I am trying to decode from json objects with generic nested object, and for this I want to pass the type of class dynamically when decoding.
For example, my classes are EContactModel and ENotificationModel which extend ObjectModel (and :Codable)s. ENotificationModel can contain a nested ObjectModel (which can be a contact, notification or other objectmodel).
I have a dictionary of types like this:
static let OBJECT_STRING_CLASS_MAP = [
"EContactModel" : EContactModel.self,
"ENotificationModel" : ENotificationModel.self
...
]
My decoding init method in ENotificationModel looks like this:
required init(from decoder: Decoder) throws
{
try super.init(from: decoder)
let values = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
...
//decode some fields here
self.message = try values.decodeIfPresent(String.self, forKey: .message)
...
//decode field "masterObject" of generic type ObjectModel
let cls = ObjectModelTypes.OBJECT_STRING_CLASS_MAP[classNameString]!
let t = type(of: cls)
print(cls) //this prints "EContactModel"
self.masterObject = try values.decodeIfPresent(cls, forKey: .masterObject)
print(t) //prints ObjectModel.Type
print(type(of: self.masterObject!)) //prints ObjectModel
}
I also tried passing type(of: anObjectInstanceFromADictionary) and still not working, but if I pass type(of: EContactModel()) it works. I cannot understand this, because both objects are the same (ie. instance of EContactModel)
Is there a solution for this?
You could declare your object models with optional variables and let JSONDecoder figure it out for you.
class ApiModelImage: Decodable {
let file: String
let thumbnail_file: String
...
}
class ApiModelVideo: Decodable {
let thumbnail: URL
let duration: String?
let youtube_id: String
let youtube_url: URL
...
}
class ApiModelMessage: Decodable {
let title: String
let body: String
let image: ApiModelImage?
let video: ApiModelVideo?
...
}
Then all you have to do is....
if let message = try? JSONDecoder().decode(ApiModelMessage.self, from: data) {
if let image = message.image {
print("yay, my message contains an image!")
}
if let video = message.video {
print("yay, my message contains a video!")
}
}
Alternatively, you could use generics and specify the type when calling your API code:
func get<T: Decodable>(from endpoint: String, onError: #escaping(_: Error?) -> Void, onSuccess: #escaping (_: T) -> Void) {
getData(from: endpoint, onError: onError) { (data) in
do {
let response = try JSONDecoder().decode(T.self, from: data)
onSuccess(response)
} catch {
onError(error)
}
}
}
Used this way, you just have to make sure you define your expected response type:
let successCb = { (_ response: GetUnreadCountsResponse) in
...
}
ApiRequest().get(from: endpoint, onError: { (_) in
...
}, onSuccess: successCb)
Since you define successCb as requiring a GetUnreadCountsResponse model, the API get method generic will be of type GetUnreadCountsResponse at runtime.
Good Luck!
Related
I'm having an inconsistent API that might return either a String or an Number as a part of the JSON response.
The dates also could be represented the same way as either a String or a Number, but are always an UNIX timestamp (i.e. timeIntervalSince1970).
To fix the issue with the dates, I simply used a custom JSONDecoder.DateDecodingStrategy:
decoder.dateDecodingStrategy = JSONDecoder.DateDecodingStrategy.custom({ decoder in
let container = try decoder.singleValueContainer()
if let doubleValue = try? container.decode(Double.self) {
return Date(timeIntervalSince1970: doubleValue)
} else if let stringValue = try? container.decode(String.self),
let doubleValue = Double(stringValue) {
return Date(timeIntervalSince1970: doubleValue)
}
throw DecodingError.dataCorruptedError(in: container,
debugDescription: "Unable to decode value of type `Date`")
})
However, no such customization is available for the Int or Double types which I'd like to apply it for.
So, I have to resort to writing Codable initializers for each of the model types that I'm using.
The alternative approach I'm looking for is to subclass the JSONDecoder and override the decode<T>(_ type: T.Type, from data: Data) throws -> T where T : Decodable method.
