Related
I've just spent two days re-templating a perl script and it's looking mighty good but I have one problem...the calendar which is written in perl.
I want to prevent users discovering the actual folder where my script resides, which is done with .htacces, so in html I can easily replace <!--URL--> with <!../linkname>
But the calendar days and months are displayed via a perl script, calendar.cgi:
When a user clicks on a day or month it should take them to the calendar main page but does so via the full url.
Using the symlink in html pages, I can make domain.com/filename go to domain.com/cgi-bin/folder1/folder2 and the browser will only show domain.com/filename as the url, but the calendar days/months are written in perl, so:
The offending line is $temper =~ s/<!--URL-->/$url/gm;
How could I replace $temper =~ s/<!--URL--> with <!../linkname>? It returns an error if I do it the same way as for html.
Edit: Error code
Regexp modifiers "/a" and "/l" are mutually exclusive at /home/public_html/cgi-bin/messenger/calendar.cgi line 43, near "=~ " syntax error at /home/public_html/cgi-bin/messenger/calendar.cgi line 43, near "{.." Compilation failed in require at /home/public_html/cgi-bin/messenger/messenger.cgi line 36.
Edit, Line 43:
This is the original line 43
$temper =~ s/<!--URL-->/$url/gm;
But that will cause links to go to public_html/cgi-bin/folder/folder
I want to replace with
$temper =~ s/<!../../filename>/$url/gm;
where 'filename' is the symlink and the browser address bar will show domain.com/filename
Edit: TLP thanks for your help, I'm not really good at coding, especially not perl but I learn a lot when you guys help me out....it's like you give me confidence to mess around until I get it right! The solution was easier than I thought.....Instead of replacing <!--URL--> I had to change /$url/gm;to /$xemail/gm;`
It's working brilliant now!
The line
$temper =~ s/<!../../filename>/$url/gm;
is invalid because / is a meta character inside the substitution operator. You must escape it, like so:
$temper =~ s/<!..\/..\/filename>/$url/gm;
Or use a different delimiter for the substitution operator s///. You may use just about any character for that, such as for example |:
$temper =~ s|<!../../filename>|$url|gm;
Then you do not need to escape /.
regex difference between vscode and visual studio
starting with
line1
line2
find: ^(.+)$
replace: "$1",
In vscode it works as expected, resulting in
"line1",
"line2",
In studio, doesn't seem to work, resulting in
"line1
",
"line2
",
Which one is correct? I assume vscode.
TL;DR: Use ^(.*[^\r\n]) to match a whole line without EOL characters.
According to the Docs:
Purpose
Expression
Example
Match any single character (except a line break)
.
a.o matches "aro" in "around" and "abo" in "about" but not "acro" in "across"
Anchor the match string to the end of a line
\r?$
car\r?$ matches "car" only when it appears at the end of a line
Anchor the match string to the end of the file
$
car$ matches "car" only when it appears at the end of the file
However, some of that doesn't seem to hold true for some reason (i.e., . does match a line break and .$ does match the end of any line). All of the following patterns will match from the beginning to the end of the line including EOL characters: ^.+, ^.+$, ^.+\r?$.
I have noticed this behavior in VS2017 before and I'm not sure why it happens but I was able to get around it using something like the following:
^(.*[^\r\n])
Note: You can also get rid of the capturing group and replace with "$0",.
In VSCode regex patterns, a dot . matches any char but any line break chars.
In .NET regex used in Visual Studio, a dot matches any char but a newline, LF, char.
This difference explains the results you get and you can't call them right or wrong, these are just regex engine differences.
Note you would not have noticed any difference between the two engines if you had used LF-only line endings, but Visual Studio in Windows uses CRLF endings by default.
In order to wrap a whole line with double quotes using .NET regex, just exclude both LF and CR (carriage return) symbols from matching by replacing the dot with a [^\r\n] negated character class:
^[^\r\n]+
And replace with "$&", pattern where $& refers to the whole match.
You may get rid of the capturing group in the VSCode regex and use the same replacement pattern as in .NET, too.
For example, this regex
(.*)<FooBar>
will match:
abcde<FooBar>
But how do I get it to match across multiple lines?
abcde
fghij<FooBar>
Try this:
((.|\n)*)<FooBar>
It basically says "any character or a newline" repeated zero or more times.
It depends on the language, but there should be a modifier that you can add to the regex pattern. In PHP it is:
/(.*)<FooBar>/s
The s at the end causes the dot to match all characters including newlines.
The question is, can the . pattern match any character? The answer varies from engine to engine. The main difference is whether the pattern is used by a POSIX or non-POSIX regex library.
A special note about lua-patterns: they are not considered regular expressions, but . matches any character there, the same as POSIX-based engines.
Another note on matlab and octave: the . matches any character by default (demo): str = "abcde\n fghij<Foobar>"; expression = '(.*)<Foobar>*'; [tokens,matches] = regexp(str,expression,'tokens','match'); (tokens contain a abcde\n fghij item).
Also, in all of boost's regex grammars the dot matches line breaks by default. Boost's ECMAScript grammar allows you to turn this off with regex_constants::no_mod_m (source).
As for oracle (it is POSIX based), use the n option (demo): select regexp_substr('abcde' || chr(10) ||' fghij<Foobar>', '(.*)<Foobar>', 1, 1, 'n', 1) as results from dual
POSIX-based engines:
A mere . already matches line breaks, so there isn't a need to use any modifiers, see bash (demo).
The tcl (demo), postgresql (demo), r (TRE, base R default engine with no perl=TRUE, for base R with perl=TRUE or for stringr/stringi patterns, use the (?s) inline modifier) (demo) also treat . the same way.
However, most POSIX-based tools process input line by line. Hence, . does not match the line breaks just because they are not in scope. Here are some examples how to override this:
sed - There are multiple workarounds. The most precise, but not very safe, is sed 'H;1h;$!d;x; s/\(.*\)><Foobar>/\1/' (H;1h;$!d;x; slurps the file into memory). If whole lines must be included, sed '/start_pattern/,/end_pattern/d' file (removing from start will end with matched lines included) or sed '/start_pattern/,/end_pattern/{{//!d;};}' file (with matching lines excluded) can be considered.
perl - perl -0pe 's/(.*)<FooBar>/$1/gs' <<< "$str" (-0 slurps the whole file into memory, -p prints the file after applying the script given by -e). Note that using -000pe will slurp the file and activate 'paragraph mode' where Perl uses consecutive newlines (\n\n) as the record separator.
gnu-grep - grep -Poz '(?si)abc\K.*?(?=<Foobar>)' file. Here, z enables file slurping, (?s) enables the DOTALL mode for the . pattern, (?i) enables case insensitive mode, \K omits the text matched so far, *? is a lazy quantifier, (?=<Foobar>) matches the location before <Foobar>.
pcregrep - pcregrep -Mi "(?si)abc\K.*?(?=<Foobar>)" file (M enables file slurping here). Note pcregrep is a good solution for macOS grep users.
See demos.
Non-POSIX-based engines:
php - Use the s modifier PCRE_DOTALL modifier: preg_match('~(.*)<Foobar>~s', $s, $m) (demo)
c# - Use RegexOptions.Singleline flag (demo): - var result = Regex.Match(s, #"(.*)<Foobar>", RegexOptions.Singleline).Groups[1].Value;- var result = Regex.Match(s, #"(?s)(.*)<Foobar>").Groups[1].Value;
powershell - Use the (?s) inline option: $s = "abcde`nfghij<FooBar>"; $s -match "(?s)(.*)<Foobar>"; $matches[1]
perl - Use the s modifier (or (?s) inline version at the start) (demo): /(.*)<FooBar>/s
python - Use the re.DOTALL (or re.S) flags or (?s) inline modifier (demo): m = re.search(r"(.*)<FooBar>", s, flags=re.S) (and then if m:, print(m.group(1)))
java - Use Pattern.DOTALL modifier (or inline (?s) flag) (demo): Pattern.compile("(.*)<FooBar>", Pattern.DOTALL)
kotlin - Use RegexOption.DOT_MATCHES_ALL : "(.*)<FooBar>".toRegex(RegexOption.DOT_MATCHES_ALL)
groovy - Use (?s) in-pattern modifier (demo): regex = /(?s)(.*)<FooBar>/
scala - Use (?s) modifier (demo): "(?s)(.*)<Foobar>".r.findAllIn("abcde\n fghij<Foobar>").matchData foreach { m => println(m.group(1)) }
javascript - Use [^] or workarounds [\d\D] / [\w\W] / [\s\S] (demo): s.match(/([\s\S]*)<FooBar>/)[1]
c++ (std::regex) Use [\s\S] or the JavaScript workarounds (demo): regex rex(R"(([\s\S]*)<FooBar>)");
vba vbscript - Use the same approach as in JavaScript, ([\s\S]*)<Foobar>. (NOTE: The MultiLine property of the RegExp object is sometimes erroneously thought to be the option to allow . match across line breaks, while, in fact, it only changes the ^ and $ behavior to match start/end of lines rather than strings, the same as in JavaScript regex)
behavior.)
ruby - Use the /m MULTILINE modifier (demo): s[/(.*)<Foobar>/m, 1]
rtrebase-r - Base R PCRE regexps - use (?s): regmatches(x, regexec("(?s)(.*)<FooBar>",x, perl=TRUE))[[1]][2] (demo)
ricustringrstringi - in stringr/stringi regex funtions that are powered with the ICU regex engine. Also use (?s): stringr::str_match(x, "(?s)(.*)<FooBar>")[,2] (demo)
go - Use the inline modifier (?s) at the start (demo): re: = regexp.MustCompile(`(?s)(.*)<FooBar>`)
swift - Use dotMatchesLineSeparators or (easier) pass the (?s) inline modifier to the pattern: let rx = "(?s)(.*)<Foobar>"
objective-c - The same as Swift. (?s) works the easiest, but here is how the option can be used: NSRegularExpression* regex = [NSRegularExpression regularExpressionWithPattern:pattern options:NSRegularExpressionDotMatchesLineSeparators error:®exError];
re2, google-apps-script - Use the (?s) modifier (demo): "(?s)(.*)<Foobar>" (in Google Spreadsheets, =REGEXEXTRACT(A2,"(?s)(.*)<Foobar>"))
NOTES ON (?s):
In most non-POSIX engines, the (?s) inline modifier (or embedded flag option) can be used to enforce . to match line breaks.
