Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 1 year ago.
Improve this question
As far as I can tell there hasn't been any releases in 5+ years. Is it a dead project, or is there a fork of it somewhere with ongoing development?
It's a decent piece of software, but it's still missing at least one must have (to me) feature: the ability to rotate objects.
There have been no updates for years, and the developers haven't responded to inquiries, so the project does appear dead.
I haven't found any forks or any true open source alternatives. Inkscape can be used to accomplish anything that Dia can or should do, but it's a bit like using c++ to write and format a word document.
Edit: draw.io seems to be a decent alternative
No, the Dia development is not halted.
The Dia editor has been overtaken by GNOME. Its hosted at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/dia and during first half of 2021 it had cca 20 commits from cca 10 different people.
Thus, Dia is still much alive.
Related
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I am involved in a project which is meant to eventually become open-source and have a code contributor community. Is there any "right" way of doing this and what should/can I expect?
Thanks
There's a pretty good book on this topic, Producing Open Source Software by Karl Fogel, which is available for free online or in dead tree form if you prefer to read it that way. It would be hard to expand much on it in a single answer. Every project will, of course, be different, so I'd recommend reading that book, and then asking more specific questions about your particular project; answers will depend on the language and platform you use, how active an open source community there already is in your area, what your business model is, and many other factors.
I would recommand using Github or Google Project Hosting (subversion/mercurial), and of course use social media network to promote the project helps too.
You can start something like this - http://wxwidgets.org/develop/
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Declining commit graph at ohloh.net:
http://www.ohloh.net/languages/compare?commit=Update&l0=c&l10=lisp&l11=csharp&l12=-1&l1=html&l2=java&l3=php&l4=perl&l5=python&l6=haskell&l7=clojure&l8=scala&l9=ruby&measure=commits
Maybe the recession has caused people to focus more on work that pays, instead of their hobbies.
Ohloh stopped automatically discovering new open source projects from code.google.com, sourceforge.net and other forges in January of 2010.
Also a large number of open source projects have since moved to github.com and many new ones start there. Ohloh has never automatically discovered new projects on github.com
So the substantial decline of the graph is due to a data problem on Ohloh's side.
This year, Ohloh has plans to start scraping automatically again.
They plan on covering code.google.com, sourceforge.net, github.com and other forges
Since Ohloh's data is based on commit history from source control, the graphs will retroactively correct themselves and all will be right again in the world.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
When I browse github I have a hard time differentiating high quality code from half-finished crap without taking a serious look at the code. What are some good ways to quickly size up a project? Rubyforge allows people to designate a "Development Status". SourceForge has a "recommend" feature. Is there some feature that I've overlooked? I just look at the number of forks and watchers. Is there a better way? I don't see a checkout count, or any other measure of popularity.
I would check for documentation. Well advanced code should have associated documentation, while fledgling projects are too busy getting their code and architecture done to create documentation, which will probably have to change by the time they release anyway. Basically, writing documentation says to me that you think the code is stable and functional enough for users to be able to benefit from it.
Recent activity is a big one. If the project does not have recent developer commits or there are open bugs, tickets, issues, questions, etc without developer responses then move on.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I want to start an open source project, but my favourite project name was already used for a framework with the same goal. This project was never popular, there is nothing to download or executable, the project had only two active days with commits at Google Code and is dead since four years. In other words: the project is irrelevant but the name is in use at Google Code and ohloh (the same dead project). The .org domain would be available.
Would it be ok to reuse this project name?
4 years, just 2 active days? Get it and make it better then old dead one ;)
I would advise against it, even if it is clearly dead. Recycling old names can cause a great deal of confusion. Moreover, if the old project has been indexed, then searches for your project or for documentation for your project could accidentally turn up information related to the previous project. There are plenty of good names out there that haven't been taken. Better to brainstorm now than cause confusion later.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
my company is very LAMP based as of now, and my management had decided to send a hardware guy and a developer to this MLG workshop. From what I check online it's mostly MS trying to bundle up a whole lot of their stuff and try to sell it to us to solve our problems.
Plus the fact that most of what we use now are pretty much open source tech, LAMP, purchased 3rd party libraries.
So I feel this is more of a management thingy rather that what a developer should attend. Have any you guys attended this? Or is this is waste of time as far as a developer need is. If it's not then I would probably talk to my team lead who's more managerial like than me to attend :P
thanks.
Go there yourself. If you send managers there, MS could succeed in selling them stuff, and then you would be forced to use it.
... I'm confused why any of you would bother attending this when you're an Open Source LAMP shop. Is a switch being considered??