I have a file object store by indexing name and library_id like below,
let objectStore = db.createObjectStore('file', { keyPath: 'id' });
tempStore.createIndex('nameLibId', ['attributes.name', 'attributes.library_id'], { unique: false });
The object store contains multiple library id's files. I'd like apply the name sort to the particular library id's files. I tried indexing in the below format but it returns empty data.
let self = this,
db = get(self, 'db'),
transaction = db.transaction(["file"], "readonly"),
objectStore = transaction.objectStore("file"),
index = objectStore.index('nameLibId'),
keyRange = IDBKeyRange.only('library_id')),
req = index.getAll(keyRange);
req.onsuccess = ((e)=>{
console.log(e.target.result); // returns empty array
});
Attached the screenshot of db model for reference.
24536475, abc, created, jhgf and lastmodified file names are belongs to a library id called 123.
Screen Shot..* file names are belongs to an another library id called 234.
I need the files which are sorted by name only the given library id. Any help would be highly appreciated.
If your index is based on a properties array and you want to match something using IDBKeyRange.only, then your parameter to IDBKeyRange.only should also be an array. Right now you are comparing a basic string value against a properties array value, where of course nothing matches. In other words, you cannot query against a two-part array using only one part of it.
Furthermore, the parameter to IDBKeyRange.only isn't a property name, it is a value. You want to specify a value to match in the index's set of keypath values. For example, if your index was based exclusively on attributes.name, then you would want to specify a particular value within that index, such as "abc".
And so, taking into account the above two points, and given that your index is not a single value but is instead an array of two properties, you need to revise your parameter to IDBKeyRange.only to look for an array. Something like IDBKeyRange.only(['abc', 'yoktc....']);.
Now, this is further complicated by the fact that what you are doing in your code does not actually accomplish what you want. Ignoring the sort concern for a moment, you only want to use the id condition, and not the name, when matching rows of this index. So you might be tempted to try IDBKeyRange.only([undefined, 'asdf']). Unfortunately this will not work at all because you cannot specify undefined (you will get a javascript error).
So, you must always query by both values, even though you only want to apply criteria to one of the values. The trick here is that you switch to using a different method than only. You use IDBKeyRange.bound(), and furthermore, you do a trick where you specify a criteria such as "smallest possible number is less than my number and my number is less than largest possible number", e.g. a condition that always is true. You use "smallest possible value" as your lower boundary, and "largest possible value" as your upper boundary.
Here is an example in your case. The smallest possible value of name I think is empty string. The largest possible value of name is probably any non-alphanumeric character, so let's use tilde "~". So, now we would rewrite the range parameter. Instead of using IDBKeyRange.only, we use IDBKeyRange.bound. It looks like the following (roughly):
var libId = ???;
var smallestNameValue = '';
var largestNameValue = '~';
var lowerBound = [smallestNameValue, libId];
var upperBOund = [largestNameValue, libId];
var range = IDBKeyRange.bound(lowerBound, upperBound);
Now, the second part, regarding sorting, and a major caveat of using indices that have multiple parts (not to be confused with the multiPart index property, ugh). And I myself get this backwards all the time, so I might even be wrong here and the above will work. The problem with the above is that one the first criterion is met the second is ignored, because of how the short-circuited array sorting algorithm works in indexedDB's comparison function. Your query is going to match everything, because every index row meets the criteria. So the trick to this is to always query first by the important condition, to basically pay attention to the order in which you specify your conditions. So what that means is that you need to switch the order of the properties you specified when creating the index, so that you can query first by libId and then by name.
Instead of createIndex('nameLibId',['attributes.name','attributes.library_id']); you want to do createIndex('nameLibId',['attributes.library_id', 'attributes.name']);. And this also means you need to swap your lower and upper bound queries, e.g. var lowerBound = [libId, smallestNameValue]; (and don't forget to switch the upper).
As I mentioned in my answer on using compound indices, you can always using indexedDB.cmp to experiment. Right now, open up the console on this web page. In the console, type something like this:
indexedDB.cmp(['', '5'], ['~', '5']);
Take a look at the results.
Some final notes:
Tilde might be the wrong thing to use, sorry but I am not bothering to remember, you could also just try any valid sentinel value, where by sentinel I mean any value you know will always come after all your other valid values
As I point out in my other answer, if either prop is missing in the data the actual object won't match
for cmp, -1 means left is less than right, 0 means left equals right, and 1 means left greater than right
Related
I need to filter the table list based on the selected query status. If the query status id lets say 1, the table must be visible and it must show only rows of query where the column query status id 1.