If placed at the start of the pattern, (?s) changes the bahavior of all . in the pattern. If the (?s) is placed somewhere after the beginning, only those .s will be affected that are located to the right of it unless this is a pattern passed to Python's re. In Python re, regardless of the (?s) location, the whole pattern . is affected. The (?s) effect is stopped using (?-s). A modified group can be used to only affect a specified range of a regex pattern (e.g., Delim1(?s:.*?)\nDelim2.* will make the first .*? match across newlines and the second .* will only match the rest of the line).
POSIX note:
In non-POSIX regex engines, to match any character, [\s\S] / [\d\D] / [\w\W] constructs can be used.
In POSIX, [\s\S] is not matching any character (as in JavaScript or any non-POSIX engine), because regex escape sequences are not supported inside bracket expressions. [\s\S] is parsed as bracket expressions that match a single character, \ or s or S.
If you're using Eclipse search, you can enable the "DOTALL" option to make '.' match any character including line delimiters: just add "(?s)" at the beginning of your search string. Example:
(?s).*<FooBar>
In many regex dialects, /[\S\s]*<Foobar>/ will do just what you want. Source
([\s\S]*)<FooBar>
The dot matches all except newlines (\r\n). So use \s\S, which will match ALL characters.
We can also use
(.*?\n)*?
to match everything including newline without being greedy.
This will make the new line optional
(.*?|\n)*?
In Ruby you can use the 'm' option (multiline):
/YOUR_REGEXP/m
See the Regexp documentation on ruby-doc.org for more information.
"." normally doesn't match line-breaks. Most regex engines allows you to add the S-flag (also called DOTALL and SINGLELINE) to make "." also match newlines.
If that fails, you could do something like [\S\s].
For Eclipse, the following expression worked:
Foo
jadajada Bar"
Regular expression:
Foo[\S\s]{1,10}.*Bar*
Note that (.|\n)* can be less efficient than (for example) [\s\S]* (if your language's regexes support such escapes) and than finding how to specify the modifier that makes . also match newlines. Or you can go with POSIXy alternatives like [[:space:][:^space:]]*.
Use:
/(.*)<FooBar>/s
The s causes dot (.) to match carriage returns.
Use RegexOptions.Singleline. It changes the meaning of . to include newlines.
Regex.Replace(content, searchText, replaceText, RegexOptions.Singleline);
In notepad++ you can use this
<table (.|\r\n)*</table>
It will match the entire table starting from
rows and columns
You can make it greedy, using the following, that way it will match the first, second and so forth tables and not all at once
<table (.|\r\n)*?</table>
In a Java-based regular expression, you can use [\s\S].
This works for me and is the simplest one:
(\X*)<FooBar>
Generally, . doesn't match newlines, so try ((.|\n)*)<foobar>.
In JavaScript you can use [^]* to search for zero to infinite characters, including line breaks.
$("#find_and_replace").click(function() {
var text = $("#textarea").val();
search_term = new RegExp("[^]*<Foobar>", "gi");;
replace_term = "Replacement term";
var new_text = text.replace(search_term, replace_term);
$("#textarea").val(new_text);
});
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<button id="find_and_replace">Find and replace</button>
<br>
<textarea ID="textarea">abcde
fghij<Foobar></textarea>
Solution:
Use pattern modifier sU will get the desired matching in PHP.
Example:
preg_match('/(.*)/sU', $content, $match);
Sources:
Pattern Modifiers
In the context of use within languages, regular expressions act on strings, not lines. So you should be able to use the regex normally, assuming that the input string has multiple lines.
In this case, the given regex will match the entire string, since "<FooBar>" is present. Depending on the specifics of the regex implementation, the $1 value (obtained from the "(.*)") will either be "fghij" or "abcde\nfghij". As others have said, some implementations allow you to control whether the "." will match the newline, giving you the choice.
Line-based regular expression use is usually for command line things like egrep.
Try: .*\n*.*<FooBar> assuming you are also allowing blank newlines. As you are allowing any character including nothing before <FooBar>.
I had the same problem and solved it in probably not the best way but it works. I replaced all line breaks before I did my real match:
mystring = Regex.Replace(mystring, "\r\n", "")
I am manipulating HTML so line breaks don't really matter to me in this case.
I tried all of the suggestions above with no luck. I am using .NET 3.5 FYI.
I wanted to match a particular if block in Java:
...
...
if(isTrue){
doAction();
}
...
...
}
If I use the regExp
if \(isTrue(.|\n)*}
it included the closing brace for the method block, so I used
if \(!isTrue([^}.]|\n)*}
to exclude the closing brace from the wildcard match.
Often we have to modify a substring with a few keywords spread across lines preceding the substring. Consider an XML element:
<TASK>
<UID>21</UID>
<Name>Architectural design</Name>
<PercentComplete>81</PercentComplete>
</TASK>
Suppose we want to modify the 81, to some other value, say 40. First identify .UID.21..UID., then skip all characters including \n till .PercentCompleted.. The regular expression pattern and the replace specification are:
String hw = new String("<TASK>\n <UID>21</UID>\n <Name>Architectural design</Name>\n <PercentComplete>81</PercentComplete>\n</TASK>");
String pattern = new String ("(<UID>21</UID>)((.|\n)*?)(<PercentComplete>)(\\d+)(</PercentComplete>)");
String replaceSpec = new String ("$1$2$440$6");
// Note that the group (<PercentComplete>) is $4 and the group ((.|\n)*?) is $2.
String iw = hw.replaceFirst(pattern, replaceSpec);
System.out.println(iw);
<TASK>
<UID>21</UID>
<Name>Architectural design</Name>
<PercentComplete>40</PercentComplete>
</TASK>
The subgroup (.|\n) is probably the missing group $3. If we make it non-capturing by (?:.|\n) then the $3 is (<PercentComplete>). So the pattern and replaceSpec can also be:
pattern = new String("(<UID>21</UID>)((?:.|\n)*?)(<PercentComplete>)(\\d+)(</PercentComplete>)");
replaceSpec = new String("$1$2$340$5")
and the replacement works correctly as before.
Typically searching for three consecutive lines in PowerShell, it would look like:
$file = Get-Content file.txt -raw
$pattern = 'lineone\r\nlinetwo\r\nlinethree\r\n' # "Windows" text
$pattern = 'lineone\nlinetwo\nlinethree\n' # "Unix" text
$pattern = 'lineone\r?\nlinetwo\r?\nlinethree\r?\n' # Both
$file -match $pattern
# output
True
Bizarrely, this would be Unix text at the prompt, but Windows text in a file:
$pattern = 'lineone
linetwo
linethree
'
Here's a way to print out the line endings:
'lineone
linetwo
linethree
' -replace "`r",'\r' -replace "`n",'\n'
# Output
lineone\nlinetwo\nlinethree\n
Option 1
One way would be to use the s flag (just like the accepted answer):
/(.*)<FooBar>/s
Demo 1
Option 2
A second way would be to use the m (multiline) flag and any of the following patterns:
/([\s\S]*)<FooBar>/m
or
/([\d\D]*)<FooBar>/m
or
/([\w\W]*)<FooBar>/m
Demo 2
RegEx Circuit
jex.im visualizes regular expressions:
For example, this regex
(.*)<FooBar>
will match:
abcde<FooBar>
But how do I get it to match across multiple lines?
abcde
fghij<FooBar>
Try this:
((.|\n)*)<FooBar>
It basically says "any character or a newline" repeated zero or more times.
It depends on the language, but there should be a modifier that you can add to the regex pattern. In PHP it is:
/(.*)<FooBar>/s
The s at the end causes the dot to match all characters including newlines.
The question is, can the . pattern match any character? The answer varies from engine to engine. The main difference is whether the pattern is used by a POSIX or non-POSIX regex library.
A special note about lua-patterns: they are not considered regular expressions, but . matches any character there, the same as POSIX-based engines.
Another note on matlab and octave: the . matches any character by default (demo): str = "abcde\n fghij<Foobar>"; expression = '(.*)<Foobar>*'; [tokens,matches] = regexp(str,expression,'tokens','match'); (tokens contain a abcde\n fghij item).
Also, in all of boost's regex grammars the dot matches line breaks by default. Boost's ECMAScript grammar allows you to turn this off with regex_constants::no_mod_m (source).
As for oracle (it is POSIX based), use the n option (demo): select regexp_substr('abcde' || chr(10) ||' fghij<Foobar>', '(.*)<Foobar>', 1, 1, 'n', 1) as results from dual
POSIX-based engines:
A mere . already matches line breaks, so there isn't a need to use any modifiers, see bash (demo).
The tcl (demo), postgresql (demo), r (TRE, base R default engine with no perl=TRUE, for base R with perl=TRUE or for stringr/stringi patterns, use the (?s) inline modifier) (demo) also treat . the same way.
However, most POSIX-based tools process input line by line. Hence, . does not match the line breaks just because they are not in scope. Here are some examples how to override this:
sed - There are multiple workarounds. The most precise, but not very safe, is sed 'H;1h;$!d;x; s/\(.*\)><Foobar>/\1/' (H;1h;$!d;x; slurps the file into memory). If whole lines must be included, sed '/start_pattern/,/end_pattern/d' file (removing from start will end with matched lines included) or sed '/start_pattern/,/end_pattern/{{//!d;};}' file (with matching lines excluded) can be considered.
perl - perl -0pe 's/(.*)<FooBar>/$1/gs' <<< "$str" (-0 slurps the whole file into memory, -p prints the file after applying the script given by -e). Note that using -000pe will slurp the file and activate 'paragraph mode' where Perl uses consecutive newlines (\n\n) as the record separator.
gnu-grep - grep -Poz '(?si)abc\K.*?(?=<Foobar>)' file. Here, z enables file slurping, (?s) enables the DOTALL mode for the . pattern, (?i) enables case insensitive mode, \K omits the text matched so far, *? is a lazy quantifier, (?=<Foobar>) matches the location before <Foobar>.
pcregrep - pcregrep -Mi "(?si)abc\K.*?(?=<Foobar>)" file (M enables file slurping here). Note pcregrep is a good solution for macOS grep users.
