I am trying to add headers to a Http+Swagger action in Logic App.
When I add a simple Http Action, I can clearly see the Headers in the designer.
However, with Swagger+Http action it disappears.
I am using token based authentication and need to add Header to this API call.
Hence, I modified the code view like below but it does not seem to help!
Cannot find much resources with regards to this. Any help is appreciated.
Thank You.
"Information_Process": {
"inputs": {
"body": {
"fileId": "Test.json",
"items": [
{
"item": {
"prop1": "#items('For_each')?['Item']?['prop1']",
"prop2": "#items('For_each')?['Item']?['prop2']",
"prop3": "#items('For_each')?['Item']?['prop3']"
}
}
]
},
"headers": {
"Authorization": "#{concat('Bearer ',variables('BearerTokenValue'))}"
},
"method": "post",
"uri": "https://appone.azurewebsites.net/api/information/proccessing"
},
"metadata": {
"apiDefinitionUrl": "https://appone.azurewebsites.net//swagger/docs/v1",
"swaggerSource": "custom"
},
"type": "Http"
}
The official documentation states to make use of the parameters to send and receive a token.
"parameters": {
"secret": {
"type": "SecureString"
}
}
Or you can try like this
"HTTP": {
"inputs": {
"headers': {
"Authorization": "#concat('Basic ', base64('username:password'))",
"Content-Type ": "application/json"
},
"method ": "GET ",
"uri": "someurl"
},
"runAfter": (),
"type": "Http"
}
Related
I'm attempting to send a row to an appsheet app with their provided API. I have it all set up in app script and I'm getting a code 200 (success) but it's not adding the data to the spreadsheet. Am I doing something wrong?
function testingAPI(){
let appId = APP ID HERE
var url = `https://api.appsheet.com/api/v2/apps/${appId}/tables/opportunity/Action`;
var options = {
"method": "post",
"headers": {
"applicationAccessKey": ACCESS KEY HERE
},
"httpBody": {
"Action": "Add",
"Properties": {
"Locale": "en-US",
"Location": "47.623098, -122.330184",
"Timezone": "Pacific Standard Time",
"UserSettings": {
"Option 1": "value1",
"Option 2": "value2"
}
},
"Rows": [
{
"IntentionSetID": "1H3t8Dt",
"AgentID": "11234",
"ActivityID": 12,
"taskComplete": true,
"taskVerified": false,
"task_verified_by": "",
"proof": "https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CpzebeLtAljqHTsFHvVCCDFc-A6aXC3O",
"agent_expected_part_detail": "",
"poc_expected_part_detail": '',
"assigned_point_value": '',
"points_assigned_by": "10/31/2014",
"actual_part_detail": "8:15:25",
"verification_date": "18:30:33"
}
]
}
};
var response = UrlFetchApp.fetch(url, options);
console.log(response.getResponseCode())
}
I was able to find that the API call is indeed going through, but it's saying the "Action" is missing:
{
"RestAPIVersion": 2,
"TableName": "opportunity",
"AppTemplateVersion": "1.000247",
"Errors": "'Action' is missing.",
"AppTemplateName": "e280cf5a-e2de-4d24-89d3-95d384a2c044",
"Operation": "REST API invoke",
"RecordType": "Stop",
"Result": "Success",
"ResultSuccess": true,
"StatusCode": "OK"
}
changing httpBody to payload got me a step further, so now it's recognizing the "add" aspect, but it's still not understanding the properties correctly. it's showing a bunch of escape characters.
REST API:
{
"Action": "Add",
"Properties": {},
"Rows": []
}
Properties:
{
"RestAPIVersion": 2,
"TableName": "opportunity",
"AppTemplateVersion": "1.000250",
"Action": "Add",
"Errors": "API 'Properties' does not have unexpected Type of 'JObject'. Value is: '{\r\n \"Action\": \"Add\",\r\n \"Properties\": \"{Timezone=Pacific Standard Time, Location=47.623098, -122.330184, Locale=en-US}\",\r\n \"Rows\": \"[Ljava.lang.Object;#489763c2\"\r\n}'",
"AppTemplateName": "e280cf5a-e2de-4d24-89d3-95d384a2c044",
"Operation": "REST API invoke",
"RecordType": "Start",
"Result": "Failure"
}
The AppSheets API POST https://api.appsheet.com/api/v2/apps/{appId}/tables/{tableName}/Action can be used to invoke an action. This means that the action should be created in AppSheet before it can be called.
