wrap paper-dialog-scrollable with another div - polymer

I am trying to use paper-dialog-scrollable inside paper-dialog but with scrollable wrapped by div
example code:
<paper-dialog>
<div>
<div class="loading">Loading</div>
<paper-dialog-scrolalble> ...dynamic long content... </paper-dialog-scrollable>
</div>
</paper-dialog>
I am loading content with AJAX so it is expected that there will be some loading screen. Using div.loading inside paper-dialog-scrollable is nonsense because user can scroll through content and loading overlay will be scrolled away (using absolute position). So I had to wrap it in another div which will have height of child and so I can use absolute position on loading div.
The problem is that paper-dialog-scrollable is no longer working. It's height is about 60px. So i went to documentation, found that there is a property called dialogElement and I set this property do a reference to paper-dialog. Nothing happend
The solution is to go to the paper-dialog-scrollable.html and inside function rewrite this.dialogElement = this.dialogElement || this.parentElement; to this.dialogElement = this.dialogElement || this.parentElement.parentElement;
But this is really soo hacky and I should check first parentElement if it has needed behaviors and then parentElement.parentElement... This is not what I want to do.. editing source code. This is all about timing. If you set property dialogElement before function _ensureTarget is called for the first time, it will work.
To make it work, you have to have setted dialogElement before attached or ready functions inside paper-dialog-scrollable are called. But there is no way ho to achiev this. Because even attached inside my own element is already too late...
From docs:
If paper-dialog-scrollable is not a direct child of the element implementing Polymer.PaperDialogBehavior, remember to set the dialogElement:
<script>
var scrollable = Polymer.dom(myDialog).querySelector('paper-dialog-scrollable');
scrollable.dialogElement = myDialog;
</script>
Like WTF Polymer team? I am using shadow dom.. How am I able to access myDialog when it is like twenty times nested inside shadow roots?
Is there any solution to this timing puzzle?
I am using paper-dialog version 2.0.1
and paper-dialog-scrollable version 2.1.0
Thanks

If you like to change size of your paper-dialog size and paper-dialog-scrollable element. Just remove the outer div and limit the scrollTarget's width/height through the mixin paper-dialog-scrollable:
paper-dialog paper-dialog-scrollable {
--paper-dialog-scrollable: {
box-sizing: border-box;
width: 60px;
height: 60px;
}
}

Related

Position SVG lines over HTML elements, while still allowing interaction with the HTMl elements [duplicate]

