checked)
{
checkedValue = inputs[i].value;
}
}
/*makeAjaxPostRequest('/poll/ajax-vote.php', 'vote='+checkedValue, processAjaxResponse);*/
makeAjaxGetRequest('/poll/ajax-vote.php?vote='+checkedValue, processAjaxResponse);
return false;"
instead:
<form id="pollForm" method="post" action="/poll/form-vote.php>
...
</form>
<script type="text/javascript">
document.getElementById('pollForm').onsubmit= function() {
var checkedValue= getRadioValue(this.elements.vote);
makeAjaxPostRequest('/poll/ajax-vote.php', 'vote='+encodeURIComponent(checkedValue), processAjaxResponse);
return false;
};
function getRadioValue(fields) {
for (var i= fields.length; i-->0;)
if (fields[i].checked)
return fields.value;
return '';
};
</script>
Always allow only POST requests for active forms that do something positive. Always use encodeURIComponent when creating query strings. Don't use getAttribute as it doesn't work right in IE; use direct DOM Level 1 HTML properties instead, eg. input.type.
if you are referring to the space in between the "Monthly poll" and "Monthly Magazine" boxes, it is not caused by padding...
What's happening is the td containing the flash video is too tall, and because it has a rowspan of 2, the two tds on the left are being adjusted to the height of the tallest td (aka the video box)
One solution is to add another tr below the first 2 rows,
let it have an empty td,
change the rowspan of the video box to 3
And then the redundant space you see in between the first 2 boxes will be transfered to the empty td you have just created.
OR
I would suggest you bite the bullet and start using CSS rather than tables for layout, purely because:
We are in the second decade of the 21st century
It is much more flexible to use CSS
It will be much easier for you change the look of the site in th future, without touching the markup.
It will be much better for search engines to index your site content
Assistive software such as screen readers can see your content in the order they are supposed to be seen
You will be one happy developer in the end
Controlling table cell padding with css can be tricky. Try adding these two css rules:
table { border-spacing: 0; }
table td { padding: 0; }
Unfortunately, the border-spacing rule isn't supported by all browser, so you may have to add cellpadding="0" and cellspacing="0" as an attribute to the table.
I've tried with the follow HTML code which is merely a more complete version of your code fragment. However, I'm seeing no padding as you have described. So my best guess is that it's caused by some other CSS rules you defined elsewhere.
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body>
<table>
<tr>
<td>
*PROBLEMATIC CELL*
</td>
<td rowspan="2">
</td>
<td rowspan="3">
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
How can I specify a td tag should span all columns (when the exact amount of columns in the table will be variable/difficult to determine when the HTML is being rendered)? w3schools mentions you can use colspan="0", but it doesn't say exactly what browsers support that value (IE 6 is in our list to support).
It appears that setting colspan to a value greater than the theoretical amount of columns you may have will work, but it will not work if you have table-layout set to fixed. Are there any disadvantages to using an automatic layout with a large number for colspan? Is there a more correct way of doing this?
Just use this:
colspan="100%"
It works on Firefox 3.6, IE 7 and Opera 11! (and I guess on others, I couldn't try)
Warning: as mentioned in the comments below this is actually the same as colspan="100". Hence, this solution will break for tables with css table-layout: fixed, or more than 100 columns.
I have IE 7.0, Firefox 3.0 and Chrome 1.0
The colspan="0" attribute in a TD is NOT spanning across all TDs in any of the above browsers.
Maybe not recommended as proper markup practice, but if you give a higher colspan value than the total possible no. of columns in other rows, then the TD would span all the columns.
This does NOT work when the table-layout CSS property is set to fixed.
Once again, this is not the perfect solution but seems to work in the above mentioned 3 browser versions when the table-layout CSS property is automatic.
If you want to make a 'title' cell that spans all columns, as header for your table, you may want to use the caption tag (http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_caption.asp / https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/caption) This element is meant for this purpose. It behaves like a div, but doesn't span the entire width of the parent of the table (like a div would do in the same position (don't try this at home!)), instead, it spans the width of the table. There are some cross-browser issues with borders and such (was acceptable for me). Anyways, you can make it look as a cell that spans all columns. Within, you can make rows by adding div-elements. I'm not sure if you can insert it in between tr-elements, but that would be a hack I guess (so not recommended). Another option would be messing around with floating divs, but that is yuck!
