I want sort one user from table who never had a note different from 0
then update the record,
then insert a new row
user note
12 1
23 0
88 0
45 0
12 0
23 0
12 0
88 2
sort a user except user 12 and user 88 becouse the have already a note somewhere
somethink like
SELECT * FROM table WHERE note=0 ORDER BY rand() LIMIT 1
the problem is that i've many users duplicate so i dont know how to exlude that...
let's say that i randomly choose the user 23
the table should become
user note
12 1
23 0
88 0
45 0
12 0
23 X <--- mark the random user choosen
12 0
88 2
23 0 <--- add a new line
in the next random pick up only the number 45 will be avaiable becouse other user has somewhere a note != 0
for this last request i've to do 2 query UPDATE then INSERT or i can do with just one query?
You can avoid subqueries for improved performance and go like this:
SELECT *
FROM YourTable
GROUP BY name
HAVING SUM(note)=0 ORDER BY rand() LIMIT 1;
Here is an SQL Fiddle DEMO.
You can use nested select :
SELECT * FROM table WHERE note=0 and user not in (select user from table where note>0) ORDER BY rand() LIMIT 1
however u should really use primary unique index on users
Related
So, its my original table. The duration is in second.
Duration
Status
30
0
30
0
31
1
30
1
31
1
31
0
31
1
30
0
30
0
30
0
31
0
30
1
30
1
30
0
and i want the result is something like this (if possible)
Status
sum of duration
0
60
1
92
0
31
1
31
0
121
1
60
0
30
i want to sum the duration for each status (0 and 1), i have try some query like sum, group, or where modification... but i dont get the correct one.
I hope someone can help me. Thank you in advance : )
note :
+ i use mysql phpmyadmin
++ im sorry, i just edited the result that i desire. because there is slight mistake in my manual count
Remember that an RDBMS table is a set.
What you're showing in your question looks like
an ordered list, rather than a set.
Write some code that reads
duration, status, and writes
duration, status, session_id.
Now, with those seven distinct IDs appearing in a table,
you're in a good position to use SUM(duration)
in a GROUP BY session_id query.
I have a table users and some other tables like images and products
Table users:
user_id user_name
1 andrew
2 lutz
3 sophie
4 michael
5 peter
6 oscor
7 anton
8 billy
9 henry
10 jon
Tables images:
user_id img_type img_url
1 0 url1
1 1 url4
2 0 url5
7 0 url7
8 0 url8
9 1 url9
Table Products
user_id prod_id
1 5
1 55
2 555
8 5555
9 5
9 55
I use this kind of SELECT:
SELECT * FROM
(SELECT user.user_id,user.user_name, img.img_type, prod.prod_id FROM
users
LEFT JOIN images img ON img.user_id = users.user_id
LEFT JOIN products prod ON prod.user_id = users.user_id
WHERE user.user_id <= 5) AS users
ORDER BY user.user_id ASC
The result should be the following output. Due to performance improvements, I use ORDER BY and an inner select. If I put a LIMIT 5 within the inner or outer select, things won't work. MySQL will hard LIMIT the results to 5. However I need the LIMIT of 5 (pagination) found unique user_id results which would lead to 9 in this case.
Can I use maybe an if-statement to push an array with found user_id and break/finish up the select when the array consist of 5 UIDs? Or can I modify somehow the select?
user_id user_name img_type prod_id
1 andrew 0 5
1 andrew 1 5
1 andrew 0 55
1 andrew 1 55
2 lutz 0 5
2 lutz 0 55
3 sophie null null
4 michael null null
5 peter null null
results: 9
LIMIT 5 and user_id <= 5 do not necessarily give you the same results. One reason: There are multiple rows (after the JOINs) for user_id = 1. This is because there can be multiple images and/or multiple products for a given 'user'.
So, first decide which you want.
LIMIT without ORDER BY gives you an arbitrary set of rows. (Yeah, it is somewhat predictable, but you should not depend on it.)
ORDER BY + LIMIT usually implies gathering all the potentially relevant rows, sorting them, then doing the "limit". There are sometimes ways around this sluggishness.
LEFT leads to the NULLs you got; did you want that?
What do you want pagination to do if you are displaying 5 items per page, but user 1 has 6 images? You need to think about this edge case before we can help you with a solution. Maybe you want all of user 1 on a page, even if it exceeds 5? Maybe you want to break in the middle of '1'; but then we need an unambiguous way to know where to continue from for the next page.
Probably any viable solution will not use nested SELECTs. As you are finding out, it leads to "errors". Think of it this way: First find all the rows you need to display on all the pages, then carve out 5 for the current page.
Here are some more musings on pagination: http://mysql.rjweb.org/doc.php/pagination
I don't know where to start so I will just post an example what I need:
A B
5 0
10 0
15 0
20 0
25* 1*
30 0
35 1
40 1
45* 0
50 0
55 0
60 0
65 0
70 1
75 1
80 0
85 0
I need a query that will look for 1 in column B (first row found in 25 1),"entry point" from this point, go down and look for first column A, that is 20 more than a A in the start point - "exit point" (found row 45 0), return row index of "entry point" and "exit point" , in this case 25 1 and 45 0 rows.
Also, the tricky part might be, that I don't want row 35 1 or 40 1, it also contains 1 in B column, but I don't want rows in between entry and exit points, so the next applicable row will be row 70 1 as an entry point (75 1 also to be)
This is something I would be able to do in java loop without problem, but I am getting lower performance than I would like, so it's been suggested using db for this kind of operation should be faster. Is it possible to do such db query?
