I'd like to have a page or a section of information that only is relevant to a specific API. Is that possible in the new portal?
In this case it has to do with information about event data that is sent out (to webhooks) when new items are created and that are then available in operations for the API. If it's not possible to have i an "API-specific" page, where would you put something like this?
I believe in this case you are trying to add some sort of static page or documentation to explain the functionality about a specific API. You may refer to this. As mentioned in the thread, you can try with swagger but in APIM portal it might not work immediately. Microsoft product team has confirmed that they working on improving support for OpenAPIv3. The ETA is about end of September.
However, you may also check the self-hosted gateway feature
The self-hosted gateway feature expands API Management support for hybrid and multi-cloud environments and enables organizations to efficiently and securely manage APIs hosted on-premises and across clouds from a single API Management service in Azure.
Official Documentation
I'm confused by the preliminary documentation on the OneNote dev blog. Does it mean that a Native App accessing has to use (compile in) a Client ID specific to an individual O365 subscription?
The implication being that an Commercial App would need recompiling for each different O365 customer. Is this the intention?
If so then this severely limits the utility of OneNote Api in O365.
I'm hoping that I've misunderstood, can anyone advise please?
Paul,
Apologies if we confused you with our initial preliminary docs. Definitely not the case. The app ID is relative to the O365 tenant that publishes the app, but you just flip over the switch to say it is a multi-tenant app for it to be able to be consumed by any tenant.
I'm planning to build an application that runs on WEB(AngularJS), Android(Native), IOS(Native).
I have experience with MongoDB, but I found CouchBase which sounds really good for me.
I read documentation and I found out I need to use sync_gatway to sync my mobile databases with main database server and reverse, until now everything is fine.
I also need to use "channels" to share records with multiple users.
The problem comes when I need to implement this for web application.
In their documentation on "Working with web applications" they explain how "bucket shadowing" is working, but they also say:
Bucket shadowing is meant to enable sync for existing Couchbase Server
apps. If you are creating a new app with both mobile and web clients,
we recommend starting with the Sync Gateway REST APIs, and connecting
backend services using the Changes Worker Pattern.
After reading Sync Gateway REST API I found out I'm limited to facebook and persona authentication. So I can't use my own authentication mechanism?
Also, there is nothing specified in REST API about channels?
Is there any example project or more documentation about this? I couldn't find anything :(
If someone has experience with this, please explain how this works.
Thanks
There is also Custom (Indirect) Authentication available on Sync Gateway, which you can use for any type of auth you need.
But you have to hide Sync Gateway's Admin API under your backend layer.
As for the channels: it is responsibility of Sync Function to route different documents to necessary channels based on Document data.
Here is a good video that describes how to build production architecture around Couchbase Lite.
I'm probably late for the party - but as of today I'd recommend taking a look in the PouchDB project for the WEB AngularJS side - they match pretty well and will sync with Couchbase.
Regarding authentication, I just released an article on that topic, find it here. Hope this helps somebody
Can anyone give me a brief rundown of how Facebook and Google Talk work, are there persistent connections involved similar to the classic Java based chat systems whereby a server manages the connections and directs messages to the necessary destination or are they stateless? I'd like to create something similar to these but I'm not sure where to start and if I need to have custom services running on a server I may have to rethink my approach.
I'm not after a full-blown explanation but I am interested to know if there's a stateless approach that doesn't require services running on a server. If Html5 is required that's ok.
Both use the Jabber protocol: http://www.jabber.org/
I have to architect a commercial vehicle fleet tracking system.
Each vehicle (a few 100, max a few 1,000) will have a GPS and satellite transmitter and will periodically report its position. Positions will be stored in a database and used to create a Google Map.
There will of course be other functionalities. Security, log in, etc and probably lots of interaction with other corporate databses (drivers start/stop time for salary purposes, etc).
Question: pure GoogleMaps is probably best implemented as a browser based app (Php & MySql?), but with the additional functionality of a commercial vehicle fleet tracking system, would it be better doing something PC based (Windows/Linux)?
Any other advice? Thanks
I think with the capabilities of modern browsers, along with various mature client-side frameworks, we are witnessing an always thinning distinction between web and desktop interfaces.
You may want to take into consideration that a web application automatically solves some important problems for you:
Distribution: No need to distribute your application. Simply provide a URL.
Updates: Upgrading and fixing problems in your software will be easier and quicker if you distribute it through a web interface.
Security: Deriving from the above, you are able to fix security vulnerabilities more promptly.
Compatibility: Your application will be able to work on any operating system that can launch a web browser.
Last but not least, remember that the Google Maps API is not free for this type of application. Article 10.9.C of Google Maps API Terms and Conditions explicitly restrict using the standard Google Maps API for fleet management and asset tracking. You would need the Google Maps API Premier to legally use Google Maps for your application.
According to one unofficial source (dated April 2008), this would cost USD 10,000 per year, which entitles you to track 100 vehicles. If you exceed the 100 vehicles, you would need to add USD 24 per additional vehicle per year.
Implement solution for the domain problems first. It means data storage, data transmission between vehicles and your system, methods of data analysis, aggregation and visualisation.
These will likely to sit as a head-less system on a server and provide access to it remotely, in both directions: to input data and to query data.
Now, PC or Web is more related to presentation on a client side. You can make both if you like. Web client as well as desktop application can serve as a client to remote data and operational server.
Don't forget that you can always host a web control in a thick client app. This is actually trivial with .Net on the Windows platform with the IE control. You can also access the browser's DOM this way and do some neat things. So just because there's a strong web component to what you're doing you're not necessarily "stuck" writing a pure web app.
One big question is what kind of hardware you'll be able to put in the vehicles. Will they be laptops or small PCs with full fledged OSs or something more mobile like CE or a pared-down Linux distro?
Google Maps is JavaScript based so you can do most things with it, e.g browser based, widgets, etc. However due to the licensing Google won't allow you to use it in anything other than an Internet environment unless you use there Enterprise License.
In terms of integrating it into other systems, its really difficult to say what's best without knowing what other software you are using, what protocols they use, are web services available, etc. I agree with Daniel though in that any distributed system not implemented in a browser better have some good reasons not to, simply because the benefits are substantial. You'll need to weight them up though with a full break down of all the different systems you will need to interact with and work out what fits best.
The great thing is that with it being JavaScript based you have a lot of flexibility in what you can do with it.
This is more an extension to #Daniel Vassallo's answer. Although a web based application would solve most problems there may be the small potential issue of bandwidth usage and reception for internet access. This may or may not be an issue for the fleet management, depending on how that is tackled on the hardware side of things.
An offline solution may assist with this issue but then a clever architect could find a way to create an initial web based solution which can be accessed with an offline application which can pick up the slack and/or provide predictive reasoning until a connection is re-established.