How to get Ext JS source code for debugging in browser ? Now I'm getting all ext js related code in single big file called ext-all-rtl-debug.js. Is it possible to get as separate files, example - separate file for Ext.form.field.ComboBox. I can find as an individual file in API docs but how to get them in browser debugging ?
In app.json, there's the reference to ext-all-rtl-debug.js.
You can replace that reference with a reference to ext.js or ext-debug.js to get a file that only contains the bare minimum ExtJS code. All other code snippets will then be loaded individually.
Please note that this means the loading time of the debug version will increase drastically, in my case from seconds to minutes. The ext-all-rtl-debug.js is usually suitable enough for debugging, but YMMV.
Related
I fail to understand some options in the dumpBackup.php maintenance script of Mediawiki.
What is the effect of --include-files? In my test wiki, dumpBackup.php --current --include-files and dumpBackup.php --current both contain the pages of the File: namespace and I see no difference.
What is the effect of --uploads? In my test wiki I see that the xml file contains a tiny bit more of xml but, to me, it looks like this is all information which is there already as part of the File: page. What is the use of this flag?
When I add both --include-files and --uploads I get the next surprise. I actually expected the combined effect of both options, but what I get is the file content of the uploaded files and the upload record. Why did I not get the file contents when I used --include-files alone?
When I use only --include-files and --uploads but no --current I would have expected to get the content of the uploaded files and the upload record (and none of the other pages). However ,I get the warning no valid action specified and no further information at all
I am completely confused since I do not understand the logic behind all of this.
If I move ComponentFoo.js from folder X to folder Y, than a bunch of import statements break. Looking into this it seems there are many solutions for typescript, but what about js / es6? If I move a file in the editor, it should find all the import statements and update them to the new location. Is this possible?
Old post, but this might help some Googlers. This feature can be enabled and disabled in User Settings. For Javascript and Typescript, it's called "Updated Imports On File Move".
I had apparently disabled it and just figured the feature was broken :X
VS Code has built-in support for this for both javascript and typescript since VS Code 1.24.
For JavaScript specifically, you need to make sure VS code's language support can find all the references to the file so that imports referring symbols in that can be updated properly. Definitely create a jsconfig.json for your project, and also consider enabling semantic checking for JavaScript so that VS Code shows when imports are not being properly resolved
If your project is configured properly but files are not being updated, make sure you are running the latest VS Code insiders build and report an issue if it still doesn't work
for flutter developers you should move files one by one. vscode doesn't support multi file moving with refactor yet.
Just use IntelliJ. It handles all kinds of refactoring perfectly. I'm a huge fan of VS Code, but refacotoring is definetly not one of it's stengths. Some imports don't get detected, and the imports can get modified in a weird way. For example, I had an import like this:
import { myStore} from 'src/common/stores/myStore';
When moving the file of myStore.ts to a different folder, VS Code constructed this bull**it:
import { myStore} from 'src/common/composables/myStoreStore';
The line above is no typo!
Btw I'm using vetur, maybe thats causing it, I don't know ...
I am getting Class file editor : Source not found error for the classes in junit / hazelcast packages. Previously i got this error for all built in java classes. But after adding the Source zip file, i am able to see String.class and all. What i need to do for these classes. Please find the screenshot
Thanks in Advance!
Interestingly enough, your question contains all the concepts you need to know in order to answer it.
In order for your IDE to show you source code for any library you are using, the corresponding library needs to come with source code attached to it.
In other words: you managed to point your IDE to the ZIP file containing the source code for your JRE/JDK - thus your IDE knows what to show you when want to open up String.class
Now it seems that you are using other libraries as well. Maybe maybe, other libraries, have other, different source code ZIP files?!
Long story short: you need to add "source code" ZIPs for each and any additional library you are using and that you want to "peek into".
Within eclipse, you achieve that for example as described in that SO q/a. Side note: that is also something to keep in mind: you should do prior research before coming up with "new" questions. Especially when you are a beginner, you can be very sure that "your" question was asked here before.
I have been asked to update a system where header information gets injected into a tif via a 3rd party console application. I don't need to worry about that bit.
The part I have been asked to look at it the merge process that generates the header information.
The current file generated by the process is assumed as correct, before I make any changes, so I want to add this as an approved result, from that I can then check that the changes I make will alter the file as expected.
I thought this would be a good opportunity to look at using ApprovalTests
The problem I have is that for what ever reason the links to the videos are considered corruptible (Possibly show me kittens jumping into boxes or something, which will stop me working, which ironically means I slow down my work done because I cannot see any help videos).
What I have been looking at is the Approvals.Verify and Approvals.VerifyFile extensions.
But what appears to be happening is confusing me.
using VerifyFile creates a received file, but the contents of the file are just a line the name of the file I have asked it to verify.
using Verify(new FileInfo("FileNameHere")) does not appear to generate the received file that I need to flag as approved, but the test does return saying that it cannot find the approved tif file.
I am probably using VerifyFile completely wrong and might be looking at using Verify wrong as well.
useful info?
Might be useful to know, that as this is a legacy application, running as a windows service, I have wrapped the service in a harness that allows me to call the routines, so the files are physically being written elsewhere on the machine outside of my control (well there is a config, but the return of the service I call generates a file in a fixed location if it is successful). I have tried copying that into the Unit Test project, but that doesn't appear to help.
Verify(File) and VerifyFile(string) are both meant to verify an existing file. As such they merely setting the received file to the file you pass in. You will still need to move/approval/create the approved file.
Here is the pseudo code and process.
[UseReporter(typeof(DiffReporter), typeof(ClipboardReporter)]
public void TestTiff()
{
string tif = YourProcessToCreateTifFile();
Approvals.VerifyFile(tif);
}
[Note: if you don't have an image diff installed, like TortoiseDiff, you might want to use the FileLauncherReporter]
Run this, once you get the result, move the file over by pasting your clipboard into a cmd window.
It will move the temporary tif to your test directory with the name ClassName.TestTiff.approved.tif
After that the test should pass until something changes.
Happy Testing!
I have a couple of test files written in my DSL in my tests plugin/project. Most of the tests use inline multi-line strings and Xtend but in four cases, I need to test code which does some magic with URLs and the classpath, so I really need resources in the classpath for that.
Since loading the resources only works when the extension is correct, I can't give the files a fake extension.
Now my problem: My DSL also has a code generator. This means that eventually, I end up with a couple of generated files in places where I can't have them (they don't compile, for example, and one even contains an error to test error handling when information is split across several files).
I can't disable the Xtext nature because the tests project uses Xtend so for these files, I do need code generation.
Since the generator runs inside Eclipse (I have the DSL plugins installed for other projects), there is no way to override the code generator in Guice.
How can I disable the code generator in this case?
There is a simple way to achieve this:
Open the properties of your project
Expand the entry for your DSL
Select "Compiler"
Select "Enable project specific settings"
Disable/deselect "Compiler is activated" under "General"
If you don't have a properties entry for your DSL:
Add this fragment to your .mwe2 workflow file:
fragment = generator.GeneratorFragment {}
Regenerate your projects
Merge the new code from plugin.xml_gen into plugin.xml both in the base and the UI plugins.
The interesting parts are the two extension points org.eclipse.ui.preferencePages and org.eclipse.ui.propertyPages