I am looking for an advice. I have to draw a wind turbine generator. I'm guessing its possible with html, css or canvas but maybe it would take ages.
I have in mind to do it with just images, have the main image for the generator and then have other images over the main one. I think it's the easiest solution to achieve it.
It has to have responsive as well.
The small pieces change the color depending on the data. So I am thinking to replace the images depending on it.
Any recommendation?.
Thanks in advance.
You could skin this cat in several ways, but if you're sure that these are all the components you need (and you won't need to keep expanding it), I agree that canvas is overkill.
Probably all you need is some markup like this:
<div id="turbine">
<div id="injector"></div>
<div id="motor"></div>
<div id="block"></div>
<div id="battery"></div>
</div>
And some CSS that looks something like this:
#turbine {
background: url("turbine-main.png");
position: relative;
}
#injector {
background: url("injector-green.png");
position: absolute;
left: 160px;
top: 130px;
width: 40px;
height: 30px;
}
#injector.failing {
background: url("injector-red.png");
}
#motor {
background: url("motor-green.png");
position: absolute;
left: 220px;
top: 140px;
}
#motor.failing {
background: url("motor-red.png");
}
Rinse and repeat for each part (adjusting image names, coordinates, and size as necessary, so that your pieces fit nicely over the main image). Add and remove the failing class from your individual pieces to toggle the red/green for each part, probably using javascript. (Or just do it in the HTML, if this is a statically rendered page.)
If you should be able to click these engine parts and jump to additional information, replace my <div>'s with <a>'s.
Related
I am working on this task where I need to put the divs in the required positions. The final result should be this:
.
I have the following code:
HTML:
<div class="activity">
<h2>Activity 5</h2>
<section class="hint"><input type="checkbox" > <h3>Hint 5</h3><i></i><div><p>Grid is <strong>not</strong> the right way to do this. In fact there is only one way to really do that...and that is with float. Remember that we float the thing we want the text to wrap around. Also remember to start by making all the shapes the right size and shape.</p><h4>Properties used:</h4><ul><li>float: left;</li></ul></div></section>
Wrap the text around the square like in this image. This is one case where Grid is NOT the right way to solve this one and will in fact make it harder if you try to use it!
<div class="content5" >
<div class="red5" ></div>
<div class="green5" ></div>
<div class="yellow5">Step 01: Continue creating the main page for your chosen web site by modifying the CSS file you created in week 9's Adding Classes and IDs to Your Website assignment. This week, you will position all of the content on your main page using the CSS positioning techniques taught in KhanAcademy. When you are done, your webpage layout should reflect what you outlined in the wireframe you designed in the assignment Your Own Site Diagram and Wireframe in week 3. <br />
If you have changed your mind on how you want the content of your main page laid out, take an opportunity to update your wireframe before completing this assignment (it is much easier to experiment with different layouts in a wireframe than it is to do so by modifying the CSS). Also, if you find that you are having trouble with using CSS positioning, feel free to review the concepts at the learn layout site: http://learnlayout.com/. You should be able to apply these principles to your site. For futher help, refer back to the Max Design site used in the beginning of the course for an example of how to implement your site design.</div>
<div class="blue5"></div>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.content5 {
/* This is the parent of the activity 5 boxes. */
position: relative;
}
.red5 {
width: 100%;
height: 100px;
background-color: red;
}
.green5 {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background-color: green;
position: absolute;
}
.yellow5 {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
background-color: gold;
}
.blue5 {
width: 100%;
height: 100px;
background-color: blue;
}
The code I have so far looks like this: I have tried a couple of things to make the text appear next to the div but they haven't worked. The HTML should not be modified. And I need to use CSS for this task, not bootstrap or something else. Thanks!
Add this to .green5 would work.
I've tried it and it actually works well.
.green5 {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background-color: green;
float: left;
}
I created a starry night animation but was wondering if anyone had a better way to place divs "randomly" with only CSS ??? Also, I'm having difficulty with responsiveness as well. Thank you for your time! just trying to learn.
check the complete code at http://codepen.io/anon/pen/MeeYWO?editors=1100
#star-bl:nth-of-type(5) {
left: -350px;
top: 225px;
}
#star-bl:nth-of-type(6) {
left: 750px;
top: 250px;
}
#star-bl:nth-of-type(7) {
left: -450px;
}
#star-sm:nth-of-type(8) {
left: -225px;
}
#star-sm:nth-of-type(9) {
left: 500px;
}
#star-sm:nth-of-type(10) {
left: -100px;
}
It's not possible in pure CSS at the moment (I'm hoping for calc(rand) to become a thing). The solution you are using is as good as any, you may want to consider using percentages if you want the stars to cluster on a smaller screen type.