See demos.
Non-POSIX-based engines:
php - Use the s modifier PCRE_DOTALL modifier: preg_match('~(.*)<Foobar>~s', $s, $m) (demo)
c# - Use RegexOptions.Singleline flag (demo): - var result = Regex.Match(s, #"(.*)<Foobar>", RegexOptions.Singleline).Groups[1].Value;- var result = Regex.Match(s, #"(?s)(.*)<Foobar>").Groups[1].Value;
powershell - Use the (?s) inline option: $s = "abcde`nfghij<FooBar>"; $s -match "(?s)(.*)<Foobar>"; $matches[1]
perl - Use the s modifier (or (?s) inline version at the start) (demo): /(.*)<FooBar>/s
python - Use the re.DOTALL (or re.S) flags or (?s) inline modifier (demo): m = re.search(r"(.*)<FooBar>", s, flags=re.S) (and then if m:, print(m.group(1)))
java - Use Pattern.DOTALL modifier (or inline (?s) flag) (demo): Pattern.compile("(.*)<FooBar>", Pattern.DOTALL)
kotlin - Use RegexOption.DOT_MATCHES_ALL : "(.*)<FooBar>".toRegex(RegexOption.DOT_MATCHES_ALL)
groovy - Use (?s) in-pattern modifier (demo): regex = /(?s)(.*)<FooBar>/
scala - Use (?s) modifier (demo): "(?s)(.*)<Foobar>".r.findAllIn("abcde\n fghij<Foobar>").matchData foreach { m => println(m.group(1)) }
javascript - Use [^] or workarounds [\d\D] / [\w\W] / [\s\S] (demo): s.match(/([\s\S]*)<FooBar>/)[1]
c++ (std::regex) Use [\s\S] or the JavaScript workarounds (demo): regex rex(R"(([\s\S]*)<FooBar>)");
vba vbscript - Use the same approach as in JavaScript, ([\s\S]*)<Foobar>. (NOTE: The MultiLine property of the RegExp object is sometimes erroneously thought to be the option to allow . match across line breaks, while, in fact, it only changes the ^ and $ behavior to match start/end of lines rather than strings, the same as in JavaScript regex)
behavior.)
ruby - Use the /m MULTILINE modifier (demo): s[/(.*)<Foobar>/m, 1]
rtrebase-r - Base R PCRE regexps - use (?s): regmatches(x, regexec("(?s)(.*)<FooBar>",x, perl=TRUE))[[1]][2] (demo)
ricustringrstringi - in stringr/stringi regex funtions that are powered with the ICU regex engine. Also use (?s): stringr::str_match(x, "(?s)(.*)<FooBar>")[,2] (demo)
go - Use the inline modifier (?s) at the start (demo): re: = regexp.MustCompile(`(?s)(.*)<FooBar>`)
swift - Use dotMatchesLineSeparators or (easier) pass the (?s) inline modifier to the pattern: let rx = "(?s)(.*)<Foobar>"
objective-c - The same as Swift. (?s) works the easiest, but here is how the option can be used: NSRegularExpression* regex = [NSRegularExpression regularExpressionWithPattern:pattern options:NSRegularExpressionDotMatchesLineSeparators error:®exError];
re2, google-apps-script - Use the (?s) modifier (demo): "(?s)(.*)<Foobar>" (in Google Spreadsheets, =REGEXEXTRACT(A2,"(?s)(.*)<Foobar>"))
NOTES ON (?s):
In most non-POSIX engines, the (?s) inline modifier (or embedded flag option) can be used to enforce . to match line breaks.
If placed at the start of the pattern, (?s) changes the bahavior of all . in the pattern. If the (?s) is placed somewhere after the beginning, only those .s will be affected that are located to the right of it unless this is a pattern passed to Python's re. In Python re, regardless of the (?s) location, the whole pattern . is affected. The (?s) effect is stopped using (?-s). A modified group can be used to only affect a specified range of a regex pattern (e.g., Delim1(?s:.*?)\nDelim2.* will make the first .*? match across newlines and the second .* will only match the rest of the line).
POSIX note:
In non-POSIX regex engines, to match any character, [\s\S] / [\d\D] / [\w\W] constructs can be used.
In POSIX, [\s\S] is not matching any character (as in JavaScript or any non-POSIX engine), because regex escape sequences are not supported inside bracket expressions. [\s\S] is parsed as bracket expressions that match a single character, \ or s or S.
If you're using Eclipse search, you can enable the "DOTALL" option to make '.' match any character including line delimiters: just add "(?s)" at the beginning of your search string. Example:
(?s).*<FooBar>
In many regex dialects, /[\S\s]*<Foobar>/ will do just what you want. Source
([\s\S]*)<FooBar>
The dot matches all except newlines (\r\n). So use \s\S, which will match ALL characters.
We can also use
(.*?\n)*?
to match everything including newline without being greedy.
This will make the new line optional
(.*?|\n)*?
In Ruby you can use the 'm' option (multiline):
/YOUR_REGEXP/m
See the Regexp documentation on ruby-doc.org for more information.
"." normally doesn't match line-breaks. Most regex engines allows you to add the S-flag (also called DOTALL and SINGLELINE) to make "." also match newlines.
If that fails, you could do something like [\S\s].
For Eclipse, the following expression worked:
Foo
jadajada Bar"
Regular expression:
Foo[\S\s]{1,10}.*Bar*
Note that (.|\n)* can be less efficient than (for example) [\s\S]* (if your language's regexes support such escapes) and than finding how to specify the modifier that makes . also match newlines. Or you can go with POSIXy alternatives like [[:space:][:^space:]]*.
Use:
/(.*)<FooBar>/s
The s causes dot (.) to match carriage returns.
Use RegexOptions.Singleline. It changes the meaning of . to include newlines.
Regex.Replace(content, searchText, replaceText, RegexOptions.Singleline);
In notepad++ you can use this
<table (.|\r\n)*</table>
It will match the entire table starting from
rows and columns
You can make it greedy, using the following, that way it will match the first, second and so forth tables and not all at once
<table (.|\r\n)*?</table>
In a Java-based regular expression, you can use [\s\S].
This works for me and is the simplest one:
(\X*)<FooBar>
Generally, . doesn't match newlines, so try ((.|\n)*)<foobar>.
In JavaScript you can use [^]* to search for zero to infinite characters, including line breaks.
$("#find_and_replace").click(function() {
var text = $("#textarea").val();
search_term = new RegExp("[^]*<Foobar>", "gi");;
replace_term = "Replacement term";
var new_text = text.replace(search_term, replace_term);
$("#textarea").val(new_text);
});
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<button id="find_and_replace">Find and replace</button>
<br>
<textarea ID="textarea">abcde
fghij<Foobar></textarea>
Solution:
Use pattern modifier sU will get the desired matching in PHP.
Example:
preg_match('/(.*)/sU', $content, $match);
Sources:
Pattern Modifiers
In the context of use within languages, regular expressions act on strings, not lines. So you should be able to use the regex normally, assuming that the input string has multiple lines.
In this case, the given regex will match the entire string, since "<FooBar>" is present. Depending on the specifics of the regex implementation, the $1 value (obtained from the "(.*)") will either be "fghij" or "abcde\nfghij". As others have said, some implementations allow you to control whether the "." will match the newline, giving you the choice.
Line-based regular expression use is usually for command line things like egrep.
Try: .*\n*.*<FooBar> assuming you are also allowing blank newlines. As you are allowing any character including nothing before <FooBar>.
I had the same problem and solved it in probably not the best way but it works. I replaced all line breaks before I did my real match:
mystring = Regex.Replace(mystring, "\r\n", "")
I am manipulating HTML so line breaks don't really matter to me in this case.
I tried all of the suggestions above with no luck. I am using .NET 3.5 FYI.
I wanted to match a particular if block in Java:
...
...
if(isTrue){
doAction();
}
...
...
}
If I use the regExp
if \(isTrue(.|\n)*}
it included the closing brace for the method block, so I used
if \(!isTrue([^}.]|\n)*}
to exclude the closing brace from the wildcard match.
Often we have to modify a substring with a few keywords spread across lines preceding the substring. Consider an XML element:
<TASK>
<UID>21</UID>
<Name>Architectural design</Name>
<PercentComplete>81</PercentComplete>
</TASK>
Suppose we want to modify the 81, to some other value, say 40. First identify .UID.21..UID., then skip all characters including \n till .PercentCompleted.. The regular expression pattern and the replace specification are:
String hw = new String("<TASK>\n <UID>21</UID>\n <Name>Architectural design</Name>\n <PercentComplete>81</PercentComplete>\n</TASK>");
String pattern = new String ("(<UID>21</UID>)((.|\n)*?)(<PercentComplete>)(\\d+)(</PercentComplete>)");
String replaceSpec = new String ("$1$2$440$6");
// Note that the group (<PercentComplete>) is $4 and the group ((.|\n)*?) is $2.
String iw = hw.replaceFirst(pattern, replaceSpec);
System.out.println(iw);
<TASK>
<UID>21</UID>
<Name>Architectural design</Name>
<PercentComplete>40</PercentComplete>
</TASK>
The subgroup (.|\n) is probably the missing group $3. If we make it non-capturing by (?:.|\n) then the $3 is (<PercentComplete>). So the pattern and replaceSpec can also be:
pattern = new String("(<UID>21</UID>)((?:.|\n)*?)(<PercentComplete>)(\\d+)(</PercentComplete>)");
replaceSpec = new String("$1$2$340$5")
and the replacement works correctly as before.