In that method I'd like to "inspect" the type T that I'm trying to decode to and then, if the base implementation (super) fails, try to decode the value first to String and then to the T (the target type).
So far, my initial prototype looks like this:
final class CustomDecoder: JSONDecoder {
override func decode<T>(_ type: T.Type, from data: Data) throws -> T where T : Decodable {
do {
return try super.decode(type, from: data)
} catch {
if type is Int.Type {
print("Trying to decode as a String")
if let decoded = try? super.decode(String.self, from: data),
let converted = Int(decoded) {
return converted as! T
}
}
throw error
}
}
}
However, I found out that the "Trying to decode as a String" message is never printed for some reason, even though the control reaches the catch stage.
I'm happy to have that custom path only for Int and Double types, since the T is Codable and that doesn't guarantee ability to initialize a value with the String, however, I of course welcome a more generalized approach.
Here's the sample Playground code that I came up with to test my prototype. It can be copy-pasted directly into the Playground and works just fine.
My goal is to have both jsonsample1 and jsonsample2 to produce the same result.
import UIKit
final class CustomDecoder: JSONDecoder {
override func decode<T>(_ type: T.Type, from data: Data) throws -> T where T : Decodable {
do {
return try super.decode(type, from: data)
} catch {
if type is Int.Type {
print("Trying to decode as a String")
if let decoded = try? super.decode(String.self, from: data),
let converted = Int(decoded) {
return converted as! T
}
}
throw error
}
}
}
let jsonSample1 =
"""
{
"name": "Paul",
"age": "38"
}
"""
let jsonSample2 =
"""
{
"name": "Paul",
"age": 38
}
"""
let data1 = jsonSample1.data(using: .utf8)!
let data2 = jsonSample2.data(using: .utf8)!
struct Person: Codable {
let name: String?
let age: Int?
}
let decoder = CustomDecoder()
let person1 = try? decoder.decode(Person.self, from: data1)
let person2 = try? decoder.decode(Person.self, from: data2)
print(person1 as Any)
print(person2 as Any)
What could be the reason for my CustomDecoder not working?
The primary reason that your decoder doesn't do what you expect is that you're not overriding the method that you want to be: JSONDecoder.decode<T>(_:from:) is the top-level method that is called when you call
try JSONDecoder().decode(Person.self, from: data)
but this is not the method that is called internally during decoding. Given the JSON you show as an example, if we write a Person struct as
struct Person: Decodable {
let name: String
let age: Int
}
then the compiler will write an init(from:) method which looks like this:
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
name = try container.decode(String.self, forKey: .name)
age = try container.decode(Int.self, forKey: .age)
}
Note that when we decode age, we are not calling a method on the decoder directly, but on a KeyedCodingContainer that we get from the decoder — specifically, the Int.Type overload of KeyedDecodingContainer.decode(_:forKey:).
In order to hook into the methods that are called during decode at the middle levels of a Decoder, you'd need to hook into its actual container methods, which is very difficult — all of JSONDecoder's containers and internals are private. In order to do this by subclassing JSONDecoder, you'd end up needing to pretty much reimplement the whole thing from scratch, which is significantly more complicated than what you're trying to do.
As suggested in a comment, you're likely better off either:
Writing Person.init(from:) manually by trying to decode both Int.self and String.self for the .age property and keeping whichever one succeeds, or
If you need to reuse this solution across many types, you can write a wrapper type to use as a property:
struct StringOrNumber: Decodable {
let number: Double
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.singleValueContainer()
do {
number = try container.decode(Double.self)
} catch (DecodingError.typeMismatch) {
let string = try container.decode(String.self)
if let n = Double(string) {
number = n
} else {
throw DecodingError.dataCorruptedError(in: container, debugDescription: "Value wasn't a number or a string...")
