I wanted to read generated opt codes for my simple program:
function test() {
const i = 2845884;
const k = 3;
return i == 2845884 ? k : 7;
}
test();
I found this gist that says that I need to build d8 from sources and run it with --trace-opt-verbose flag.
https://gist.github.com/kevincennis/0cd2138c78a07412ef21
That approach doesn't work for me neither other approaches I found on the web. Looks like all current solutions are outdated.
How can I see what opt codes will be generated for this program?
How can I see what opt codes will be generated for this program?
For this program, you are already seeing all optimized code, because no optimized code will be generated for it, because it doesn't run anywhere near long enough for optimized compilation to be worth the effort.
In general, to print optimized code that V8 generates, you need three things:
(1) A binary that has disassembler support. This is on-by-default in Debug and "optdebug" builds; for Release builds you need the GN arg v8_enable_disassembler = true.
(2) The command-line flag --print-opt-code.
(3) A function that runs hot enough to get optimized.
Try calling your test() in a loop. If you still don't see anything, run the loop more often.
(The threshold varies depending on V8 version, test program size and behavior, and due to background compilation possibly also your hardware, so there is no general rule-of-thumb number I could state here. For one-liner functions, expect to need several thousand calls.)
To answer your other question: yes, V8's optimizing compiler supports constant folding, and your test program will be folded to just return 3.
Side notes:
I found this gist that says that I need to build d8 from sources and run it with --trace-opt-verbose flag.
--trace-opt-verbose has never printed optimized code, and the gist you linked doesn't claim that it does. (That said, that gist makes a bunch of rather dubious claims, so it's not a particularly good source to begin with.)
Looks like all current solutions are outdated.
Or slightly more accurately: that one gist didn't solve your problem.
On SO alone, you could have found How to print the compiled instructions in V8 engine? or V8 will not print out disassembly or Are there ways to see the assembly code for the code generated by any of the JavaScript jits, especially V8's?, all dealing with variations of this question.
None of this has changed recently; the build flag is a requirement since at least 2014, the command-line flag as well as the fact that optimization only kicks in after a while have been unchanged since at least 2011.
FWIW, the easiest way to build V8 yourself is to follow the official documentation. The gm.py helper script used by that flow even sets the v8_enable_disassembler flag for you automatically.
Specifically, my issue is that I have CUDA code that needs <curand_kernel.h> to run. This isn't included by default in NVRTC. Presumably then when creating the program context (i.e. the call to nvrtcCreateProgram), I have to send in the name of the file (curand_kernel.h) and also the source code of curand_kernel.h? I feel like I shouldn't have to do that.
It's hard to tell; I haven't managed to find an example from NVIDIA of someone needing standard CUDA files like this as a source, so I really don't understand what the syntax is. Some issues: curand_kernel.h also has includes... Do I have to do the same for each of these? I am not even sure the NVRTC compiler will even run correctly on curand_kernel.h, because there are some language features it doesn't support, aren't there?
Next: if you've sent in the source code of a header file to nvrtcCreateProgram, do I still have to #include it in the code to be executed / will it cause an error if I do so?
A link to example code that does this or something like it would be appreciated much more than a straightforward answer; I really haven't managed to find any.
You have to send the "filename" and the source of each header separately.
When the preprocessor does its thing, it'll use any #include filenames as a key to find the source for the header, based on the collection that you provide.
I suspect that, in this case, the compiler (driver) doesn't have file system access, so you have to give it the source in much the same way that you would for shader includes in OpenGL.
So:
Include your header's name when calling nvrtcCreateProgram. The compiler will, internally, generate the equivalent of a std::map<string,string> containing the source of each header indexed by the given name.
In your kernel source, use #include "foo.cuh" as usual.
The compiler will use foo.cuh as an index or key into its internal map (created when you called nvrtcCreateProgram), and will retrieve the header source from that collection
Compilation proceeds as normal.
One of the reasons that nvrtc provides only a "subset" of features is that the compiler plays in a somewhat sandboxed environment, without necessarily having all of the supporting tools and utilities lying around that you have with offline compilation. So, you have to manually handle a lot of the stuff that the normal nvcc + (gcc | MSVC| clang) combination provides.
