I need help to structure a page, i thought it was easy but it wasn't, at least not for me.
Logo: always centered, of course.
Element: For instance, an image, always centered. Image can be vertical or horizontal, but needs to be centered.
Text: Next to the element/image.
There are no boxes really, i saw other questions where they where trying to keep center box always centered, but in this case i just have one main box/container and then text/caption next to the image.
What i cannot do is keeping image centered, because if i add text next to the image, will try to center the whole thing.
Thanks!
Horizontal and vertical centering is most easily solved with flexbox. Simply set the following on your container:
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
flex-wrap: wrap;
Note that you'll want a height too! I've gone with 100vh to occupy the full viewport.
To centralise your element at the top just give it align-self: flex-start.
From here it's just a matter of having a child which contains both the central item and offset item, both of which need position: absolute. The offset item will additionally want margin-left equal to the width of the centralised item, but it should only be applied inside of a media query.
To drop the offset item below for mobile screens, you'll want a second media query which adds margin-top.
This can be seen in the following (click Full page after Run code snippet to see the desktop view).
body {
margin: 0;
}
.container {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
flex-wrap: wrap;
height: 100vh;
}
.top {
border: 1px solid black;
width: 50%;
height: 10%;
align-self: flex-start;
}
.inner-container {
border: 1px solid black;
width: 50%;
height: 50%
}
.center, .off-center {
position: absolute;
}
#media screen and (min-width: 769px) {
.off-center {
margin-left: 50%;
}
}
#media screen and (max-width: 768px) {
.off-center {
margin-top: 50vh;
}
}
<div class="container">
<div class="top">Logo</div>
<div class="inner-container">
<div class="center">Center</div>
<div class="off-center">Off-center</div>
</div>
</div>
Related
So I am building a 3 column preview card using HTML, CSS and FLEXBOX. I built it using the mobile-first approach. It starts off as a column but when it is being expanded and it reaches a certain dimension, it transforms into a row. The problem I am having is that as the containers transform to a row, they grow in different sizes. The heights grow differently as some become columns become taller than others. How can I make sure they all grow at the same rate? How do I make sure that one column does not become larger than the other as they are being expanded? I tried setting flex-grow to 1 and flex-shrink to 1 but it is not working. Please find relevant parts of my code below.
Here is a link to the live version of my site
body {
box-sizing: border-box;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
min-height: 100vh;
}
--The panel is the container as a whole--
.panel {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
text-align: center;
border: 1px solid white;
border-radius: 10px;
width: 100%;
max-width: 960px;
height: 100%
}
--I am styling each column below--
.panel section {
display: flex;
padding: 2.5rem;
flex-direction: column;
text-align: left;
border-bottom: none;
height: 100%;
#media only screen and (min-width: 560px) {
.panel {
display: flex;
flex-direction: row;
border-radius: 10px ;
width: 80%;
height: 100%;
}
.panel section {
height: 100%;
}
}
Remove the height: 100% from the child elements and just simply change the align-items to stretch on desktop, that will create equal height columns.
Well there can be different ways to solve this.
Problem : Due to which this error occur . It the difference between the amount of content in three containers as middle has more content that is you have told more about SUVS . This is the cause
Solution : Either you can make the content almost equal or can make the height of container bigger so that content can easily fit
Content equal and Content fixed height - Less compatible as content can vary on need
Increase height of container - Using hard code(400px; 30em) you can increase the height of the container according to need of content . And you can position Learn more btn at bottom using absolute position . So that it positioned at equal height
#media only screen and (min-width: 560px)
.panel section {
height: 30em;
position: relative;
}
.general-button {
background-color: var(--major-color);
border-radius: 5rem;
padding: 0.89rem;
margin: 1.1em 0;
border: none;
width: 8rem;
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
}
I have the code here but basically the problem is I have these product cards and I am trying to get them in the center but also align them with the other cards if that makes sense.
https://codepen.io/manfreebie/pen/NWNvyGz
Here is a visual of what I want to accomplish vs. what is actually happening. It looks fine at first till you try to resize it.
I have tried to make the cocktail-container have the value flex-start instead of center for the justify-content attribute like this
#cocktails-container {
max-width: 70%;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
justify-content: flex-start;
}
but that leaves a lot of whitespace on the right side when I resize it. I have tried playing around a little bit with inline-block and using text-align instead but that didn't work either.
Add this code.
#cocktails-container::after {
content: "";
flex: auto;
}
I am only sharing parts that I changed, the rest is the same.
#cocktails-container {
width: 70%; // You can adjust this for your needs
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
justify-content: start;
}
// Removed margin from .cocktail but added padding to the a tag
.cocktail {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
padding-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
}
a {
width: 33%; // You should adjust this for different screen widths, mobile 100% large 25% etc.
padding: 15px;
box-sizing: border-box; // This is necessary to include padding in '33% width'
}
Please try this code,To How do I center these items properly?