}
}
}
}
struct Person: Decodable {
let name: String
let age: StringOrNumber
}
You can also write StringOrNumber as an enum which can hold either case string(String) or case number(Double) if knowing which type of value was in the payload was important:
enum StringOrNumber: Decodable {
case number(Double)
case string(String)
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.singleValueContainer()
do {
self = try .number(container.decode(Double.self))
} catch (DecodingError.typeMismatch) {
let string = try container.decode(String.self)
if let n = Double(string) {
self = .string(string)
} else {
throw DecodingError.dataCorruptedError(in: container, debugDescription: "Value wasn't a number or a string...")
}
}
}
}
Though this isn't as relevant if you always need Double/Int access to the data, since you'd need to re-convert at the use site every time (and you call this out in a comment)
I know there are already some articles regarding this issue, but I could not find anything related to my JSON.
This is how my JSON likes like:
{
"message": {
"affenpinscher": [],
"african": [],
"airedale": [],
"akita": [],
"appenzeller": [],
"australian": [
"shepherd"
],
"basenji": []
},
"status: "succes"
}
So, if I understand it correctly it is dictionary because it starts with {, but what are the things inside the "message"?
This is my Dog.swift class where I am re-writing the JSON, but I am not sure if it is correct:
class Dog: Decodable, Identifiable {
var message: Message?
var status: String?
}
struct Message: Decodable {
var affenpinscher: [String:[String]]?
var african: [String]?
var airedale: [String]?
var akita: [String]?
var appenzeller: [String]?
var australian: [String]?
var basenji: [String]?
}
As you can see in the first value I was trying to play with data types, but no success.
I am decoding and parsing JSON here:
class ContentModel: ObservableObject {
#Published var dogs = Message()
init() {
getDogs()
}
func getDogs(){
// Create URL
let urlString = Constants.apiUrl
let url = URL(string: urlString)
if let url = url {
// Create URL request
var request = URLRequest(url: url, cachePolicy: .reloadIgnoringLocalCacheData, timeoutInterval: 10)
request.httpMethod = "GET"
// Get URLSession
let session = URLSession.shared
// Create Data Task
let dataTask = session.dataTask(with: request) { (data, response, error) in
// Check that there is not an error
if error == nil {
do {
// Parse JSON
let decoder = JSONDecoder()
let result = try decoder.decode(Dog.self, from: data!)
print(result)
// Assign result to the dogs property
DispatchQueue.main.async {
self.dogs = result.message!
}
} catch {
print(error)
}
}
}
// Start the Data Task
dataTask.resume()
}
}
}
And here I would love to iterate through it eventually, which I also have no idea how to do it:
struct ContentView: View {
#EnvironmentObject var model: ContentModel
var body: some View {
NavigationView {
ScrollView {
LazyVStack {
if model.dogs != nil {
// ForEach(Array(model.dogs.keys), id: \.self) { d in
// Text(d)
// }
}
}
.navigationTitle("All Dogs")
}
}
}
}
What can I try next to resolve this?
First of all don't use classes for a JSON model and to conform to Identifiable you have to add an id property and CodingKeys if there is no key id in the JSON.
My suggestion is to map the unhandy [String: [String]] dictionary to an array of an extra struct
I renamed Dog as Response and named the extra struct Dog
struct Dog {
let name : String
let types : [String]
}
struct Response: Decodable, Identifiable {
private enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey { case message, status }
let id = UUID()
let dogs: [Dog]
let status: String
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
status = try container.decode(String.self, forKey: .status)
let message = try container.decode([String:[String]].self, forKey: .message)
dogs = message.map(Dog.init).sorted{$0.name < $1.name}
}
}
In the model declare
#Published var dogs = [Dog]()
and decode
let result = try decoder.decode(Response.self, from: data!)
print(result)
// Assign result to the dogs property
DispatchQueue.main.async {
self.dogs = result.dogs
}
The dogs array can be displayed seamlessly in a List
PS: Actually appenzeller is supposed to be
"appenzeller": ["sennenhund"],
or correctly in English
"appenzell": ["mountain dog"],
😉😉😉
Using the native Swift approach that #vadian answered is a much lighter weight solution, but if you work with JSON often I'd recommend using SwiftyJSON.