I do not know how to go about filtering inside the query object.
Here is snippet of my code https://stackblitz.com/edit/angular-ivy-wbg67u?file=src/app/app.component.ts
(note: I'm not very familiar with Angular, so there may be some Angular-specific rules that I'm breaking here).
Your query is an array of objects, so we use Array.prototype.filter to filter to just the ones that we want. The id property is a string (like "1") on the queries, but a number on the options, so you do need to convert one of them in order to compare. My first pass at a filtered query is
this.query.filter(q => parseInt(q.queryStatus.id) === this.radioSelected)
But if nothing is checked then this will return no queries, when we want it to return all queries. So we need to see if there is a selection or not.
if (this.radioSelected === undefined) {
return this.query;
} else {
return this.query.filter(q => parseInt(q.queryStatus.id) === this.radioSelected)
}
I've changed the typescript type radioSelected: any; to radioSelected: number | undefined; (you should avoid using any whenever possible). Also, you were storing queryStatus.denomination to radioSelected, but it makes more sense to store queryStatus.id so I changes that in the html. Especially in this case where you have inconsistent spaces around your strings, a number comparison is less error-prone than a string comparison.
Lastly, we need to change the html so that it shows the filtered query rather than the original query. I don't know much about Angular so I'm not sure what the pros and cons are
of defining filteredQuery as a property vs a method, but I made it a method. And then changed
<tr *ngFor="let queryDetails of query">
to
<tr *ngFor="let queryDetails of filteredQuery()">
and it works as expected.
I have a database table that contains URLs in a column. I want to show certain data depending on what page the user is on, defaulting to a 'parent' page if not a direct match. How can I find the columns where the value is part of the submitted URL?
Eg. I have www.example.com/foo/bar/baz/here.html; I would expect to see (after sorting on length of column value):
www.example.com/foo/bar/baz/here.html
www.example.com/foo/bar/baz
www.example.com/foo/bar
www.example.com/foo
www.example.com
if all those URLs are in the table of course.
Is there a built in function or would I need to create a procedure? Googling kept getting me to LIKE and REGEXP, which is not what I need. I figured that a single query would be much more efficient than chopping the URL and making multiple queries (the URLs could potentially contain many path components).
Simple turn around the "Like" operator:
SELECT * FROM urls WHERE "www.example.com/foo/bar/baz/here.html" LIKE CONCAT(url, "%");
http://sqlfiddle.com/#!2/ef6ee/1
I have a text field with data, something like:
[{"id":10001,"timeStarted":1355729600733,"projectId":10002,"issueId":"29732,","userName":"tester","assignee":"test","status":"STARTED","shared":True,"name":"Session 4","projectName":"IDS","assigneeDisplayName":"First1 Last1"},
{"id":10002,"timeStarted":1358354188010,"projectId":10002,"issueId":"","userName":"tester","assignee":"test","status":"CREATED","shared":True,"name":"asdf98798","projectName":"IDS","assigneeDisplayName":"First Last"}]
but with much more rows, it may be 30-40, and may be 2 more different statuses (total 4).
Is it possible to extract some data from here having read-only access to DB and only using MySQL query?
For example to count number of items with status "Stated" and with status "created".
Additional conditions may apply, e.g. where id is in definite interval.
Assuming you're using PHP, first you're better off with correcting those unrecognized booleans. You have True where it should have been true (alternatively TRUE for PHP) for it to evaluate the data right.
$jsStr = preg_replace_callback(
'~(?<=[,{[])(".+?"\s*:\s*)(true|false)(?=\s*[,}\]])~i',
create_function('$m','return $m[1].strtolower($m[2]);'),
$jsStr);
Then to be able to process it you want to use the json_decode() function.
$parsed = json_decode($jsStr);
// see the result if you like:
// print_r($parsed);
Ultimately if you want to extract some specific information on the client side (using Javascript) you can use the Array filter() function or a loop if you're not using jQuery. Otherwise you can use the jQuery filter() function with necessary conditions.
If you want to do this in PHP, after the string is parsed into JSON you can use the solutions that apply to Javascript.
Is it possible to create an index on a Boolean type field?
Lets say the schema of the records I want to store is:
{
id:1,
name:"Kris",
_dirty:true
}
I created normal not unique index (onupgradeneeded):
...
store.createIndex("dirty","_dirty",{ unique: false })
...