Typically searching for three consecutive lines in PowerShell, it would look like:
$file = Get-Content file.txt -raw
$pattern = 'lineone\r\nlinetwo\r\nlinethree\r\n' # "Windows" text
$pattern = 'lineone\nlinetwo\nlinethree\n' # "Unix" text
$pattern = 'lineone\r?\nlinetwo\r?\nlinethree\r?\n' # Both
$file -match $pattern
# output
True
Bizarrely, this would be Unix text at the prompt, but Windows text in a file:
$pattern = 'lineone
linetwo
linethree
'
Here's a way to print out the line endings:
'lineone
linetwo
linethree
' -replace "`r",'\r' -replace "`n",'\n'
# Output
lineone\nlinetwo\nlinethree\n
Option 1
One way would be to use the s flag (just like the accepted answer):
/(.*)<FooBar>/s
Demo 1
Option 2
A second way would be to use the m (multiline) flag and any of the following patterns:
/([\s\S]*)<FooBar>/m
or
/([\d\D]*)<FooBar>/m
or
/([\w\W]*)<FooBar>/m
Demo 2
RegEx Circuit
jex.im visualizes regular expressions:
Everyone runs into syntax errors. Even experienced programmers make typos. For newcomers, it's just part of the learning process. However, it's often easy to interpret error messages such as:
PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected '{' in index.php on line 20
The unexpected symbol isn't always the real culprit. But the line number gives a rough idea of where to start looking.
Always look at the code context. The syntax mistake often hides in the mentioned or in previous code lines. Compare your code against syntax examples from the manual.
While not every case matches the other. Yet there are some general steps to solve syntax mistakes.
This references summarized the common pitfalls:
Unexpected T_STRING
Unexpected T_VARIABLE Unexpected '$varname' (T_VARIABLE)
Unexpected T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING Unexpected T_ENCAPSED_AND_WHITESPACE
Unexpected $end
Unexpected T_FUNCTION…
Unexpected {Unexpected }Unexpected (Unexpected )
Unexpected [Unexpected ]
Unexpected T_IF Unexpected T_FOREACH Unexpected T_FOR Unexpected T_WHILE Unexpected T_DO Unexpected T_PRINT Unexpected T_ECHO
Unexpected T_LNUMBER
Unexpected ?
Unexpected continue (T_CONTINUE)Unexpected continue (T_BREAK)Unexpected continue (T_RETURN)
Unexpected '='
Unexpected T_INLINE_HTML…
Unexpected T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM…
Unexpected T_OBJECT_OPERATOR…
Unexpected T_DOUBLE_ARROW…
Unexpected T_SL…
Unexpected T_BOOLEAN_OR…
Unexpected T_BOOLEAN_AND…
Unexpected T_IS_EQUAL
Unexpected T_IS_GREATER_OR_EQUAL
Unexpected T_IS_IDENTICAL
Unexpected T_IS_NOT_EQUAL
Unexpected T_IS_NOT_IDENTICAL
Unexpected T_IS_SMALLER_OR_EQUAL
Unexpected <
Unexpected >
Unexpected T_NS_SEPARATOR…
Unexpected character in input: '\' (ASCII=92) state=1
Unexpected 'public' (T_PUBLIC) Unexpected 'private' (T_PRIVATE) Unexpected 'protected' (T_PROTECTED) Unexpected 'final' (T_FINAL)…
Unexpected T_STATIC…
Unexpected T_CLASS…
Unexpected 'use' (T_USE)
Unexpected T_DNUMBER
Unexpected , (comma)
Unpexected . (period)
Unexpected ; (semicolon)
Unexpected * (asterisk)
Unexpected : (colon)
Unexpected ':', expecting ',' or ')'
Unexpected & (call-time pass-by-reference)
Unexpected .
Closely related references:
What does this error mean in PHP? (runtime errors)
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_XXX
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_ENCAPSED_AND_WHITESPACE
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_VARIABLE
What does this symbol mean in PHP? (language tokens)
Those “” smart ‘’ quotes mean nothing to PHP
And:
The PHP manual on php.net and its various language tokens
Or Wikipedia's syntax introduction on PHP.
And lastly our php tag-wiki of course.
While Stack Overflow is also welcoming rookie coders, it's mostly targetted at professional programming questions.
Answering everyone's coding mistakes and narrow typos is considered mostly off-topic.
So please take the time to follow the basic steps, before posting syntax fixing requests.
If you still have to, please show your own solving initiative, attempted fixes, and your thought process on what looks or might be wrong.
If your browser displays error messages such as "SyntaxError: illegal character", then it's not actually php-related, but a javascript-syntax error.
Syntax errors raised on vendor code: Finally, consider that if the syntax error was not raised by editing your codebase, but after an external vendor package install or upgrade, it could be due to PHP version incompatibility, so check the vendor's requirements against your platform setup.
What are the syntax errors?
PHP belongs to the C-style and imperative programming languages. It has rigid grammar rules, which it cannot recover from when encountering misplaced symbols or identifiers. It can't guess your coding intentions.
Most important tips
There are a few basic precautions you can always take:
Use proper code indentation, or adopt any lofty coding style.
Readability prevents irregularities.
Use an IDE or editor for PHP with syntax highlighting.
Which also help with parentheses/bracket balancing.
Read the language reference and examples in the manual.
Twice, to become somewhat proficient.
How to interpret parser errors
A typical syntax error message reads:
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_STRING, expecting ';' in file.php on line 217
Which lists the possible location of a syntax mistake. See the mentioned file name and line number.
A moniker such as T_STRING explains which symbol the parser/tokenizer couldn't process finally. This isn't necessarily the cause of the syntax mistake, however.
It's important to look into previous code lines as well. Often syntax errors are just mishaps that happened earlier. The error line number is just where the parser conclusively gave up to process it all.
Solving syntax errors
There are many approaches to narrow down and fix syntax hiccups.
Open the mentioned source file. Look at the mentioned code line.
For runaway strings and misplaced operators, this is usually where you find the culprit.
Read the line left to right and imagine what each symbol does.
More regularly you need to look at preceding lines as well.
In particular, missing ; semicolons are missing at the previous line ends/statement. (At least from the stylistic viewpoint. )
If { code blocks } are incorrectly closed or nested, you may need to investigate even further up the source code. Use proper code indentation to simplify that.
Look at the syntax colorization!
Strings and variables and constants should all have different colors.
Operators +-*/. should be tinted distinct as well. Else they might be in the wrong context.
If you see string colorization extend too far or too short, then you have found an unescaped or missing closing " or ' string marker.
Having two same-colored punctuation characters next to each other can also mean trouble. Usually, operators are lone if it's not ++, --, or parentheses following an operator. Two strings/identifiers directly following each other are incorrect in most contexts.
Whitespace is your friend.
Follow any coding style.
Break up long lines temporarily.
You can freely add newlines between operators or constants and strings. The parser will then concretize the line number for parsing errors. Instead of looking at the very lengthy code, you can isolate the missing or misplaced syntax symbol.
Split up complex if statements into distinct or nested if conditions.
Instead of lengthy math formulas or logic chains, use temporary variables to simplify the code. (More readable = fewer errors.)
Add newlines between:
The code you can easily identify as correct,
The parts you're unsure about,
And the lines which the parser complains about.
Partitioning up long code blocks really helps to locate the origin of syntax errors.
Comment out offending code.
If you can't isolate the problem source, start to comment out (and thus temporarily remove) blocks of code.
As soon as you got rid of the parsing error, you have found the problem source. Look more closely there.
Sometimes you want to temporarily remove complete function/method blocks. (In case of unmatched curly braces and wrongly indented code.)
When you can't resolve the syntax issue, try to rewrite the commented out sections from scratch.
As a newcomer, avoid some of the confusing syntax constructs.
The ternary ? : condition operator can compact code and is useful indeed. But it doesn't aid readability in all cases. Prefer plain if statements while unversed.
PHP's alternative syntax (if:/elseif:/endif;) is common for templates, but arguably less easy to follow than normal { code } blocks.
The most prevalent newcomer mistakes are:
Missing semicolons ; for terminating statements/lines.
Mismatched string quotes for " or ' and unescaped quotes within.
Forgotten operators, in particular for the string . concatenation.
Unbalanced ( parentheses ). Count them in the reported line. Are there an equal number of them?
Don't forget that solving one syntax problem can uncover the next.
If you make one issue go away, but other crops up in some code below, you're mostly on the right path.
If after editing a new syntax error crops up in the same line, then your attempted change was possibly a failure. (Not always though.)
Restore a backup of previously working code, if you can't fix it.
Adopt a source code versioning system. You can always view a diff of the broken and last working version. Which might be enlightening as to what the syntax problem is.
Invisible stray Unicode characters: In some cases, you need to use a hexeditor or different editor/viewer on your source. Some problems cannot be found just from looking at your code.
Try grep --color -P -n "\[\x80-\xFF\]" file.php as the first measure to find non-ASCII symbols.
In particular BOMs, zero-width spaces, or non-breaking spaces, and smart quotes regularly can find their way into the source code.
Take care of which type of linebreaks are saved in files.
PHP just honors \n newlines, not \r carriage returns.
Which is occasionally an issue for MacOS users (even on OS X for misconfigured editors).
It often only surfaces as an issue when single-line // or # comments are used. Multiline /*...*/ comments do seldom disturb the parser when linebreaks get ignored.
If your syntax error does not transmit over the web:
It happens that you have a syntax error on your machine. But posting the very same file online does not exhibit it anymore. Which can only mean one of two things:
You are looking at the wrong file!
Or your code contained invisible stray Unicode (see above).
You can easily find out: Just copy your code back from the web form into your text editor.
Check your PHP version. Not all syntax constructs are available on every server.
php -v for the command line interpreter
<?php phpinfo(); for the one invoked through the webserver.
Those aren't necessarily the same. In particular when working with frameworks, you will them to match up.
Don't use PHP's reserved keywords as identifiers for functions/methods, classes or constants.
Trial-and-error is your last resort.
If all else fails, you can always google your error message. Syntax symbols aren't as easy to search for (Stack Overflow itself is indexed by SymbolHound though). Therefore it may take looking through a few more pages before you find something relevant.
