Hope all are doing good.
I am wanted to mock one of my exception which is inside one private method like below :
private void verifyScenarios(String empid, String token) {
if (Validation if true) // Line 1 :
throw new CustomException("my message"); //Line 2
else
any code.
}
Line 1: will be true.
Line 2 : This line throwing exception because of that my junit test case is failing, Is there any way to mock line 2 and make it success.
Thanks in advance.
Such things are not possible with Mockito, however I believe that all you need is to assert (pass the test) if exception is thrown, because it is a part of your business logic.
Try #Test(expected = CustomException.class) instead of #Test if you are using JUnit 4. Test will pass only if code will throw your exception.
You can use an expected exception rule. With this solution you can easily check the error message that is thrown as well.
Related
I have a simple unit test which asserts on an object instance of Try from the vavr library.
#Test
public void testFoo()
{
final Try<Foo> result = createMyFooInstance();
assertThat(result.isSuccess()).isTrue();
}
My question focuses on the formulation of the test assertion.
Semantically I want to have "if foo is success, all fine, otherwise, throw the encapsulated exception". The latter one is important so that I can see the error cause directly in the JUnit output.
Is there any convenient API that I can use to nicely formulate that semantics?
You could use
#Test
public void testFoo() {
final Try<Foo> result = createMyFooInstance();
result.get();
}
In case when result is a Failure, result.get() will throw the wrapped exception. In case when result is a Success, it will succeed.
Though this solution doesn't contain explicit assertions, it will implicitly fail the cases when the result is a Failure.
If you prefer to have an assertion failed instead of a test failed with exception, you could also use:
#Test
public void testFoo() {
final Try<Foo> result = createMyFooInstance();
assertThatCode(result::get).doesNotThrowAnyException();
}
After searching for days now and reading pretty much everything related to that, I'm finally posting my question here, since I couldn't find a solution for my specific problem.
I want my REST WebServices to return the original Exception, that has been thrown or at least the correct StackTrace. To test this, I'm using JUnit integrationtests and Wildfly 13 as app-server. After researching I found 2 possible solutions.
1.Using Exception Mappers
While this magical thing catches all of my Exceptions and allows me to return a Response, I've noticed that my StackTrace is changed if I use it like in the example. For example, "com.test.TestClass" is turned into "null.thread" or "null.interceptor". It seems like somehow the exception is changed on the way and the paths to the class are lost or censored, but I can't make sense of it.
Also I couldn't find any restrictions for the Response.entity, be it size, datatype or security.
As far as I understand, you can catch the ExceptionMapper Response OR a WebApplicationException, which contains the response. In my case, the response in the WebApplicationException contains all the relevant data except the (correct) StackTrace.
2.Using WebApplicationException
Another Solution would be to simply throw WebApplicationException instead of ECEException and not using a mapper. If I do that and catch it, the Exception is empty though. It doesn't contain any of the data set, it's always 500 - InternalServerError (I guess, Wildfly couldn't handle it then and threw an exception itself).
Or is it not supposed to be catched/thrown like that? Do I need to convert it to JSon or can I expect it to simply work out of the box with my annotations in the WebServiceInterface and the Response MediaType? Does it even make sense to put a full Response within a WebApplicationException? I mean, both contain fields for the ErrorCode, which seems redundand, even though there is a constructor for that approach.
Long story short:
What's the best approach to catch all possible exceptions and retrieve the full stack trace? Reading this post, I guess catching all "Exception"s is fine and they are always returned as WebApplicationExceptions, but the stack trace is still gone/malformed... your thoughts?
**JUnitTest**
#Test
public void testCreateTask_ClusterInvalid() throws IOException {
final RPETask taskToCreate = new RPETask();;
try
{
final long tid = taskManagerWebService.createTask(taskToCreate);
}
catch (WebApplicationException e) //Responses are ALWAYS catched as WebApplicationException
{
Response response = e.getResponse();
String emString = response.readEntity(String.class);
Gson gson = new Gson();
ECEWebErrorMessage errorMessage = gson.fromJson(emString, ECEWebErrorMessage.class);
errorMessage.displayErrorInformationOnConsole();
}
}
**WebServiceInterface**
#POST
#Path(URI_CREATE_TASK)
#Consumes(WebServiceNames.JSON)
#Produces(WebServiceNames.JSON)
long createTask(final RPETask task) throws ECEException;
**WebService**
#Override
public long createTask(final RPETask task) throws ECEException {
if (LOGGER.isTraceEnabled()) {
LOGGER.trace("createTask(" + task + ")");
}
return taskManager.createTask(task);
}
**ManagerBeanInterface**
long createTask(RPETask task) throws ECEException;
**ManagerBean**
#Override
public long createTask(final RPETask task) throws ECEException {
final ClusterEngineBean cluster = find(ClusterEngineBean.class, task.getCluster());
if (cluster == null) {
throw new ECEObjectNotFoundException(ClusterEngineBean.class, task.getCluster());
}
}
**ExceptionMapper**
#Provider
public class GenericWebExceptionMapper implements ExceptionMapper<Exception> {
final Log logger = LogFactory.getLog(getClass());
#Override
public Response toResponse(Exception ex) {
//At this point, the Exception is fully available -> Sending it as Response breaks it!
logger.error("GenericWebExceptionMapper -> toResponse(Throwable ex)", ex);
ECEWebErrorMessage errorMessage = new ECEWebErrorMessage(500,
ex.getMessage(),
ex.getClass().getCanonicalName(),
ex.getStackTrace());
return Response.status(Status.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR)
.entity(errorMessage)
.type(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
.build();
}
}
After more research I've finally found a solution for myself.