If i understand corectly that you need the first valid entry point and its first valid exit point, something like this should do the job
SELECT
(
SELECT
MIN(A)
FROM
table
WHERE
B = 1
) entry,
A exit,
FROM
table
WHERE
A + 20 >= (SELECT
MIN(A)
FROM
table
WHERE
B = 1)
AND
B = 0
LIMIT 1
Have a existing table of results like this;
race_id race_num racer_id place
1 0 32 2
1 1 32 3
1 2 32 1
1 3 32 6
1 0 44 2
1 1 44 2
1 2 44 2
1 3 44 2
etc...
Have lots of PHP scripts that access this table output the results in a nice format.
Now I have a case where I need to output the results for only certain race_nums.
So I have created this table races_included.
race_view race_id race_num
Day 1 1 0
Day 1 1 1
Day 2 1 2
Day 2 1 3
And can use this query to get the right results.
SELECT racer_id, place from results WHERE race_id=1
AND race_num IN
(SELECT race_num FROM races_included WHERE race_id='1' AND race_view='Day 1')
This is great but I only need this feature for a few races and to have it work in a compatible mode for the simple case show all races. I need to add alot of rows to the races_included table. Like
race_view race_id race_num
All 1 0
All 1 1
All 1 2
All 1 3
95% of my races don't use the daily feature.
So I am looking for a way to change the query so that if for race 1 there are no records in the races_included table it defaults to all races. In addition I need it to be close the same execution speed as the query without the IN clause, because this query Or variations of it are used a lot.
One way that does work is to redefine the table as races_excluded and use NOT IN. This works great but is a pain to manage the table when races are added or deleted.
Is there a simple way to use EXISTS and IN in tandem as a subquery to get the desired results? Or some other neat trick I am missing.
To clarify I have found a working but very slow solution.
SELECT * FROM race_results WHERE race_id=1
AND FIND_IN_SET(race_num, (SELECT IF((SELECT Count(*) FROM races_excluded
WHERE rid=1>0),(SELECT GROUP_CONCAT(rnum) FROM races_excluded
WHERE rid=1 AND race_view='Day 1' GROUP BY rid),race_num)))
It basically checks if any records exists for that race_id and if not return a set equal to the current race_num and if yes returns a list of included race nums.
You can do this by using or in the subquery:
SELECT racer_id, plac
from results
WHERE race_id = 1 AND
race_num IN (SELECT race_num
FROM races_included
WHERE race_id = '1' AND (race_view = 'Day 1' or raw_view = 'ANY')
);
I have a big table with 300,000 records. This table has a integer value called "velocity" and it`s value is from 0 to 100.
In the firsts records, the value is 0 and I want to remove. I want to remove from the query, the records where the velocity field repeats more than 10 times. For example:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 5 10 12 13 15 20 30 20 15 10 8 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 4 5 10 20...
[-------remove this-----------].......................................................................[---------] <- do not remove this
Thanks
The easiest way to do this is with a loop.
You can write a stored procedure that iterates through the records, or you might do it outside of the database. I'd do it like that if this needs to be done once. If this is a continuous process, it's better to make sure that the extra data is just not inserted into the database in the first place.
Anyway, if you insist on doing this in pure SQL, without stored procedures with loops, you can use a query like this:
set #groupnum=0;
select
GroupNum,
count(*) as RecsInGroup
from
(
select
t1.id as Id,
t1.velocity as velocity1,
t2.velocity as velocity2,
if(t1.velocity<>t2.velocity,#groupnum:=#groupnum+1,#groupnum) as GroupNum
from
VelocityTable as t1
join
VelocityTable as t2
on
t1.id=t2.id-1
) as groups
group by
GroupNum
having RecsInGroup>10
What happens here?
Step 1
The inner query just selects all records in your table, but splits the data in sequential groups.
So, using your example, it does this:
velocity : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 5 10 12 13 15 20 30 20 15 10 8 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 4 5 10 20
Groupnum : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 18 18 18 19 20 21 22
It does that by joining the table to itself, by linking subsequent records in the table. Every time the left and right velocity are different, the GroupNum is increased. Otherwise it's left unchanged.
Step 2
The result if the query is wrapped in an outer query, and grouped by GroupNum. Again, using your example it would result in this:
GroupNum,RecsInGroup
0,15 // !!
1,1
2,1
3,1
4,1
5,1
6,1
7,1
8,1
9,1
10,1
11,1
12,1
13,1
14,1
15,1
16,1
17,1
18,4 // !!
19,1
20,1
21,1
By Adding the having RecsInGroup>10 clause, the result becomes this:
GroupNum,RecsInGroup
0,15
Now, with this list of GroupNum's you can delete records.
Step 3
With the query above you have:
A list of all your records, with an added GroupNum column.
The list of GroupNum's that need to be removed.
Deleting the records should be easy at this point.
I'd just rip through the records sequentially, with a variable sized window that expands and contracts to comprehend identical values. Whenever the size is >= 10 when the value changes, delete the rows using the primary keys.
You can put BEGIN TRAN and COMMIT TRAN at the beginning and end of the DELETE statements to make things reasonably efficient.
thank you very much. I'm allmost there, but i tried it with a mySQL View as table source and it's not working (unkown table xxx). I can't use the whole table because it's have more than 19 millions records, I just need the record from a specific day, vehicle plate and city.