The index is created, but it is empty! - In the index IndexedDB browser there are no records with Boolean values - only Strings, Numbers and Dates or even Arrays.
I am using Chrome 25 canary
I would like to find all records that have _dirty attribute set to true - do I have to modify _dirty to string or int then?
Yes, boolean is not a valid key.
If you must, of course you can resolve to 1 and 0.
But it is for good reason. Indexing boolean value is not informative. In your above case, you can do table scan and filter on-the-fly, rather than index query.
The answer marked as checked is not entirely correct.
You cannot create an index on a property that contains values of the Boolean JavaScript type. That part of the other answer is correct. If you have an object like var obj = {isActive: true};, trying to create an index on obj.isActive will not work and the browser will report an error message.
However, you can easily simulate the desired result. indexedDB does not insert properties that are not present in an object into an index. Therefore, you can define a property to represent true, and not define the property to represent false. When the property exists, the object will appear in the index. When the property does not exist, the object will not appear in the index.
Example
For example, suppose you have an object store of 'obj' objects. Suppose you want to create a boolean-like index on the isActive property of these objects.
Start by creating an index on the isActive property. In the onupgradeneeded callback function, use store.createIndex('isActive','isActive');
To represent 'true' for an object, simply use obj.isActive = 1;. Then add or put the object into the object store. When you want to query for all objects where isActive is set, you simply use db.transaction('store').index('isActive').openCursor();.
To represent false, simply use delete obj.isActive; and then add or or put the object into the object store.
When you query for all objects where isActive is set, these objects that are missing the isActive property (because it was deleted or never set) will not appear when iterating with the cursor.
Voila, a boolean index.
Performance notes
Opening a cursor on an index like was done in the example used here will provide good performance. The difference in performance is not noticeable with small data, but it is extremely noticeable when storing a larger amount of objects. There is no need to adopt some third party library to accomplish 'boolean indices'. This is a mundane and simple feature you can do on your own. You should try to use the native functionality as much as possible.
Boolean properties describe the exclusive state (Active/Inactive), 'On/Off', 'Enabled/Disabled', 'Yes/No'. You can use these value pairs instead of Boolean in JS data model for readability. Also this tactic allow to add other states ('NotSet', for situation if something was not configured in object, etc.)...
I've used 0 and 1 instead of boolean type.
I wanted to ask what's the difference between the value in the adressline and the id I get when i use getId().
For example for one document the getId() value is:
t8K_TLQPmKzgB72pY4TblUg
while in the adressline the key is:
0Amu7sNvd2IoudDhLX1RMUVBtS3pnQjcycFk0VGJsVWc
what i figured out so far is that when you encode getId in base64 you get more or less the last part of the key in the adressline
(base64Encode(t8K_TLQPmKzgB72pY4TblUg) = dDhLX1RMUVBtS3pnQjcycFk0VGJsVWc=).
But I still don't know what 0Amu7sNvd2Iou stands for, because i have the impression that this parts also is different in older documents, therefore i can't just combine the key using all the time 0Amu7sNvd2Iou at the beginning
Why I need to know this: my scripts use the getId method but some users fill in their ids manually (they just copypaste it from the key from the adressline). The result is that when i try to compare them although they refer to the same document i can't match them like they are completly different...
thanks a lot for bringing light into this problem
edit #taras:
i can also open the document with the key and the id. It's just weird that there are kind of two different id's for one document. If for example i want to compare if a value somebody copypasted from the adressline to a document is the same as the file i have opened i won't get a true, even it is the same file
var keyFromHeadline = "0Amu7sNvd2IoudDhLX1RMUVBtS3pnQjcycFk0VGJsVWc"
var id = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet.getId();
if (keyFromHeadline==id) Browser.msgBox("blabla")
Therefore i would be interested what is the reason for the two different values and how i could match them
If you need to have unique file IDs just normalize them. Everytime a user enters an ID manually just run it trough the fileIdNormalize function:
function fileIdNormalize(id) {
if (typeof id == 'string' && id.length > 0)
return DocsList.getFileById(id).getId();
return '';
}
Just a suggestion :
Since base64Encode seems to give you a significative part of the adress url you could use a match to check if the document is the same.
Something like :
if('manually_entered_key'.match(base64Encode('the_value_obtained_by_getId')==base64Encode('the_value_obtained_by_getId')){
// consider as the same doc ...