I am facing a issue, here is my script. some end or bracket issue but I have checked noting is missing.
function [h, display_array] = displayData(X, example_width)
%DISPLAYDATA Display 2D data in a nice grid
% [h, display_array] = DISPLAYDATA(X, example_width) displays 2D data
% stored in X in a nice grid. It returns the figure handle h and the
% displayed array if requested.
% Set example_width automatically if not passed in
if ~exist('example_width', 'var') || isempty(example_width)
example_width = round(sqrt(size(X, 2)));
end
% Gray Image
colormap(gray);
% Compute rows, cols
[m n] = size(X);
example_height = (n / example_width);
% Compute number of items to display
display_rows = floor(sqrt(m));
display_cols = ceil(m / display_rows);
% Between images padding
pad = 1;
% Setup blank display
display_array = - ones(pad + display_rows * (example_height + pad), ...
pad + display_cols * (example_width + pad));
% Copy each example into a patch on the display array
curr_ex = 1;
for j = 1:display_rows
for i = 1:display_cols
if curr_ex > m,
break;
end
% Copy the patch
% Get the max value of the patch
max_val = max(abs(X(curr_ex, :)));
display_array(pad + (j - 1) * (example_height + pad) +
(1:example_height), ...
pad + (i - 1) * (example_width + pad) +
(1:example_width)) = ...
reshape(X(curr_ex, :),
example_height, example_width) / max_val;
curr_ex = curr_ex + 1;
end
if curr_ex > m,
break;
end
end
% Display Image
h = imagesc(display_array, [-1 1]);
% Do not show axis
axis image off
drawnow;
end
ERROR:
displayData
parse error near line 86 of file C:\Users\ALI\displayData.m
syntax error
Pls guide which is the error in the script, this script is already written in
the coursera so its must be error free.
You seem to have modified the code, and moved the "ellipsis" operator (i.e. ...) or the line that is supposed to follow it, in several places compared to the original code in coursera.
Since the point of the ellipsis operator is to appear at the end of a line, denoting that the line that follows is meant to be a continuation of the line before, then moving either the ellipsis or the line below it will break the code.
E.g.
a = 1 + ... % correct use of ellipsis, code continues below
2 % treated as one line, i.e. a = 1 + 2
vs
a = 1 + % without ellipsis, the line is complete, and has an error
... 2 % bad use of ellipsis; also anything to the right of '...' is ignored
vs
a = 1 + ... % ellipsis used properly so far
% but the empty line here makes the whole 'line' `a = 1 +` which is wrong
2 % This is a new instruction
Related
I'm trying to create a figure where the user can select cells to turn on or off. Then, the user can click a button 'Enter' to save the board as an array. I successfully found a way to create interactivity in my plot thanks to a very useful explanation I found here. I just made some changes to suit my needs.
However, I can't find a way to save the board. The button is working (or at least isn't not working), but the data isn't saved. And I don't know how to fix that. Any help would be appreciated.
Here is my code:
function CreatePattern
hFigure = figure;
hAxes = axes;
axis equal;
axis off;
hold on;
% create a button to calculate the difference between 2 points
h = uicontrol('Position',[215 5 150 30],'String','Enter','Callback', #SaveArray);
function SaveArray(ButtonH, eventdata)
global initial
initial = Board;
close(hFigure)
end
N = 1; % for line width
M = 20; % board size
squareEdgeSize = 1;
% create the board of patch objects
hPatchObjects = zeros(M,M);
for j = M:-1:1
for k = 1:M
hPatchObjects(M - j+ 1, k) = rectangle('Position', [k*squareEdgeSize,j*squareEdgeSize,squareEdgeSize,squareEdgeSize], 'FaceColor', [0 0 0],...
'EdgeColor', 'w', 'LineWidth', N, 'HitTest', 'on', 'ButtonDownFcn', {#OnPatchPressedCallback, M - j+ 1, k});
end
end
%global Board
Board = zeros(M,M);
playerColours = [1 1 1; 0 0 0];
xlim([squareEdgeSize M*squareEdgeSize]);
ylim([squareEdgeSize M*squareEdgeSize]);
function OnPatchPressedCallback(hObject, eventdata, rowIndex, colIndex)
% change FaceColor to player colour
value = Board(rowIndex,colIndex);
if value == 1
set(hObject, 'FaceColor', playerColours(2, :));
Board(rowIndex,colIndex) = 0; % update board
else
set(hObject, 'FaceColor', playerColours(1, :));
Board(rowIndex,colIndex) = 1; % update board
end
end
end
%imwrite(~pattern,'custom_pattern.jpeg')
I'm trying to create a loop to go over the last bars and figure out what the average gain is when the hma is sloping up. But I'm getting an error I don't understand. Is it not possible to have a loop inside a function?
