Why can't I make a circle with border-radius? - html

* {
margin: 0;
}
div {
background-color: green;
height: 900px;
width: 50%;
margin: auto;
border-radius: 50px;
overflow: hidden;
padding: 20px;
border: 4px solid red;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
div:hover {
box-shadow: 5px 5px 5px 1px blue;
}
#media screen and (max-width:600px) {
div {
background-color: aqua;
color: red;
width: 100%;
height: 10%;
}
body {
background-color: chocolate
}
}
.divas {
background-color: yellow;
position: relative;
margin-top: 20%;
height: 300px;
border-radius: 50%;
}
<div>This is text . This is text . This is text . This is text . This is text . This is text . This is text . This is text . This is text . This is text . This is text . This is text . </div>
<div class="divas"></div>
Hello I would like to make a perfectly rounded circle. I tried creating it with border-radius , but it doesn't allow me to create a perfect circle. Can someone explain me why? I tried changing padding and such but it doesn't work anyways.? Thanks in advance.

If you want to create circle with border-radius then height and width should be same for the div which you are applying border-radius
Then only border-radius will look like circle
Example
#circle{
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
border-radius: 50%;
background: #000;
}
<div id="circle"></div>

For a perfect circle you need an element with the same height and width. You also only have a border-radius:50px instead of border-radius:50% defined.
* {
margin: 0;
}
div {
background-color: green;
height: 500px;
width: 500px;
margin: auto;
border-radius: 50%;
overflow: hidden;
padding: 25px 28px 28px;
text-align: center;
border: 4px solid red;
box-sizing: border-box;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
font-size: 60px;
}
div:hover {
box-shadow: 5px 5px 5px 1px blue;
}
#media screen and (max-width:600px) {
div {
background-color: aqua;
color: red;
width: 100%;
height: 10%;
}
body {
background-color: chocolate
}
}
.divas {
background-color: yellow;
position: relative;
margin-top: 20%;
height: 300px;
width: 300px;
border-radius: 50%;
}
<div>
This is text.<br> This is text. This is text. This is text. This is text. This is text.
</div>
<div class="divas"></div>

Div with same height and width
border-radius is half the width gives a circle.
.mycircle {
background-color: green;
height: 200px;
width: 200px;
border-radius: 100px;
}
<div class="mycircle"></div>

For Creating a circle in css object should have same width and height
add width:300px; to .divas class.

You want to create a circle with border-radius then height and width should be the same for the element which you are applying border-radius:100%
* {
margin: 0;
}
div {
background-color: green;
height: 600px;
width: 600px;
margin: auto;
border-radius: 100%;
overflow: hidden;
padding: 90px;
border: 4px solid red;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
div:hover {
box-shadow: 5px 5px 5px 1px blue;
}
#media screen and (max-width:600px) {
div {
background-color: aqua;
color: red;
width: 100%;
height: 10%;
}
body {
background-color: chocolate
}
}
.divas {
background-color: yellow;
position: relative;
margin-top: 20%;
height: 300px;
width: 300px;
border-radius: 100%;
}
<div>This is text . This is text . This is text . This is text . This is text . This is text . This is text . This is text . This is text . This is text . This is text . This is text . </div>
<div class="divas"></div>

In order to make a perfect circle, you need to set width and height equal. If you do so by CSS you need to define them both in 'px', rather than '%' since the window width & height may vary from device to device. Now set border-radius as 50%. Below is the CSS:
div {
background-color: green;
height: 900px;
width: 900px;
margin: auto;
border-radius: 50%;
overflow: hidden;
padding: 20px;
border: 4px solid red;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
In case your with is dependent on the window's width (as you have used %), you can set height equal to width using javascript. Here is how to do it.
HTML
<div></div>
JavaScript
var requiredWidth = window.innerWidth * (0.5); //window width excluding scrollbar.
var div = document.querySelector('div');
div.style.width = requiredWidth + 'px';
div.style.height = requiredWidth + 'px';
Now that you have defined height and width using javascript, set border-radius to 50% in your CSS.
CSS
div {
border-radius: 50%;
background-color: red;
}

Use the aspect-ratio CSS' property. Compatible with all major browsers...
.fixed-units {
width: 150px;
aspect-ratio: 1 / 1;
border: 1px solid #000;
background-color: #bada55;
border-radius: 50%;
}
.dynamic-units {
width: 50%;
aspect-ratio: 1 / 1;
border: 1px solid #000;
background-color: #daba55;
border-radius: 50%;
}
<label>For Fixed Units</label>
<div class="fixed-units"></div>
<br>
<label>For Dynamic Units</label>
<div class="dynamic-units"></div>

You need to use border-radius: 100% and have your height and width be equal.