I have a div that has background:transparent, along with border. Underneath this div, I have more elements.
Currently, I'm able to click the underlying elements when I click outside of the overlay div. However, I'm unable to click the underlying elements when clicking directly on the overlay div.
I want to be able to click through this div so that I can click on the underlying elements.
Yes, you CAN do this.
Using pointer-events: none along with CSS conditional statements for IE11 (does not work in IE10 or below), you can get a cross browser compatible solution for this problem.
Using AlphaImageLoader, you can even put transparent .PNG/.GIFs in the overlay div and have clicks flow through to elements underneath.
CSS:
pointer-events: none;
background: url('your_transparent.png');
IE11 conditional:
filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader(src='your_transparent.png', sizingMethod='scale');
background: none !important;
Here is a basic example page with all the code.
Yes, you CAN force overlapping layers to pass through (ignore) click events.
PLUS you CAN have specific children excluded from this behavior...
You can do this, using pointer-events
pointer-events influences the reaction to click-, tap-, scroll- und hover events.
In a layer that should ignore / pass-through mentioned events you set
pointer-events: none;
Children of that unresponsive layer that need to react mouse / tap events again need:
pointer-events: auto;
That second part is very helpful if you work with multiple overlapping div layers (probably some parents being transparent), where you need to be able to click on child elements and only that child elements.
Example usage:
.parent {
pointer-events:none;
}
.child {
pointer-events:auto;
}
<div class="parent">
I'm unresponsive
I'm clickable again, wohoo !
</div>
Allowing the user to click through a div to the underlying element depends on the browser. All modern browsers, including Firefox, Chrome, Safari, and Opera, understand pointer-events:none.
For IE, it depends on the background. If the background is transparent, clickthrough works without you needing to do anything. On the other hand, for something like background:white; opacity:0; filter:Alpha(opacity=0);, IE needs manual event forwarding.
See a JSFiddle test and CanIUse pointer events.
I'm adding this answer because I didn’t see it here in full. I was able to do this using elementFromPoint. So basically:
attach a click to the div you want to be clicked through
hide it
determine what element the pointer is on
fire the click on the element there.
var range-selector= $("")
.css("position", "absolute").addClass("range-selector")
.appendTo("")
.click(function(e) {
_range-selector.hide();
$(document.elementFromPoint(e.clientX,e.clientY)).trigger("click");
});
In my case the overlaying div is absolutely positioned—I am not sure if this makes a difference. This works on IE8/9, Safari Chrome and Firefox at least.
Hide overlaying the element
Determine cursor coordinates
Get element on those coordinates
Trigger click on element
Show overlaying element again
$('#elementontop').click(e => {
$('#elementontop').hide();
$(document.elementFromPoint(e.clientX, e.clientY)).trigger("click");
$('#elementontop').show();
});
I needed to do this and decided to take this route:
$('.overlay').click(function(e){
var left = $(window).scrollLeft();
var top = $(window).scrollTop();
//hide the overlay for now so the document can find the underlying elements
$(this).css('display','none');
//use the current scroll position to deduct from the click position
$(document.elementFromPoint(e.pageX-left, e.pageY-top)).click();
//show the overlay again
$(this).css('display','block');
});
I currently work with canvas speech balloons. But because the balloon with the pointer is wrapped in a div, some links under it aren't click able anymore. I cant use extjs in this case.
See basic example for my speech balloon tutorial requires HTML5
So I decided to collect all link coordinates from inside the balloons in an array.
var clickarray=[];
function getcoo(thatdiv){
thatdiv.find(".link").each(function(){
var offset=$(this).offset();
clickarray.unshift([(offset.left),
(offset.top),
(offset.left+$(this).width()),
(offset.top+$(this).height()),
($(this).attr('name')),
1]);
});
}
I call this function on each (new) balloon. It grabs the coordinates of the left/top and right/down corners of a link.class - additionally the name attribute for what to do if someone clicks in that coordinates and I loved to set a 1 which means that it wasn't clicked jet. And unshift this array to the clickarray. You could use push too.
To work with that array:
$("body").click(function(event){
event.preventDefault();//if it is a a-tag
var x=event.pageX;
var y=event.pageY;
var job="";
for(var i in clickarray){
if(x>=clickarray[i][0] && x<=clickarray[i][2] && y>=clickarray[i][1] && y<=clickarray[i][3] && clickarray[i][5]==1){
job=clickarray[i][4];
clickarray[i][5]=0;//set to allready clicked
break;
}
}
if(job.length>0){
// --do some thing with the job --
}
});
This function proofs the coordinates of a body click event or whether it was already clicked and returns the name attribute. I think it is not necessary to go deeper, but you see it is not that complicate.
Hope in was enlish...
Another idea to try (situationally) would be to:
Put the content you want in a div;
Put the non-clicking overlay over the entire page with a z-index higher,
make another cropped copy of the original div
overlay and abs position the copy div in the same place as the original content you want to be clickable with an even higher z-index?
Any thoughts?
I think the event.stopPropagation(); should be mentioned here as well. Add this to the Click function of your button.
Prevents the event from bubbling up the DOM tree, preventing any parent handlers from being notified of the event.
Just wrap a tag around all the HTML extract, for example