Unfortunately that is not possible at the moment in CSS.
However, if you would be willing to change from CSS to LESS, you could give your stars random values. It's possible to insert JavaScript into LESS by wrapping the JavaScript expression with back-ticks as shown in this post.
Here's an example for giving your div #star-bl a random left value from 1 to 100.
#star-bl {
#random-margin: `Math.random() * 100`;
left: #random-margin * 1px;
}
You would still need to give every star a separate block inside the LESS file, but it would give your stars different positions every time you visit the page.
Here's a link to a guide for using LESS.
Not with vanila CSS but you can use a CSS pre-processor such as Less or Sass to generate random numbers for you at compile time.
Here's how you could do it in Sass using its random instance method.
#import compass
body
background: black
.star
width: 10px
height: 10px
position: absolute
font-size: 10px
color: white
#for $i from 1 through 500
.star:nth-child(#{$i})
top: random(1000) + px
left: random(1000) + px
DEMO: http://codepen.io/moob/pen/dXXGdy
I'm trying to make a simple browser game without relying on anything fancy like flash or html5. I was doing pretty well in getting everything set up, but when I got to the ground I ran into trouble as I'm not very good at setting up html pages. I want to have a tiled ground that I can put objects on, then click on the objects to take the user to another page. I'm not sure how to go about something like this and am looking for some direction.
I have a fairly good grasp on PHP, understand basic html, very limited css and am starting to learn javascript and am planning on picking up jQuery.
I don't really understand what you want, but this might help:
Live Demo
To understand how the positioning works, see:
http://css-tricks.com/absolute-positioning-inside-relative-positioning/
http://css-tricks.com/absolute-relative-fixed-positioining-how-do-they-differ/
HTML:
<div id="gameContainer">
</div>
CSS:
#gameContainer {
width: 320px;
height: 320px;
border: 1px solid #000;
background: url(http://i.stack.imgur.com/sFV9k.png);
position: relative
}
.wall {
background: url(http://i.stack.imgur.com/IFjyp.png);
width: 32px;
height: 32px;
position: absolute
}
I’m reading some Html code for a web page, where author essentially wanted to create a page with header, footer and content area. The content area would be divided into three columns with center column having the right and left margins set to 200px, and these two margins are to be filled by two other DIVs docked on the page border with absolute positioning.
Here is author’s code for content area ( for the sake of clarity I’ve omitted the header and footer code ):
<div id="container">
<div id="container2">
<div id="centercol">
</div>
<div id="rightcol">
</div>
</div>
<div id="leftcol">
</div>
</div>
CSS file:
body
{
margin: 0px;
font-family: Verdana, Arial, Serif;
font-size: 12px;
}
#container
{
background-color: #818689;
}
#container2
{
background-color: #bcbfc0;
margin-right: 200px;
}
#leftcol
{
position: absolute;
top: 184px;
left: 0px;
width: 200px;
background-color: #bcbfc0;
font-size: 10px;
}
#centercol
{
position: relative;
margin-left: 200px;
padding: 0px;
background-color: white;
}
#rightcol
{
position: absolute;
top: 184px;
right: 0px;
width: 198px;
color: White;
background-color: #818689;
font-size: 10px;
}
Any idea why author decided to put both the center column and the right column inside container2? I see no advantages in doing that and in fact it just complicates the logical structure of the page?!
thanx
It looks like this was so he could have position effectively determined by the width and position of the centercol while allowing for a particular source order for the content. There are a few different ways to do this. Id guess he did it this way to avoid using floats (and the various "fixes" for IE6 compat that entails).
Not the way i would have done it i dont think but i assume it worked well for this site in the grand scheme of things.