You can parse the URL data task response into a Swifty json object like so:
import SwiftyJSON
guard let data = data, let json = try? JSON(data: data) else {
return
}
// Make sure the json fetch was successful
if json["status"].stringValue != "success" {
return
}
Then you can access the message object safely without the verbosity of using Decodable. Here the message is parsed into an array of dog structs:
struct Dog {
let name : String
let types : [String]
}
var dogs: [Dog] = []
/// Load the docs into an array
for (name, typesJson) in json["message"].dictionaryValue {
dogs.append(Dog(name: name, types: typesJson.arrayValue.map { $0.stringValue }))
}
print("dogs", dogs)
I am trying to decode data from a Firebase DataSnapshot so that it can be decoded using JSONDecoder.
I can decode this data fine when I use a URL to access it with a network request (obtaining a Data object).
However, I want to use the Firebase API to directly obtain the data, using observeSingleEvent as described on this page.
But, when I do this, I cannot seem to convert the result into a Data object, which I need to use JSONDecoder.
Is it possible to do the new style of JSON decoding with a DataSnapshot? How is it possible? I can't seem to figure it out.
I have created a library called CodableFirebase that provides Encoders and Decoders that are designed specifically for Firebase.
So for the example above:
import Firebase
import CodableFirebase
let item: GroceryItem = // here you will create an instance of GroceryItem
let data = try! FirebaseEncoder().encode(item)
Database.database().reference().child("pathToGraceryItem").setValue(data)
And here's how you will read the same data:
Database.database().reference().child("pathToGraceryItem").observeSingleEvent(of: .value, with: { (snapshot) in
guard let value = snapshot.value else { return }
do {
let item = try FirebaseDecoder().decode(GroceryItem.self, from: value)
print(item)
} catch let error {
print(error)
}
})
I've converted Firebase Snapshots using JSONDecoder by converting snapshots back to JSON in Data format. Your struct needs to conform to Decodable or Codable. I've done this with SwiftyJSON but this example is using JSONSerialization and it still works.
JSONSnapshotPotatoes {
"name": "Potatoes",
"price": 5,
}
JSONSnapshotChicken {
"name": "Chicken",
"price": 10,
"onSale": true
}
struct GroceryItem: Decodable {
var name: String
var price: Double
var onSale: Bool? //Use optionals for keys that may or may not exist
}
Database.database().reference().child("grocery_item").observeSingleEvent(of: .value, with: { (snapshot) in
guard let value = snapshot.value as? [String: Any] else { return }
do {
let jsonData = try JSONSerialization.data(withJSONObject: value, options: [])
let groceryItem = try JSONDecoder().decode(GroceryItem.self, from: jsonData)
print(groceryItem)
} catch let error {
print(error)
}
})
Please note that if your JSON keys are not the same as your Decodable struct. You'll need to use CodingKeys. Example:
JSONSnapshotSpinach {
"title": "Spinach",
"price": 10,
"onSale": true
}
struct GroceryItem: Decodable {
var name: String
var price: Double
var onSale: Bool?
enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case name = "title"
case price
case onSale
}
}
You can find more information on this using Apple Docs here.
No. Firebase returns a FIRDataSnapshot that can't be decodable. You can use this structure however, which is pretty simple and easy to understand:
struct GroceryItem {
let key: String
let name: String
let addedByUser: String
let ref: FIRDatabaseReference?