Further guides:
PHP Debugging Basics by David Sklar
Fixing PHP Errors by Jason McCreary
PHP Errors – 10 Common Mistakes by Mario Lurig
Common PHP Errors and Solutions
How to Troubleshoot and Fix your WordPress Website
A Guide To PHP Error Messages For Designers - Smashing Magazine
White screen of death
If your website is just blank, then typically a syntax error is the cause.
Enable their display with:
error_reporting = E_ALL
display_errors = 1
In your php.ini generally, or via .htaccess for mod_php,
or even .user.ini with FastCGI setups.
Enabling it within the broken script is too late because PHP can't even interpret/run the first line. A quick workaround is crafting a wrapper script, say test.php:
<?php
error_reporting(E_ALL);
ini_set("display_errors", 1);
include("./broken-script.php");
Then invoke the failing code by accessing this wrapper script.
It also helps to enable PHP's error_log and look into your webserver's error.log when a script crashes with HTTP 500 responses.
I think this topic is totally overdiscussed/overcomplicated. Using an IDE is THE way to go to completely avoid any syntax errors. I would even say that working without an IDE is kind of unprofessional. Why? Because modern IDEs check your syntax after every character you type. When you code and your entire line turns red, and a big warning notice shows you the exact type and the exact position of the syntax error, then there's absolutely no need to search for another solution.
Using a syntax-checking IDE means:
You'll (effectively) never run into syntax errors again, simply because you see them right as you type. Seriously.
Excellent IDEs with syntax check (all of them are available for Linux, Windows and Mac):
NetBeans [free]
PHPStorm [$199 USD]
Eclipse with PHP Plugin [free]
Sublime [$80 USD] (mainly a text editor, but expandable with plugins, like PHP Syntax Parser)
Unexpected [
These days, the unexpected [ array bracket is commonly seen on outdated PHP versions. The short array syntax is available since PHP >= 5.4. Older installations only support array().
$php53 = array(1, 2, 3);
$php54 = [1, 2, 3];
⇑
Array function result dereferencing is likewise not available for older PHP versions:
$result = get_whatever()["key"];
⇑
Reference - What does this error mean in PHP? - "Syntax error, unexpected \[" shows the most common and practical workarounds.
Though, you're always better off just upgrading your PHP installation. For shared webhosting plans, first research if e.g. SetHandler php56-fcgi can be used to enable a newer runtime.
See also:
PHP syntax for dereferencing function result → possible as of PHP 5.4
PHP syntax error, unexpected '['
Shorthand for arrays: is there a literal syntax like {} or []?
PHP 5.3.10 vs PHP 5.5.3 syntax error unexpected '['
PHP Difference between array() and []
PHP Array Syntax Parse Error Left Square Bracket "["
BTW, there are also preprocessors and PHP 5.4 syntax down-converters if you're really clingy with older + slower PHP versions.
Other causes for Unexpected [ syntax errors
If it's not the PHP version mismatch, then it's oftentimes a plain typo or newcomer syntax mistake:
You can't use array property declarations/expressions in classes, not even in PHP 7.
protected $var["x"] = "Nope";
⇑
Confusing [ with opening curly braces { or parentheses ( is a common oversight.
foreach [$a as $b)
⇑
Or even:
function foobar[$a, $b, $c] {
⇑
Or trying to dereference constants (before PHP 5.6) as arrays:
$var = const[123];
⇑
At least PHP interprets that const as a constant name.
If you meant to access an array variable (which is the typical cause here), then add the leading $ sigil - so it becomes a $varname.
You are trying to use the global keyword on a member of an associative array. This is not valid syntax:
global $var['key'];
Unexpected ] closing square bracket
This is somewhat rarer, but there are also syntax accidents with the terminating array ] bracket.
Again mismatches with ) parentheses or } curly braces are common:
function foobar($a, $b, $c] {
⇑
Or trying to end an array where there isn't one:
$var = 2];
Which often occurs in multi-line and nested array declarations.
$array = [1,[2,3],4,[5,6[7,[8],[9,10]],11],12]],15];
⇑
If so, use your IDE for bracket matching to find any premature ] array closure. At the very least use more spacing and newlines to narrow it down.
Unexpected T_VARIABLE
An "unexpected T_VARIABLE" means that there's a literal $variable name, which doesn't fit into the current expression/statement structure.
Missing semicolon
It most commonly indicates a missing semicolon in the previous line. Variable assignments following a statement are a good indicator where to look:
⇓
func1()
$var = 1 + 2; # parse error in line +2
String concatenation
A frequent mishap are string concatenations with forgotten . operator:
⇓
print "Here comes the value: " $value;
Btw, you should prefer string interpolation (basic variables in double quotes) whenever that helps readability. Which avoids these syntax issues.
String interpolation is a scripting language core feature. No shame in utilizing it. Ignore any micro-optimization advise about variable . concatenation being faster. It's not.
Missing expression operators
Of course the same issue can arise in other expressions, for instance arithmetic operations:
⇓
print 4 + 7 $var;
PHP can't guess here if the variable should have been added, subtracted or compared etc.
Lists
Same for syntax lists, like in array populations, where the parser also indicates an expected comma , for example:
⇓
$var = array("1" => $val, $val2, $val3 $val4);
Or functions parameter lists:
⇓
function myfunc($param1, $param2 $param3, $param4)
Equivalently do you see this with list or global statements, or when lacking a ; semicolon in a for loop.
Class declarations
This parser error also occurs in class declarations. You can only assign static constants, not expressions. Thus the parser complains about variables as assigned data:
class xyz { ⇓
var $value = $_GET["input"];
Unmatched } closing curly braces can in particular lead here. If a method is terminated too early (use proper indentation!), then a stray variable is commonly misplaced into the class declaration body.
Variables after identifiers
You can also never have a variable follow an identifier directly:
⇓
$this->myFunc$VAR();
Btw, this is a common example where the intention was to use variable variables perhaps. In this case a variable property lookup with $this->{"myFunc$VAR"}(); for example.
Take in mind that using variable variables should be the exception. Newcomers often try to use them too casually, even when arrays would be simpler and more appropriate.
Missing parentheses after language constructs
Hasty typing may lead to forgotten opening or closing parenthesis
for if and for and foreach statements:
⇓
foreach $array as $key) {
Solution: add the missing opening ( between statement and variable.
⇓
if ($var = pdo_query($sql) {
$result = …
The curly { brace does not open the code block, without closing the if expression with the ) closing parenthesis first.
Else does not expect conditions
⇓
else ($var >= 0)
Solution: Remove the conditions from else or use elseif.
Need brackets for closure
⇓
function() use $var {}
Solution: Add brackets around $var.
Invisible whitespace
As mentioned in the reference answer on "Invisible stray Unicode" (such as a non-breaking space), you might also see this error for unsuspecting code like:
<?php
⇐
$var = new PDO(...);
It's rather prevalent in the start of files and for copy-and-pasted code. Check with a hexeditor, if your code does not visually appear to contain a syntax issue.
See also
Search: unexpected T_VARIABLE
Unexpected T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING Unexpected T_ENCAPSED_AND_WHITESPACE
The unwieldy names T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING and T_ENCAPSED_AND_WHITESPACE refer to quoted "string" literals.
They're used in different contexts, but the syntax issue are quite similar. T_ENCAPSED… warnings occur in double quoted string context, while T_CONSTANT… strings are often astray in plain PHP expressions or statements.
Incorrect variable interpolation
And it comes up most frequently for incorrect PHP variable interpolation:
⇓ ⇓
echo "Here comes a $wrong['array'] access";
Quoting arrays keys is a must in PHP context. But in double quoted strings (or HEREDOCs) this is a mistake. The parser complains about the contained single quoted 'string', because it usually expects a literal identifier / key there.
More precisely it's valid to use PHP2-style simple syntax within double quotes for array references:
echo "This is only $valid[here] ...";
Nested arrays or deeper object references however require the complex curly string expression syntax:
echo "Use {$array['as_usual']} with curly syntax.";
If unsure, this is commonly safer to use. It's often even considered more readable. And better IDEs actually use distinct syntax colorization for that.
Missing concatenation
If a string follows an expression, but lacks a concatenation or other operator, then you'll see PHP complain about the string literal:
⇓
print "Hello " . WORLD " !";
While it's obvious to you and me, PHP just can't guess that the string was meant to be appended there.
Confusing string quote enclosures
The same syntax error occurs when confounding string delimiters. A string started by a single ' or double " quote also ends with the same.
⇓
print "click here";
⌞⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⌟⌞⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⌟⌞⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⌟
That example started with double quotes. But double quotes were also destined for the HTML attributes. The intended concatenation operator within however became interpreted as part of a second string in single quotes.
Tip: Set your editor/IDE to use slightly distinct colorization for single and double quoted strings. (It also helps with application logic to prefer e.g. double quoted strings for textual output, and single quoted strings only for constant-like values.)
This is a good example where you shouldn't break out of double quotes in the first place. Instead just use proper \" escapes for the HTML attributes´ quotes:
print "click here";
While this can also lead to syntax confusion, all better IDEs/editors again help by colorizing the escaped quotes differently.
Missing opening quote
Equivalently are forgotten opening "/' quotes a recipe for parser errors:
⇓
make_url(login', 'open');
Here the ', ' would become a string literal after a bareword, when obviously login was meant to be a string parameter.
Array lists
If you miss a , comma in an array creation block, the parser will see two consecutive strings:
array( ⇓
"key" => "value"
"next" => "....",
);
Note that the last line may always contain an extra comma, but overlooking one in between is unforgivable. Which is hard to discover without syntax highlighting.
Function parameter lists
The same thing for function calls:
⇓
myfunc(123, "text", "and" "more")
Runaway strings
A common variation are quite simply forgotten string terminators:
⇓
mysql_evil("SELECT * FROM stuffs);
print "'ok'";
⇑
Here PHP complains about two string literals directly following each other. But the real cause is the unclosed previous string of course.
HEREDOC indentation
Prior PHP 7.3, the heredoc string end delimiter can't be prefixed with spaces:
print <<< HTML
<link..>
HTML;
⇑
Solution: upgrade PHP or find a better hoster.