Related

HTML extend height of div

div.div1 {
position: relative;
border: 1px solid black;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
padding: 10px;
}
div.div2 {
background-color: gray;
border: 1px solid black;
padding: 10px;
}
div.div3 {
position: absolute;
border: 1px solid red;
height: 20px;
width: 20px;
bottom: 10px;
left: 10px;
}
<div class="div1">
<div class="div2">Test 123</div>
<div class="div3">A</div>
</div>
I use the above code to display a big div with two divs in it. For the first one I use position: absolute to place it on bottom left of the div.
How can I extend the height of the second gray one so that it's 5 pixels above the first, but without having to measure its exact height in pixel (like the pic below)? I can set height: 50px; for example but is there another way?
I would use a flexbox approach rather than absolute positioning (comments in css below)
div.div1 {
display: flex;
flex-direction:column;
/* add the above styles*/
border: 1px solid black;
min-height: 100px; /*I would also change this to min-height otherwise it may cause issues if your text goes to 2 lines*/
width: 100px;
padding: 10px;
}
div.div2 {
flex-grow:1; /* make div grow to fill the space */
margin-bottom:5px; /* minus the amount of margin you wanted */
background-color: gray;
border: 1px solid black;
padding: 10px;
}
div.div3 {
/* remove absolute positioning */
border: 1px solid red;
height: 20px;
width: 20px;
}
<div class="div1">
<div class="div2">Test 123</div>
<div class="div3">A</div>
</div>
EDIT: I suggest that, if you can focus on the modern browser features, going the flexbox way as shown by Pete is definitely a cleaner approach than the ones I've shown bellow. That being said, here are the alternatives:
You can use calc to dynamically determine the height of div2:
div.div1 {
position: relative;
border: 1px solid black;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
padding: 10px;
}
div.div2 {
background-color: gray;
border: 1px solid black;
padding: 10px;
height: calc(
100%
- 20px /* div1: padding top and bottom */
- 2px /* div1: border top and bottom */
- 20px /* div3: height */
- 2px /* div3: border top and bottom*/
- 5px /* desired separation*/
);
}
div.div3 {
position: absolute;
border: 1px solid red;
height: 20px;
width: 20px;
bottom: 10px;
left: 10px;
}
<div class="div1">
<div class="div2">Test 123</div>
<div class="div3">A</div>
</div>
You can avoid including padding and border width in your calculations if you set the box-sizing for your divs to border-box (You might want to set this for all elements):
div {
box-sizing: border-box;
}
div.div1 {
position: relative;
border: 1px solid black;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
padding: 10px;
}
div.div2 {
background-color: gray;
border: 1px solid black;
padding: 10px;
height: calc(
100%
- 20px /* div3: height */
- 5px /* desired separation */
);
}
div.div3 {
position: absolute;
border: 1px solid red;
height: 20px;
width: 20px;
bottom: 10px;
left: 10px;
}
<div class="div1">
<div class="div2">Test 123</div>
<div class="div3">A</div>
</div>
There's this rather new, hip CSS property called 'flex' which you're now going to love because it does it exactly that without the need of positioning absolute etc. I did something similar yesterday where I had a vertical nav bar and I wanted one menu at the top and one at the bottom. In a responsive environment; using your approach of positioning absolute it would've resulted in a nasty mess of working out heights to stop the content from overlapping. Flex prevented this! Yeyyyyy
https://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/a-guide-to-flexbox/
In your example you want to do something like this:
.div1 {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
flex-wrap: nowrap;
justify-content: space-around;
}
.div2 {
align-self: flex-start;
flex-grow:1;
width:100%;
}
.div3 {
align-self: flex-end;
width:100%;
}
Now your div 3 will always be at the bottom. Although now .div3 will extend the entire width so within the div insert your content and BOOM done.
You can use calc on the heightsetting as in my snippet below. That setting is 100% minus (20 + 10 + 2) for the height, border and bottom of the lower DIV minus (5 + 2) for the distance and the border of the first DIV minus 10px for the padding of the parent, summing up to 49px .
div.div1 {
position: relative;
border: 1px solid black;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
padding: 10px;
}
div.div2 {
background-color: gray;
border: 1px solid black;
padding: 10px;
height: calc(100% - 49px);
}
div.div3 {
position: absolute;
border: 1px solid red;
height: 20px;
width: 20px;
bottom: 10px;
left: 10px;
}
<div class="div1">
<div class="div2">Test 123</div>
<div class="div3">A</div>
</div>