var completed: Bool
init(name: String, addedByUser: String, completed: Bool, key: String = "") {
self.key = key
self.name = name
self.addedByUser = addedByUser
self.completed = completed
self.ref = nil
}
init(snapshot: FIRDataSnapshot) {
key = snapshot.key
let snapshotValue = snapshot.value as! [String: AnyObject]
name = snapshotValue["name"] as! String
addedByUser = snapshotValue["addedByUser"] as! String
completed = snapshotValue["completed"] as! Bool
ref = snapshot.ref
}
func toAnyObject() -> Any {
return [
"name": name,
"addedByUser": addedByUser,
"completed": completed
]
}
}
And use toAnyObject() to save your item:
let groceryItemRef = ref.child("items")
groceryItemRef.setValue(groceryItem.toAnyObject())
Source: https://www.raywenderlich.com/139322/firebase-tutorial-getting-started-2
Or you can use this solution for children
extension DatabaseReference {
func makeSimpleRequest<U: Decodable>(completion: #escaping (U) -> Void) {
self.observeSingleEvent(of: .value, with: { snapshot in
guard let object = snapshot.children.allObjects as? [DataSnapshot] else { return }
let dict = object.compactMap { $0.value as? [String: Any] }
do {
let jsonData = try JSONSerialization.data(withJSONObject: dict, options: [])
let parsedObjects = try JSONDecoder().decode(U.self, from: jsonData)
completion(parsedObjects)
} catch let error {
print(error)
}
})
}
}
and use
self.refPriceStatistics.child(productId).makeSimpleRequest { (parsedArray: [YourArray]) in
callback(parsedArray)
}
If your data type is Codable you can use the following solution to decode directly. You do not need any plugin. I used the solution for Cloud Firestore.
import Firebase
import FirebaseFirestoreSwift
let db = Firestore.firestore()
let query = db.collection("CollectionName")
.whereField("id", isEqualTo: "123")
guard let documents = snapshot?.documents, error == nil else {
return
}
if let document = documents.first {
do {
let decodedData = try document.data(as: ModelClass.self)
// ModelClass a Codable Class
}
catch let error {
//
}
}
You can convert the value returned by Firebase to Data, and then decode that.
Add this extension to your project:
extension Collection {
//Designed for use with Dictionary and Array types
var jsonData: Data? {
return try? JSONSerialization.data(withJSONObject: self, options: .prettyPrinted)
}
}
Then use it to convert the value of the observed snapshot into data, which can then be decoded:
yourRef.observe(.value) { (snapshot) in
guard snapshot.exists(),
let value = snapshot.value as? [String],
let data = value.jsonData else {
return
}
//cast to expected type
do {
let yourNewObject = try JSONDecoder().decode([YourClass].self, from: data)
} catch let decodeError {
print("decodable error")
}
}
You can use this library CodableFirebase or the following extension can be helpful.
extension JSONDecoder {
func decode<T>(_ type: T.Type, from value: Any) throws -> T where T : Decodable {
do {
let data = try JSONSerialization.data(withJSONObject: value, options: .prettyPrinted)
let decoded = try decode(type, from: data)
return decoded
} catch {
throw error
}
}
How do you decode json to a generic model in swift?
In java for decoding json I use GSON and in general it does not matter I use <T<E>> or ArrayList<E>.In swift Array is a struct and can't be inheritance and it has not implemented Decodable.
I'm looking for a generic elegant class to use in all my web service.
My scenario:
I have json response
{
"status": true,
"message": "",
"code": 200,
"response": [{
"id": 43
}]
}
and a generic reponse model like this from web services:
class GeneralResponse< T : Decodable >:NSObject,Decodable{
var status = false
var message = ""
var code = -1
var response : T?
private enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case status
case message
case code
case response
}
required public init(from decoder: Decoder) throws{
let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
status = try container.decode(Bool.self, forKey: .status)
message = try container.decode(String.self, forKey: .message)
code = try container.decode(Int.self, forKey: .code)
response = try container.decode(T.self, forKey: .response)
}
}
class ItemDemoModel:Decodable {
var id = -1
private enum ItemDemModelCodingKeys : String, CodingKey {
case id
}
required init(from decoder:Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: ItemDemModelCodingKeys.self)
id = try container.decode(Int.self, forKey: .id)
}
}
response variable can be ItemDemoModel or an array of ItemDemoModel.
For example:
It can be GeneralResponse<Array<ItemDemoModel>>>
or GeneralResponse<ItemDemoModel>>
thanks.
If you declare a Decodable properties with same name as the key in json then you don't really need an enum to define Coding keys and an initializer to manually map every property with the key.
Also, there is no need to inherit from NSObject in Swift until you have a specific use case for that. Looking at the declaration, it seems unnecessary so your GeneralResponse can be redeclared as simple as this,
class GeneralResponse<T: Decodable>: Decodable {
var code: Int
var status: Bool
var message: String?
var response : T?