.box {
display: flex;
align-items: flex-start;
height: 200px;
}
.box .selected {
align-self: center;
}
<div class="box">
<div class="selected">Three</div>
</div>
I hope this code will be useful for you.
Thank you.
The issue that I identified while checking the code is that you are using a margin margin: 50px 0px; for the .cocktail class. Change it to the below one.
#media (max-width: 800px) {
.cocktail {
width: 60%;
margin: 50px auto;
}
}
Giving margin value 50px 0px; will make the left and right margin to zero in the samller resolution. Update that to 50px auto that will give left and right margins auto value.
So I'm using flexbox to create the grid unfortunately, I'm a little stuck as to how to make the divs stack on top of each other. This is what it looks like when I hide overflow:auto and add position relative to the carddiv. I believe the divs are stacking on top but they don't look the right way.
this is what it looks like:
Image Link
https://imgur.com/a/1KsJDh7
What I want it to look like is this:
Except positon:absolute makes everything disappear.
I'm new to css/html so I'm not exactly sure what I'm doing wrong.
https://imgur.com/a/mrLsTdX
App.css
* {
/*overflow:auto*/
}
.App {
/*display: flex;*/
/*flex-wrap: wrap;*/
}
Card.css
.container{
background-color: yellow;
display: flex;
flex-flow: column;
text-align: center;
position: relative;
margin: 10% 10% 10%;
}
.cardDiv {
height: 100vh;
position: absolute;
}
.cardPicture {
background-color: blue;
height: 50vh;
}
.cardDescription {
background-color: green;
height: 50vh;
}
However, without position:absolute it looks like this which is what I want it to look like except it doesn't stack. I assume the first version is stacked which is why it only shows one div?
The code below is for the second image link:
https://imgur.com/a/mrLsTdX
App.css
* {
overflow:auto
}
.App {
/*display: flex;*/
/*flex-wrap: wrap;*/
}
Card.css
.container{
background-color: yellow;
display: flex;
flex-flow: column;
text-align: center;
position: relative;
margin: 10% 10% 10%;
}
.cardDiv {
height: 100vh;
}
.cardPicture {
background-color: blue;
height: 50vh;
}
.cardDescription {
background-color: green;
height: 50vh;
}
The cardDivs are being generated through a map function that is inserting the divs.
The html looks like this:
<div className='container'>
<div className="cardDiv">
<div className="cardPicture"></div>
<div className="cardDescription"></div>
</div>
</div>
Does anyone have any idea on what I could do make the divs stack up without disappearing?
I think the issue is the combination of a flex container and flex items that have been set to absolute positioning. When you set position: absolute on .cardDiv it takes all the cardDiv elements out of the flex flow, and without any width or content, the cardDiv's disappear. As an experiment, take your first CSS block and add a width (say, 50px) to .cardDiv. You should see the cards reappear, stacked and taking up 50 pixels horizontally.
When you set a element to display: flex or display: inline-flex, all the direct children of that element become flex items. You can see all the things that does to the children by default here, and the purpose of the various flex properties are there to manipulate how the children will be displayed along the axis you specify. If you set one of these flex-items to absolute positioning, however, it takes that element out of that flex configuration.
If I understand what you want correctly, I'm not sure you need the container to be flex at all. Try taking the flex properties out of the container, setting the cardDivs to position:absolute and setting width and height to conform to how much of the screen you want filled.
.container {
position: relative;
margin: 1rem;
}
.cardDiv {
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100vh;
}
.cardPicture {
background-color: blue;
height: 50%;
}
.cardDescription {
background-color: green;
height: 50%;
}
Let me know if this is not what you were looking for-- I figure you can adjust it to how you want the cards to appear. But that's them stacked and split 50-50 between picture and description.
I'm using flex box to align two items to left and right of the container, while vertically centre-aligning them. Here's a very simple example of what I'm trying to achieve.
HTML:
<div class="container">
<div class="first"></div>
<div class="second"></div>
</div>
CSS:
.container {
width:100%;
display: flex;
flex-direction: row;
flex-wrap: wrap;
justify-content: space-between;
align-items: center;
}
.first {
background-color: yellow;
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
}
.second {
background-color: blue;
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
}
Here's the jsfiddle of the example.
This works perfectly well if the screen is wide enough to fit both internal divs on one row. However when the screen size is small (e.g. a mobile phone) and the divs wrap onto the second line, the second one also becomes aligned to the left side (i.e. flex-start). How can I force the second div to always be aligned against the right border, regardless of whether it's on the first row or wrapped onto the second one?
