I've found a lot of answers to this question, but none (that I can find) apply to my particular situation.
I have an image in a div that I would like to scale with the width of the page. However, my image is much larger than what you actually see, as I'm using object-fit: cover and object-position to fit it to the container. I can't find a solution that keeps the image the same while scaling the container (and therefore image) down.
In other words, I would like the container and image to scale and have the image look the exactly the same. All the solutions I've found move the image around inside the container when the page width is changed.
Edit for clarity: Imagine there's a dot at the very center of the image, and normally that dot is in the very center of the container. In my case (because of object-position I think), the dot moves vertically when the width of the page is changed. I need some way to scale the container down to keep the dot in the same place.
Edit 2: Figured it out. Setting the height of the container via vw (viewport width) does exactly what I'm looking for. e.g. height: 10vw;
Here's the CSS I have at the moment:
.container {
height: 25%; /* This would need to be removed/changed I assume.*/
}
.image {
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
object-fit: cover;
object-position: 100% 80%;
}
My container is the full width of the page.
This seems so obvious to me, I think I didn't get your point.
Is this what you want ? This snippet shows that no matter the size of the picture, it will fit into the container.
EDIT Your issue is that your image isn't centered in your container. To do that, you have several options. Here is one using a relative position with a transform. You could also use flexboxes, which are, in my opinion, much better.
.container {
width: 500px;
border: 1px solid darkcyan;
height: 600px;
}
img {
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
position: relative;
top: 50%;
transform: translateY(-50%);
}
<div class="container">
<img src="https://placeholdit.co//i/500x250?&bg=cccccc&fc=000000&text=BIG IMAGE">
</div>
.image{
max-width: 100%;
}
<img src="https://wallpaperbrowse.com/media/images/750806.jpg" class="image" />
To have your image fill the width of it's container, you need the max-width property:
.image {
max-width: 100%;
}
Well, after a bit more digging I found the answer to my question. The solution was to use vw (viewport width) to set the height of my container.
In my case, using height: 10vw; on the container does exactly what I'm looking for. The value of that can be adjusted of course depending on how much space you want the container/image to take up.
You can use max-width: 100%; in style of the img.
But another way is to use your image as a background of your div with the following style:
.container {
background-image: url(https://maxoffsky.com/word/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/andreasbg.png);
background-size: cover;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: center center;
width:70%;
height:300px;
margin:0 auto;
}
<div class="container"><div>
Update:
You can run the following demo and change the size of it here
.container {
background-color: black;
width:70%;
margin:0 auto;
padding:20px;
position:relative;
}
img{
position:relative;
max-width:100%;
}
.dot{
background:yellow;
width:10px;
height:10px;
position:absolute;
left:50%;
top:50%;
transform: translate(-5px,-5px);
z-index:1;
border-radius:50%;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="dot"></div>
<img src="https://maxoffsky.com/word/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/andreasbg.png">
<div>
You can see the yellow dot always (any page sizes) in the center of image and center of the container:
Small page size:
Large page size
Related
I have a div with a background-image assigned in the CSS3 file.
The image is responsive, so it scales according to the screen size BUT the container keeps the height at all screen sizes.
I need to know if there is a way to make the container responsive as well as the background image.
HTML:
<div class="responsive> </div>
CSS3:
.responsive {
background: url('https://s20.postimg.org/o09gf7fvx/bag.jpg') no-repeat center top;
border: 1px solid red;
background-size: contain;
width: 100%;
height: 270px;
}
I must use background-image selector and no img src tag.
Here is the fiddle file.
Thank you.
Update - February 3rd, 2021
Since I wrote the original answer a new CSS property has been introduced - 'aspect-ratio' - to solve this problem.
<div id="responsive">some text</div>
CSS:
#container {
width: 100%;
background: hotpink;
aspect-ratio: 100 / 29;
}
At the time of writing this CSS property doesn't yet have widespread browser support.
Working Example: https://jsfiddle.net/fu0nL57t/
Ref: https://web.dev/aspect-ratio/
=====================================================
Original Answer
This can be done an additional dummy element, inside the element you want to keep at a fixed ratio. If you specify a padding-top or padding-bottom as a percentage, that is in terms of the width of the container element, and this then keeps the height of the container element at a fixed ratio.
<div id="responsive">
some text
<div id="dummy"></div>
</div>
CSS:
#responsive {
display: inline-block;
position: relative;
width: 100%;
background: url('https://s20.postimg.org/o09gf7fvx/bag.jpg') no-repeat center top;
background-size: contain;
}
#dummy {
padding-top: 29%;
}
Working Example:
https://jsfiddle.net/098jj61q/
Credits:
http://ansciath.tumblr.com/post/7347495869/css-aspect-ratio
http://alistapart.com/article/creating-intrinsic-ratios-for-video
Yes its correct. According to #Paulie_D, you can't do that with background image.As per your requirement you can do that using img tag only.