}
Similarly, ItemDemoModel can be declared as this,
class ItemDemoModel: Decodable {
var id: Int
}
Now you can setup your service as below to get the GeneralResponse<T> for any request,
struct RequestObject {
var method: String
var path: String
var params: [String: Any]
}
class WebService {
private let decoder: JSONDecoder
public init(_ decoder: JSONDecoder = JSONDecoder()) {
self.decoder = decoder
}
public func decoded<T: Decodable>(_ objectType: T.Type,
with request: RequestObject,
completion: #escaping (GeneralResponse<T>?, Error?) -> Void) {
// Here you should get data from the network call.
// For compilation, we can create an empty object.
let data = Data()
// Now parsing
do {
let response = try self.decoder.decode(GeneralResponse<T>.self, from: data)
completion(response, nil)
} catch {
completion(nil, error)
}
}
}
Usage
let request = RequestObject(method: "GET", path: "https://url.com", params: [:])
WebService().decoded([ItemDemoModel].self, with: request) { (response, error) in
if let items = response?.response {
print(items)
}
}
P.S; You must be used to declare arrays and dictionaries as below,
let array: Array<SomeType>
let dictionary: Dictionary<String: SomeType>
let arrayOfDictionary: Array<Dictionary<String: SomeType>>
But with Swift's type inference, you can declare an array and a dictionary as simple as below,
let array: [SomeType]
let dictionary: [String: SomeType]
let arrayOfDictionary: [[String: SomeType]]
Here you have a function you may want to use in order to decode your JSON:
func decode<T: Decodable>(_ data: Data, completion: #escaping ((T) -> Void)) {
do {
let model = try JSONDecoder().decode(T.self, from: data)
completion(model)
} catch {
log(error.localizedDescription, level: .error)
}
}
So you can just call your function like:
decode(data, completion: { (user: User) in
// Do something with your parsed user struct or whatever you wanna parse
})
I hope this helps :D
Array<T> conforms to Decodable if T conforms to Decodable, so GeneralResponse<[ItemDemoModel]> won't produce any errors.
As shown here:
You can simply do this:
let decoder = JSONDecoder()
let obj = try decoder.decode(type, from: json.data(using: .utf8)!)
I am trying to create a Codable extension that is capable of initialising a Decodable (Swift 4) object with only a json string. So what Should work is:
struct MyObject: Decodable {
var title: String?
}
let myObject = MyObject(json: "{\"title\":\"The title\"}")
I think this means that I should create an init that calls the self.init with a Decoder. Here is the code that I came up with:
public init?(json: String) throws {
guard let decoder: Decoder = GetDecoder.decode(json: json)?.decoder else { return }
try self.init(from: decoder) // Who what should we do to get it so that we can call this?
}
That code is capable of getting the decoder, but I get a compiler error on calling the init. The error that I get is:
'self' used before self.init call
Does this mean that there is no way to add an init to the Decodable protocol?
For the complete source code see the codable extension on github
update:
After debugging the solution below from #appzYourLive I found out that I had a conflict with the init(json: initialisers on Decodable and Array. I just published a new version of the extension to GitHub. I also added the solution as a new answer to this question.
A possible workaround
DecodableFromString
A possible solution is defining another protocol
protocol DecodableFromString: Decodable { }
with its own initializer
extension DecodableFromString {
init?(from json: String) throws {
guard let data = try json.data(using: .utf8) else { return nil }
guard let value = try? JSONDecoder().decode(Self.self, from: data) else { return nil }
self = value
}
}
Conforming to DecodableFromString
Now you need to conform your type to DecodableFromString
struct Person:Codable, DecodableFromString {
let firstName: String
let lastName: String
}
Result
And finally given a JSON
let json = """
{
"firstName": "Luke",
"lastName": "Skywalker"
}
"""
you can build your value
if let luke = try? Person(from: json) {
print(luke)
}
Person(firstName: "Luke", lastName: "Skywalker")
This is what can be done:
extension Decodable {
init?(jsonString: String) throws {
guard let jsonData = jsonString.data(using: .utf8) else { return nil }
self = try JSONDecoder().decode(Self.self, from: jsonData)
}
}
See: https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-5356
[UPD] Problem fixed in XCode 9 beta 3 (see the above link for details).
