How can one be sure that even if an EWS call to set item internet headers succeeds (I.E. a mailbox.makeEwsRequestAsync call's result status is not Office.AsyncResultStatus.Failed), those headers are also present on the officeJs mail item BEFORE completing an onSend event ?
This question relates to:
onSend REST API changes do not reflect in the UI
and
using ExtendedProperties in the Outlook REST API to set Message item headers
The most straightforward answer for this is the change key. Any change to any property on an item will result in that item having a new change key. When you call SendItem/UpdateItem and pass in the change key that you have, IF the item has changed (including message headers), the call will fail due to conflict resolution, assuming that you pass in the NeverOverwrite conflictResolutionMode for UpdateItem (which can also send). If I recall correctly, SendItem will always fail if the change key has changed.
Related
My goal is very simple and I would guess it is a very common goal among web developers.
I am creating a Rails (5.1) application, and I simply want to use AJAX to get the value of a specific cell in a specific row of a specific table in my database (later I am going to use that value to highlight some text on the current page in the user's browser).
I have not been able to find any documentation online explaining how to do this. As I said, it seems like a basic task to ask of jquery and ajax, so I'm confused as to why I'm having so much trouble figuring it out.
For concreteness, say I have a table called 'animals', and I want to get the value of the column 'species' for the animal with 'id' = 99.
How can I construct an AJAX call to query the database for the value of 'species' for the 'animal' with 'id' = 99 .
Though some DBs provide a REST API, what we commonly do is define a route in the app to pull and return data from the DB.
So:
Add a route
Add a controller/action for that route
In that action, fetch the data from the DB and render it in your preferred format
On the client-side, make the AJAX call to that controller/action and do something with the response.
I have received data from json web service with RESTRequest component
but I do not know how I should display the returned data in a grid?
How can I use RESTResponseDataSetAdapter to improve this?
Try this - it took me about 15 minutes to get working
Open the RESTDemos in your Delphi install's Samples\Object Pascal\Database\RESTDemo
Drop a TStringGrid on the RHS of the the Delphi-Praxis tab (I chose this one because
the URI on the Fetch to DataSet produces a 404 error).
If necessary, make the non-visual controls on the form visible.
Dbl-click BindingList and use the QuickBindings to add a LinkGridToDataSource. Set its
DataSource to ClientDataSet and its GridControl to StringGrid1. Thus will cause DBSourceDB1 to be created'.
Set the Response property of RestReponseDataSetAdaptor to `RESTResponse'.
Compile, run and click the fetch list of forums button. You should see the StringGrid populates
from the contents of memo_ResponseData
That should show you that LiveBindings can work with a RESTReponse to populate a grid. The RESTDemos demo has a lot more things in it, but if this is your first experience of LiveBindings, you might want to backtrack and try setting up a simple test project which populates a TStringGrid and a few TEdits from a dataset of your own.
I have the below style created, how this currently works is that I am using AngularJS to call an API which will return JSON. The response is true or false and based on the values from the database the class changes from white to green. Green represents that it needs to be completed. Once they are complete, they click the red button to clear it out. This all runs on a 5 second interval in Angular and checks the database and rewrites the $scope object.
Change request came in and they want to be able to click on the green items to check them off as they are complete, then click the red button. The problem, how can I get it to where I update the object without changing the already changed class that a user has completed?
Your problem is that there is no single truth about the state of the boxes anymore. One state is in the server and the client sees another state.
There is no other way than extending your model (the fields in your $scope) to keep track of the client changes. You could for example mark certain boxes as "locked" and prevent an update with the server values.
However, if your regular update just overwrites your model with a new set of values, you will have to write some code to update the existing model partially instead of overwriting it completely.
I moved three files in My Drive to the trash. Then retrieved changes with Changes: list API (https://developers.google.com/drive/v2/reference/changes/list). It returned three changes, with ids 11607, 11608 and 11609. However, the largestChangeId field was 11608. When I made the API request again with startChangeId: 11608, it returned the two last changes. When I made the API request with startChangeId: 11609, it returned no result.
Is it expected? Or relying on change ids in such a way is not right?
In your case, it looks like you're exposed to a bug. I'm adding details of the changes list and how it should work in normal circumstances. Let's assume your latest change id was 11606 and you made three trashing operations.
GET changes?startChangeId=11607 should list:
11607
11608
11609
And the next time you are requesting changes.list, you should always increment the latest latestChangeId by 1.
In this case you need to request the following on your next poll.
GET changes?startChangeID=11610 and it will be returning an empty list.
Using the Box 1.0 REST API, I am trying to work with the functions in SOAP UI.
The API doc for get_managed_users with user_id=12345 (internal id retrieved with get_user_id call correctly) is returning all the users. The docs say that would be the case if you do not specify a user_id value. But my full command is: (Token and API key changed to protect the clueless)
https://www.box.com/api/1.0/rest?user_id=27360&auth_token=blahbalhblah1234&action=get_managed_users&api_key=someKeyYouShouldNotSee
Now I could work with the complete result list, but that won't scale as we get thousands of users into the system.
I can make a call with edit_managed_user, using the same user_id value and the change is reflected in the UI, and in the next get_managed_users call. Thus I do have the correct user_id value, I would so assume.
I tried testuser#gmail.com as the user_id value as well, and get the entire list back. This leads me to believe that somehow I am sending user_id wrong, but I just do not see it.
Any hints? Why, with what seems like a valid user_id value is it acting like it is absent or incorrect?
Most likely you have either called this method with an invalid user_id, or one that is not in your set of managed users. Can you double check that the user comes back in your list of already managed users?