I have a field in my SSRS database that usually has one value assigned to it, but occasionally may have multiple values. Is it possible to separate these out so they can be individually counted? For example:
Ham; Count: 4
Turkey; Count: 2
Ham, Turkey; Count: 1
Should be:
Ham; Count: 5
Turkey; Count: 3
Related
I'm not sure if SSRS is dumb, or I am (I'm leaning towards both).
I have a dataset that (as a result of joins etc) has some columns with the same values duplicated across every row (fairly standard database stuff):
rid cnt bid flg1 flg2
-------------------------------
4 2882 1 17 3
5 2784 1 17 3
6 1293 1 17 3
18 9288 2 4 9
20 762 2 4 9
Reporting based on cnt is straightforward enough. I can also make a tablix that shows the following:
bid flg1 flg2
------------------
1 17 3
2 4 9
(Where the tablix is grouped by Fields!bid.Value and the columns are just Fields!flg1.Value and Fields!flg2.Value respectively.)
What I can't figure out is how to display the sum of these values -- specifically I want to show that the sum of flg1 is 21 and the sum of flg2 is 12 -- not the sum of every row in the dataset (counting each value more than once).
(Note that I'm not looking for a sum of distinct values, as they may not be unique. I want a sum of one value from each bid group, because it's from a table join so they will always have the same value.)
If possible, I'd also like to be able to do a similar calculation at the top level of the report (not in any tablix); although I'd settle for hiding the detail row if that's the only way.
Obviously, Sum(Fields!flg1.Value) isn't the answer, as this either returns 51 (if on the first row inside the group) or 59 (if outside it).
I also tried Sum(Fields!flg1.Value, "bid") but this wasn't considered a valid scope.
I also tried Sum(First(Fields!flg1.Value, "bid")) but apparently you're not allowed to sum first values for some weird reason (and may have had the same scope problem anyway).
Using Sum(Max(Fields!flg1.Value, "bid")) does work, but feels wrong. Is there a better way to do this?
(Related: is there a good way to save the result of that calculation so that I can later also show a Sum of those totals without an even hairier expression?)
There are two basic ways to do this.
Do what you have already done (Sum(Max(Fields!flg1.Value, "bid")))
Sum the rendered values. To do this check the name of the cell containing the data you want (check it's properties) and then use something like =SUM(ReportItems!flg1.Value) where flg1 is the name of the textbox, which is not necessarily always the same name as the field.
Let's say there is a table like the following:
id | number
----|----------
1 | 1
4 | 6
5 | 2
14 | 3
now I need all numbers that are not set between 1 and the highest number that is set. Here the highest number is 6, so I need all numbers that are not set between 1 and 6. Here it is: 4 and 5
But how can I achieve this with spring and hibernate jpa with a MySQL database?
The highest number is easy. Sort numbers DESC and then the first one. But then return all missing numbers that are not in the database? Is this possible?
One way: select each number that is smaller then the highest number and check if the returned object is null. So first check 5, then 4, then 3, ... But this is of course very slow on big databases.
So another idea was: get all numbers that are set and get the missing numbers on java side with the difference of two lists (one list with the numbers out of the database, the other list with the numbers from 1 to the highest number of the database). But on big databases it is also dumb to get everything. (Let's say, there are 1 million entries and only one number is missing.)
The third idea: something like select where number NULL would be perfect. But for this the database would have to be initialized with all possible numbers ever there. So that is also not possible.
Is there a possible way? Am I overseeing something?
I have a SQL Server Report Builder tablix report that evaluates sales activity over time.
Rows by company, columns are grouped by date. Something like this:
2015 2016 2017
Company1 10 12 1
Company2 6 5 0
Company3 8 10 7
(The report also expands columns into months)
I would like to add a column, or color a background, calculated based on the average of each year's totals. For example, Company1 averages 7.6/year if I include 2017. I would like to be able to say that 2015 was 131% of average, 2016 was 157% of average, and 2017 is 13% of average. Bonus points if I can exclude the current year from the average.