My code:
// Get Average Gains on long streaks
getAverageGain(hmaValue) =>
gainStart = 0.00
gainAmount = 0.00
gainCount = 0
gaining = hmaValue[1] < hmaValue
for i=0 to 2000
if gaining[i] and not gaining[i+1]
gainStart := hmaValue[i]
if gaining[i+1] and not gaining[i] and gainStart != 0.00
gainAmount += ((hmaValue[i+1] - gainStart) / gainStart) * 100
gainCount ++
gainAmount/gainCount
There is no ++ operator in pinescript. Change it to gainCount := gainCount + 1.
You can see the list of operators in pinescript from here.
Problem was with the double + sign....not the for loop
gainCount ++
Unfortunately Pine-script's error messages aren't always clear enough
I'm trying to calculate the precision and recall using the nltk.metrics.score (http://www.nltk.org/_modules/nltk/metrics/scores.html) with my NLTK.NaiveBayesClassifier.
However, I stumble upon the error:
"unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'int' and 'NoneType".
which I suspect is from my 10-fold cross-validation where in some reference sets, there are zero negative (the data set is a bit imbalanced where 87% of it is positive).
According to nltk.metrics.score,
def precision(reference, test):
"Given a set of reference values and a set of test values, return
the fraction of test values that appear in the reference set.
In particular, return card(``reference`` intersection
``test``)/card(``test``).
If ``test`` is empty, then return None."
It seems that some of my 10-fold set is returning recall as None since there are no Negative in the reference set. Any idea on how to approach this problem?
My full code is as follow:
trainfeats = negfeats + posfeats
n = 10 # 5-fold cross-validation
subset_size = len(trainfeats) // n
accuracy = []
pos_precision = []
pos_recall = []
neg_precision = []
neg_recall = []
pos_fmeasure = []
neg_fmeasure = []
cv_count = 1
for i in range(n):
testing_this_round = trainfeats[i*subset_size:][:subset_size]
training_this_round = trainfeats[:i*subset_size] + trainfeats[(i+1)*subset_size:]
classifier = NaiveBayesClassifier.train(training_this_round)
refsets = collections.defaultdict(set)
testsets = collections.defaultdict(set)
for i, (feats, label) in enumerate(testing_this_round):
refsets[label].add(i)
observed = classifier.classify(feats)
testsets[observed].add(i)
cv_accuracy = nltk.classify.util.accuracy(classifier, testing_this_round)
cv_pos_precision = precision(refsets['Positive'], testsets['Positive'])
cv_pos_recall = recall(refsets['Positive'], testsets['Positive'])
cv_pos_fmeasure = f_measure(refsets['Positive'], testsets['Positive'])
cv_neg_precision = precision(refsets['Negative'], testsets['Negative'])
cv_neg_recall = recall(refsets['Negative'], testsets['Negative'])
cv_neg_fmeasure = f_measure(refsets['Negative'], testsets['Negative'])
accuracy.append(cv_accuracy)
pos_precision.append(cv_pos_precision)
pos_recall.append(cv_pos_recall)
neg_precision.append(cv_neg_precision)
neg_recall.append(cv_neg_recall)
pos_fmeasure.append(cv_pos_fmeasure)
neg_fmeasure.append(cv_neg_fmeasure)
cv_count += 1
print('---------------------------------------')
print('N-FOLD CROSS VALIDATION RESULT ' + '(' + 'Naive Bayes' + ')')
print('---------------------------------------')
print('accuracy:', sum(accuracy) / n)
print('precision', (sum(pos_precision)/n + sum(neg_precision)/n) / 2)
print('recall', (sum(pos_recall)/n + sum(neg_recall)/n) / 2)
print('f-measure', (sum(pos_fmeasure)/n + sum(neg_fmeasure)/n) / 2)
print('')
Perhaps not the most elegant, but guess the most simple fix would be setting it to 0 and the actual value if not None, e.g.:
cv_pos_precision = 0
if precision(refsets['Positive'], testsets['Positive']):
cv_pos_precision = precision(refsets['Positive'], testsets['Positive'])
And for the others as well, of course.
