Is it possible to get notifications for a functional location; as in: not link it to an equipment first, but just link it to the functional location? And if so, where is the connection between them?
Notifications with functional location only (aka empty equipment) are created via IW21 just fine.
If it's not the case for you then some customizing setting prevents it.
To find the link between the created notification and functional location use chain:
QMEL-qmnum = QMIH-qmnum >>
QMIH-iloan = ILOA-iloan >>
ILOA-tplnr
Related
I am currently building a network with a lot of different company with each one running a node.
The model is basically one big asset. A company might access couple of property and be restricted from other.
I saw that asset property permission is not possible.
The only solution I can see would be to create sub asset of that main asset and apply different permission and deny the possibility to host a node ?
Thanks a lot for your ideas & suggestions.
Jonathan.
Yes your solution work perfectly in case of a participant that does not host a node. However if the participant host a node It is now possible with a new feature implemented in Fabric 1.2: http://hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io/en/latest/private-data/private-data.html
Hyperledger Composer:
I suggest you to split your asset in smaller ones and implement the right access control for each one.
However you can implement specific logics in the transaction processor based on the identity / participant which is invoking the chaincode.
For example:
// Get the current participant.
var currentParticipant = getCurrentParticipant();
if (currentParticipant.getFullyQualifiedType() == 'org.example.ParticipantOfCompanyA') {
//do something
} else if (currentParticipant.getFullyQualifiedType() == 'org.example.ParticipantOfCompanyB') {
//do something else
}
Here the link to the official documentation:
https://hyperledger.github.io/composer/unstable/api/runtime-api#getcurrentparticipant
Hyperledger Fabric:
From Fabric v1.2 is possible to create private data between organizations on the same channel.
Here the link to the official documentation:
http://hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io/en/latest/private-data/private-data.html
I have connected Wso2 with an external LDAP. So, i want to handle the LDAP groups. However in Wso2 doc it states to use :
groupOfNames as our objectClass and
member as our MembershipAttribute
However my current LDAP server is not like that. This means that i use
PosixGroup as my objectClass and
memberUid for my MembershipAttribute
This leads me to the point that , when i add a user to a group, then Wso2 goes and puts this value uid=b1,ou=users,dc=transip,dc=nl inside memberUid. This is not compatible with my set up. What i need is Wso2 to just put the user's uid in the memberUid field and then the entry will be compatible with the rest of my setup.
How can i configure Wso2 to pass the uid when adding a user to a group instead of passing dn (Distinguished Name).
According to JIRA [1], this issue has been already fixed in WSO2 IS 5.1.0. According to the JIRA to get your setup working you need to configure GroupObjectClass as "PosixGroup" and MembershipAttribute as "memberUid" in the UserStoreManager configuration relevant to your UserStore.
[1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/IDENTITY-3400
The same question has posted in https://wso2.org/jira/browse/IDENTITY-6295 as well. In order to achieve this its need to write custom user store manager, changing member attribute to add only uid, rather full DN.
In Box API v1, it was possible to request creation of a shared link for a file or folder, without caring about what kind of sharing was required. In fact, it was not possible to ask for a particular type of share - you just used the public_share method and passed in the target type (file/folder) and target ID, and optionally a share password. In an Enterprise Account, for instance, this might result in the maximum access level being "company" or "collaborators", if public links are disallowed.
With Box API v2, according to the docs here, you need to specify an access parameter that has to be "open", "company", or "collaborators".
The problem is, using the wrong type may cause the share to fail. For instance, in a folder/account that only allows collaborators, I get a 400 error if I ask for a "open" share.
What I really want is to get exactly the same result as if the user clicked the "Share" link in the Box web site. Which is, it should enable sharing for the file but default the level appropriately.
Is there a way to do this with v2, without the admin having to tell us their "preferred" access level for shared links we create? I'm using the Java SDK, like this:
BoxItemRequestObject req = BoxItemRequestObject.createSharedLinkRequestObject(BoxSharedLinkRequestObject.createSharedLinkRequestObject("open"));
BoxItem item = itemsManager.createSharedLink(<ID>, req, BoxResourceType.FILE);
Thanks,
Ben Gilbert
Smartsheet.com
Just set the access to the empty set {}
So your request would look like this:
{"shared_link": {}}
I figured out how to make this work. I need to set access to null when creating the BoxSharedLinkRequestObject, like this:**
BoxItemRequestObject req = BoxItemRequestObject.createSharedLinkRequestObject(BoxSharedLinkRequestObject.createSharedLinkRequestObject(null));
This doesn't produce quite the same JSON as was recommended (shared_link: {}), but it does produce JSON that is apparently equivalent: shared_link: { access: null }. I couldn't figure out any way to produce an empty shared_link object using the SDK -- I either had to have a null shared_link (which didn't work at all) or some value for the access field.
I am trying to develop an integration with box. I am using "box-api", "~> 0.2.2" gem. I have an api key.
box_object = Box::Api.new("j7p3zz29xgva8t52lgoptyxuavtji66y")
ticket = box_object.get_ticket
auth_key= box_object.get_auth_token(ticket[:ticket])
i am getting this exception
Box::Api::NotAuthorized: not_logged_in
Can anyone suggest what is going wrong?
the ticket is used to construct a URL to which your app must redirect the user. This is the first leg of the v1 authentication process. This documentation provides a guide.
Apart from checking the above answers, also ensure that box admin has approved an app before it can be used.
Refer to . - https://community.box.com/t5/How-to-Guides-for-Admins/Enabling-Custom-Built-Applications/ta-p/2188
I'm looking for a way to extend the RTC client to get the current work item programmatically, or even better add a listener that notifies me whenever the current work item is changed.
I don't know where to start. Any hints?
One can use the following code to get the IWorkItemActivationManager:
IWorkItemActivationManager manager = ClientModel.getWorkItemActivationManager();
Wie this manager, it is possible to use the method getActiveWorkItem to get a IWorkItemHandle:
IWorkItemHandle handle = manager.getActiveWorkItem();
Then the following code can be used to get the IWorkItem:
IAuditableClient auditableClient= (IAuditableClient) Controller.getInstance().getTeamRepository().getClientLibrary(IAuditableClient.class);
IWorkItem item = auditableClient.resolveAuditable(handle, com.ibm.team.workitem.common.model.IWorkItem.FULL_PROFILE, null);
The ClientModel is in the following package: com.ibm.team.workitem.rcp.core
One way I usually explore is the OSLC API through REST call.
With a Chrome and its "Developer Tool" activated, I click on the web client and look at the request done.
That gives an indication of the kind of service involved.
Then you can look at "How to consume the Rational Team Concert change management services", which illustrates how those services are structured.
Combine it with "Extending Rational Team Concert 3.x" and you can start from there.