See also
Interpolation (double quoted string) of Associative Arrays in PHP
PHP - syntax error, unexpected T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING
Syntax error, unexpected T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING in PHP
Unexpected T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING error in SQL Query
Unexpected T_STRING
T_STRING is a bit of a misnomer. It does not refer to a quoted "string". It means a raw identifier was encountered. This can range from bare words to leftover CONSTANT or function names, forgotten unquoted strings, or any plain text.
Misquoted strings
This syntax error is most common for misquoted string values however. Any unescaped and stray " or ' quote will form an invalid expression:
⇓ ⇓
echo "click here";
Syntax highlighting will make such mistakes super obvious. It's important to remember to use backslashes for escaping \" double quotes, or \' single quotes - depending on which was used as string enclosure.
For convenience you should prefer outer single quotes when outputting plain HTML with double quotes within.
Use double quoted strings if you want to interpolate variables, but then watch out for escaping literal " double quotes.
For lengthier output, prefer multiple echo/print lines instead of escaping in and out. Better yet consider a HEREDOC section.
Another example is using PHP entry inside HTML code generated with PHP:
$text = '<div>some text with <?php echo 'some php entry' ?></div>'
This happens if $text is large with many lines and developer does not see the whole PHP variable value and focus on the piece of code forgetting about its source. Example is here
See also What is the difference between single-quoted and double-quoted strings in PHP?.
Unclosed strings
If you miss a closing " then a syntax error typically materializes later. An unterminated string will often consume a bit of code until the next intended string value:
⇓
echo "Some text", $a_variable, "and some runaway string ;
success("finished");
⇯
It's not just literal T_STRINGs which the parser may protest then. Another frequent variation is an Unexpected '>' for unquoted literal HTML.
Non-programming string quotes
If you copy and paste code from a blog or website, you sometimes end up with invalid code. Typographic quotes aren't what PHP expects:
$text = ’Something something..’ + ”these ain't quotes”;
Typographic/smart quotes are Unicode symbols. PHP treats them as part of adjoining alphanumeric text. For example ”these is interpreted as a constant identifier. But any following text literal is then seen as a bareword/T_STRING by the parser.
The missing semicolon; again
If you have an unterminated expression in previous lines, then any following statement or language construct gets seen as raw identifier:
⇓
func1()
function2();
PHP just can't know if you meant to run two functions after another, or if you meant to multiply their results, add them, compare them, or only run one || or the other.
Short open tags and <?xml headers in PHP scripts
This is rather uncommon. But if short_open_tags are enabled, then you can't begin your PHP scripts with an XML declaration:
⇓
<?xml version="1.0"?>
PHP will see the <? and reclaim it for itself. It won't understand what the stray xml was meant for. It'll get interpreted as constant. But the version will be seen as another literal/constant. And since the parser can't make sense of two subsequent literals/values without an expression operator in between, that'll be a parser failure.
Invisible Unicode characters
A most hideous cause for syntax errors are Unicode symbols, such as the non-breaking space. PHP allows Unicode characters as identifier names. If you get a T_STRING parser complaint for wholly unsuspicious code like:
<?php
print 123;
You need to break out another text editor. Or an hexeditor even. What looks like plain spaces and newlines here, may contain invisible constants. Java-based IDEs are sometimes oblivious to an UTF-8 BOM mangled within, zero-width spaces, paragraph separators, etc. Try to reedit everything, remove whitespace and add normal spaces back in.
You can narrow it down with with adding redundant ; statement separators at each line start:
<?php
;print 123;
The extra ; semicolon here will convert the preceding invisible character into an undefined constant reference (expression as statement). Which in return makes PHP produce a helpful notice.
The `$` sign missing in front of variable names
Variables in PHP are represented by a dollar sign followed by the name of the variable.
The dollar sign ($) is a sigil that marks the identifier as a name of a variable. Without this sigil, the identifier could be a language keyword or a constant.
This is a common error when the PHP code was "translated" from code written in another language (C, Java, JavaScript, etc.). In such cases, a declaration of the variable type (when the original code was written in a language that uses typed variables) could also sneak out and produce this error.
Escaped Quotation marks
If you use \ in a string, it has a special meaning. This is called an "Escape Character" and normally tells the parser to take the next character literally.
Example: echo 'Jim said \'Hello\''; will print Jim said 'hello'
If you escape the closing quote of a string, the closing quote will be taken literally and not as intended, i.e. as a printable quote as part of the string and not close the string. This will show as a parse error commonly after you open the next string or at the end of the script.
Very common error when specifiying paths in Windows: "C:\xampp\htdocs\" is wrong. You need "C:\\xampp\\htdocs\\".
Typed properties
You need PHP ≥7.4 to use property typing such as:
public stdClass $obj;
Unexpected (
Opening parentheses typically follow language constructs such as if/foreach/for/array/list or start an arithmetic expression. They're syntactically incorrect after "strings", a previous (), a lone $, and in some typical declaration contexts.
Function declaration parameters
A rarer occurrence for this error is trying to use expressions as default function parameters. This is not supported, even in PHP7:
function header_fallback($value, $expires = time() + 90000) {
Parameters in a function declaration can only be literal values or constant expressions. Unlike for function invocations, where you can freely use whatever(1+something()*2), etc.
Class property defaults
Same thing for class member declarations, where only literal/constant values are allowed, not expressions:
class xyz { ⇓
var $default = get_config("xyz_default");
Put such things in the constructor.
See also Why don't PHP attributes allow functions?
Again note that PHP 7 only allows var $xy = 1 + 2 +3; constant expressions there.
JavaScript syntax in PHP
Using JavaScript or jQuery syntax won't work in PHP for obvious reasons:
<?php ⇓
print $(document).text();
When this happens, it usually indicates an unterminated preceding string; and literal <script> sections leaking into PHP code context.
isset(()), empty, key, next, current
Both isset() and empty() are language built-ins, not functions. They need to access a variable directly. If you inadvertently add a pair of parentheses too much, then you'd create an expression however:
⇓
if (isset(($_GET["id"]))) {
The same applies to any language construct that requires implicit variable name access. These built-ins are part of the language grammar, therefore don't permit decorative extra parentheses.
User-level functions that require a variable reference -but get an expression result passed- lead to runtime errors instead.
Unexpected )
Absent function parameter
You cannot have stray commas last in a function call. PHP expects a value there and thusly complains about an early closing ) parenthesis.
⇓
callfunc(1, 2, );
A trailing comma is only allowed in array() or list() constructs.
Unfinished expressions
If you forget something in an arithmetic expression, then the parser gives up. Because how should it possibly interpret that:
⇓
$var = 2 * (1 + );
And if you forgot the closing ) even, then you'd get a complaint about the unexpected semicolon instead.
Foreach as constant
For forgotten variable $ prefixes in control statements you will see:
↓ ⇓
foreach ($array as wrong) {
PHP here sometimes tells you it expected a :: instead. Because a class::$variable could have satisfied the expected $variable expression..
Unexpected {
Curly braces { and } enclose code blocks. And syntax errors about them usually indicate some incorrect nesting.
Unmatched subexpressions in an if
Most commonly unbalanced ( and ) are the cause if the parser complains about the opening curly { appearing too early. A simple example:
⇓
if (($x == $y) && (2 == true) {
Count your parentheses or use an IDE which helps with that. Also don't write code without any spaces. Readability counts.
{ and } in expression context
You can't use curly braces in expressions. If you confuse parentheses and curlys, it won't comply to the language grammar:
⇓
$var = 5 * {7 + $x};
There are a few exceptions for identifier construction, such as local scope variable ${references}.
Variable variables or curly var expressions
This is pretty rare. But you might also get { and } parser complaints for complex variable expressions:
⇓
print "Hello {$world[2{]} !";
Though there's a higher likelihood for an unexpected } in such contexts.
Unexpected }
When getting an "unexpected }" error, you've mostly closed a code block too early.
Last statement in a code block
It can happen for any unterminated expression.
And if the last line in a function/code block lacks a trailing ; semicolon:
function whatever() {
doStuff()
} ⇧
Here the parser can't tell if you perhaps still wanted to add + 25; to the function result or something else.
Invalid block nesting / Forgotten {
You'll sometimes see this parser error when a code block was } closed too early, or you forgot an opening { even:
function doStuff() {
if (true) ⇦
print "yes";
}
} ⇧
In above snippet the if didn't have an opening { curly brace. Thus the closing } one below became redundant. And therefore the next closing }, which was intended for the function, was not associable to the original opening { curly brace.
Such errors are even harder to find without proper code indentation. Use an IDE and bracket matching.
Unexpected {, expecting (
Language constructs which require a condition/declaration header and a code block will trigger this error.
Parameter lists
For example misdeclared functions without parameter list are not permitted:
⇓
function whatever {
}
Control statement conditions
And you can't likewise have an if without condition.
⇓
if {
}
Which doesn't make sense, obviously. The same thing for the usual suspects, for/foreach, while/do, etc.
If you've got this particular error, you definitely should look up some manual examples.
Unexpected T_IF
Unexpected T_ELSEIF
Unexpected T_ELSE
Unexpected T_ENDIF
Conditional control blocks if, elseif and else follow a simple structure. When you encounter a syntax error, it's most likely just invalid block nesting → with missing { curly braces } - or one too many.
Missing { or } due to incorrect indentation
Mismatched code braces are common to less well-formatted code such as:
if((!($opt["uniQartz5.8"]!=$this->check58)) or (empty($_POST['poree']))) {if
($true) {echo"halp";} elseif((!$z)or%b){excSmthng(False,5.8)}elseif (False){
If your code looks like this, start afresh! Otherwise it's unfixable to you or anyone else. There's no point in showcasing this on the internet to inquire for help.
You will only be able to fix it, if you can visually follow the nested structure and relation of if/else conditionals and their { code blocks }. Use your IDE to see if they're all paired.
if (true) {
if (false) {
…
}
elseif ($whatever) {
if ($something2) {
…
}
else {
…
}
}
else {
…
}
if (false) { // a second `if` tree
…
}
else {
…
}
}
elseif (false) {
…
}
Any double } } will not just close a branch, but a previous condition structure. Therefore stick with one coding style; don't mix and match in nested if/else trees.