I'm trying to plot a function that contains a definite integral. My code uses all anonymous functions. When I run the file, it gives me an error. My code is below:
%%% List of Parameters %%%
gamma_sp = 1;
cap_gamma = 15;
gamma_ph = 0;
omega_0 = -750;
d_omega_0 = 400;
omega_inh = 100;
d_omega_inh = 1000;
%%% Formulae %%%
gamma_t = gamma_sp/2 + cap_gamma/2 + gamma_ph;
G = #(x) exp(-(x-omega_inh).^2./(2*d_omega_inh.^2))./(sqrt(2*pi)*d_omega_inh);
F = #(x) exp(-(x-omega_0).^2./(2*d_omega_0.^2))./(sqrt(2*pi)*d_omega_0);
A_integral = #(x,y) G(x)./(y - x + 1i*gamma_t);
Q_integral = #(x,y) F(x)./(y - x + 1i*gamma_t);
A = #(y) integral(#(x)A_integral(x,y),-1000,1000);
Q = #(y) integral(#(x)Q_integral(x,y),-3000,0);
P1 = #(y) -1./(1i.*(gamma_sp + cap_gamma)).*(1./(y + 2.*1i.*gamma_t)*(A(y)-conj(A(0)))-1./y.*(A(y)-A(0))+cap_gamma./gamma_sp.*Q(y).*(A(0)-conj(A(0))));
P2 = #(y) conj(P1(y));
P = #(y) P1(y) - P2(y);
sig = #(y) abs(P(y)).^2;
rng = -2000:0.05:1000;
plot(rng,sig(rng))
It seems to me that when the program runs the plot command, it should put each value of rng into sig(y), and that value will be used as the y value in A_integral and Q_integral. However, matlab throws an error when I try to run the program.
Error using -
Matrix dimensions must agree.
Error in #(x,y)G(x)./(y-x+1i*gamma_t)
Error in #(x)A_integral(x,y)
Error in integralCalc/iterateScalarValued (line 314)
fx = FUN(t);
Error in integralCalc/vadapt (line 133)
[q,errbnd] = iterateScalarValued(u,tinterval,pathlen);
Error in integralCalc (line 76)
[q,errbnd] = vadapt(#AtoBInvTransform,interval);
Error in integral (line 89)
Q = integralCalc(fun,a,b,opstruct);
Error in #(y)integral(#(x)A_integral(x,y),-1000,1000)
Error in
#(y)-1./(1i.*(gamma_sp+cap_gamma)).*(1./(y+2.*1i.*gamma_t)*(A(y)-conj(A(0)))-1. /y.*(A(y)-A(0))+cap_gamma./gamma_sp.*Q(y).*(A(0)-conj(A(0))))
Error in #(y)P1(y)-P2(y)
Error in #(y)abs(P(y)).^2
Error in fwm_spec_diff_paper_eqn (line 26)
plot(rng,sig(rng))
Any ideas about what I'm doing wrong?
You have
>> rng = -2000:0.05:1000;
>> numel(rng)
ans =
60001
all 60001 elements get passed down to
A = #(y) integral(#(x)A_integral(x,y),-1000,1000);
which calls
A_integral = #(x,y) G(x)./(y - x + 1i*gamma_t);
(similar for Q). The thing is, integral is an adaptive quadrature method, meaning (roughly) that the amount of x's it will insert into A_integral varies with how A_integral behaves at certain x.
Therefore, the amount of elements in y will generally be different from the elements in x in the call to A_integral. This is why y-x +1i*gamma_t fails.
Considering the complexity of what you're trying to do, I think it is best to re-define all anonymous functions as proper functions, and integrate a few of them into single functions. Look into the documentation of bsxfun to see if that can help (e.g., bsxfun(#minus, y.', x) instead of y-x could perhaps fix a few of these issues), otherwise, vectorize only in x and loop over y.
Thanks Rody, that made sense to me. I keep trying to use matlab like mathematica and I forget how matlab does things. I modified the code a bit, and it produces the right result. The integrals are evaluated very roughly, but it should be easy to fix that. I've posted my modified code below.