A possible, but non-ideal, solution would be to preprocess the file that you need in your IDE, save the result and then #include that. However, I bet there is a better way to do that. if you just want curand, consider diving into the library and extracting the part you need (blech) or using another GPU-friendly rand implementation. On older CUDA versions, I just generated a big array of random floats on the host, uploaded it to the GPU, and sampled it in the kernels.
This related link may be helpful.
You do not need to load curand_kernel.h yourself and add it to the include "aliases" mechanism.
Instead, you can simply add the CUDA include directory to your (set of) include paths, e.g. by adding --include-path=/usr/local/cuda/include to your NVRTC compiler options.
(I do this in my GPU-kernel-runner test harness, by default, to be on the safe side.)
I would like to know what the following declarations do. I have seen them in a C code on MSVisual Studio Compiled code.
extern "C" __declspec(dllexport)
extern "C" __declspec(dllimport)
I know somewhat that they are used to declare external linkage for functions(functional defined in different source file.But would like to know in detail how this works.
-Ajit
The extern "C" part tells a C++ compiler that the item being declared should use C linkage, which means that the name will not be mangled (or will be mangled in the same way that a C compiler would). This makes it so the item can be linked to from C code and most other languages as well, since C linkage is typically the standard used for that on a platform.
The __declspec(dllexport) and __declspec(dllimport) items are non-standard attributes that tell the compiler that the item should be exported (or imported) from a DLL. The __declspec() attribute is supported on MS compilers and probably other compilers that target Windows. I'm not sure if GCC does or not. Other storage class attributes that can be specified with __declspec() (at least in MSVC) include uuid(), naked, deprecated and others that provide the compiler with information on how an object or function should be compiled.
dllexport tells the compiler to generate a .lib file. dllimport tells the compiler to look in a .lib file for the function declaration (its definition will be in a dll).
It means the functions/classes that follow it are visible and accessible across a DLL boundary so you can link against them and call them from other code
Everyone (at least everyone who uses a compiled language) has faced compilation errors but how many times do you get to actually crash the compiler?
I've had my fair share of "internal compiler errors" but most went away just by re-compiling. Do you have a (minimal) piece of code that crashes the compiler?
I write the compiler we use, so it crashes sometimes.
easy.
// -*- C++ -*-
template <int n>
class Foo : public Foo<n+1>
{
};
int main(int, char*[])
{
Foo<0> x;
return 0;
};
ejgottl#luna:~/tmp$ g++ -ftemplate-depth-1000000 -Wall foo.cpp -o foo
g++: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)
Please submit a full bug report.
See `<URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html>` for instructions.
For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions, see
`<URL:file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.2/README.Bugs>`.
I haven't made GHC (a Haskell compiler) crash yet, but I've gotten it to error out with a
My brain just exploded.
I can't handle pattern bindings for existentially-quantified constructors.
It's pretty easy to work around, and you don't hit this unless you have some tricky (and usually wrong) design, but it probably wins as the best compiler error message ever.
VC catches it gracefully now, but in the mid 90's, this would crashed both Microsoft C++ and Borland C++ compilers:
struct MyClass
{
MyClass operator->() { return *this; }
};
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
MyClass A;
A->x;
}
An overloaded operator-> is intrinsically recursive. The function is expected to return a pointer, which oper-> is again applied to. This fragment made code generation infinitely recursive.
Actionscript 3.0:
switch(on_some_variable)
{
}
Empty switch = Kaboom!
Visual C++ 9.0 SP1
this just happened to me
------ Build started: Project: pdfp, Configuration: Debug Win32 ------
Compiling...
reader.cpp
xref.cpp
c:\projects\pdfp\xref.cpp(52) : fatal error C1001: An internal error has occurred in the compiler.
(compiler file 'f:\dd\vctools\compiler\cxxfe\sl\p1\c\toil.c', line 8569)
To work around this problem, try simplifying or changing the program near the locations listed above.
Please choose the Technical Support command on the Visual C++
Help menu, or open the Technical Support help file for more information
Generating Code...
Build log was saved at "file://c:\Projects\pdfp\Debug\BuildLog.htm"
pdfp - 1 error(s), 0 warning(s)
========== Build: 0 succeeded, 1 failed, 0 up-to-date, 0 skipped ==========
Well, this didn't actually crash the compiler -- It was merely a bug were VC++ wouldn't accept perfectly good code. (details provided here).
The odd this about it was that it was only triggered when three fairly obscure conditions were all met. Moving one line of code was all that was needed for an effective workaround. And one of the needed pre-conditions was "using namespace std;" which is widely discouraged in production code.
