i just want to ask for any of your ideas on what method to be created, i mean a useful method that can be implement to any grails project. Thanks!
Here is my example method
String.metaClass.htmlEscape {
return org.apache.commons.lang3.StringEscapeUtils.escapeHtml4(delegate)
}
and here's how you call it in the controller
def kups = ([['name':'<marquee direction="up">"Sample 1"</marquee>'.htmlEscape()],['name':'<b>Sample 2</b>'.htmlEscape()]])
render kups as JSON
and the output is
<marquee direction="up">"Sample 1"</marquee> <b>Sample 2</b>
So guys please me for any method ideas Thanks :)
Related
I just started learning PCL in xamarin and I have been going over the MvvmCross tutorial and i cant find why i keep getting this error
No overload for method 'EnsureLoaded' takes 1 arguments:
protected override IMvxNavigationSerializer CreateNavigationSerializer()
{
Cirrious.MvvmCross.Plugins.Json.PluginLoader.Instance.EnsureLoaded(true);
return new MvxJsonNavigationSerializer();
}
I installed the Cirrious.MvvmCross.Plugins.Json and all the other reffereces:
can some help please thank you.
As I know it doesn't need any arguments at all, so try just
Cirrious.MvvmCross.Plugins.Json.PluginLoader.Instance.EnsureLoaded();
I don't know if anyone has asked this question or perhaps I have overlooked. Please accept my apologies.
I have a LoginViewController in front of InitialSlidingView. How can I pass NSManagedObjectContext into InitialSlidingView and subsequently to any NavigationTopView? I have NSManagedObjectContext and NSManagedObjectModel in AppDelegate.
Thanks.
Adrian
You can expose a NSManagedObject property on your view controllers. Then you can set this property on the view controllers the need it or end up passing it along.
i'd like to know if i can call a controller action inside a template, and inside another controller in fatFree framework (F3).
I'm not sure if i understand you corrently, but calling a Class method in Template would go like this:
{{ MyConroller->doSomething() }}
Of cause you could call one controller within another too... just use raw php
$obj = new MyController();
$obj->foo();
or use the F3 call method $f3->call('MyController->doSomething');
Also check out the new API docs.
http://fatfreeframework.com/base#call
It's still under construction, but hopefully you'll find more information about this or any other framework part very soon.
Many MVC purists would balk at the idea of a View (template) calling methods on the Controller. They would say that the controller needs to provide the data that the view needs, or at least give it the Model, so that it can retrieve data from there.
Furthermore, the View probably shouldn't be doing anything (or asking another component to do anything), other than generating the display. But can query the Model for data. But maybe by doSomething() you do mean getSomeData().
While I'm not an MVC purist I do agree with the idea of keeping logic and functionality out of the view if at all possible.
I have a Grails service that sends out e-mails using a 3rd-party service by doing a HTTP call:
class EmailService {
def sendEmail(values) {
def valueJson = values as JSON
... // does HTTP call to 3rd party service
}
}
I've written a unit test to test this service (because an integration test spins up Hibernate and the entire domain framework, which I don't need):
#TestFor(EmailService)
class EmailServiceTests {
void testEmailServiceWorks() {
def values = [test: 'test', test2: 'test2']
service.sendEmail(values)
}
}
However, when I execute this unit test, it fails with this exception when it tries to do the as JSON conversion:
org.apache.commons.lang.UnhandledException: org.codehaus.groovy.grails.web.converters.exceptions.ConverterException: Unconvertable Object of class: java.util.LinkedHashMap
I then re-wrote my unit test to just do the following:
void testEmailServiceWorks() {
def value = [test: 'test', test2: 'test2']
def valueJson = value as JSON
}
And I get the same exception when it tries to do the as JSON conversion.
Does anyone know why I'm getting this exception, and how I can fix it?
Even though you are testing a service, you can apply the #TestMixin(ControllerUnitTestMixin) annotation to your test class to get Grails to set up the JSON converter.
The as JSON magic is created when the domain framework spins up.