What you have to do, without using the div just make the image responsive by treating it as a block element as,
.img-responsive {
display: block;
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
or if you insist to use division with background image then cover the backgound image and set min-height as,
div.mydiv {
background:url(background_image.jpg);
background-repeat:no-repeat !important;
background-size: cover !important;
background-position:center center !important;
min-height:300px;
}
I have a two column layout - fixed right column width, an scalable content in the left column.
The layout scales great with different screen sizes until I add images to the scalable column. If the container goes down to the size of the image it pushes the column too wide, squashing my 300px right column.
I set
width:100%;
on the images, which solves the responsiveness issue, but when the container is full screen again the images scale to fill it, which is not what I want because it looks rubbish. I've added
max-width:100%;
which hasn't helped.
In short, I want the image behaviour to be "Be your real size, unless the container is smaller, in which case shrink."
(I should mention that my two-column layout is done with flexbox)
Edit:
After playing around with this for ages, it turns out to be a difference in behaviour between broswers - Chrome scales the container, shrinking the image (as per max-width) but Firefox just pushes all the content out. Open this in each: https://jsfiddle.net/andyg1/sb7zefr5/
Remove width:100%; and keep max-width:100%;. This will keep images at their original size but shrink them to 100% width if the container is smaller.
Here's an example https://jsfiddle.net/v4kL409v/
You can use width: 100% and the real size if the image or the maximum size of the conainer as max-width, for example
my_image {
width: 100%;
max-width: 320px;
}
That way it will shrink with the container, but not grow above a set size.
You can use an image as a background to your flex-item.
background-image, background-repeat, background-position, and most importantly background-size
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
body {
width: 100vw;
height: 100vh;
}
.flex {
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
.bg {
width: 50vw;
height: 50vh;
background: url(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/24/Lenna.png) no-repeat center;
background-size: contain;
outline: 3px dashed red;
flex: 1 0 50%;
}
.rt {
width: 300px;
height: 50vh;
outline: 3px dashed blue;
}
<div class="flex">
<figure class="bg"></figure>
<figure class="rt"></figure>
</div>
After identifying that the problem is different between Firefox and Chrome I did some research to find out that the problem can be fixed by adding:
min-width:0;
to the element containing the responsive. As discussed here: Firefox flexbox image width
Add display:block to image.
.my_image {
display:block;
max-width:100%;
height:auto;
}
how can I solve this image oversize problem in my simple HTML photogallery with finding images in directory by PHP? I can't solve it and it's not visually good. Can you please help me? Screenshot is
Thanks.
Set all of the pictures with the same class, then add an image height to that class and it will set the images to all the same height.
Here is an example that i just made - http://jsfiddle.net/3gd5ooLf/
Im not sure how you are getting the image in PHP so i can't tell you how to set the class without seeing some code.
here's the CSS example:
.height {
height: 100px;
}
This may be a good example to you . Refer to stackoverflow old question too. here is the link:link
.img {
position: relative;
float: left;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background-position: 50% 50%;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: cover;
}
<div class="img" style="background-image:url('http://i.imgur.com/tI5jq2c.jpg');"></div>
In your css file, you could add heigth and width property to adjust the images size.
For example:
img {
heigth:200px;
width: auto;
}
will set the heigth to 200px, but will keep the aspect ratio. To have square images, set the width to, for example, 200px
If you prefer, you could set the image to be scrollable when it's too long like so:
img {
height:200px;
width:200px;
overflow: scroll;
}
I am trying to figure out how to re-size an image so that it keeps it ratio of width to height, but gets re-sized until the height of the image matches the height of the containing div. I have these images that are pretty large and long (screenshots), and I want to put them into a 200px width, 180px height div for display and without re-sizing the images manually. To make this look good, the sides of the image need to overflow and be hidden with the containing div. This is what I have so far:
http://jsfiddle.net/f9krj/2/
HTML
<a class="image_container" href="http://www.skintype.ca/assets/background-x_large.jpg">
<img src="http://www.skintype.ca/assets/background-x_large.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
CSS
a.image_container {
background-color: #999;
width: 200px;
height: 180px;
display: inline-block;
overflow: hidden;
}
a.image_container img {
width: 100%;
}
As you can see, there is grey color showing on the images parent container which should not be shown at all. In order for that container to be filled completely, the width needs to be overflowed equally on both sides. Is this possible? Is it also possible to account for an image that is also too tall?
Original Answer:
If you are ready to opt for CSS3, you can use css3 translate property. Resize based on whatever is bigger. If your height is bigger and width is smaller than container, width will be stretch to 100% and height will be trimmed from both side. Same goes for larger width as well.
Your need, HTML:
<div class="img-wrap">
<img src="http://lorempixel.com/300/160/nature/" />
</div>
<div class="img-wrap">
<img src="http://lorempixel.com/300/200/nature/" />
</div>
<div class="img-wrap">
<img src="http://lorempixel.com/200/300/nature/" />
</div>
And CSS:
.img-wrap {
width: 200px;
height: 150px;
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
overflow: hidden;
margin: 0;
}
div > img {
display: block;
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
min-height: 100%;
min-width: 100%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
}
Voila! Working: http://jsfiddle.net/shekhardesigner/aYrhG/
Explanation
DIV is set to the relative position. This means all the child elements will get the starting coordinates (origins) from where this DIV starts.