<a href="/categories/1">
<img alt="test1" class="img-responsive" src="/assets/photo.jpg" />
<div class="caption bg-orange">
<h2>
test1
</h2>
</div>
</a>
in my example my caption class has hover effects, that with pointer-events:none; you just will lose
wrapping the content will keep your hover effects and you can click in all the picture, div included, regards!
An easier way would be to inline the transparent background image using Data URIs as follows:
.click-through {
pointer-events: none;
background: url();
}
I think that you can consider changing your markup. If I am not wrong, you'd like to put an invisible layer above the document and your invisible markup may be preceding your document image (is this correct?).
Instead, I propose that you put the invisible right after the document image but changing the position to absolute.
Notice that you need a parent element to have position: relative and then you will be able to use this idea. Otherwise your absolute layer will be placed just in the top left corner.
An absolute position element is positioned relative to the first parent
element that has a position other than static.
If no such element is found, the containing block is html
Hope this helps. See here for more information about CSS positioning.
You can place an AP overlay like...
#overlay {
position: absolute;
top: -79px;
left: -60px;
height: 80px;
width: 380px;
z-index: 2;
background: url(fake.gif);
}
<div id="overlay"></div>
just put it over where you dont want ie cliked. Works in all.
This is not a precise answer for the question but may help in finding a workaround for it.
I had an image I was hiding on page load and displaying when waiting on an AJAX call then hiding again however...
I found the only way to display my image when loading the page then make it disappear and be able to click things where the image was located before hiding it was to put the image into a DIV, make the size of the DIV 10x10 pixels or small enough to prevent it causing an issue then hiding the containing div. This allowed the image to overflow the div while visible and when the div was hidden, only the divs area was affected by inability to click objects beneath and not the whole size of the image the DIV contained and was displaying.
I tried all the methods to hide the image including CSS display=none/block, opacity=0, hiding the image with hidden=true. All of them resulted in my image being hidden but the area where it was displayed to act like there was a cover over the stuff underneath so clicks and so on wouldn't act on the underlying objects. Once the image was inside a tiny DIV and I hid the tiny DIV, the entire area occupied by the image was clear and only the tiny area under the DIV I hid was affected but as I made it small enough (10x10 pixels), the issue was fixed (sort of).
I found this to be a dirty workaround for what should be a simple issue but I was not able to find any way to hide the object in its native format without a container. My object was in the form of etc. If anyone has a better way, please let me know.
I couldn't always use pointer-events: none in my scenario, because I wanted both the overlay and the underlying element(s) to be clickable / selectable.
The DOM structure looked like this:
<div id="outerElement">
<div id="canvas-wrapper">
<canvas id="overlay"></canvas>
</div>
<!-- Omitted: element(s) behind canvas that should still be selectable -->
</div>
(The outerElement, canvas-wrapper and canvas elements have the same size.)
To make the elements behind the canvas act normally (e.g. selectable, editable), I used the following code:
canvasWrapper.style.pointerEvents = 'none';
outerElement.addEventListener('mousedown', event => {
const clickedOnElementInCanvas = yourCheck // TODO: check if the event *would* click a canvas element.
if (!clickedOnElementInCanvas) {
// if necessary, add logic to deselect your canvas elements ...
wrapper.style.pointerEvents = 'none';
return true;
}
// Check if we emitted the event ourselves (avoid endless loop)
if (event.isTrusted) {
// Manually forward element to the canvas
const mouseEvent = new MouseEvent(event.type, event);
canvas.dispatchEvent(mouseEvent);
mouseEvent.stopPropagation();
}
return true;
});
Some canvas objects also came with input fields, so I had to allow keyboard events, too.
To do this, I had to update the pointerEvents property based on whether a canvas input field was currently focused or not:
onCanvasModified(canvas, () => {
const inputFieldInCanvasActive = // TODO: Check if an input field of the canvas is active.
wrapper.style.pointerEvents = inputFieldInCanvasActive ? 'auto' : 'none';
});
it doesn't work that way. the work around is to manually check the coordinates of the mouse click against the area occupied by each element.
area occupied by an element can found found by 1. getting the location of the element with respect to the top left of the page, and 2. the width and the height. a library like jQuery makes this pretty simple, although it can be done in plain js. adding an event handler for mousemove on the document object will provide continuous updates of the mouse position from the top and left of the page. deciding if the mouse is over any given object consists of checking if the mouse position is between the left, right, top and bottom edges of an element.
Nope, you can't click ‘through’ an element. You can get the co-ordinates of the click and try to work out what element was underneath the clicked element, but this is really tedious for browsers that don't have document.elementFromPoint. Then you still have to emulate the default action of clicking, which isn't necessarily trivial depending on what elements you have under there.
Since you've got a fully-transparent window area, you'll probably be better off implementing it as separate border elements around the outside, leaving the centre area free of obstruction so you can really just click straight through.