Apart from consistency here, it turns out helpful to avoid lengthy conditions too. Use temporary variables or functions to avoid unreadable if-expressions.
IF cannot be used in expressions
A surprisingly frequent newcomer mistake is trying to use an if statement in an expression, such as a print statement:
⇓
echo "<a href='" . if ($link == "example.org") { echo …
Which is invalid of course.
You can use a ternary conditional, but beware of readability impacts.
echo "<a href='" . ($link ? "http://yes" : "http://no") . "</a>";
Otherwise break such output constructs up: use multiple ifs and echos.
Better yet, use temporary variables, and place your conditionals before:
if ($link) { $href = "yes"; } else { $href = "no"; }
echo "<a href='$href'>Link</a>";
Defining functions or methods for such cases often makes sense too.
Control blocks don't return "results"
Now this is less common, but a few coders even try to treat if as if it could return a result:
$var = if ($x == $y) { "true" };
Which is structurally identical to using if within a string concatenation / expression.
But control structures (if / foreach / while) don't have a "result".
The literal string "true" would also just be a void statement.
You'll have to use an assignment in the code block:
if ($x == $y) { $var = "true"; }
Alternatively, resort to a ?: ternary comparison.
If in If
You cannot nest an if within a condition either:
⇓
if ($x == true and (if $y != false)) { ... }
Which is obviously redundant, because the and (or or) already allows chaining comparisons.
Forgotten ; semicolons
Once more: Each control block needs to be a statement. If the previous code piece isn't terminated by a semicolon, then that's a guaranteed syntax error:
⇓
$var = 1 + 2 + 3
if (true) { … }
Btw, the last line in a {…} code block needs a semicolon too.
Semicolon too early
Now it's probably wrong to blame a particular coding style, as this pitfall is too easy to overlook:
⇓
if ($x == 5);
{
$y = 7;
}
else ←
{
$x = -1;
}
Which happens more often than you might imagine.
When you terminate the if () expression with ; it will execute a void statement. The ; becomes a an empty {} of its own!
The {…} block thus is detached from the if, and would always run.
So the else no longer had a relation to an open if construct,
which is why this would lead to an Unexpected T_ELSE syntax error.
Which also explains a likewise subtle variation of this syntax error:
if ($x) { x_is_true(); }; else { something_else(); };
Where the ; after the code block {…} terminates the whole if
construct, severing the else branch syntactically.
Not using code blocks
It's syntactically allowed to omit curly braces {…} for code blocks in if/elseif/else branches. Which sadly is a syntax style very common to unversed coders. (Under the false assumption this was quicker to type or read).
However that's highly likely to trip up the syntax. Sooner or later additional statements will find their way into the if/else branches:
if (true)
$x = 5;
elseif (false)
$x = 6;
$y = 7; ←
else
$z = 0;
But to actually use code blocks, you do have to write {…} them as such!
Even seasoned programmers avoid this braceless syntax, or at least
understand it as an exceptional exception to the rule.
Else / Elseif in wrong order
One thing to remind yourself is the conditional order, of course.
if ($a) { … }
else { … }
elseif ($b) { … }
↑
You can have as many elseifs as you want, but else has to go last. That's just how it is.
Class declarations
As mentioned above, you can't have control statements in a class declaration:
class xyz {
if (true) {
function ($var) {}
}
You either forgot a function definition, or closed one } too early in such cases.
Unexpected T_ELSEIF / T_ELSE
When mixing PHP and HTML, the closing } for an if/elseif must be in the same PHP block <?php ?> as the next elseif/else. This will generate an error as the closing } for the if needs to be part of the elseif:
<?php if ($x) { ?>
html
<?php } ?>
<?php elseif ($y) { ?>
html
<?php } ?>
The correct form <?php } elseif:
<?php if ($x) { ?>
html
<?php } elseif ($y) { ?>
html
<?php } ?>
This is more or less a variation of incorrect indentation - presumably often based on wrong coding intentions.
You cannot mash other statements inbetween if and elseif/else structural tokens:
if (true) {
}
echo "in between"; ←
elseif (false) {
}
?> text <?php ←
else {
}
Either can only occur in {…} code blocks, not in between control structure tokens.
This wouldn't make sense anyway. It's not like that there was some "undefined" state when PHP jumps between if and else branches.
You'll have to make up your mind where print statements belong to / or if they need to be repeated in both branches.
Nor can you part an if/else between different control structures:
foreach ($array as $i) {
if ($i) { … }
}
else { … }
There is no syntactic relation between the if and else. The foreach lexical scope ends at }, so there's no point for the if structure to continue.
T_ENDIF
If an unexpected T_ENDIF is complained about, you're using the alternative syntax style if: ⋯ elseif: ⋯ else: ⋯ endif;. Which you should really think twice about.
A common pitfall is confusing the eerily similar : colon for a ; semicolon. (Covered in "Semicolon too early")
As indentation is harder to track in template files, the more when using the alternative syntax - it's plausible your endif; does not match any if:.
Using } endif;
is a doubled if-terminator.
While an "unexpected $end" is usually the price for a forgotten closing } curly brace.
Assignment vs. comparison
So, this is not a syntax error, but worth mentioning in this context:
⇓
if ($x = true) { }
else { do_false(); }
That's not a ==/=== comparison, but an = assignment. This is rather subtle, and will easily lead some users to helplessly edit whole condition blocks. Watch out for unintended assignments first - whenver you experience a logic fault / misbeheviour.
Unexpected $end
When PHP talks about an "unexpected $end", it means that your code ended while the parser is expecting more code. (The message is a bit misleading when taken literally. It's not about a variable named "$end", as sometimes assumed by newcomers. It refers to the "end of file", EOF.)
Cause: Unbalanced { and } for code blocks / and function or class declarations.
It's pretty much always about a missing } curly brace to close preceding code blocks. What it's saying is that the parser is expecting to find a closing } but actually reached the end of the file.
Again, use proper indentation to avoid such issues.
Use an IDE with bracket matching, to find out where the } is amiss.
There are keyboard shortcuts in most IDEs and text editors:
NetBeans, PhpStorm, Komodo: Ctrl[ and Ctrl]
Eclipse, Aptana: CtrlShiftP
Atom, Sublime: Ctrlm - Zend Studio CtrlM
Geany, Notepad++: CtrlB - Joe: CtrlG - Emacs: C-M-n - Vim: %
Most IDEs also highlight matching braces, brackets and parentheses.
Which makes it pretty easy to inspect their correlation:
Unterminated expressions
An Unexpected $end syntax/parser error can also occur for unterminated expressions or statements:
$var = func(1,
?>EOF
So, look at the end of scripts first. A trailing ; is often redundant for the last statement in any PHP script. But you should have one. Precisely because it narrows such syntax issues down. Particularly after you find yourself adding more statements at the end of the script.
Indented HEREDOC markers
Another common occurrence appears with HEREDOC or NOWDOC strings. The terminating marker goes ignored with leading spaces, tabs, etc.:
print <<< END
Content...
Content....
END;
# ↑ terminator isn't exactly at the line start
Therefore the parser assumes the HEREDOC string to continue until the end of the file (hence "Unexpected $end"). Pretty much all IDEs and syntax-highlighting editors will make this obvious or warn about it.
Escaped Quotation marks
If you use \ in a string, it has a special meaning. This is called an "Escape Character" and normally tells the parser to take the next character literally.
Example: echo 'Jim said \'Hello\''; will print Jim said 'hello'
If you escape the closing quote of a string, the closing quote will be taken literally and not as intended, i.e. as a printable quote as part of the string and not close the string. This will show as a parse error commonly after you open the next string or at the end of the script.
Very common error when specifying paths in Windows: "C:\xampp\htdocs\" is wrong. You need "C:\\xampp\\htdocs\\". Alternately, PHP will usually convert Unix-style paths (e.g. "C:/xampp/htdocs/") to the correct path for Windows.
Alternative syntax
Somewhat rarer you can see this syntax error when using the alternative syntax for statement/code blocks in templates. Using if: and else: and a missing endif; for example.
See also:
PHP syntax error “unexpected $end”
Parse error: Syntax error, unexpected end of file in my PHP code
Parse error syntax error unexpected end of file, using PHP
PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected end of file in a CodeIgniter View
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected end of file (Registration script)
"Parse error: syntax error, unexpected $end" For my uni registration assignment
Fixing PHP Errors: PHP Error #3: Unexpected end of file
Unexpected T_IS_EQUAL
Unexpected T_IS_GREATER_OR_EQUAL
Unexpected T_IS_IDENTICAL
Unexpected T_IS_NOT_EQUAL
Unexpected T_IS_NOT_IDENTICAL
Unexpected T_IS_SMALLER_OR_EQUAL
Unexpected <
Unexpected >
Comparison operators such as ==, >=, ===, !=, <>, !== and <= or < and > mostly should be used just in expressions, such as if expressions. If the parser complains about them, then it often means incorrect paring or mismatched ( ) parens around them.
Parens grouping
In particular for if statements with multiple comparisons you must take care to correctly count opening and closing parenthesis:
⇓
if (($foo < 7) && $bar) > 5 || $baz < 9) { ... }
↑
Here the if condition here was already terminated by the )
Once your comparisons become sufficiently complex it often helps to split it up into multiple and nested if constructs rather.
isset() mashed with comparing
A common newcomer is pitfal is trying to combine isset() or empty() with comparisons:
⇓
if (empty($_POST["var"] == 1)) {
Or even:
⇓
if (isset($variable !== "value")) {
This doesn't make sense to PHP, because isset and empty are language constructs that only accept variable names. It doesn't make sense to compare the result either, because the output is only/already a boolean.
Confusing >= greater-or-equal with => array operator
Both operators look somewhat similar, so they sometimes get mixed up:
⇓
if ($var => 5) { ... }
You only need to remember that this comparison operator is called "greater than or equal" to get it right.