You have to either change your test to an integration one or mock the asType.
def setUp(){
java.util.LinkedHashMap.metaClass.asType = { Class c ->
new grails.converters."$c"(delegate)
}
}
Rember to clean up after yourself in the tearDown, you wouldn't want metaprogramming leaks in your test suite.
def tearDown(){
java.util.LinkedHashMap.metaClass.asType = null
}
Edit:
If you come from the future, consider this answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/15485593/194932
As Grails 3.3.x grails-test-mixins plugin is deprecated. #see migration guide.
For this problem you should implement GrailsWebUnitTest which is coming from Grails Testing Support Framework.
you can initialise the JSON in the setUp() . There are various marshallers which implement ObjectMarshaller , which need to be added to the ConverterConfiguration for JSON conversion to work.
http://grails.github.io/grails-doc/2.4.4/api/index.html?org/codehaus/groovy/grails/web/converters/marshaller/json/package-summary.html
example :
DefaultConverterConfiguration<JSON> defaultConverterConfig = new DefaultConverterConfiguration<JSON>()
defaultConverterConfig.registerObjectMarshaller(new CollectionMarshaller())
defaultConverterConfig.registerObjectMarshaller(new MapMarshaller())
defaultConverterConfig.registerObjectMarshaller(new GenericJavaBeanMarshaller())
ConvertersConfigurationHolder.setTheadLocalConverterConfiguration(JSON.class, defaultConverterConfig);
I just ran into this, and I really didn't want to implement GrailsWebUnitTest as recommended in another answer here. I want to keep my service test as "pure" and lean as possible. I ended up doing this:
void setupSpec() {
defineBeans(new ConvertersGrailsPlugin())
}
void cleanupSpec() {
ConvertersConfigurationHolder.clear()
}
This is how it happens under the hood when you implement GrailsWebUnitTest (via WebSetupSpecInterceptor and WebCleanupSpecInterceptor).
That said, the converters seem to be meant for use in the web tier, primarily for making it easy to transparently return data in different formats from a controller. It's worth considering why the service you're testing needs the converters in the first place.
For example, in my case, someone used the JSON converter to serialize some data to a string so it could be stored in a single field in the database. That doesn't seem like an appropriate user of the converters, so I plan on changing how it's done. Making the converters available in my service test is a temporary solution to allow me to improve our test coverage before I refactor things.
I was getting the same error when trying to unit test a controller that calls "render myMap as JSON". We use Grails 1.3.7 and none of the other solutions worked for me without introducing other problems. Upgrading Grails was not an alternative for us at the moment.
My solution was to use JSONBuilder instead of "as JSON", like this:
render(contentType: "application/json", {myMap})
See http://docs.grails.org/latest/guide/theWebLayer.html#moreOnJSONBuilder
(I realize this is old, but came here in search for a solution and so might others)
I started out looking at the JAX-RS plugin for grails and thought that was the way to go mainly because it was based on JSR-311 and I figure following standards is usually the smart thing to do. However, using Grail's UrlMappings it seems I basically achieve the same thing. I figure I'm missing something, however, we aren't doing anything overly complex. We basically just need to expose CRUD via an API. Example of doing the same thing with both versions:
JAX-RS:
#PUT
#Consumes(['application/json'])
#Produces(['application/json'])
Response putUser(User user) {
user.save(flush:true)
ok user
}
Grails:
def update = {
def user = new User(params['user'])
user.save(flush:true)
render user as JSON
}
Obviously, this is an overly-simplified example and like I said, maybe I'm missing something important. Also, the nice thing about the Grails built in mechanism is I can utilize Content Negotiation along with it.
Anyone have any opinions on this?
I had to make the same decision, and I found it just easier to use URL Mappings because the API was not that complex and there were a limited number of API calls that needed to supported.
If came down to what would be easier to maintain based on the LOE and the resources able to support the implementation.
The jax-rs plugin is very useful if you are creating web services straight to your domain models. It gives you a "generate-resource" command that automatically creates CRUD apis for your model.
grails generate-resource mydomain.Model
This part seems to work fine, however, I encountered quite a few bugs/problems with the plugin that I finally had to implement the REST services using URL-mappings.
Although the URL-mapping method seems to be more coding, it works perfectly.
import grails.converters.JSON
class ModelServiceController {
def id = params.id
def myModel = MyModel.findById(id)
render myModel as JSON
}
Here's the link for grails REST
http://grails.org/doc/1.0.x/guide/13.%20Web%20Services.html