How to achieve this in polymer

Is their any design templates(like WordPress or bootstrap) in polymer that having the effect of scrolling to next div or previous div onscroll and animating the previous div(like parallax-container) I tried parallax-container but it is having overflow I have used overflow: hidden; but display was not correct.Then I have implemented this functions and called when clicking key down and up arrows.
scroll_down() {
//dist = next element offsetTop
smooth_scroll_to(el,dist, 2000);
//sliding previous div by adding animation name
}
scroll_up(){
//dist = previous element offsetTop
smooth_scroll_to(el,dist, 2000);
//sliding div by adding animation name
}
When user clicks the same button multiple times or combination of both the buttons they are messing up (animation and scrolling) so I am searching for any template or any component. My divs are present inside the paper-header-panel
Any help is appreciated,
Thank you,
Babji.
I've updated the parallax-container element in question with a patch to resolve this issue until the underlying issue with webkit is resolved. The latest version of the parallax-container element is 1.0.1 - let me know if there's any issues :)

Calculate width from auto to pixel then add by pixel in LESS CSS

I want to use auto width and add x pixels to it.
How can this be acheived Less file?
span
{
width:calc(auto + 100px);
}
I want to use auto, since I don't know the length of the text. But I know a fixed size text gets append to it at some point. I don't want the span to grow larger when this happen. Therefore, adding 100px to auto would handle it perfectly.
You should do this with JQuery.
window.onload = function(){
$('span').width($('span').width()+100px);
};
And the CSS code remains
span{
width: auto;
}
EDIT: If the span content changes after the onload function is being executed, then you should execute that line whenever the content changes.
Here you can find how to do this. Credits to #Emile
1- The jQuery change event is used only on user input fields because if anything else is manipulated (e.g., a div), that manipulation is coming from code. So, find where the manipulation occurs, and then add whatever you need to there.
2- But if that's not possible for any reason (you're using a complicated plugin or can't find any "callback" possibilities) then the jQuery approach I'd suggest is:
a. For simple DOM manipulation, use jQuery chaining and traversing, $("#content").html('something').end().find(whatever)....
b. If you'd like to do something else, employ jQuery's bind with custom event and triggerHandler
$("#content").html('something').triggerHandler('customAction');
$('#content').unbind().bind('customAction', function(event, data) {
//Custom-action
});
Here's a link to jQuery trigger handler: http://api.jquery.com/triggerHandler/
As stated by #Paulie_D, this wasn't possible.
Proposed solution to handle this with Javascript would probably work, but I prefer to avoid this solution as I don't like handling the layout with Javascript instead of HTML/CSS.
The solution I used :
Use a DIV instead of a SPAN. This allowed to add another div inside it with a fixed width of 100px. This way, the parent div size to content including this 100px child div. Thus making the +100 needed.
When extra content is added, child div is used to display the extra content instead.
<div class="ParentDiv">
TextWithVariableLength
<div class = "ChildDiv"></div>
</div>
LESS
.ParentDiv
{
width: auto;
}
.ChildDiv
{
height:100%;
width: 100px;
}

How to use core-scroll-header-panel with core-animated-pages

Following up from How to use core-scroll-header-panel with core-list I want place the core-list inside a core-animated-pages
I modified the jsbin that Jeff Posnick provided in his answer to add the core-animated-pages. See http://jsbin.com/xibile/1
Unfortunately, the core-animated-pages seems to ignore the size of it's children in determining it's own size. I can work around this by changing the overflow of list-test to visible instead of hidden. See http://jsbin.com/xibile/2 (note you need to resize the window before the list renders)
This works reasonably OK but seems like a hack. Before I introduced the core-animated-pages the content div gracefully grew to accommodate the size of its child (list-test). Now it doesn't and I simply bust out of it via overflow
How do I get core-animated-pages to size to the size of the currently selected child?
This seems to have been asked before but there was no satisfactory answer. I'm hoping this has changed in the latest version of core elements
Also if anyone knows how to fix it so that you don't have to resize the window to get the list to render that would be awesome too.
Inside the .content div, try wrapping the list-test with a session and you will have a scollable list again. Please see this jsbin.
<div class="content">
<core-animated-pages id="pages" selected="0">
<session>
<list-test id="list" data="{{data}}"></list-test>
</session>
</core-animated-pages>
</div>
Here is why.
Before you wrap the list-test with the core-animated-pages, the .content div has an absolute position (with a padding-top so it doesn't get covered up by the main heading of the core-scroll-header-panel) and that's why your list-test was displaying correctly.
Now that you wrap it with a core-animated-pages which has a default position of relative, your list becomes collapsed.
The fix is easy, wrap your list-test with another session. You don't even need to make it fit as the core-animated-pages will automatically give its direct children the css below -
{
position: absolute;
top: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
}
Hope this helps!
Update
For the core-list rendering bug, you might be able to get away from re-calling updateSize() after a short day (50ms), like this -
t.addEventListener('template-bound', function () {
var list = document.querySelector('list-test::shadow core-list');
// to update the size
list.updateSize();
this.job('delay', function () {
list.updateSize();
}, 50);
Here's another jsbin for this. Hopefully this issue will be addressed by the Polymer team in the future!