EDIT: In the example, I assigned fixed width to the two child elements - this is for simplicity only. In the real life application, all widths are dynamically changing based on the content read from the database at run-time. Hence, any solution that's based on fixed sizes will not work.
You can try adding some left margin to push your .second element to the right:
.second {
margin-left: auto;
}
.container {
width:100%;
display: flex;
flex-direction: row;
flex-wrap: wrap;
justify-content: space-between;
align-items: center;
}
.first {
background-color: yellow;
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
}
.second {
background-color: blue;
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
margin-left: auto;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="first"></div>
<div class="second"></div>
</div>
Or, similarly, justify all elements to the right but push .first element to the left:
.container {
justify-content: flex-end;
}
.first {
margin-right: auto;
}
.container {
width:100%;
display: flex;
flex-direction: row;
flex-wrap: wrap;
justify-content: flex-end;
align-items: center;
}
.first {
background-color: yellow;
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
margin-right: auto;
}
.second {
background-color: blue;
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="first"></div>
<div class="second"></div>
</div>
I found a solution but it is rather "hacky" in nature (see demo here, explanation later), in the sense that it requires you to explicitly know the width of the parent container which will trigger a layout change based on #media.
The reason why your code is not working is because of the confusion over how align-self works. In the flexbox model, "align" refers to alignment along the cross-axis (i.e. in a conventional sense of a "row" layout direction, that will refer to vertical alignment), while "justify" refers to alignment along the main axis (i.e. the row). To better explain my point, I hereby attach an image made by Chris Coyier from his flexbox guide:
Therefore, align-self: flex-start means telling the .first to align to the top of the container, and align-self: flex-end means telling .second to align to the bottom of the container. In this case, since you have not declared an explicit height for the parent, the parent will take on the height of its tallest child. Since both .first and .second are 100px tall, the parent will also have a computed height of 100px, therefore making no difference in the alignment (because both with be flush with the start and end of the cross axis).
A hack would be switching the flex-direction to row, with the following restrictions: You know how wide your container will be, or the explicit widths of its children. In this case the breakpoint will be at 400px, where .first and .second will intersect each other.
.container {
width:100%;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
flex-wrap: wrap;
justify-content: space-between;
height: 100px;
}
.first {
background-color: yellow;
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
align-self: flex-start;
}
.second {
background-color: blue;
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
align-self: flex-end;
}
#media screen and (max-width: 400px) {
.container {
height: 200px;
}
}
Then again, here is a proof-of-concept fiddle, modified from your original one: http://jsfiddle.net/teddyrised/cncozfem/2/
How can I achieve the following structure without using tables or JavaScript? The white borders represent edges of divs and aren't relevant to the question.
The size of the area in the middle is going to vary, but it will have exact pixel values and the whole structure should scale according to those values. To simplify it, I'd need a way to set "100% - n px" width to the top-middle and bottom-middle divs.
I'd appreciate a clean cross-browser solution, but in case it's not possible, CSS hacks will do.
Here's a bonus. Another structure I've been struggling with and end up using tables or JavaScript. It's slightly different, but introduces new problems. I've been mainly using it in jQuery-based windowing system, but I'd like to keep the layout out of the script and only control the size of one element (the middle one).
New way I've just stumbled upon: css calc():
.calculated-width {
width: -webkit-calc(100% - 100px);
width: -moz-calc(100% - 100px);
width: calc(100% - 100px);
}
Source: css width 100% minus 100px
You can use nested elements and padding to get a left and right edge on the toolbar. The default width of a div element is auto, which means that it uses the available width. You can then add padding to the element and it still keeps within the available width.
Here is an example that you can use for putting images as left and right rounded corners, and a center image that repeats between them.
The HTML:
<div class="Header">
<div>
<div>This is the dynamic center area</div>
</div>
</div>
The CSS:
.Header {
background: url(left.gif) no-repeat;
padding-left: 30px;
}
.Header div {
background: url(right.gif) top right no-repeat;
padding-right: 30px;
}
.Header div div {
background: url(center.gif) repeat-x;
padding: 0;
height: 30px;
}
While Guffa's answer works in many situations, in some cases you may not want the left and/or right pieces of padding to be the parent of the center div. In these cases, you can use a block formatting context on the center and float the padding divs left and right. Here's the code
The HTML:
<div class="container">
<div class="left"></div>
<div class="right"></div>
<div class="center"></div>
</div>
The CSS:
.container {
width: 100px;
height: 20px;
}
.left, .right {
width: 20px;
height: 100%;
float: left;
background: black;
}
.right {
float: right;
}
.center {
overflow: auto;
height: 100%;
background: blue;
}
I feel that this element hierarchy is more natural when compared to nested nested divs, and better represents what's on the page. Because of this, borders, padding, and margin can be applied normally to all elements (ie: this 'naturality' goes beyond style and has ramifications).