The result might look something like this:
2015 2016 2017
Company1 10 (131%) 12 (157%) 1 (7.6%)
Company2 6 (%%) 5 (%%) 0 (%%)
Company3 8 (%%) 10 (%%) 7 (%%)
Since the source data has one sale per row, and the tablix is what's creating the grouped count by date, I can't seem to just run an average, which just gives me "1", due to the fact that I'm counting on a count column. The source data looks something like this:
CompanyName Date SalesRep Amt Count
Company1, 1/1/2015, salesrepname, 50000, 1
Company1, 2/1/2015, salesrepname, 20000, 1
Company1, 3/1/2015, salesrepname, 50000, 1
Company1, 4/1/2015, salesrepname, 10000, 1
Company1, 5/1/2015, salesrepname, 5000, 1
...
How do I go about getting the average of each year?
If you were just grouping on Company and Year you could override the scope of your aggregates with a group name. However, SSRS doesn't have a way to specify combinations of groups. So in your case you will need to make those sub-calculations available another way. It is usually best to do that in the SQL. You can either add a subquery to your existing query (preferred) or add an additional dataset. If you use a separate dataset you'll also have to match up the values with a Lookup function.
If you try to come up with an elaborate workaround like custom code or referencing textboxes it is going to become difficult to maintain and will be very inefficient.
wouldn't a formula like this work?
=sum(Fields!count.Value)/
(sum(Fields!count.Value,"Year")/countdistinct(Fields!CompanyName.Value,"Year"))
assuming your column group name is Year.
I have a database that tracks invoice payment certification. I am trying to build a report that will bring The following info in
Service Line - ABC
Total "unique" records - 2
max age - 3
Min age - 1
Avg of max age - 3
count of records over 14 days - 0
count of records under 14 days - 2
score: records under 14 days/total records - 100%
I am trying to build the report from a query that includes a date range. the important column names are:
Service Line DLN Age in days
ABC 123456 1
DEF 987654 3
ABC 123456 2
DEF 987654 4
ABC 123456 3
The DLN is an identifier to each different invoice number. I entered the data in above that I need it to return as it correlates to the table below.
I totally forgot I asked the question on here and ended up fixing the issue. What I ended up doing is building the report from scratch from the query instead of using the wizard. Then I just free typed the functions into unbound text boxes. I did then use the grouping to separate it the way I needed. Once I realized my mistake and that the solution was so easy I felt kind of dumb.
I am working on a ssrs report with column grouping. the followin is my scenario.
Matrix 1:
ID 2012 2013
1 20 40
1 30 50
Total 50 90
Matrix 2:
ID 2012 2013
1 60 70
1 60 80
Total 120 150
I need the sum of matrix1 and matrix2 like below:
ID 2012 2013
1 170 240
But I got the result like :
ID 2012 2013
1 410 410
I have applied column grouping in all the 3 matrices and gave the expression to get sum for matrix 3 as: =Sum(Fields!amount1.Value, "dsmatrix1") + Sum(Fields!Tamount1.Value, "dsmatrix2")
Please help me to get a solution for this.
Thanks!
I think I know what's going on. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Based on what I'm seeing, I'm guessing that Matrix 1 and Matrix 2 only have three fields each, an ID field, an amount field (being "amount1" or "Tamount1"), and a year field.
Your column grouping is manipulating the display of the data to show all values broken out by year. This works fine when looking at data from a single dataset. However, your formula is specifying that the sum of everything in the Amount1 field of dsmatrix1 and the Tamount1 field of dsmatrix2 should be added. This does not take into account the column grouping. Your expression is essentially taking all of the values from both datasets and adding them together.
Not knowing more about your query structure or how the data is filtered, my best guess is that you need another SQL dataset. In this case, you would take the queries from your two previous datasets and union them with the "Union All" command. Note that you will want to use Union All and not just Union. More on that here: What is the difference between UNION and UNION ALL?
Your end result should look something like this:
--This will be your dsmatrix1 query copied and pasted
Select ...
Union All
--This will be your dsmatrix2 query copied and pasted
Select ...
--Place one single Order by clause at the bottom
Order by ...
Note: for your two queries to be unioned properly, you'll need to make sure that each have the same number of fields, each with the same data types. Then you can point your third matrix to the new dataset.
Hope that helps!