My original problem was caused by these 2 reasons:
A conflict between an init with an identical signature that I added as an
extension to Array which is also Codable when its inner objects are
Codable.
A swift compiler bug that causes a problem when you use a failable
initialiser. See https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-5356
So since there is an issue with using a failable initialiser I ended up with:
public extension Decodable {
init(json: String) throws {
guard let data = json.data(using: .utf8) else { throw CodingError.RuntimeError("cannot create data from string") }
try self.init(data: data, keyPath: keyPath)
}
init(data: Data) throws {
self = try JSONDecoder().decode(Self.self, from: data)
}
}
enum CodingError : Error {
case RuntimeError(String)
}
I also made a variation where you kan use a keyPath to jump to a certain section:
public extension Decodable {
init(json: String, keyPath: String? = nil) throws {
guard let data = json.data(using: .utf8) else { throw CodingError.RuntimeError("cannot create data from string") }
try self.init(data: data, keyPath: keyPath)
}
init(data: Data, keyPath: String? = nil) throws {
if let keyPath = keyPath {
let topLevel = try JSONSerialization.jsonObject(with: data, options: JSONSerialization.ReadingOptions.mutableContainers)
guard let nestedJson = (topLevel as AnyObject).value(forKeyPath: keyPath) else { throw CodingError.RuntimeError("Cannot decode data to object") }
let nestedData = try JSONSerialization.data(withJSONObject: nestedJson)
self = try JSONDecoder().decode(Self.self, from: nestedData)
return
}
self = try JSONDecoder().decode(Self.self, from: data)
}
}
You can find the complete code of my Decodable and Encodable extensions below. It's also in my GitHub subspec. With this extension you can use code like:
struct YourCodableObject : Codable {
var naam: String?
var id: Int?
}
let json = yourEncodableObjectInstance.toJsonString()
let data = yourEncodableObjectInstance.toJsonData()
let newObject = try? YourCodableObject(json: json)
let newObject2 = try? YourCodableObject(data: data)
let objectArray = try? [YourCodableObject](json: json)
let objectArray2 = try? [YourCodableObject](data: data)
let newJson = objectArray.toJsonString()
let innerObject = try? TestCodable(json: "{\"user\":{\"id\":1,\"naam\":\"Edwin\"}}", keyPath: "user")
try initialObject.saveToDocuments("myFile.dat")
let readObject = try? TestCodable(fileNameInDocuments: "myFile.dat")
try objectArray.saveToDocuments("myFile2.dat")
let objectArray3 = try? [TestCodable](fileNameInDocuments: "myFile2.dat")
And here are the 2 extensions:
//
// Codable.swift
// Stuff
//
// Created by Edwin Vermeer on 28/06/2017.
// Copyright © 2017 EVICT BV. All rights reserved.