Resources
Invoke an Action | AppSheet
I am trying to use the PATCH projects/:project_id/items/:item_id endpoint in order to update the "displayName" attribute of an item in BIM360. There is an example on how to do exactly that in the Forge documentation, but for some reason I am getting an 400 error.
Here is my payload:
{
"jsonapi": {
"version": "1.0"
},
"data": {
"type": "items",
"id": "ITEM_URN",
"attributes": {
"displayName": "NEW_ITEM_NAME.EXTENSION"
}
}
}
Here is the error I get:
{
"jsonapi": {
"version": "1.0"
},
"errors": [
{
"id": "a4c43bbb-9e34-4973-9f9c-58a7e1d7bdb6",
"status": "400",
"code": "BAD_INPUT",
"title": "One or more input values in the request were bad",
"detail": "Request input is invalid for this operation."
}
]
}
I successfully use the same endpoint in order to change the parent folder for this same item (as described in this post answer: Autodesk Forge; Pragmatically changing file location without new upload ), so the problem must be in the update "displayName" portion. Here the successful payload sample that returns a 200 answer:
{
"jsonapi": {
"version": "1.0"
},
"data": {
"type": "items",
"id": "ITEM_URN",
"relationships": {
"parent": {
"data": {
"type": "folders",
"id": "DESTINATION_FOLDER_URN"
}
}
}
}
}
Forge Documentation with example: https://forge.autodesk.com/en/docs/data/v2/reference/http/projects-project_id-items-item_id-PATCH/
What am I missing in order to update the "displayName" attribute?
If you want to change the file name, you can change tip version name and title , creating new version is required, but you don't have to upload file again. Please try the API at https://forge.autodesk.com/en/docs/data/v2/reference/http/projects-project_id-versions-POST/ :
POST /versions?copyFrom={tip_version_urn}
{
"jsonapi": {
"version": "1.0"
},
"data": {
"type": "versions",
"attributes": {
"name": "newName"
}
}
}
A new tip version will be created with the updated name.
I build a chatbot with Watson Assistant and integrate it with Slack. I want to write Native JSON supported by Slack through Watson Dialog using JSON Editor. The doc of Watson Assistant says:
output.integrations.slack: any JSON response you want to be included in the attachment field of a response intended for Slack.
(see https://cloud.ibm.com/docs/assistant?topic=assistant-dialog-responses-json#dialog-responses-json-user-defined)
So I tried sth like this:
{
"output": {
"integrations": {
"slack": {
"attachment": {
"blocks": [
{
"text": {
"text": "Pick a date for the deadline.",
"type": "mrkdwn"
},
"type": "section",
"accessory": {
"type": "datepicker",
"action_id": "datepicker-action",
"placeholder": {
"text": "Select a date",
"type": "plain_text",
"emoji": true
},
"initial_date": "1990-04-28"
}
}
]
}
}
},
"generic": [
{
"response_type": "text",
"values": [],
"selection_policy": "sequential"
}
]
}
}
The content of the attachment field is copied from the Block Kit Builer(https://api.slack.com/tools/block-kit-builder).
But this seems not work. Can anyone give me some suggestions? Thanks in advance.
Output.integrations is not a preferred way.
Pls try
"output": {
"generic": [
{
"user_defined": {
//Put here your slack attachment
},
"response_type": "user_defined"
}
]}
By using user_defined you can mix with it more responses like text, image, etc.
I'm using solr 6.5.1. I have json data in Rest url;
For example:
POST : http://localhost:8484/api/cloud/list-users
is_user: xxx
is_key : pqxqxaweqweqx14123
I can able to fetch data via postman rest client. Is there anyway to post data to solr collection via above rest post url? Please tell me how do i implement this feature in solr.