%%% List of Parameters %%%
gamma_sp = 1;
cap_gamma = 15;
gamma_ph = 0;
omega_0 = -750;
d_omega_0 = 400;
omega_inh = 100;
d_omega_inh = 1000;
%%% Formulae %%%
gamma_t = gamma_sp/2 + cap_gamma/2 + gamma_ph;
G = #(x) exp(-(x-omega_inh).^2./(2*d_omega_inh.^2))./(sqrt(2*pi)*d_omega_inh);
F = #(x) exp(-(x-omega_0).^2./(2*d_omega_0.^2))./(sqrt(2*pi)*d_omega_0);
A_integral = #(x,y) G(x)./(y - x + 1i*gamma_t);
Q_integral = #(x,y) F(x)./(y - x + 1i*gamma_t);
w = -2000:0.05:1000;
sigplot = zeros(size(w));
P1plot = zeros(size(w));
P2plot = zeros(size(w));
Pplot = zeros(size(w));
aInt_range = -1000:0.1:1200;
qInt_range = -2000:0.1:100;
A_0 = sum(A_integral(aInt_range,0).*0.1);
for k=1:size(w,2)
P1plot(k) = -1./(1i*(gamma_sp + cap_gamma)).*(1./(w(k)+2.*1i.*gamma_t).*(sum(A_integral(aInt_range,w(k)).*0.1)-conj(A_0))-1./w(k).*(sum(A_integral(aInt_range,w(k)).*0.1)-A_0)+cap_gamma./gamma_sp.*sum(Q_integral(qInt_range,w(k)).*0.1).*(A_0-conj(A_0)));
P2plot(k) = conj(P1plot(k));
Pplot(k) = P1plot(k) - P2plot(k);
sigplot(k) = abs(Pplot(k)).^2;
end
plot(w,sigplot)
Many random-number generators return floating numbers between 0 and 1.
What's the best and correct way to get integers between a and b?
Divide the interval [0,1] in B-A+1 bins
Example A=2, B=5
[----+----+----+----]
0 1/4 1/2 3/4 1
Maps to 2 3 4 5
The problem with the formula
Int (Rnd() * (B-A+1)) + A
is that your Rnd() generation interval is closed on both sides, thus the 0 and the 1 are both possible outputs and the formula gives 6 when the Rnd() is exactly 1.
In a real random distribution (not pseudo), the 1 has probability zero. I think it is safe enough to program something like:
r=Rnd()
if r equal 1
MyInt = B
else
MyInt = Int(r * (B-A+1)) + A
endif
Edit
Just a quick test in Mathematica:
Define our function:
f[a_, b_] := If[(r = RandomReal[]) == 1, b, IntegerPart[r (b - a + 1)] + a]
Build a table with 3 10^5 numbers in [1,100]:
table = SortBy[Tally[Table[f[1, 100], {300000}]], First]
Check minimum and maximum:
In[137]:= {Max[First /# table], Min[First /# table]}
Out[137]= {100, 1}
Lets see the distribution:
BarChart[Last /# SortBy[Tally[Table[f[1, 100], {300000}]], First],
ChartStyle -> "DarkRainbow"]
X = (Rand() * (B - A)) + A
Another way to look at it, where r is your random number in the range 0 to 1:
(1-r)a + rb
As for your additional requirement of the result being an integer, maybe (apart from using built in casting) the modulus operator can help you out. Check out this question and the answer:
Expand a random range from 1–5 to 1–7
Well, why not just look at how Python does it itself? Read random.py in your installation's lib directory.
After gutting it to only support the behavior of random.randint() (which is what you want) and removing all error checks for non-integer or out-of-bounds arguments, you get:
import random
def randint(start, stop):
width = stop+1 - start
return start + int(random.random()*width)
Testing:
>>> l = []
>>> for i in range(2000000):
... l.append(randint(3,6))
...
>>> l.count(3)
499593
>>> l.count(4)
499359
>>> l.count(5)
501432
>>> l.count(6)
499616
>>>
Assuming r_a_b is the desired random number between a and b and r_0_1 is a random number between 0 and 1 the following should work just fine:
r_a_b = (r_0_1 * (b-a)) + a