The image is set as a BLOCK element, min-width/height both set to 100% means to resize the image no matter of its size to be the minimum of 100% of it's parent. min is the key. If by min-height, the image height exceeded the parent's height, no problem. It will look for if min-width and try to set the minimum height to be 100% of parents. Both goes vice-versa. This ensures there are no gaps around the div but image is always bit bigger and gets trimmed by overflow:hidden;
Now image, this is set to an absolute position with left:50% and top:50%. Means push the image 50% from the top and left making sure the origin is taken from DIV. Left/Top units are measured from the parent.
Magic moment:
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
Now, this translate function of CSS3 transform property moves/repositions an element in question. This property deals with the applied element hence the values (x, y) OR (-50%, -50%) means to move the image negative left by 50% of image size and move to the negative top by 50% of image size.
Eg. if Image size was 200px × 150px, transform:translate(-50%, -50%) will calculated to translate(-100px, -75px). % unit helps when we have various size of image.
This is just a tricky way to figure out centroid of the image and the parent DIV and match them.
Apologies for taking too long to explain!
Resources to read more:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/transform-function/translate
https://css-tricks.com/centering-css-complete-guide/
Change your code:
a.image_container img {
width: 100%;
}
To this:
a.image_container img {
width: auto; // to maintain aspect ratio. You can use 100% if you don't care about that
height: 100%;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/f9krj/5/
Use max-width property of CSS, like this :
img{
max-width:100%;
}
you can use flex box for it.. this will solve your problem
.image-parent
{
height:33px;
display:flex;
}
If you take answer's Shekhar K. Sharma, and it almost work, you need also add to your this height: 1px; or this width: 1px; for must work.
For me the easiest way to do it without using position absolute, translate.
<div class="img-container">
<img src="yoururl" />
</div>
the CSS should look like this :
.img-container {
height:100px;
width:100px;
overflow:hidden;
}
.img-container > img {
width:100%;
height:100%;
object-fit:cover;
}
If all your trying to do is fill the div this might help someone else, if aspect ratio is not important, is responsive.
.img-fill > img {
min-height: 100%;
min-width: 100%;
}
I have a gallery slider, with random images from the forum. So, the size is pretty random but the gallery(container frame) itself is fix sized. So, we decided to set the image height to a fixed size but the width is set to auto. This way, the image will not be squeezed inside the container if its ratio different is too much from the container ratio.
Then, I set the container's text-align to center in order to center the image. But, this only works for images smaller than the container. If the image is still bigger than the container (after resize), the image is aligned to the left instead.
The jsffidle example.
NOTE: Using background-image is not a solution because resizing background image currently is still not supported by many browsers (especially IE and some Chinese browsers).
Hope there is enough information here. So, how do I center the image in this situation?
I have found another solution
<style type="text/css">
.container {
width:600px; //set how much you want
overflow: hidden;
position: relative;
}
.containerSecond{
position: absolute;
top:0px;
left:-100%;
width:300%;
}
.image{
width: 800px; //your image size
}
</style>
and in body
<div class="container">
<div class="containerSecond">
<image src="..." class="" />
</div>
</div>
This will center your image whenever your container is bigger or smaller. In this case your image should be bigger than 300% of container to not be centered, but in that case you can make with of containerSecond bigger, and it will work
You would use max sizes:
img {
max-width: 200px;
max-height: 200px;
}
Take a look: http://jsfiddle.net/fabianhjr/zW6eh/
Edit: still having centring problems, I will get back to you on that.
I had similar problem, but the solution was about to crop right and left margin, while the image should be centered. Smaller images are stretched.
My solution is also in this JS Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/david_binda/9tTRQ/
HTML
<div class="thumb-wrapper">
<a href="" title="" class="img">
<img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/40/Tectonic_plate_boundaries.png" alt="" />
</a>
</div>
CSS
.thumb-wrapper{
width: 200px; // desired thumbnail width
height: 150px; // desired thumbnail height
overflow: hidden;
position: relative;
margin: 0 auto;
}
.thumb-wrapper .img{
display: block;
position: absolute;
width: 300px; // should be wider than final thumbnail
height: 150px; // desired thumbnail height
left: 50%;
margin-left: -150px; // half of above defined width eg. 300/2 = 150
}
.thumb-wrapper .img img{
width: auto !important;
max-width: 300px !important; // should be wider than final thumbnail
min-width: 200px !important; // desired width of thumbnail
height: 150px !important; // desired thumbnail height
margin: 0 auto;
display: block;
}
The solution that I've found is:
img{
position:absolute;
top:50%;
left:50%;
transform:translate(-50%,-50%);//You have to add all the prefixes
//of transform
}
div.container{
position:relative;
overflow:hidden;
}
Okay, I think this is your best solution.
You set your wrapper around each image to display: table; and then one more wrapper inside that with a display: table-row; and set your img's to display: table-cell
This way you can resize anyway you like while keeping the ratio.
http://jsfiddle.net/zW6eh/17/
You can also simply set your height: to 200px; This will keep your width auto by default.