Nevertheless, messages asking how to fix the problem were a staple on Microsoft VC++ newsgroups. I couldn't figure out how so many people stumbled onto an obscure bug. So, eventually, I asked someone.....
The exact code needed to trigger the bug was an example in Stroustrup's "The C++ Programming Langauge". (*)
(*) Note, I'm not saying he did it on purpose. I sure he tested it under a UNIX variant of C++, and was completely unaware of it's affect on VC++.
I've seen a few compiler bugs in the C# compiler (all edge cases, all reported appropriately) and confirmed some crashes provoked by other people.
The scariest compiler (of a sort) bug I've encountered was a JIT bug in one version of Java. It was quite reproducible, but caused the VM to go down. Adding a fairly no-op statement (I can't remember exactly what offhand - possibly just declaring an extra local variable with an initial value) moved it away from whatever corner case it happened to be - and it was fixed in a later version.
This crashed the C64 BASIC:
PRINT 0 + "" +- 0
Yes, especially when it's an old or undermaintained compiler (GCC 2.95, Tendra in C++ mode). I don't keep the pieces of code around, though.
Visual C++ 5. 'Nuff said.
Oops, forgot an 'e' in typedef and crashed the compiler.
typdef struct kGUIColor GameColor;
c:\source\kgui\samples\space\space.cpp(35) : fatal error C1001: INTERNAL COMPILER ERROR
(compiler file 'msc1.cpp', line 2708)
Please choose the Technical Support command on the Visual C++
Help menu, or open the Technical Support help file for more information
Today VS2003SP1 gave me a C1001 (Internal Compiler Error) complaining about compiler file 'msc1.cpp', line 2708) because of this:
struct PATTERN {
…
};
It turns out that the problem was that the structure name I was trying to define (PATTERN) was already a typedef in the GDI for a brush type. However instead of telling me that the symbol is already defined (like it does for most other things) it not only did not point to the structure as the problem—I narrowed the problem down to it by selectively commenting out blocks until the error went away—but it also gave me the aforementioned cryptic error which has nothing to do with the file specified—which I can’t even find to examine the line in question. :|
I was able to reproduce it with the following code:
typedef int SOMETHINGOROTHER;
struct SOMETHINGOROTHER {};
> fatal error C1001: INTERNAL COMPILER ERROR
> (compiler file 'msc1.cpp', line 2708) …
Whereas the following code gives the expected error message:
struct SOMETHINGOROTHER {};
typedef int SOMETHINGOROTHER;
> 'SOMETHINGOROTHER' : redefinition; different basic types
Clearly the problem is in the compiler’s structure handling routine.
I wonder if VS2005+ do better…
Here's a way to crash the VS2003 C++ compiler.
typedef map<int,int> Tmap;
private: Tmap; * m_map;
This will result in a crash and the following error message
fatal error C1001: INTERNAL COMPILER
ERROR (compiler file 'msc1.cpp', line
2708) Please choose the Technical
Support command on the Visual C++ Help
menu, or open the Technical Support
help file for more information
Remove the semicolon immediately after Tmap (second line which defines m_map) to eliminate the error.
In a project I was working in, some specific usages of Boost Lambda expressions could make the Visual C++ compiler crash. (We were using Visual Studio 2003)
The compiler would only crash during the release build, a debug build would work fine.
There had been a religious war raging through the team about the appropriate usage of the lambda libraries, I was almost grateful that the compiler settled it for us. :-)
In version 1.2.x of the Mono C# compiler would crash quite a bit with complicated code (if I remember correctly, nested anonymous delegates). Fortunately with 2.x release, I haven't seen any crashes.
At my previous job we had a simulator which was notorious for being able to crash (ICE) compilers or cause them to generate incorrect code. And when the code actually was generated correctly, ofter the compiler took 15 minutes for a single source file. Visual Studio was never (as long as I worked there) able to compile the simulator core.
The core was automatically generated from a DSL, and the generated code often pushed the compiler to its limits.
Upgrading to a new version of GCC often caused widespread nervosity: will the new version work?
Thanks to #Nick, this crashes VS2005.
template<typename Res, typename T>
Res operator_cast(const T& t)
{
return t.operator Res();
}
int main()
{
return operator_cast<int>(0);
}
I've crashed a compiler before by running it out of memory.