Printing Scrolled Divs

I have a web page that displays a long line graph inside a div with overflow-x: scroll.
This works well as a web page allowing the use to scroll back and forward through the graph.
However, when printing the page the scroll position is reset to zero.
Is there a way to overcome this?
I think you're going to have to specify an alternate CSS for printing where you somehow need to remove the overflow:
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css” href="sheet.css" media="print" />
However, maybe there is an approach with JavaScript or even Flash? If I understand correctly, you only want to have a part of the graph printed (the one "selected" by the user?) and not the full one? I'm pretty sure that's not possible with plain HTML/CSS, but I strongly believe that Flash or maybe JavaScript/AJAX (to only load a part of the image at a time) can solve it.
You can't do this in plain CSS -- you will have to reimplement the scrolling using your Javascript UI library of choice to get what you want.
The user state of the scrollbar isn't used when printing (think about it, if you're scrolled 3 screens down a page and hit "print" does it make sense for the browser to only print the part of the document that's in your window at the time?). However, if you use JS, which actually manipulates the DOM (i.e. sets the x-position offset to -293 if the person has scrolled right 293 pixels, just like style="left: -293px; overflow: hidden;" in CSS), then it will show up as such in printed documents.
My suggestion is, unless the graphs are very wide, just skip all of this nonsense and use a printer stylesheet with width: 100% for the graph's <div> so the graph just shrinks to page width.
A simple approach would be to have some javascript which posts back to your page with the user's selected scroll position on a link saying something like 'setup for printing'. Then the server side returns a page with the graph relatively positioned at the scroll position with overflow:hidden to clip the graph appropriately.
Of course this would not work for users with javascript disabled - if you want to support this you would need the user to specify the scroll position in something like a text input element and submit button which you hid with javascript when enabled.
You need to temporarily turn the scroll position of the parent into a negative margin of the child, and put that parent as overflow:hidden.
Here's how to do it in Javascript (which is the only way, css cannot do that)
Note that you will need something to execute printDone() after the printing to restore everything as normal. You could trigger it with a wheel event e.g. because the user will only have a problem when trying to scroll. Or you can just put a button as I did, and show it only when printGo() is called.
<html>
<head>
<style>
#wrapper {
width:800px;
overflow-x:scroll;
}
#content {
width:2000px;
border:2px solid red;
}
#media print { /* This overwrites the css when printing */
#wrapper {
overflow-x:hidden;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
Print<br>
I'm done printing!
<div id=wrapper>
<div id=content>
Hello this is my content.
</div>
</div>
<script>
var wrapper = document.getElementById('wrapper');
var content = document.getElementById('content');
var scrollPos;
function printGo(){
scrollPos = wrapper.scrollLeft; // Save scroll position
wrapper.scrollLeft = 0;
wrapper.style.overflowX = 'hidden'; // Optional since css does it
content.style.marginLeft = -scrollPos+'px'; // Put it as a negative margin of child instead
window.print();
}
function printDone(){
wrapper.scrollLeft = scrollPos; // Restore scroll position
wrapper.style.overflowX = 'scroll'; // Optional since css does it
content.style.marginLeft = '';
}
</script>
</body></html>