//
enum CodingError : Error {
case RuntimeError(String)
}
public extension Encodable {
/**
Convert this object to json data
- parameter outputFormatting: The formatting of the output JSON data (compact or pritty printed)
- parameter dateEncodinStrategy: how do you want to format the date
- parameter dataEncodingStrategy: what kind of encoding. base64 is the default
- returns: The json data
*/
public func toJsonData(outputFormatting: JSONEncoder.OutputFormatting = .compact, dateEncodingStrategy: JSONEncoder.DateEncodingStrategy = .deferredToDate, dataEncodingStrategy: JSONEncoder.DataEncodingStrategy = .base64Encode) -> Data? {
let encoder = JSONEncoder()
encoder.outputFormatting = outputFormatting
encoder.dateEncodingStrategy = dateEncodingStrategy
encoder.dataEncodingStrategy = dataEncodingStrategy
return try? encoder.encode(self)
}
/**
Convert this object to a json string
- parameter outputFormatting: The formatting of the output JSON data (compact or pritty printed)
- parameter dateEncodinStrategy: how do you want to format the date
- parameter dataEncodingStrategy: what kind of encoding. base64 is the default
- returns: The json string
*/
public func toJsonString(outputFormatting: JSONEncoder.OutputFormatting = .compact, dateEncodingStrategy: JSONEncoder.DateEncodingStrategy = .deferredToDate, dataEncodingStrategy: JSONEncoder.DataEncodingStrategy = .base64Encode) -> String? {
let data = self.toJsonData(outputFormatting: outputFormatting, dateEncodingStrategy: dateEncodingStrategy, dataEncodingStrategy: dataEncodingStrategy)
return data == nil ? nil : String(data: data!, encoding: .utf8)
}
/**
Save this object to a file in the temp directory
- parameter fileName: The filename
- returns: Nothing
*/
public func saveTo(_ fileURL: URL) throws {
guard let data = self.toJsonData() else { throw CodingError.RuntimeError("cannot create data from object")}
try data.write(to: fileURL, options: .atomic)
}
/**
Save this object to a file in the temp directory
- parameter fileName: The filename
- returns: Nothing
*/
public func saveToTemp(_ fileName: String) throws {
let fileURL = try FileManager.default.url(for: .cachesDirectory, in: .userDomainMask, appropriateFor: nil, create: false).appendingPathComponent(fileName)
try self.saveTo(fileURL)
}
#if os(tvOS)
// Save to documents folder is not supported on tvOS
#else
/**
Save this object to a file in the documents directory
- parameter fileName: The filename
- returns: true if successfull
*/
public func saveToDocuments(_ fileName: String) throws {
let fileURL = try FileManager.default.url(for: .documentDirectory, in: .userDomainMask, appropriateFor: nil, create: false).appendingPathComponent(fileName)
try self.saveTo(fileURL)
}
#endif
}
public extension Decodable {
/**
Create an instance of this type from a json string
- parameter json: The json string
- parameter keyPath: for if you want something else than the root object
*/
init(json: String, keyPath: String? = nil) throws {
guard let data = json.data(using: .utf8) else { throw CodingError.RuntimeError("cannot create data from string") }
try self.init(data: data, keyPath: keyPath)
}
/**
Create an instance of this type from a json string
- parameter data: The json data
- parameter keyPath: for if you want something else than the root object
*/
init(data: Data, keyPath: String? = nil) throws {
if let keyPath = keyPath {
let topLevel = try JSONSerialization.jsonObject(with: data, options: JSONSerialization.ReadingOptions.mutableContainers)
guard let nestedJson = (topLevel as AnyObject).value(forKeyPath: keyPath) else { throw CodingError.RuntimeError("Cannot decode data to object") }
let nestedData = try JSONSerialization.data(withJSONObject: nestedJson)
let value = try JSONDecoder().decode(Self.self, from: nestedData)
self = value
return
}
self = try JSONDecoder().decode(Self.self, from: data)
}
/**
Initialize this object from an archived file from an URL
- parameter fileNameInTemp: The filename
*/
public init(fileURL: URL) throws {
let data = try Data(contentsOf: fileURL)
try self.init(data: data)
}
/**
Initialize this object from an archived file from the temp directory
- parameter fileNameInTemp: The filename
*/
public init(fileNameInTemp: String) throws {
let fileURL = try FileManager.default.url(for: .cachesDirectory, in: .userDomainMask, appropriateFor: nil, create: false).appendingPathComponent(fileNameInTemp)
try self.init(fileURL: fileURL)
}
/**
Initialize this object from an archived file from the documents directory
- parameter fileNameInDocuments: The filename
*/
public init(fileNameInDocuments: String) throws {
let fileURL = try FileManager.default.url(for: .documentDirectory, in: .userDomainMask, appropriateFor: nil, create: false).appendingPathComponent(fileNameInDocuments)
try self.init(fileURL: fileURL)
}
}