Give a DOS compiler about 0.5mb of source code. Crunch.
When you get a message "Catastrophic Failure" you know you're trying....
Michael
I use both pcc and gcc to compile my old OS project.
I found a bug with how both pcc and gcc handle a non-trivial piece of code and it crashed pcc.
(chars are signed on my platform)
struct{
char myvalue:1;
}mystruct;
pcc crashed because all bitfield values must be int though, so it's really more buggy there, but gcc handles it wrongly. See, if you think about it, it is signed, but only has room for one bit. So therefore, it only can store 0 and -1. Well, gcc handles it wrong by storing 0 or 1.
VC++ has crashed on me when compiling C++ if template usage is messed up (e.g., missing out on a closing ">").
I did. Some Delphi versions (lets say #4) crashed very often with cryptic error messages.
The newer versions (2006 and more) are stable but not rock solid. (7 was great in that case).
Compiler crashes often occur with large edits, and debug sessions of complex projects (lots of dll's). Most of the time a restart of the ide is enough. But sometimes you need to restart the PC.
O and I once crashed OS2 along with the compiler because the swapfile grew too large.
One time when I used the generators example from the Python docs, it broke the version of Python we were using. The same week, one of my colleagues managed to misuse the FFI such that any calculation involving the number 3 would crash python.
The Microsoft Xbox 360 compiler can crash easily. I was given source code with Japanese comments and when converted to regular text one of the last characters on the line was a '\' so it continued the comment onto the next line. If the next line was a switch command, then the compiler crashes.
//wierd japanese characters here %^$$\
switch(n)
{
case 0:
.....
break;
case 1:
.....
break;
}
I have crashed Delphi 7 many times asking it to compile legacy dos code.
The prime culprit seems to be any qualification of something as being in the system unit. This won't always blow it up but when it blows up on such stuff I look through and rewrite anything that requires such an override and the problem goes away.
The blowups are 100% reproduceable but I have never managed to make a simple test case. It doesn't actually crash the compiler most of the time, you usually get an error that has nothing to do with the problem and may be hundreds of lines from it. The environment is destabilized, save and exit is ok but don't think of doing anything else.
Back in the stone age with Borland Pascal 7 (the last dos version) I broke it many times. No crash, just incorrect and inconsistent code emission. I finally learned to keep the .EXE (not counting debug info) below 3mb. The farther beyond that I went the more unstable it got.
I've crashed VC++ a number of times, usually with template code. But that's not the most interesting crash...
I crashed the VS2005 Team System compiler with the /analyze option compiling my shared code library which compiled without error without the switch, and on VS2008 with and without the switch. Of course MS wasn't very interested because it was a bug in the old version of the compiler, but I thought it was pretty interesting.
I managed to segfault the Python interpreter. Of course, I was working on a C extension at the time and getting it not-quite-right.
It doesn't happen as much as it used to, but occasionally the ASP.net precompiler has issues - I haven't seen it personally, but I have fixed a problem on another project once where they had name clashes because they weren't using namespaces properly (caused compiler crashes) during pre-compile.
In the good old days (unmanaged MSVC++) we had the odd compiler crash usually due to linking in external static win32 classes (.lib) and a couple of odd bits of code occasionally caused issues, but these were all picked up very quickly.
I don't know if I would call it crashing, but sdcc (Small Device C Compiler) fails at compiling code formed in a particular way:
Target: 8051
Code had to execute in a 512 byte cache loaded from an external tester
Tester is in control and stores the code - cache can't fetch the next page
No function calls allowed - the PC (program counter) would skip to a place not resident in cache; preprocessor macros were used to accomplish modular coding practice
Jumps (branching) allowed if it doesn't skip out of the cache
No const values - in the data section of the program code which causes code in cache to fetch something not in cache - preprocessor constant (#define) OK here
The preprocessor macros are unrolled resulting in flat, but large code - everything in main(); execution skips the startup code (setting up the stack, etc) and starts at the beginning of main()
Relevant part of this answer:
Occasionally, sdcc would refuse to compile syntactically correct code, with a message about running out of memory. This even happened compiling on 64-bit boxes with 8GB of RAM.
The solution in these cases was to split the firmware into separate pieces and compile them separately and execute them separately. The pieces may have been able to be linked back together, but at that point it didn't matter.
I didn't try it, but the Keil 8051 compiler probably could have handled the problematic code.