Im using a code not writing by me. So when executing this code we get error about the inexistance of zero_grads()
optimizer.zero_grads()
AttributeError: 'Adam' object has no attribute 'zero_grads'
This code is:
import chainer.optimizers as O
optimizer = O.Adam()
optimizer.setup(model)
clip = chainer.optimizer.GradientClipping(5.0)
optimizer.add_hook(clip)
....
optimizer.zero_grads()
optimizer.update()
Does i should change: optimizer.zero_grads()
to
optimizer.use_cleargrads(use=True)?
Note that im using chainer 4.0 version and the code what building with chainer 1.5.
optimizer's method zero_grads are deprecated and deleted, now it is preferable to use Link's method cleargrads.
So I guess you should change optimizer.zero_grads() to model.cleargrads()
Also, Refer
AttributeError: 'MomentumSGD' object has no attribute 'zero_grads'
However, when you want to use the code written in chainer v1.5, there may be several other places you need to update for chainer v4. It might be better to try executing the code with chainer v1.5 to see the behavior at first.
Related
I'm using Chisel and blackbox to run my chisel logic against a verilog register file.
The registerfile does not have reset signal so I expect the register to be randomly initialized.
I passed the --x-initial unique to verilator,
Basically this is how I launch the test:
private val backendName = "verilator"
"NOCDMA" should s" do blkwrite and blkread correctly (with $backendName)" in {
Driver.execute(Array("--fint-write-vcd","--backend-name",s"$backendName",
"--more-vcs-flags","--trace-depth 1 --x-initial unique"),
()=>new DMANetworkWithMem(memAddrWidth,memDataWidth)(nocDataWidth)(nNodesX,nNodesY)){
c => new DMANetworkRWTest(c)
}
}
But The data I read from the register file is all zero before I wrote anything to it.
The read data is correct after I wrote to it.
So, is there anything inside chisel that I need to tune or I did not do everything properly ?
Any suggestions?
I'm not certain, but I found the following issue on Verilator with a similar issue: https://github.com/verilator/verilator/issues/1399.
From skimming the above issue, I think you also need to pass +verilator+seed+<value> and +verilator+rand+reset+<value> at runtime. I am not an expert in the iotesters, but I believe you can add these runtime values through the iotesters argument: --more-vcs-c-flags.
Side note, I would also set --x-assign unique in Verilator if there are cases in the Verilog where runtime would otherwise inject an X (eg. out-of-bounds index).
I hope this helps!
This is a general question about CakePHP 3, I have a substantial OOP background, but I'm new to PHP and am stuck using Cake for a project. I guess this revolves around conventions.
So say I have some model entity, Apple, with a matching ApplesTable class. In the ApplesTable class, I've implemented a method to find something from the database. If I was in the ApplesController, my understanding is that I could write: $this->Apples->method() and it would be fine.
However, if I want to access that method in say, the OrangesController, just typing the same thing gives me a fatal error saying "Call to a member function method() on boolean." From what I found researching, it could be something with it not being able to load the model element so the method call written above would just be producing false, creating the error.
Again, I'm newer to PHP and totally new to Cake, so some of the conventions with the framework are still a little hazy. Hopefully someone can help clear this up -- thanks!
Try loadModel(), when you need to use a model table/collection that is not the controller’s default one.
// ApplesController
loadModel("Oranges");
$this->Oranges->makeJuice();
$orange_sugar = $this->Oranges->sugar;
or if your models are associated,
// ApplesController
$this->Apples->Oranges->makeJuice();
$orange_sugar = $this->Apples->Oranges->sugar;
There is not much to add to the title. It's what i'm trying to do. Any suggestions?
I reviewed the docs at github and googled extensively.
The best i got is:
value.parseHtml().select('p[contains('xyz')]')
It results in a syntax error.
The 'select' syntax is based on the select syntax in Beautiful Soup (http://jsoup.org/cookbook/extracting-data/selector-syntax)
In this case I believe the syntax you need is:
value.parseHtml().select("p:contains(xyz)")
Owen
Perhaps you missed my writeup (and WARNING) on the wiki :) here ?
https://github.com/OpenRefine/OpenRefine/wiki/StrippingHTML#extract-html-attributes-text-links-with-integrated-grel-jsoup-commands
WARNING: Make sure to use .toString() suffixes when needed to output strings into Refine cells while working with the built-in HTML GREL commands (the default output is org.jsoup.nodes objects). Otherwise you'll get a preview just fine in the Expression Editor, BUT no data shown in the Refine cells when you apply it!
BTW, How could we make the docs better and where, so that someone doesn't miss this in the future ?
I even gave folks a nice example in our docs that shows using .toString() :
https://github.com/OpenRefine/OpenRefine/wiki/GREL-Other-Functions#selectelement-e-string-s
I have just started a new version of my Crysis Wars Server Side Modification called InfinityX. For better management, I have put the functions inside tables as it looks neater and I can group functions together (like Core.PlayerHandle:GetIp(player)), but I have ran into a problem.