Overall though sometimes you have to do some interesting things to match a comp with markup/css. Depending on what the designer has thrown at you and the level of abstraction needed within the system (assuming its built on some sort of dynamic content) you can end up doing something that cant possibly be construed as straight-forward. Nature of the beast until CSS and the browser implementations of it catch up to graphic designers :-)
Usually people adjust their markup due to having their layout and design in mind. That's probably what the author in that article was doing when he put those two sections together. It's not what I would have done, but at the same time you don't want to get yourself worked up about semantic debates on the internet :)
I would rather see someone author web-pages for the content and then design them in CSS (How To: Pure CSS Design)
If the author wants for search-engine purposes the main content to come first then that would be a reason. I'm not sure why he'd use absolutes though as you can't clear them and that would cause problems for a footer.
I'm currently using a combination of CSS and Div tags to achieve rounded corners on a text element. This is the CSS I'm using:
div#installerSearch {
float: left;
position: relative;
color: #000055;
width: 154px;
border: 1px solid #2A5390;
padding: 8px;
background-image: url('images/background.png');
}
div.roundAllGreen {
position: absolute;
width: 8px;
height: 8px;
background-image: url('images/roundgreenthingy.png');
}
div.roundTopLeft {
left: -1px;
top: -1px;
background-position: 0px 0px;
}
div.roundTopRight {
right: -1px;
top: -1px;
background-position: -7px 0px;
}
div.roundBottomLeft {
left: -1px;
bottom: -1px;
background-position: 0px -7px;
}
div.roundBottomRight {
right: -1px;
bottom: -1px;
background-position: -7px -7px;
}
and this is the resulting HTML:
<div id="installerSearch">
<div class="roundAll roundTopLeft"></div>
<div class="roundAll roundTopRight"></div>
<div class="roundAll roundBottomLeft"></div>
<div class="roundAll roundBottomRight"></div>
<p> ... </p>
</div>
Can anyone else spot the issue? I've resorted (for lack of a better method) to including presentation in the form of markup, which makes this a little difficult to re-theme, as I'm trying to do.
What I'd really like would be the ability to have CSS add div tags inside a container div for me. I realize that this breaks the "no content in CSS" rule on a code level, but considering that my rounded corners hardly qualify as content it doesn't break it in my book.
So I guess what I'm asking is, is there a good way to accomplish the same effect (rounded corners using images) without needing to introduce extra tags into my content using CSS? The idea here is to end up with a CSS sheet that I can swap out completely without needing to make modifications to my template HTML page, but if that's not possible I'd accept that as an answer. It just seems that google is utterly failing on me this time. ^_^
Short answer: there is not currently a well-supported CSS-only way to do this.
If you can't wait around for CSS3 support, you may want to look in to JavaScript alternatives. Nifty Corners Cube will add rounded corners, and claims to even anti-alias. There are also many jQuery corner plugins, and this one does many different corner effects.
Is there a particular reason you want to use images for the corners? If all you need is a round corner, you may be able to get by using the aforementioned JavaScript solutions. I would really recommend looking at the Nifty Corners Cube examples.
Edit: If you are concerned about extra markup harming your search engine efficiency, then a JavaScript solution would make even more sense (although a CSS-only solution would be best in my opinion) because the extra markup would be added client-side. I have worked with a few search engines and they purposely strip out script tags before indexing the content.
Can anyone else spot the issue?
The difference in className between roundAll and roundAllGreen?
I've resorted (for lack of a better method) to including presentation in the form of markup, which makes this a little difficult to re-theme, as I'm trying to do.
Some sort of interference with the markup is unavoidable until such time as (a) IE supports border-radius, or (b) multiple background images on a single element become possible.
Another possibility with somewhat less interference is background nesting:
<div class="box"><div><div><div>
Hello
</div></div></div></div>
.box { background: url(topleft.png) top left no-repeat; }
.box div { background: url(topright.png) top right no-repeat; }
.box div div { background: url(bottomleft.png) bottom left no-repeat; }
.box div div div { background: url(bottomright.png) bottom right no-repeat; }
In your current page the width of the box is fixed, so you can get away with only two nested divs, one for the top edge and one for the bottom.
You can write JavaScript that will add those divs for you. But it's a huge problem in CSS, it does depend on the content anyway whatever others might say.
Another jquery plugin that works very nice: Anti-aliased Rounded corners with JQuery
one mod to bobinces's solution:
<div class="box"><div><div><div>
Hello
</div></div></div></div>
.box { background: url(topleft.png) top left no-repeat; }
.box>div { background: url(topright.png) top right no-repeat; }
.box>div>div { background: url(bottomleft.png) bottom left no-repeat; }
.box>div>div>div { background: url(bottomright.png) bottom right no-repeat; }