See also: If statement structure in PHP
Nothing to compare against
You also can't combine two comparisons if they pertain the same variable name:
⇓
if ($xyz > 5 and < 100)
PHP can't deduce that you meant to compare the initial variable again. Expressions are usually paired according to operator precedence, so by the time the < is seen, there'd be only a boolean result left from the original variable.
See also: unexpected T_IS_SMALLER_OR_EQUAL
Comparison chains
You can't compare against a variable with a row of operators:
⇓
$reult = (5 < $x < 10);
This has to be broken up into two comparisons, each against $x.
This is actually more a case of blacklisted expressions (due to equivalent operator associativity). It's syntactically valid in a few C-style languages, but PHP wouldn't interpret it as expected comparison chain either.
Unexpected > Unexpected <
The greater than > or less than < operators don't have a custom T_XXX tokenizer name. And while they can be misplaced like all they others, you more often see the parser complain about them for misquoted strings and mashed HTML:
⇓
print "Hello";
↑
This amounts to a string "<a href='z" being compared > to a literal constant Hello and then another < comparison. Or that's at least how PHP sees it. The actual cause and syntax mistake was the premature string " termination.
It's also not possible to nest PHP start tags:
<?php echo <?php my_func(); ?>
↑
See also:
php unexpected T_IS_NOT_EQUAL error
syntax error, unexpected T_IS_EQUAL
Syntax error on return statement
http://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/96891-parse-error-syntax-error-unexpected-t-is-not-identical-expecting-or/
Unexpected T_IF
Unexpected T_FOREACH
Unexpected T_FOR
Unexpected T_WHILE
Unexpected T_DO
Unexpected T_ECHO
Control constructs such as if, foreach, for, while, list, global, return, do, print, echo may only be used as statements. They usually reside on a line by themselves.
Semicolon; where you at?
Pretty universally have you missed a semicolon in the previous line if the parser complains about a control statement:
⇓
$x = myfunc()
if (true) {
Solution: look into the previous line; add semicolon.
Class declarations
Another location where this occurs is in class declarations. In the class section you can only list property initializations and method sections. No code may reside there.
class xyz {
if (true) {}
foreach ($var) {}
Such syntax errors commonly materialize for incorrectly nested { and }. In particular when function code blocks got closed too early.
Statements in expression context
Most language constructs can only be used as statements. They aren't meant to be placed inside other expressions:
⇓
$var = array(1, 2, foreach($else as $_), 5, 6);
Likewise can't you use an if in strings, math expressions or elsewhere:
⇓
print "Oh, " . if (true) { "you!" } . " won't work";
// Use a ternary condition here instead, when versed enough.
For embedding if-like conditions in an expression specifically, you often want to use a ?: ternary evaluation.
The same applies to for, while, global, echo and a lesser extend list.
⇓
echo 123, echo 567, "huh?";
Whereas print() is a language built-in that may be used in expression context. (But rarely makes sense.)
Reserved keywords as identifiers
You also can't use do or if and other language constructs for user-defined functions or class names. (Perhaps in PHP 7. But even then it wouldn't be advisable.)
Your have a semi-colon instead of a colon (:) or curly bracket ({) after your control block
Control structures are typically wrapped in curly braces (but colons can be used in an alternative syntax) to represent their scope. If you accidentally use a semi-colon you prematurely close that block resulting in your closing statement throwing an error.
foreach ($errors as $error); <-- should be : or {
Unexpected '?'
If you are trying to use <?php within <?php this error will be given*.
$var = 'hello '<?php echo 'world'; ?>;
* For PHP versions 4.3.1, 4.3.5 - 4.3.11, 4.4.0 - 4.4.1, 5.0.0 - 5.0.5, 4.4.2 - 4.4.9, 5.1.0 - 5.1.6, 5.2.0 - 5.2.17, 5.3.0 - 5.3.29, 5.4.0 - 5.4.45, 5.5.0 - 5.5.38, 5.6.0 - 5.6.40, 7.0.0 - 7.0.33, 7.1.0 - 7.1.33, 7.2.0 - 7.2.34, 7.3.0 - 7.3.31, 7.4.0 - 7.4.24
If you are trying to use the null coalescing operator ?? in a version of PHP prior to PHP 7 you will get this error.
<?= $a ?? 2; // works in PHP 7+
<?= (!empty($a)) ? $a : 2; // All versions of PHP
Unexpected '?', expecting variable
A similar error can occur for nullable types, as in:
function add(?int $sum): ?int {
Which again indicates an outdated PHP version being used (either the CLI version php -v or the webserver bound one phpinfo();).
Unexpected T_LNUMBER
The token T_LNUMBER refers to a "long" / number.
Invalid variable names
In PHP, and most other programming languages, variables cannot start with a number. The first character must be alphabetic or an underscore.
$1 // Bad
$_1 // Good
Quite often comes up for using preg_replace-placeholders "$1" in PHP context:
# ↓ ⇓ ↓
preg_replace("/#(\w+)/e", strtopupper($1) )
Where the callback should have been quoted. (Now the /e regex flag has been deprecated. But it's sometimes still misused in preg_replace_callback functions.)
The same identifier constraint applies to object properties, btw.
↓
$json->0->value
While the tokenizer/parser does not allow a literal $1 as variable name, one could use ${1} or ${"1"}. Which is a syntactic workaround for non-standard identifiers. (It's best to think of it as a local scope lookup. But generally: prefer plain arrays for such cases!)
Amusingly, but very much not recommended, PHPs parser allows Unicode-identifiers; such that $➊ would be valid. (Unlike a literal 1).
Stray array entry
An unexpected long can also occur for array declarations - when missing , commas:
# ↓ ↓
$xy = array(1 2 3);
Or likewise function calls and declarations, and other constructs:
func(1, 2 3);
function xy($z 2);
for ($i=2 3<$z)
So usually there's one of ; or , missing for separating lists or expressions.
Misquoted HTML
And again, misquoted strings are a frequent source of stray numbers:
# ↓ ↓
echo "<td colspan="3">something bad</td>";
Such cases should be treated more or less like Unexpected T_STRING errors.
Other identifiers
Neither functions, classes, nor namespaces can be named beginning with a number either:
↓
function 123shop() {
Pretty much the same as for variable names.
Unexpected '='
This can be caused by having invalid characters in a variable name. Variables names must follow these rules:
Variable names follow the same rules as other labels in PHP. A valid variable name starts with a letter or underscore, followed by any number of letters, numbers, or underscores. As a regular expression, it would be expressed thus: '[a-zA-Z_\x7f-\xff][a-zA-Z0-9_\x7f-\xff]*'
Unexpected 'endwhile' (T_ENDWHILE)
The syntax is using a colon - if there is no colon the above error will occur.
<?php while($query->fetch()): ?>
....
<?php endwhile; ?>
The alternative to this syntax is using curly brackets:
<?php while($query->fetch()) { ?>
....
<?php } ?>
http://php.net/manual/en/control-structures.while.php
Unexpected '.'
This can occur if you are trying to use the splat operator(...) in an unsupported version of PHP.
... first became available in PHP 5.6 to capture a variable number of arguments to a function:
function concatenate($transform, ...$strings) {
$string = '';
foreach($strings as $piece) {
$string .= $piece;
}
return($transform($string));
}
echo concatenate("strtoupper", "I'd ", "like ", 4 + 2, " apples");
// This would print:
// I'D LIKE 6 APPLES
In PHP 7.4, you could use it for Array expressions.
$parts = ['apple', 'pear'];
$fruits = ['banana', 'orange', ...$parts, 'watermelon'];
// ['banana', 'orange', 'apple', 'pear', 'watermelon'];
Unexpected :
1. PHP 8 named parameter syntax
unexpected ':', expecting ',' or ')'
If attempting to use PHP 8's new named parameter functionality in a version of PHP < 8 this error will occur:
$table->string(column:'Name');
Solutions:
Upgrade your version of PHP to PHP 8.0.0 or higher
Do not use named parameters (pass the parameters in the order they are expected)
2. Cropped class :: separator
An error message that begins Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ':' can be caused by mistakenly writing a class static reference Class::$Variable as Class:$Variable.
Unexpected 'continue' (T_CONTINUE)
continue is a statement (like for, or if) and must appear standalone. It cannot be used as part of an expression. Partly because continue doesn't return a value, but in an expression every sub-expression must result in some value so the overall expression results in a value. That's the difference between a statement and an expression.
That means continue cannot be used in a ternary statement or any statement that requires a return value.
Unexpected 'break' (T_BREAK)
Same goes for break; of course. It's also not usable in expression context, but a strict statement (on the same level as foreach or an if block).
Unexpected 'return' (T_RETURN)
Now this might be more surprising for return, but that's also just a block-level statement. It does return a value (or NULL) to the higher scope/function, but it does not evaluate as expression itself. → That is: there's no point in doing return(return(false);;
One more reason to occurrence of these errors is unexpected whitespace like similar characters with-in code, the code lines seems to be perfect, but they contains some specific characters which are similar to break line or whitespace or tab but they not get parsed by the parser.
I face this issue when I try to put some code from webpage to the code editor by simply copy paste, I saw this error with array definition. everything was looking right in array definition. I can't sort out right error, finally I define this array in single line, then error was gone. then again I try to make that definition multiple like but manually adding break(Enter) for each array element and saved the file this time no parsing error by editor and also no error while running it.
For Example I faced issue with this snippet which was on one blog, actually can't post those snippets ,cause stack overflow already knows the problem with code.
then after solving it my working snippet is, which looks similar with one which shows parsing error
syntax error, unexpected ''auth'' (T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING), expecting ']'
public $aliases = [
'csrf'=> \CodeIgniter\Filters\CSRF::class,
'toolbar'=> \CodeIgniter\Filters\DebugToolbar::class,
'honeypot'=> \CodeIgniter\Filters\Honeypot::class,
'auth' => \App\Filters\Auth::class,
];
For newbies to VS Code, if you see the syntax error, check if you have saved the file. If you have a wrong syntax, save the file, and then fix the syntax withou saving again, VS Code will keep showing you the error. The error message will disappear only after you save the file.