Html css with jsfiddle ex: not working: vertical align and using full width based on width percentage of two child containers

https://jsfiddle.net/3Lthpf72/5/
Html css with jsfiddle ex: not working: vertical align and using full width based on width percentage of two child containers
When I make the two child containers add up to the parent width percentage, it folds down. Also the vertical align middle is at the bottom, not the middle.
Any thoughts?
.payee.list-item {
border: 1px solid red;
height: 100%;
width: 300px;
}
.list-item-content {
display: inline-block;
border: 1px solid blue;
width: 80%
}
.payee.list-item>img {
border: 1px solid green;
height: 45px;
display: inline-block;
width: 17%;
vertical-align: middle;
}
<div class="payee list-item">
<img src="/Image/PayeeBillPayAccountPortrait/832">
<div class="list-item-content">
<h4>Colonel Sanders!</h4>
<h3>Colonel Sanders</h3>
</div>
</div>
Are you trying to do something like that?
.payee.list-item {
border: 1px solid red;
height: 100%;
width: 300px;
display: inline-block;
position: relative;
}
.list-item-content {
float: right;
border: 1px solid blue;
width: 80%
}
h3, h4 {
width: 50%;
float: left;
box-sizing: border-box;
padding: 6px;
}
h3{background: lightgray;}
h4{background: gray;}
.payee.list-item>img {
border: 1px solid green;
max-height: 45px;
width: 17%;
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
transform: translateY(-50%);
}
<div class="payee list-item">
<img src="https://static.pexels.com/photos/6555/nature-sunset-person-woman.jpg">
<div class="list-item-content">
<h3>Colonel Sanders</h3>
<h4>Colonel Sanders!</h4>
</div>
</div>

How to avoid absolute bottom positioned div from overlapping other when window is resized

I have a page where I have a div at the bottom of the page which when clicked shows another div, just above the bottom div.
I'd like to avoid the footer divs overlapping the content div higher up the page when the window is resized.
The heights of the divs involved shouldn't change.
Is a CSS-only solution possible?
I've created a jsfiddle here
CSS
html, body {
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
#container {
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
background-color: white;
border: solid #aaa 1px;
padding: 4px;
}
#content {
height: 300px;
border: solid blue 1px;
}
#footer-content {
height: 100px;
border: solid red 1px;
display:none;
}
#footer-footer {
cursor: pointer;
height: 20px;
border: solid cyan 1px;
}
#footer.expanded #footer-content {
display:block;
}
#footer {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0px;
width: 100%;
}
HTML
<div id="container">
<div id="content">content
</div>
<div id="footer">
<div id="footer-content">footer-content</div>
<div id="footer-footer">Click me to expand</div>
</div>
</div>
JS
$("#footer-footer").on("click", function (evt) {
$("#footer").toggleClass("expanded");
});
Simply add position: relative to the #container. This way the absolute positioning of the footer refers to the container.
http://jsfiddle.net/5bkznxud/5/
You'll probably notice that in the example above there's always a scrollbar on the right. This is because of the borders and padding on #container. Here's an example with outline (border with no calculated width) and without any padding:
http://jsfiddle.net/5bkznxud/6/
TIP: Always use outline instead of border for blocking a layout OR use box-sizing: border-box. This causes a box' dimensions to also calculate for the border. Otherwise a box with width of 100% and border will span slightly wider than you want.
It can be solved by using calc().
In this case you can create a jQuery function that get the height of footer-content and footer-footer -> .height(). Without jQuery, I don't think it's possible.
Here is an example:
html, body {
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
#container {
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
background-color: white;
border: solid #aaa 1px;
padding: 4px;
min-height: 420px;
}
#content {
height:calc(100% - 135px);
border: solid blue 1px;
}
#footer-content {
height: 100px;
border: solid red 1px;
display:none;
}
#footer-footer {
cursor: pointer;
height: 20px;
border: solid cyan 1px;
}
#footer.expanded #footer-content {
display:block;
}
#footer {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0px;
width: 100%;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/dokmngv0/
Browser support for the calc() feature: http://caniuse.com/#feat=calc