Do
<table>
<caption style="gimme some style!"><!-- Title of table --></caption>
<thead><!-- ... --></thead>
<tbody><!-- ... --></tbody>
</table>
Don't
<div>
<div style="float: left;/* extra styling /*"><!-- Title of table --></div>
<table>
<thead><!-- ... --></thead>
<tbody><!-- ... --></tbody>
</table>
<div style="clear: both"></div>
</div>
As a partial answer, here's a few points about colspan="0", which was mentioned in the question.
tl;dr version:
colspan="0" doesn't work in any browser whatsoever. W3Schools is wrong (as usual). HTML 4 said that colspan="0" should cause a column to span the whole table, but nobody implemented this and it was removed from the spec after HTML 4.
Some more detail and evidence:
All major browsers treat it as equivalent to colspan="1".
Here's a demo showing this; try it on any browser you like.
td {
border: 1px solid black;
}
<table>
<tr>
<td>ay</td>
<td>bee</td>
<td>see</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="0">colspan="0"</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="1">colspan="1"</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">colspan="3"</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="1000">colspan="1000"</td>
</tr>
</table>
The HTML 4 spec (now old and outdated, but current back when this question was asked) did indeed say that colspan="0" should be treated as spanning all columns:
The value zero ("0") means that the cell spans all columns from the current column to the last column of the column group (COLGROUP) in which the cell is defined.
However, most browsers never implemented this.
HTML 5.0 (made a candidate recommendation back in 2012), the WhatWG HTML living standard (the dominant standard today), and the latest W3 HTML 5 spec all do not contain the wording quoted from HTML 4 above, and unanimously agree that a colspan of 0 is not allowed, with this wording which appears in all three specs:
The td and th elements may have a colspan content attribute specified, whose value must be a valid non-negative integer greater than zero ...
Sources:
https://www.w3.org/TR/html50/tabular-data.html#attributes-common-to-td-and-th-elements
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/tables.html#attributes-common-to-td-and-th-elements
https://www.w3.org/TR/html53/tabular-data.html#attributes-common-to-td-and-th-elements
The following claims from the W3Schools page linked to in the question are - at least nowadays - completely false:
Only Firefox supports colspan="0", which has a special meaning ... [It] tells the browser to span the cell to the last column of the column group (colgroup)
and
Differences Between HTML 4.01 and HTML5
NONE.
If you're not already aware that W3Schools is generally held in contempt by web developers for its frequent inaccuracies, consider this a lesson in why.
For IE 6, you'll want to equal colspan to the number of columns in your table. If you have 5 columns, then you'll want: colspan="5".
The reason is that IE handles colspans differently, it uses the HTML 3.2 specification:
IE implements the HTML 3.2 definition, it sets colspan=0 as colspan=1.
The bug is well documented.
If you're using jQuery (or don't mind adding it), this will get the job done better than any of these hacks.
function getMaxColCount($table) {
var maxCol = 0;
$table.find('tr').each(function(i,o) {
var colCount = 0;
$(o).find('td:not(.maxcols),th:not(.maxcols)').each(function(i,oo) {
var cc = Number($(oo).attr('colspan'));
if (cc) {
colCount += cc;
} else {
colCount += 1;
}
});
if(colCount > maxCol) {
maxCol = colCount;
}
});
return maxCol;
}
To ease the implementation, I decorate any td/th I need adjusted with a class such as "maxCol" then I can do the following:
$('td.maxcols, th.maxcols').each(function(i,o) {
$t = $($(o).parents('table')[0]); $(o).attr('colspan', getMaxColCount($t));
});
If you find an implementation this won't work for, don't slam the answer, explain in comments and I'll update if it can be covered.
Another working but ugly solution : colspan="100", where 100 is a value larger than total columns you need to colspan.
According to the W3C, the colspan="0" option is valid only with COLGROUP tag.
Below is a concise es6 solution (similar to Rainbabba's answer but without the jQuery).
Array.from(document.querySelectorAll('[data-colspan-max]')).forEach(td => {
let table = td;
while (table && table.nodeName !== 'TABLE') table = table.parentNode;
td.colSpan = Array.from(table.querySelector('tr').children).reduce((acc, child) => acc + child.colSpan, 0);
});
html {
font-family: Verdana;
}
tr > * {
padding: 1rem;
box-shadow: 0 0 8px gray inset;
}
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Header 1</th>
<th>Header 2</th>
<th>Header 3</th>
<th>Header 4</th>
<th>Header 5</th>
<th>Header 6</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbod><tr>
<td data-colspan-max>td will be set to full width</td>
</tr></tbod>
</table>
Simply set colspan to the number of columns in the table.