Why is the StackTrace gone/malformed?
It's for security reasons. Wildfly automatically detects outgoing StackTraces and censors them, using interceptors. Im not sure if you can do anything about that, but I guess you shouldn't do that anyway.
What is the best approach?
Using Exception Mappers worked for me. Instead of catching them as WebApplicationException, you can always expect a response with the appropriote error code and handle them that way. For example error code 200 = OK, do this... error code 404 = NOTFOUND, do that...I that case your WebServices should always return Responses and contain the object you want to retreive in the entity field of the Response.
Feel free to add additional information to this solution.
How do I test if an assertion is thrown by the method under test using junit? Heres the method I'm testing:
public int f(int i){
assert i > 0;
return i;
}
I'm using junit 4.12.
You can test it by providing parameter in #Test annotation:
#Test(expected = AssertionError.class)
public void shouldThrowExceptionWhenIncorrectInput() {
f(-3);
}
This will check if the AssertException is thrown.
However, if you want to ensure that this function wont be run with incorrect parameters, you have to be aware that assertions can be turned off by running java with -da parameters.
To ensure that exception is thrown I would suggest throwing IllegalArgumentException inside some validation method, and to provide it with proper message. Then you will be sure that this will always throw exception when incorrect parameters are provided.
I have this scenario in which some tests can throw different exceptions.
#Test
public void addDevice(){
device.addDevice(); // this may throw exception 1
device.verifyStatus("Ready");
device.open(); // this may throw exception 2
device.verifyStatus("Open");
}
#Test
public void otherTest(){
device.act(); // this may throw exception 3
device.verifyStatus("Ready");
}
#After
public void tearDown(){
// handle the exception here
}
I want to handle those exceptions in the #After section without wrapping the test with try, catch.
Is that possible?
No, it is not possible.
You could wrap the test anyway with a try-catch-block. Then you could store the exception to a member variable instead of handling it.
In the #After method you can check whether the exception is null or not.
Due to your comment that you have hundreds of tests with this code I assume that this is set up logic which should actually be in an #Before method.
Thus, you could specify an external resource rule with a before and after method: https://github.com/junit-team/junit/wiki/Rules#externalresource-rules
In the before() method you perform the set up, catch and store the exceptions and in the after() method you handle them.
But does it make sense to handle the exception later? Can you run your test cases successfully if the set up fails?
I am running into an extremely strange behavior in Groovy. When I throw an exception from a closure in a Script, the end exception that was thrown was different.
Here are the code and the details:
public class TestDelegate {
def method(Closure closure) {
closure.setResolveStrategy(Closure.DELEGATE_FIRST);
closure.delegate = this;
closure.call();
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
// Make Script from File
File dslFile = new File("src/Script.dsl");
GroovyShell shell = new GroovyShell();
Script dslScript = shell.parse(dslFile);
TestDelegate myDelegate = new TestDelegate();
dslScript.metaClass.methodMissing = {
// will run method(closure)
String name, arguments ->
myDelegate.invokeMethod(name, arguments);
}
dslScript.metaClass.propertyMissing = {
String name ->
println "Will throw error now!"
throw new MyOwnException("errrrror");
}
dslScript.run();
}
}
class MyOwnException extends Exception {
public MyOwnException(String message) {
super(message);
}
}
Script.dsl:
method {
println a;
}
So the plan is that when I run the main() method in TestDelegate, it will run the DSL script, which calls for the method method(). Not finding it in the script, it will invoke methodMissing, which then invokes method() from myDelegate, which in turns invoke the closure, setting the delegate to the testDelegate. So far, so good. Then the closure is supposed to try printing out "a", which is not defined and will thus set off propertyMissing, which will will throw MyOwnException.
When I run the code, however, I get the following output:
Will throw error now!
Exception in thread "main" groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property: a for class: TestDelegate
Now, it must have reached that catch block, since it printed "Will throw error now!" It must have thrown MyOwnException too! But somewhere along the lines, MyOwnException was converted to MissingPropertyException, and I have no idea why. Does anyone have any idea?
P.S. if I remove closure.setResolveStrategy(Closure.DELEGATE_FIRST) from TestDelegate#method(), the code acts as expected and throws MyOwnException. But I really need the setResolveStrategy(Closure.DELEGATE_FIRST) for my DSL project. And I would prefer to know the root cause of this rather than just removing a line or two and see that it works without understanding why.
I think this is what essentially happens: With a delegate-first resolve strategy, the Groovy runtime first tries to access property a on myDelegate, which results in a MissingPropertyException because no such property exists. Then it tries propertyMissing, which causes a MyOwnException to be thrown. Eventually the runtime gives up and rethrows the first exception encountered (a design decision), which happens to be the MissingPropertyException.
With an owner-first resolve strategy, propertyMissing is consulted first, and hence MyOwnException is eventually rethrown.
Looking at the stack trace and source code underneath should provide more evidence.