Make Divs on both sides of another div expand to the edge of the container

Best way to demonstrate what I want is to show it:
I want the left and right div to expand to the left and right edge of the container div automatically.
It can be done with Javascript and with flex but I'm wondering is there is another way that supports IE9+ (flex is IE11+)
I created this live demo (click "Run with JS") with a dynamically changing center div (since the "real life" problem doesn't have a static size)
Using a display: table-cell would make it easy for you.
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/abhitalks/VytTX/1/
HTML:
<div class="outer">
<div id="left" class="inner"></div>
<div id="center" class="inner">...</div>
<div id="right" class="inner"></div>
</div>
CSS:
body { width: 100%; }
div.outer {
width: 90%;
border: 1px solid gray;
background-color: rgb(12, 34, 43);
text-align: center;
display: table;
border-spacing: 10px;
}
div.inner {
border: 1px solid gray;
height: 200px;
display: table-cell;
min-width: 20px; width: 20px;
padding: 4px;
background-color: rgb(212, 234, 143);
}
You could achieve that like this :
An example: http://codepen.io/srekoble/pen/rugxh (change the variable of the center width $width)
It's a sass file for a variable usage:
* {
box-sizing: border-box;
-webkit-box-sizing: border-box;
}
div.outer {
width: 100%;
border: 1px solid gray;
background-color: rgb(12,34,43);
text-align: center;
margin: 0 auto;
font-size: 0;
}
div.inner {
border: 1px solid gray;
height: 200px;
display:inline-block;
min-width: 20px;
}
$width: 50%;
#center {
width: $width;
background: red;
}
#left,
#right {
width: ( 100% - $width ) / 2;
background: yellow;
}
<style>
body
{
background: #0B222A;
}
.outer
{
width: 400px;
height: 300px;
background: #D3EA8F;
margin: auto;
}
.inner
{
width: 60%;
height: 300px;
background: #D3EA8F;
border-left: solid 10px #0B222A;
border-right: solid 10px #0B222A;
margin: auto;
}
</style>
<div class="outer">
<div class="inner"></div>
</div>

Proper div sizing without using pixel values

My case is as follows. I have a div with two children divs. I'd like the 'event' div to be 300px of width and height. First requirement is to keep the size of the 'event' div when 'content' and 'bar' elements use 100% of parent's width. Secondly as for now, borders of 'content' element are not visible. Is it possible to fit everything inside without using hardcoded values and get this display properly in most of the modern browsers (FF, Chrome, Opera, IE7+) ?
This is what I'd like to achieve (notice the left red bar which takes 100% height and doesn't collide with the grey border around the event element):
And this is what I have. Html :
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="scheduler">
<div class="event" style="top: 30px; height: 300px; width: 300px">
<div class="bar"></div>
<div class="content">
<div class="inner-content">Some text</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
, css :
#wrapper {
width: 600px;
height: 600px;
}
#scheduler {
background-color: #E1FFFE;
display: block;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
padding: 0 10px;
position: relative;
}
#scheduler .event {
display: block;
float: left;
position: relative;
width:100%;
overflow:hidden;
}
#scheduler .event .bar {
background-color: red;
display: inline;
float: left;
height: 100%;
position: relative;
width: 5px;
}
#scheduler .event .content {
background-color: white;
border: 1px solid #CCCCCC;
border-left: none;
display: inline;
float: left;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
}
and a runnable demo :
http://jsfiddle.net/6nTvD/1/
Try this. Take out the bar div, then change the .content css to:
#scheduler .event .content {
background-color: white;
border: 1px solid #CCCCCC;
border-left: 5px solid red; // replaces the bar
display: inline;
float: left;
height: 99%; // a bit of a hack to fit the border in
position: relative;
width: 98%; // hack
}
http://jsfiddle.net/Dp3yz/
EDIT: Code with the .bar still in place:
#scheduler .event .bar {
background-color: red;
display: inline;
float: left;
height: 99.9%; /* Small offset at bottom */
position: relative;
width: 5px;
}
#scheduler .event .content {
background-color: white;
/* revised border */
border-top: 1px solid #CCCCCC;
border-right: 1px solid #CCCCCC;
border-bottom: 1px solid #CCCCCC;
display: inline;
float: left;
height: 99%;
position: absolute;
width: 98%;
}
New version:
http://jsfiddle.net/JJrC9/1/
I don't think I fully understand your quandary, however, with the only difference I can spy between your desired outcome and your current work being the presence of the borders -- switching overflow:hidden; on #scheduler .event to overflow:visible; produces something that visually looks to me like it achieves the desired affect.