All other "shortcuts" have pitfalls.
The best thing to do is set the colspan to the correct number to begin with. If your table has 5 columns, set it to colspan="5" That is the only way that will work in all scenarios. No, it's not an outdated solution or only recommended for IE6 or anything -- that's literally the best way to handle this.
I wouldn't recommend using Javascript to solve this unless the number of columns changes during runtime.
If the number of columns is variable, then you'll need to calculate the number of columns so that you can populate the colspan. If you have a variable number of columns, whatever is generating the table should be able to be adapted to also calculate the number of columns the table has.
As other answers have mentioned, if your table is not set to table-layout: fixed, you can also just set colspan to a really large number. But I find this solution messy, and it can be a headache if you come back later and decide it should be a fixed table layout. Better just to do it correctly the first time.
A CSS solution would be ideal, but I was unable to find one, so here is a JavaScript solution: for a tr element with a given class, maximize it by selecting a full row, counting its td elements and their colSpan attributes, and just setting the widened row with el.colSpan = newcolspan;. Like so...
var headertablerows = document.getElementsByClassName('max-col-span');
[].forEach.call(headertablerows, function (headertablerow) {
var colspan = 0;
[].forEach.call(headertablerow.nextElementSibling.children, function (child) {
colspan += child.colSpan ? parseInt(child.colSpan, 10) : 1;
});
headertablerow.children[0].colSpan = colspan;
});
html {
font-family: Verdana;
}
tr > * {
padding: 1rem;
box-shadow: 0 0 8px gray inset;
}
<table>
<tr class="max-col-span">
<td>1 - max width
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2 - no colspan
</td>
<td colspan="2">3 - colspan is 2
</td>
</tr>
</table>
You may need to adjust this if you're using table headers, but this should give a proof-of-concept approach that uses 100% pure JavaScript.
Anyone else here feel that diving into JS for this seemingly minor issue seems a bit much?
PURE CSS
Boom! I have a pure CSS solution to offer you! Example is below, you just have to add a class to the row that you want to span all columns. Then the CSS will make the first <td> element span the full width and hide the remaining <td> elements. (You must use visibility:hidden; and NOT display:none; for this.)
Note: You will need at least two cells for this method to render nicely, and CSS will render best if you keep the correct quantity of <td> elements - don't remove any to make room for span element. This will help ensure the cells / rows still flow normally.
EXAMPLE
/* standard styling css */
table {
border-collapse: collapse;
}
table, tr, td {
border: 1px solid black;
}
td {
padding: 3px;
}
/* make full width class span the whole table */
.full-span {
position:relative;
}
.full-span > * {
visibility: hidden;
border:0;
}
.full-span > *:nth-child(1) {
display: block;
visibility: unset;
position:absolute;
}
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>A1</td>
<td>A2</td>
<td>A3</td>
<td>A4</td>
</tr>
<tr class="full-span">
<td>B1 long text</td>
<td>B2</td>
<td>B3</td>
<td>B4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>C1</td>
<td>C2</td>
<td>C3</td>
<td>C4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>D1</td>
<td>D2</td>
<td>D3</td>
<td>D4</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Bonus tip!
if you are dynamically producing your table in PHP/JS, this may clean up some of your code. Say you are looping through a 2D array to create a table: for each row that needs to span all columns you'll need to add some logic to calculate the amount of columns, add the colspan attribute, add any remaining <td> elements required to make up the full width of the table and so on.
Using my method, you can loop through all the columns and output them all, and simply include the class in the parent row.
Just want to add my experience and answer to this.
Note: It only works when you have a pre-defined table and a tr with ths, but are loading in your rows (for example via AJAX) dynamically.
In this case you can count the number of th's there are in your first header row, and use that to span the whole column.
This can be needed when you want to relay a message when no results have been found.
Something like this in jQuery, where table is your input table:
var trs = $(table).find("tr");
var numberColumns = 999;
if (trs.length === 1) {
//Assume having one row means that there is a header
var headerColumns = $(trs).find("th").length;
if (headerColumns > 0) {
numberColumns = headerColumns;
}
}
colspan="100%"
it's work also in email outlook , gmail....