I have a site that still uses Drupal 7.x. I have a top banner that works fine on a large screen with greater than 1100px. However, that same banner will not work on smaller screens, especially not on smartphone size displays. So, if I put the banner into a block with an image tag, how can I change the source image for different display widths?
I tried using a percent width and media queries for the different background images. I haven't found a way to style the background image so that it resizes as a percent of the viewport. It will change the background image based on the media queries but I cannot get the alignment or the percent width of the background image to change with the change in the width of the viewport.
Thanks in advance for any advice on how to manage this issue. Maybe there is a module that handles changing the content of a block based on the size of the viewport.
If the banner doesn't fit on your smaller screen, try using background-size: contain or background-size: cover.
It should be possible to archieve this using CSS only, without the need to have different images in all media queries.
Related
I'm working on a website. There's one problem. The slider won't fit in the frame without stretching.
Slider Image is full width of screen and i have defined height for it.
In CSS part i have applied object-fit: cover but this crop my image
I hope you guys can help me out on this. I'd tried alot and also asked some other people but they can't help me with this.
Or Should i restrict my client to use image of that resolution only?
Yes Mostly you should restrict the client from using different ratios, or resolutions, because you are using the full width aaaaand defined height, defined height is very limiting in your case, what you can do is use
object-fit:cover;
object-fit:center;
but that doesn't stop the cropping it will just focus on the center of the image when cropping.
I would like to find out how to present a banner or logo on a responsive design but I can't find a question that is not flagged as bad or likely to be closed. I've tried numerous ways of phrasing the question and none of them are liked. So, I have no idea how to even present this question or even where to begin to look for the answer or how to ask the question. PLEASE, PLEASE give me an idea of how to word this so someone will see my question. I've tried web searches but nothing addresses the issue and I cannot even figure out how to work it.
In case someone sees this, what I am doing is taking a site that was not responsive and had a banner that was 1100 px wide by 110px in height. The trend seems to be to move away from such banners and use logos that are square or round instead or to use text for branding. If I just reduced the size of the banner to 500px wide then the height would proportionally decrease to only 40 or 50px if a percent value was used. That clearly won't look good on a small screen.
Also, if I reduced the image to a more square dimension the image isn't actually resizing by percent values when the CSS background-image style is used instead of an img tag surrounded by div tags. I haven't found a way to control alignment and size using percent values on the background-image property of a container. I could tell my client that we shouldn't use a wide banner in a responsive design but I don't know if that means I am missing an option.
A different image seems to be required on smaller displays using media queries. Can alignment and resizing as percent values be used with the background image CSS style or should different images be served using the img tag?
Lastly, on a high pixel density display tablet or even smartphone serve a large image due to the number of pixels wide being greater than 900px or 1000px? With high-density displays, it seems that even a smartphone could have a width greater than 1000px but that may not look right.
this will size it:
.img-class {
background-image: url('path/myImage.png');
background-size: 200px 200px;
}
first value is width, second value is height, you can also use %, or to scale the whole thing use a single value like for example: background-size: 80%;
A different image seems to be required on smaller displays using media
queries. Can alignment and resizing as percent values be used with the
background image CSS style or should different images be served using
the img tag?
Yes as long as you scale it down and not up, or it blurs out.
Lastly, on a high pixel density display tablet or even smartphone
serve a large image due to the number of pixels wide being greater
than 900px or 1000px? With high-density displays, it seems that even a
smartphone could have a width greater than 1000px but that may not
look right.
Just be sure your images are 'retina ready' and that's all, meaning if you want to place on your website a 200x200 px image, create it 400x400 px instead, then using css you force it to always be 200x200, so it will read a 400x400 and resize it to 200x200 making it not blurred on mobile.
Side note: If you have graphic images and not photographs, i recommend you using svg (vector images) now supported on all browsers, that are scalable so retina ready by default let's say, and way smaller in size.
so i have this simple problem with Bootstrap but i have not found a solution to it and it goes like this: i want to have a carousel in my web page and i took the code from Bootstrap's official web page and i want to display 1200 x 400 images but if an image i want to display is not that size, it could be smaller or it could be bigger, what should i do to make that image fit on the space if it's not the size i want... i have tried with html specifying a width and a height but it doesn't work. Maybe this question is a little bit silly but i have not found a way and also i have tried to change the size of the image but it was unsuccesfull.
Thanks for the answers!
It is often recommended for slider to keep all your images same dimension. But if there is no way left to do so, you can make CSS adjustments.
For an example:
You can give same dimensions (height and width) in CSS for all those images. and use object-fit: cover; so that image does not squeeze.
I 've created a site using Dreamweaver, and all my images have absolute position with % metrics. it expands proportionally on wider screens, but everytime I try to resize and shrink browser window it just becomes a mess with all the images fallen in one narrow window. How can I rebuild my design so it shrinks in a browser window in a way that when it is too small for an element, it just wouldn't fit. Do I have to use fixed pos-ing or any other type of pos-ing? Whats the usual way web designers do the sites?
P.S. my site contains text and abs. images, as well as fixed image that scrolls with the screen. What should I use to keep it that way but make a decent view in all screen sizes?
Use media queries or place a min-width on either the body or the element in question. For example placing min-width:900px on the body will stop the entire body from re-sizing below 900px width. (Note: That is not the responsive way to do things. Media queries are a much better practice)
I am trying the carousel example here http://getbootstrap.com/javascript/#carousel with image of 1200x300. It looks fine in large screen with width more than 1200. However when I reduce the browser width the image in the carousel decrease and it looks thin.
Is there any trick to have kind of minimum height applied to the image within carousel.
You can use CSS media queries to achieve what you need.
Basically what I think is happening as I don't have any code to look at is that you have responsive bootstrap on which you need to turn off otherwise bootstrap cleverly resizes the objects on the page.
Also I noticed that if you resize the image http://placehold.it/1200x300 then it shrinks though that might not affect it at all
If you set max-width: 100%; height: auto; on the img, it will retain it's aspect ratio (i.e. remain the correct shape) no matter how narrow you make it.