Note that this only works on divs and other elements that share its 'fill 100% of the width by default' property. Inputs, tables, and possibly others will require you to wrap them in a container div and add a little more css to restore this quality. If you're unlucky enough to be in that situation, contact me and I'll dig up the css.
jsfiddle here: jsfiddle.net/RgdeQ
Enjoy!
You can make use of Flexbox layout. You need to set flex: 1 on the element that needs to have dynamic width or height for flex-direction: row and column respectively.
Dynamic width:
HTML
<div class="container">
<div class="fixed-width">
1
</div>
<div class="flexible-width">
2
</div>
<div class="fixed-width">
3
</div>
</div>
CSS
.container {
display: flex;
}
.fixed-width {
width: 200px; /* Fixed width or flex-basis: 200px */
}
.flexible-width {
flex: 1; /* Stretch to occupy remaining width i.e. flex-grow: 1 and flex-shrink: 1*/
}
Output:
.container {
display: flex;
width: 100%;
color: #fff;
font-family: Roboto;
}
.fixed-width {
background: #9BCB3C;
width: 200px; /* Fixed width */
text-align: center;
}
.flexible-width {
background: #88BEF5;
flex: 1; /* Stretch to occupy remaining width */
text-align: center;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="fixed-width">
1
</div>
<div class="flexible-width">
2
</div>
<div class="fixed-width">
3
</div>
</div>
Dynamic height:
HTML
<div class="container">
<div class="fixed-height">
1
</div>
<div class="flexible-height">
2
</div>
<div class="fixed-height">
3
</div>
</div>
CSS
.container {
display: flex;
}
.fixed-height {
height: 200px; /* Fixed height or flex-basis: 200px */
}
.flexible-height {
flex: 1; /* Stretch to occupy remaining height i.e. flex-grow: 1 and flex-shrink: 1*/
}
Output:
.container {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
height: 100vh;
color: #fff;
font-family: Roboto;
}
.fixed-height {
background: #9BCB3C;
height: 50px; /* Fixed height or flex-basis: 100px */
text-align: center;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
justify-content: center;
}
.flexible-height {
background: #88BEF5;
flex: 1; /* Stretch to occupy remaining width */
text-align: center;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
justify-content: center;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="fixed-height">
1
</div>
<div class="flexible-height">
2
</div>
<div class="fixed-height">
3
</div>
</div>
The usual way to do it is as outlined by Guffa, nested elements. It's a bit sad having to add extra markup to get the hooks you need for this, but in practice a wrapper div here or there isn't going to hurt anyone.
If you must do it without extra elements (eg. when you don't have control of the page markup), you can use box-sizing, which has pretty decent but not complete or simple browser support. Likely more fun than having to rely on scripting though.
Maybe I'm being dumb, but isn't table the obvious solution here?
<div class="parent">
<div class="fixed">
<div class="stretchToFit">
</div>
.parent{ display: table; width 100%; }
.fixed { display: table-cell; width: 150px; }
.stretchToFit{ display: table-cell; vertical-align: top}
Another way that I've figured out in chrome is even simpler, but man is it a hack!
.fixed{
float: left
}
.stretchToFit{
display: table-cell;
width: 1%;
}
This alone should fill the rest of the line horizontally, as table-cells do. However, you get some strange issues with it going over 100% of its parent, setting the width to a percent value fixes it though.
We can achieve this using flex-box very easily.
If we have three elements like Header, MiddleContainer and Footer. And we want to give some fixed height to Header and Footer. then we can write like this:
For React/RN(defaults are 'display' as flex and 'flexDirection' as column), in web css we'll have to specify the body container or container containing these as display: 'flex', flex-direction: 'column' like below:
container-containing-these-elements: {
display: flex,
flex-direction: column
}
header: {
height: 40,
},
middle-container: {
flex: 1, // this will take the rest of the space available.
},
footer: {
height: 100,
}
what if your wrapping div was 100% and you used padding for a pixel amount, then if the padding # needs to be dynamic, you can easily use jQuery to modify your padding amount when your events fire.
I had a similar issue where I wanted a banner across the top of the screen that had one image on the left and a repeating image on the right to the edge of the screen. I ended up resolving it like so:
CSS:
.banner_left {
position: absolute;
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
width: 131px;
height: 150px;
background-image: url("left_image.jpg");
background-repeat: no-repeat;
}
.banner_right {
position: absolute;
top: 0px;
left: 131px;
right: 0px;
height: 150px;
background-image: url("right_repeating_image.jpg");
background-repeat: repeat-x;
background-position: top left;
}
The key was the right tag. I'm basically specifying that I want it to repeat from 131px in from the left to 0px from the right.
In some contexts, you can leverage margin settings to effectively specify "100% width minus N pixels". See the accepted answer to this question.