Try this:
POST /api/cloud/list-users/update/json/docs?commit=true HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost:8484
Content-Type: application/json
{
"is_user": "xxx",
"is_key": "pqxqxaweqweqx14123"
}
And if you want to import it into Postman, here's a json (save it to a .json and then import it as a collection into Postman)
{
"variables": [],
"info": {
"name": "Solr Post New Document",
"_postman_id": "291f6b0e-6aad-7778-c29d-f194ce45c5de",
"description": "",
"schema": "https://schema.getpostman.com/json/collection/v2.0.0/collection.json"
},
"item": [
{
"name": "Solr Post New Document",
"request": {
"url": "http://localhost:8983/solr/test/update/json/docs?commit=true",
"method": "POST",
"header": [
{
"key": "Content-Type",
"value": "application/json",
"description": ""
}
],
"body": {
"mode": "raw",
"raw": "{\n\"is_user\": \"xxx\",\n\"is_key\": \"pqxqxaweqweqx14123\"\n}\n"
},
"description": ""
},
"response": []
}
]}
For more details, see the solr documentation:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Uploading+Data+with+Index+Handlers#UploadingDatawithIndexHandlers-JSONFormattedIndexUpdates
I am trying to configure Wiremock mappings to return a JSON response with a value from the request.
The request is simply
{ "clientTag": "123" }
And the mapping for it is:
{
"priority": 4,
"request": {
"method": "POST",
"urlPattern": "/test"
},
"response": {
"status": 200,
"body": "{ \"loginId\": \"${loginId}\" }",
"headers": {
"Content-Type": "application/json"
}
},
"captures" : [ {
"source" : "BODY",
"target" : "loginId",
"pattern" : "$..clientTag",
"captureGroup" : 1
} ]
}
I receive the response:
{ "loginId": "" }
while the expected one is:
{ "loginId": "123" }
If I switch to XML requests, everything works fine with the pattern <clientTag>(.*?)</clientTag>, but I would like to stick to JSON.
Unfortunately Wiremock documentation is scarce hence the question. Any ideas?
UPDATE: If someone is reading this later, you'd do best to use the transforms in the code, which are available in the later Wiremock versions.
This seems like a perfect use-case for OpenTable's Wiremock Body Transformer.
It can be easily integrated with the Standalone Server like this:
java -cp "wiremock-body-transformer-1.1.6.jar:wiremock-2.3.1-standalone.jar" com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.standalone.WireMockServerRunner --verbose --extensions com.opentable.extension.BodyTransformer
This extension allows you to easily specify a variable in the request that you would want to match in the response.
{
"request": {
"method": "POST",
"urlPath": "/transform",
"bodyPatterns": [
{
"matchesJsonPath": "$.name"
}
]
},
"response": {
"status": 200,
"body": "{\"responseName\": \"$(name)\"}",
"headers": {
"Content-Type": "application/json"
},
"transformers": ["body-transformer"]
}
}
It also easily allows you to generate a random integer in the response as seen here:
{
"request": {
"method": "POST",
"urlPath": "/transform",
},
"response": {
"status": 200,
"body": "{\"randomInteger\": \"$(!RandomInteger)\"}",
"headers": {
"Content-Type": "application/json"
},
"transformers": ["body-transformer"]
}
}
Unless you've added an extension you haven't mentioned, this can't work - there's no "captures" element in the JSON API, and no way (without extensions) to do variable substitution in responses.
WireMock.Net does support this now.
When sending a request like:
{
"username": "stef"
}
And using mapping like:
{
"Request": {
"Path": {
"Matchers": [
{
"Name": "WildcardMatcher",
"Pattern": "/test"
}
]
},
"Methods": [
"post"
]
},
"Response": {
"StatusCode": 200,
"BodyAsJson": {
"path": "{{request.path}}",
"result": "{{JsonPath.SelectToken request.bodyAsJson \"username\"}}"
},
"UseTransformer": true,
"Headers": {
"Content-Type": "application/json"
}
}
}
The response will be like:
{
"path": "/test",
"result": "stef"
}
Note that this functionality is currently in preview mode, see NuGet package version 1.0.4.8-preview-01.
If you have any questions, just create an issue on this github project.