The problem is that the specified method to get the players' name, player:GetName() is being seen as an invalid method, when the method actually is completely valid.
I would like to know if using the below structure is causing a problem and if so, how to fix it. This is the first time I've used this structure for functions, but it is already proving easier than the old method I was using.
The Code:
Event =
{
PlayerConnect = function(player)
Msg.All:CenteredConsole("$4Event$8 (Connect)$9: $3"..player:GetName().." on channel "..player.actor:GetChannel());
System.LogAlways(Default.Tag.."Incoming Connect on Channel "..player.actor:GetChannel());
Event:Log("Connect", player);
end;
};
The below code works when I bypass the function and put the code directly where it's needed:
Msg.All:CenteredConsole("$4Event$8 (Connect)$9: $3"..player:GetName().." on channel "..player.actor:GetChannel());
System.LogAlways(Default.Tag.."Incoming Connect on Channel "..player.actor:GetChannel());
The Error:
[Warning] [Lua Error] infinityx/main/core.events.lua:23: attempt to call method 'GetName' (a nil value)
PlayerConnect, (infinityx/main/core.events.lua: 23)
ConnectScript, (infinityx/main/core.main.lua: 52)
OnClientEnteredGame, (scripts/gamerules/instantaction.lua: 511)
(null) (scripts/gamerules/teaminstantaction.lua: 520)
Any clarification would be appreciated.
Thanks :)
Well, as PlayerConnect is inside the table Event, and you are calling with a ":", add self as first arg in the function, like:
PlayerConnect = function(self, player)
Clearly, player in the first block of code is not the same as player in the second block of code. The problem must be that the caller of Event.PlayerConnect is not passing the same value.
To test that your Event.PlayerConnect function works, try this in the same place as your second block of code:
Event.PlayerConnect(player)
That should work as you expect.
So, the problem comes down to how Event.PlayerConnect is called without the second block of code. I'm not familiar with that game engine so I don't know how it is done. Perhaps reviewing the documentation and/or debugging that area would help. If you print(player) or call the equivalent log function in both cases, you should see they are different. If you can't run in a debugger, you can still get a stack trace with print(debug.traceback("Accessing player, who's value is: "..player)). If there is indeed some kind of table-based player object in both cases, you can try comparing their fields to see how they are different. You might need to write a simple dumping function to help with that.
I'm writing a simple Twitter client to play with coffeescript. I have an object literal with some functions that call each other via callbacks.
somebject =
foo: 'bar'
authenticateAndGetTweets: ->
console.log "Authorizing using oauth"
oauth = ChromeExOAuth.initBackgroundPage(this.oauthdetails)
oauth.authorize( this.afterLogin.call this )
afterLogin: ->
this.getTweets(this.pollinterval)
This code works perfectly. Edit: actually this.afterlogin should be sent as a callback above, not ran immediately, as Trevor noted below.
If, within authenticateAndGetTweets, I removed the 'call' and just ran:
oauth.authorize( this.afterLogin )
and don't use 'call', I get the following error:
Uncaught TypeError: Object [object DOMWindow] has no method 'getTweets
Which makes sense, since 'this' in afterLogin is bound to the thing that initiated the callback rather than 'someobject' my object literal.
I was wondering if there's some magic in Coffeescript I could be doing instead of 'call'. Initially I thought using the '=>' but the code will give the same error as above if '=>' is used.
So is there a way I can avoid using call? Or does coffeescript not obviate the need for it? What made '=>' not work how I expected it to?
Thanks. I'm really enjoying coffeescript so far and want to make sure I'm doing things 'the right way'.
As matyr points out in his comments, the line
oauth.authorize( this.afterLogin.call this )
doesn't cause this.afterLogin to be called as a callback by oauth.authorize; instead, it's equivalent to
oauth.authorize this.afterLogin()
Assuming that you want this.afterLogin to used as a callback by oauth.authorize, megakorre's answer gives a correct CoffeeScript idiom. An alternative approach supported by many modern JS environments, as matyr points out, would be to write
oauth.authorize( this.afterLogin.bind this )
There's no CoffeeScript shorthand for this, partly because Function::bind isn't supported by all major browsers. You could also use the bind function from a library like Underscore.js:
oauth.authorize( _.bind this.afterLogin, this )
Finally, if you were to define someobject as a class instead, you could use => to define afterLogin such that it's always bound to the instance, e.g.
class SomeClass
foo: 'bar'
authenticateAndGetTweets: ->
console.log "Authorizing using oauth"
oauth = ChromeExOAuth.initBackgroundPage(this.oauthdetails)
oauth.authorize(this.afterLogin)
afterLogin: =>
this.getTweets(this.pollinterval)
someobject = new SomeClass
you can put a lambda in the function call like so
auth.authorize(=> #afterLogin())
You have to use either the call or apply methods because they set the scope of the function (the value of this). The error results because the default scope is the window object.